The Impact of the Theory-Based Training on Beliefs of Women towards Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-235
Author(s):  
Alireza Didarloo ◽  
Leila Mokhtary ◽  
Hamid-Reza Khalkhali ◽  
Soheila Ahangarzadeh-Rezaei
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Beliefs ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
Screening Behaviors

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer among women that is fatal if not diagnosed and treated in due time. Health beliefs play an important role in people's willingness to engage in health-promoting behaviors. Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the effects of the health belief model (HBM)-based training intervention on women’s health beliefs towards breast cancer screening behaviors. Methods: The study of educational intervention was conducted on women referred to healthcare centers. The sample was selected by convenient sampling and randomly assigned to control and intervention groups of 50 subjects. The intervention group received the theory-based training intervention, but the control group received only the routine care. Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale (CHBMS) was used for collecting the study data. Data analysis was performed using independent t-test, paired t-test, Chi-squared test, and correlation coefficient in SPSS software version 16.00. Results: The mean age of the subjects for control and intervention groups was 39.06±9.78, 38.32±8.27, respectively. Overall, 38%, 12% and 13%of the subjects reported breast selfexamination behavior, mammography and clinical breast examinations, respectively. Before the intervention program, the overall mean score of health beliefs in groups of control and intervention was 160.82±23.28, and 159.14±20.61, respectively. After educational intervention, the overall mean score of beliefs in the intervention group changed from 159.14±20.61 to 195.26±24.42, and it was statistically significant (p<0.001). In the control group, after the intervention, no significant changes were observed in the mean score of total health beliefs and were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Among the variables of the HBM, women's perceived self-efficacy toward breast selfexamination experienced the most positive change after an educational intervention. Conclusion: Our results indicated that HBM-based training significantly improved women’s beliefs toward breast cancer screening behaviors. It is suggested that trainers in the healthcare system use these educational approaches to promote people’s beliefs toward breast cancer and its screening methods.

Evaluation of Health Belief Model-Based Intervention on Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors among Health Volunteers

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 904-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohtasham Ghaffari ◽  
Sanaz Nasiri Esfahani ◽  
Sakineh Rakhshanderou ◽  
Parisa Hosseini Koukamari
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
Screening Behaviors

Effectiveness of the Theory-Based Educational Interventions on Screening of Breast Cancer in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-236
Author(s):  
Saeed Bashirian ◽  
Younes Mohammadi ◽  
Majid Barati ◽  
Leila Moaddabshoar ◽  
Mitra Dogonchi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Screening Behavior ◽  
Self Examination ◽  
Screening Behaviors

Screening plays an essential role in the reduction of mortality and morbidity of breast cancer, which is one of the most common cancers in women worldwide. The aim of this study was to find out whether the use of health education model and theory-based behavioral interventions is effective in women’s breast cancer screening behavior. Applying different search strategies, we searched electronic databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus without time limit from January 12 to March 11, 2017. Keywords included “Breast neoplasm,” Screening,” “Women,” and “Health Education.” First, screening was conducted based on title, abstract, and full text. Then, the studies were screened according to the selection criteria of our study. The relevant and eligible studies were critically appraised by Delphi checklist. In addition, a meta-analysis of eligible studies was conducted with the random-effect approach. Twenty-six of 8,620 initial studies (with sample size of 10,681 in the intervention group and 8,854 in the control group) were included in the final analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the probability of screening behavior in the intervention group is 1.4 times of that in the control group. Furthermore, subgroup analysis by the type of screening behavior indicates that the probabilities of conducting breast self-examination and mammography in the intervention group are 1.9 and 1.4 times of those in the control group. The health education program has a significant impact on breast cancer screening behaviors, particularly breast self-examination. Thus, given the positive effects of the educational screening programs in women, it is suggested that these programs must be continuously pursued with long-term follow-up and increasing rates of screening behaviors should be monitored.

scholarly journals Relationship of fear and fatalism with breast cancer screening among women using health belief model

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Howaida Amin Hassan Fahmy Elsaba ◽  
Amal Samir Ahmed Abd El-Maksoud
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Beliefs ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
Relationship Of

Despite the potential benefits of screening in discovering breast cancer, many women still do not follow recommended screening regimens. Fear of cancer detection and fatalistic beliefs were identified by previous studies as the main reasons given by women for noncompliance with breast cancer screening. The aim of this descriptive study is to explore relationship of fear and fatalism with breast cancer screening among a convenience sample of 136 women recruited during their visit to the Gynecology Clinic at the Maternity University Hospital in Alexandria, Egypt. The study tool consists of four parts: (1) Bio-sociodemographic information; (2) Champion Breast Cancer Fear Scale (CBCFS); (3) Powe Fatalism Inventory (PFI); (4) abridged version of the Champion Health Belief Model Scale (CHBMS). The findings revealed that only 3.7% and 14.7% of women practiced regular breast self-examination and had previously had mammography, respectively. Negative correlations were found between fatalism and health beliefs; and between fear and health belief. A positive correlation was found between fatalism and fear. The findings of this study add some experimental support for the relationships between fear, fatalism, and breast cancer screening behavior.  

Effect of an Information Leaflet on Breast Cancer Screening Participation. A Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Maria Montero-Moraga ◽  
Margarita Posso ◽  
Marta Román ◽  
Andrea Burón ◽  
Maria Sala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Information Leaflet ◽  
Lower Socioeconomic

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the impact of an information leaflet about the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening on women’s participation.Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted within a population-based breast cancer screening program and included women from the catchment areas of two hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. We evaluated women aged 50-69 years invited to screening between September 2019 and January 2020. One hospital attended a population with a lower socioeconomic status than the other. The intervention group received an information leaflet on the benefits and harms of mammography screening. The control group received the usual invitation letter. We compared the participation rate between groups, stratified by hospital and by per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. Results: We included 11,119 women in the study: 5,416 in the intervention group and 5,703 in the control group. A total of 36.4% (1,964/5,393) of the women in the intervention group and 37.5% (2,135/5,694) of those in the control group attended screening, respectively. Overall, we found no differences in participation among groups (difference in participation -1.1%; 95% CI; -2.9% to 0.7%, p-value=0.240). In the hospital attending a population with a low socioeconomic status, attendance was lower in the intervention group (-1.4%, 95% CI: -5.7% to -0.03%, p-value=0.029). In the per-protocol analysis, participation was lower in the intervention group (-2.6%, 95% CI: -4.6% to -0.5%, p-value=0.015). Conclusions: Overall participation in our program was unaffected by a new information leaflet on the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening. However, participation was lower in certain populations with lower socioeconomic status.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document