scholarly journals INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY IN RUSSIAN REGIONS

Federalism ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 5-19
Author(s):  
M. A. Nikonova

The transition to a market economy in the 1990s led to a significant reduction in the number of R&D organizations, especially R&D departments and survey organizations, as well as in the number of R&D personnel and especially researchers. This was largely due to the outflow of competitive personnel, technology and capital from the country. These changes, which led to a decrease in the level of scientific potential of the country, the effectiveness of innovation, the aggravation of the problem of continuity in science have become a factor limiting the transition to innovative development of the Russian economy. An additional factor complicating the transition to a knowledge-based economy today is the low demand of domestic industry for innovations developed in Russia, an unsatisfactory investment climate for attracting private business to R&D. The article on the basis of the analysis of the relevant indicators identified the main problems that reduce the innovative activity of the regions of Russia, and proposed measures to overcome them.

2008 ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
A. Nekipelov ◽  
Yu. Goland

The appeals to minimize state intervention in the Russian economy are counterproductive. However the excessive involvement of the state is fraught with the threat of building nomenclature capitalism. That is the main idea of the series of articles by prominent representatives of Russian economic thought who formulate their position on key elements of the long-term strategy of Russia’s development. The articles deal with such important issues as Russia’s economic policy, transition to knowledge-based economy, basic directions of monetary and structural policies, strengthening of property rights, development of human potential, foreign economic priorities of our state.


The article determines a significant importance of knowledge management as a key technology for the development of an enterprise in an innovative knowledge-based economy. The main features of the enterprise development as an open dynamic system are systematized and characteristics of the knowledge economy and innovative economy are determined. Following the above characteristics it is proved that the formation of an innovative economy is impossible without new knowledge and its commercialization, and the basis of the knowledge economy are innovations in various fields of activity. The given types of economies should be further considered not as separate concepts, but as integral components of the innovative knowledge-based economy. The theoretical approaches to the definition of the essence of knowledge management at the enterprise are systematized and their interrelation with the innovation process and innovative development is shown through the creation of new knowledge, increasing the efficiency of innovation development and the formation of innovative abilities of the innovatively active employees. The goals, tasks, functions, principles, stages, methods and methods of knowledge management in innovative knowledge-based economy are considered. The typology of contradictions in the innovative activity of the enterprise is given; the essence of economic, information, technological, organizational, psychological, structural and social contradictions is revealed. Technologies of knowledge management that contribute to eliminating contradictions and innovative development of the enterprise are defined. It is substantiated that different types of contradictions in the innovative activity of an enterprise can be eliminated by means of knowledge management technologies, which, as a result, causes qualitative changes at the enterprise. As the key signs of development are qualitative changes and elimination of contradictions, the use of knowledge management in the conditions of an innovative knowledge-based economy will contribute to the development of the enterprise.


2008 ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rubinstein

The appeals to minimize state intervention in the Russian economy are counterproductive. However the excessive involvement of the state is fraught with the threat of building nomenclature capitalism. That is the main idea of the series of articles by prominent representatives of Russian economic thought who formulate their position on key elements of the long-term strategy of Russia’s development. The articles deal with such important issues as Russia’s economic policy, transition to knowledge-based economy, basic directions of monetary and structural policies, strengthening of property rights, development of human potential, foreign economic priorities of our state.


2008 ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
L. Abalkin

The appeals to minimize state intervention in the Russian economy are counterproductive. However the excessive involvement of the state is fraught with the threat of building nomenclature capitalism. That is the main idea of the series of articles by prominent representatives of Russian economic thought who formulate their position on key elements of the long-term strategy of Russia’s development. The articles deal with such important issues as Russia’s economic policy, transition to knowledge-based economy, basic directions of monetary and structural policies, strengthening of property rights, development of human potential, foreign economic priorities of our state.


2008 ◽  
pp. 64-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Petrakov

The appeals to minimize state intervention in the Russian economy are counterproductive. However the excessive involvement of the state is fraught with the threat of building nomenclature capitalism. That is the main idea of the series of articles by prominent representatives of Russian economic thought who formulate their position on key elements of the long-term strategy of Russia’s development. The articles deal with such important issues as Russia’s economic policy, transition to knowledge-based economy, basic directions of monetary and structural policies, strengthening of property rights, development of human potential, foreign economic priorities of our state.


