scholarly journals Effectiveness of Corticosteroid Tapes and Plasters for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

2020 ◽  
pp. 491-496
Author(s):  
Rei Ogawa

AbstractIn Japan, corticosteroid tapes and plasters have long served as a first-line therapy for keloids and hypertrophic scars. Pediatric patients are particularly responsive to this type of treatment. This may reflect the fact children have thinner skin than adults and the steroids are therefore more easily absorbed. The postoperative application of corticosteroid tapes/plasters also significantly prevents the development of keloids and hypertrophic scars after surgery. Steroid tape is available in the following three countries in different preparations. In the UK, the commercially available formulation comprises a fludroxycortide-impregnated tape (4 μg/cm2). Fludroxycortide tape is a Group III preparation. The USA has a steroid tape preparation that contains 4 μg/cm2 flurandrenolide, which is also a Group III preparation. In Japan, two steroid tape formulations are available, namely, the Group III preparation found in the UK (4 μg/cm2 fludroxycortide tape) and a 20 μg/cm2 deprodone propionate tape. Deprodone propionate tape is considered to be a Group I or II preparation. In our experience, deprodone propionate tape (Eclar® plaster) is the most effective tape for the treatment and prevention of keloids.

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (7) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
L N Shelikhova ◽  
V V Fominykh ◽  
D S Abramov ◽  
N V Myakova ◽  
M A Maschan ◽  
...  

Aim. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of crizotinib used in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory ALK-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL). Subjects and methods. The paper describes the experience with crizotinib used in 8 patients with refractory ALK-ALCL before and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results. All the 8 (100%) patients treated with crizotinib were recorded to have complete responses, including complete metabolic ones (tumor disappearance as evidenced by positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography. Conclusion. Low and manageable toxicity of crizotinib and complete PET-negative responses in patients with resistant ALK lymphomas favor the need to test the drug as first-line therapy, by possibly decreasing the intensification of chemotherapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (13) ◽  
pp. 1493-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Lim ◽  
Carl Samuelsen ◽  
Amanda Golembesky ◽  
Sulena Shrestha ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Taieb ◽  
Gerald W Prager ◽  
Davide Melisi ◽  
C Benedikt Westphalen ◽  
Nathalie D'Esquermes ◽  
...  

BackgroundTreatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) relies on chemotherapeutic regimens. We investigated patterns of first-line and second-line treatment choices, their geographical variation between European countries, and alignment with current European recommendations.MethodsThis retrospective, observational chart review study was conducted between July 2014 and January 2016. Physicians were recruited from nine European countries. Patient data were collected in electronic patient record forms (PRFs) by physicians managing patients with mPAC. Patients with a current mPAC diagnosis aged ≥18 years old who had completed first-line therapy during the study period were included.ResultsParticipating physicians (n=225) completed 2565 PRFs. The vast majority of PRFs were from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Most patients (86.6%) had stage IV disease at diagnosis. The most common first-line treatments were FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin/folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) (35.6%), gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (25.7%) and gemcitabine monotherapy (20.5%). Physicians in France and the UK prescribed FOLFIRINOX more frequently than gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel. Gemcitabine-based therapies were more widely used at second-line, although 5-fluorouracil-based therapies were preferred in Italy and Spain, where gemcitabine-based treatments were more frequently selected for first-line. For patients receiving first-line modified FOLFIRINOX, second-line gemcitabine monotherapy was preferred in the overall population (45.9%).ConclusionAlthough treatment choices for patients with mPAC varied between countries, they align with current European guidelines. Factors including drug availability, reimbursement, patient characteristics, physician preference and prior first-line therapy affect treatment choices. Approved, recommended therapies for patients who progress following first-line treatment are lacking. These findings may influence the development of effective treatment plans, potentially improving future patient outcomes.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5530-5530
Author(s):  
Hassan A Sumaili ◽  
Asim F Belgaumi ◽  
Amani A Al-Kofide ◽  
Amal Al-Seraihy ◽  
Hassan El-Solh ◽  
...  