2008 ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
S. Sitaryan ◽  
I. Ivanov

The appeals to minimize state intervention in the Russian economy are counterproductive. However the excessive involvement of the state is fraught with the threat of building nomenclature capitalism. That is the main idea of the series of articles by prominent representatives of Russian economic thought who formulate their position on key elements of the long-term strategy of Russia’s development. The articles deal with such important issues as Russia’s economic policy, transition to knowledge-based economy, basic directions of monetary and structural policies, strengthening of property rights, development of human potential, foreign economic priorities of our state.


2021 ◽  
Vol 942 (1) ◽  
pp. 012001
Author(s):  
D G Kochergin ◽  
E E Zhernov ◽  
V A Logachev ◽  
L G Shutko

Abstract According to the economic concept of the “resource curse”, the specialization of countries and regions in the extraction of minerals can have a negative impact on their long-term economic development. The authors of the article propose, that this influence can significantly slow down the transition to development based on knowledge. The article tested this hypothesis using the dynamics of indicators of the knowledge-based economy the group of resource regions of Russia. Of the 12 resource regions of Russia, only two successfully form the knowledge-based economy - Tomsk Region and The Republic of Tatarstan. These regions had a developed education system and research infrastructure even before the discovery of oil here in the 1940s-1960s. For the rest of the resource regions, there is a large lag behind the leading regions of the knowledge economy in Russia, which does not significantly decrease during 2005-2019. At the same time, these regions did not have a developed scientific and educational base by the beginning of the active industrial development of natural resources on their territory. Thus, the formation of the knowledge-based economy in resource regions is strongly influenced by both the resource curse and path dependence effects. The absence of structural economic policies in the regions that are rich in natural resources will hinder their transition to knowledge-based development.


2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1028-1038
Author(s):  
Pavel V. Druzhinin ◽  
◽  
Ekaterina V. Molchanova

The emergence of the COVID‑19 pandemic has become a new global challenge for the whole humankind affecting all spheres of society. The purpose of this article is to identify the complex effect of various factors on the mortality rate in Russian regions during the first and second waves of the coronavirus pandemic. As the information base of the study, official statistical publications («Regions of Russia», «Natural Population Movement») were used, as well as data from the official Internet resource on the situation with the incidence of COVID‑19 in the regions of Russia. With the help of economic and mathematical tools, the impact of demographic, socio-economic, environmental, medical and geographical factors on the mortality rate in Russian regions was assessed. The calculations allowed to establish the causes of a significant increase in mortality in the Russian regions, as well as to identify significant differences between the first and second waves of the pandemic. The study showed that demographic and geographical factors played the leading role, but their influence at different time periods had its own characteristics. The coronavirus pandemic accelerated the process of reducing the country’s population, and also caused significant damage to the Russian economy. The results of the study can be used in the field of medico-demographic policy aimed at preserving the social (population) health of the nation


2008 ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Grinberg

The appeals to minimize state intervention in the Russian economy are counterproductive. However the excessive involvement of the state is fraught with the threat of building nomenclature capitalism. That is the main idea of the series of articles by prominent representatives of Russian economic thought who formulate their position on key elements of the long-term strategy of Russia’s development. The articles deal with such important issues as Russia’s economic policy, transition to knowledge-based economy, basic directions of monetary and structural policies, strengthening of property rights, development of human potential, foreign economic priorities of our state.


2008 ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Makarov

The appeals to minimize state intervention in the Russian economy are counterproductive. However the excessive involvement of the state is fraught with the threat of building nomenclature capitalism. That is the main idea of the series of articles by prominent representatives of Russian economic thought who formulate their position on key elements of the long-term strategy of Russia’s development. The articles deal with such important issues as Russia’s economic policy, transition to knowledge-based economy, basic directions of monetary and structural policies, strengthening of property rights, development of human potential, foreign economic priorities of our state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document