Abstract Most pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma are cured of their disease with standard combined-modality first-line therapy. Those who relapse are subjected to salvage chemo-radiotherapy, and patients who respond often undergo either autologous or allogeneic HCT, with a reported outcome ranging from 40%-60%. Variables affecting the outcome of such patients are not clearly defined. This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients who underwent HCT at our institution. Between 1995 and 2012, 29 pediatric (age <14 years) patients with HL underwent HCT. This cohort included 24 boys and 5 girls. Their median ages at initial diagnosis and at HCT were 9.85 years (mean 8.85; range 3.6-13.75) and 12.18 years (mean 11.24; range 5.6-14.9), respectively. 28 patients had classic HL (23 nodular sclerosis, 3 mixed cellularity, 1 lymphocyte-depleted, and 1 lymphocyte-rich) and one patient had nodular lymphocyte-predominance HL. Ten had persistent/progressive disease following first line therapy, while 19 had relapsed following achievement of complete response (CR). For these patients median time to relapse from completion of first-line therapy was 16.9 months (mean 20.1; range 1.9-53.1). All patients received salvage chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy prior to HCT; fifteen patients achieved CR, 13 had a partial response and one had progressive disease. Two patients had allogeneic bone marrow (BM) grafts from matched-related donors, while the rest had autologous grafts (16 BM; 10 PBSC; 1 BM+PBSC) following chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning. Twelve patients have relapsed/progressed post-HCT at a median of 6.04 months (mean 11.8; range 1.02-71.4). Nine patients have died; eight because of disease progression and one due to sepsis post HCT. Only two patients died within the first 100 days post HCT, giving a Day-100 mortality rate of 6.8%. Two patients who relapsed after HCT were salvaged with chemo/radiotherapy and remain disease free 2.8 and 9.7 years later. The 5-year estimated overall survival (OS) from HCT for the whole cohort is 61.6%, with an event free survival (EFS) of 57.9%. Patients who had persistent/progressive disease at the end first-line therapy or relapsed <6months off therapy had a worse OS and EFS as compared to those who relapsed later (OS 42.9% v. 75.3%, p=0.047 [Taron-Ware]; EFS 41.7% v. 60.8%, p=0.052 [Taron-Ware]). The outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory HL following HCT is encouraging, as a majority of patients survive free of their lymphoma. Timing of relapse/progression remains an important prognostic factor and patients who fail early may be considered for novel therapeutic approaches. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 706-706
Author(s):  
Francesca Jackson-Spence ◽  
Agne Jovaisaite ◽  
Michael Grant ◽  
Wing-Kin Liu ◽  
Thomas Butters ◽  
...  

706 Background: The introduction of first line immune combination or immune/VEGF therapy in metastatic renal cancer has changed treatment landscape. Here we compare outcomes of these combinations with patients treated with first line sunitinib. The focus is on the impact of subsequent treatments. Methods: This retrospective analysis was performed at Barts Cancer Institute for consecutive patients from April 2015 when front line immune therapy was first used at our institution. Only patients enrolled on reported prospective trials were included to avoid selection bias. Patients were treated with VEGF targeted therapy (n=35) (group V), PD-1 + CTLA4 (n=15) (group I/I) or a combination of PD-L1 + VEGF TKI inhibitor (n=29) (group I/V). The primary analysis focused on the proportion of patients who received second line therapy and their outcome. Results: 79 patients received first line therapy for clear cell RCC. IMDC good, intermediate and poor risk occurred in 27.8%, 60.8% and 11.4% respectively. Front line response rates for V, I/I and I/V groups were 34.3%, 46.7% and 65.5% and PFS in V, I/I and I/V groups were 11mo (95%CI 6-16), 18mo (95% CI 0-41) and 36mo (95% CI 13-59), respectively (P= 0.016). OS in the 3 groups were immature but not significantly different. Second line therapy occurred in 87.5%, 92.9% and 81.8% in the V, I/I and I/V groups respectively (in those who progressed after initial therapy). Second line response rate post first line V, I/I and I/V were 11%, 0% and 0% respectively as per RECIST 1.1. 63% of patients receiving VEGF front line therapy subsequently received immune therapy. 95% of patients receiving first line immune/immune or immune/VEGF combination therapy received VEGF therapy in the second line. Only 70% of patients who progressed on second line therapy got 3rd line therapy across all arms. Conclusions: Response rates after front line immune combination therapy are modest. The sequencing of PD-1 therapy after VEGF monotherapy appears particularly relevant in outcomes. A high proportion of patients are sequencing therapy and reaching third line which may help improve outcomes.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5885-5885
Author(s):  
Jing Xie ◽  
Alan Yong ◽  
Catherine Waweru ◽  
Thuy Anh Sorof ◽  
Ravi K Goyal ◽  
...  

Introduction: Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a critical component of the B-cell receptor pathway, and is a validated target for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib is a first-generation, covalent, small molecule BTK inhibitor approved for the treatment of CLL. We present a preliminary analysis of treatment patterns and adverse events (AEs) in patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib in a real-world setting. Methods: A retrospective chart review is being conducted among patients diagnosed with CLL and treated with ibrutinib in oncology centers throughout the UK; the target sample size for the study is 250 patients. Patients are eligible if they initiated ibrutinib after diagnosis of CLL, between January 2017 and June 2018, with at least 12 months of follow-up data available, with the exception that patients who died less than 12 months after ibrutinib initiation remained eligible. Hematology/oncology physicians reviewed medical records and completed web-based data collection forms. Baseline medical history information and data on treatment characteristics and AEs were collected. By June 2019, a total of 151 medical records (60% of the target sample size) had been abstracted. All analyses were descriptive in nature and were performed in SAS v9.4 or later (Cary, NC, USA). Results: Twenty-two physicians from specialist cancer centers or tertiary referral treatment centers (45.5%), teaching hospitals (31.8%) and non-teaching hospitals (22.7%) submitted data on ibrutinib-treated patients. The median follow-up for this interim sample of 151 patients was 16.1 months (range: 2.8-27.5 months) from ibrutinib initiation (index date) and 61.7 months (range: 11.6-264.1 months) from initial CLL diagnosis (Table 1). Median age was 71 years, 56% were male, 22.5% of patients had del(17p) mutation and 24.5% had TP53 mutations/aberrations. Of the 151 patients, 24.5% (n=37) initiated ibrutinib as first-line therapy while 75.5% (n=114) initiated ibrutinib as second- or later-line treatment. Median time to initiation of ibrutinib was 3.8 months (range: 0.3-123.7 months) for first-line therapy after initial CLL diagnosis and 22.3 months (range: 0.2-242.2 months) for second-line therapy after end of first-line therapy. Other therapies that patients received besides ibrutinib included the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (first-line, 22.5%; second-line, 1.7%), bendamustine plus rituximab (first-line, 19.9%; second-line, 15.5%), and chlorambucil plus rituximab (first-line, 10.6%; second-line, 1.7%). The most common AEs observed during ibrutinib therapy were bruising (19.9%), cytopenias (18.5%), diarrhea (15.2%), and arthralgia (11.3%) (Table 2). Conclusion: This preliminary analysis describes patient characteristics and treatment patterns in ibrutinib-treated patients in the UK. We found that the majority of ibrutinib use was in the second-line or later, reflecting the current UK public reimbursement situation. AEs such as bruising and cytopenias were commonly reported in patients treated with ibrutinib, and future analyses from this study will determine how these AEs and others affect dosing, treatment discontinuation and healthcare resource utilization. Disclosures Xie: AstraZeneca: Employment. Yong:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Waweru:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sorof:Acerta Pharma: Employment. Goyal:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Davis:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Follows:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hillmen:Apellis: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document