Effect of an Information Leaflet on Breast Cancer Screening Participation. A Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Maria Montero-Moraga ◽  
Margarita Posso ◽  
Marta Román ◽  
Andrea Burón ◽  
Maria Sala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Information Leaflet ◽  
Lower Socioeconomic

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the impact of an information leaflet about the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening on women’s participation.Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted within a population-based breast cancer screening program and included women from the catchment areas of two hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. We evaluated women aged 50-69 years invited to screening between September 2019 and January 2020. One hospital attended a population with a lower socioeconomic status than the other. The intervention group received an information leaflet on the benefits and harms of mammography screening. The control group received the usual invitation letter. We compared the participation rate between groups, stratified by hospital and by per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. Results: We included 11,119 women in the study: 5,416 in the intervention group and 5,703 in the control group. A total of 36.4% (1,964/5,393) of the women in the intervention group and 37.5% (2,135/5,694) of those in the control group attended screening, respectively. Overall, we found no differences in participation among groups (difference in participation -1.1%; 95% CI; -2.9% to 0.7%, p-value=0.240). In the hospital attending a population with a low socioeconomic status, attendance was lower in the intervention group (-1.4%, 95% CI: -5.7% to -0.03%, p-value=0.029). In the per-protocol analysis, participation was lower in the intervention group (-2.6%, 95% CI: -4.6% to -0.5%, p-value=0.015). Conclusions: Overall participation in our program was unaffected by a new information leaflet on the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening. However, participation was lower in certain populations with lower socioeconomic status.

scholarly journals Effect of an information leaflet on breast cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Maria Montero-Moraga ◽  
Margarita Posso ◽  
Marta Román ◽  
Andrea Burón ◽  
Maria Sala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Information Leaflet ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Objective To evaluate the impact of an information leaflet about the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening on women’s participation. Methods This cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted within a population-based breast cancer screening program and included women from the catchment areas of two hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. We evaluated women aged 50–69 years invited to screening between September 2019 and January 2020. The intervention group received an information leaflet on the benefits and harms of mammography screening. The control group received the usual invitation letter. The clusters consisted of the processing days of the invitation letter, assigned to the intervention with a simple random allocation scheme. We compared the participation rate at the individual level between groups, stratified by hospital and by per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. Results We included 11,119 women (137 clusters): 5416 in the intervention group (66 clusters) and 5703 in the control group (71 clusters). A total of 36% (1964/5393) of the women in the intervention group and 37% (2135/5694) of those in the control group attended screening, respectively. Overall, we found no differences in participation among groups (difference in participation − 1.1%; 95%CI; − 2.9 to 0.7%). In a hospital attending a population with a low socioeconomic status, attendance was lower in the intervention group (− 1.4, 95%CI: − 5.7% to − 0.03%). Conclusions Overall participation in our program was unaffected by a new information leaflet on the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening. However, participation was lower in certain populations with lower socioeconomic status Trial registration Trial registration number ISRCTN13848929.

The Impact of the Theory-Based Training on Beliefs of Women towards Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-235
Author(s):  
Alireza Didarloo ◽  
Leila Mokhtary ◽  
Hamid-Reza Khalkhali ◽  
Soheila Ahangarzadeh-Rezaei
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Beliefs ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
Screening Behaviors

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer among women that is fatal if not diagnosed and treated in due time. Health beliefs play an important role in people's willingness to engage in health-promoting behaviors. Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the effects of the health belief model (HBM)-based training intervention on women’s health beliefs towards breast cancer screening behaviors. Methods: The study of educational intervention was conducted on women referred to healthcare centers. The sample was selected by convenient sampling and randomly assigned to control and intervention groups of 50 subjects. The intervention group received the theory-based training intervention, but the control group received only the routine care. Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale (CHBMS) was used for collecting the study data. Data analysis was performed using independent t-test, paired t-test, Chi-squared test, and correlation coefficient in SPSS software version 16.00. Results: The mean age of the subjects for control and intervention groups was 39.06±9.78, 38.32±8.27, respectively. Overall, 38%, 12% and 13%of the subjects reported breast selfexamination behavior, mammography and clinical breast examinations, respectively. Before the intervention program, the overall mean score of health beliefs in groups of control and intervention was 160.82±23.28, and 159.14±20.61, respectively. After educational intervention, the overall mean score of beliefs in the intervention group changed from 159.14±20.61 to 195.26±24.42, and it was statistically significant (p<0.001). In the control group, after the intervention, no significant changes were observed in the mean score of total health beliefs and were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Among the variables of the HBM, women's perceived self-efficacy toward breast selfexamination experienced the most positive change after an educational intervention. Conclusion: Our results indicated that HBM-based training significantly improved women’s beliefs toward breast cancer screening behaviors. It is suggested that trainers in the healthcare system use these educational approaches to promote people’s beliefs toward breast cancer and its screening methods.

Effectiveness of the Theory-Based Educational Interventions on Screening of Breast Cancer in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-236
Author(s):  
Saeed Bashirian ◽  
Younes Mohammadi ◽  
Majid Barati ◽  
Leila Moaddabshoar ◽  
Mitra Dogonchi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Screening Behavior ◽  
Self Examination ◽  
Screening Behaviors

Screening plays an essential role in the reduction of mortality and morbidity of breast cancer, which is one of the most common cancers in women worldwide. The aim of this study was to find out whether the use of health education model and theory-based behavioral interventions is effective in women’s breast cancer screening behavior. Applying different search strategies, we searched electronic databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus without time limit from January 12 to March 11, 2017. Keywords included “Breast neoplasm,” Screening,” “Women,” and “Health Education.” First, screening was conducted based on title, abstract, and full text. Then, the studies were screened according to the selection criteria of our study. The relevant and eligible studies were critically appraised by Delphi checklist. In addition, a meta-analysis of eligible studies was conducted with the random-effect approach. Twenty-six of 8,620 initial studies (with sample size of 10,681 in the intervention group and 8,854 in the control group) were included in the final analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the probability of screening behavior in the intervention group is 1.4 times of that in the control group. Furthermore, subgroup analysis by the type of screening behavior indicates that the probabilities of conducting breast self-examination and mammography in the intervention group are 1.9 and 1.4 times of those in the control group. The health education program has a significant impact on breast cancer screening behaviors, particularly breast self-examination. Thus, given the positive effects of the educational screening programs in women, it is suggested that these programs must be continuously pursued with long-term follow-up and increasing rates of screening behaviors should be monitored.

scholarly journals Change in Breast Cancer Screening Knowledge is Associated With Change in Mammogram Intention in Mexican-Origin Women After an Educational Intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117822341878290
Author(s):  
Jennifer J Salinas ◽  
Theresa Byrd ◽  
Charmaine Martin ◽  
Alok K Dwivedi ◽  
Adam Alomari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
El Paso ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Mexican Origin ◽  
First Child ◽  
To Receive ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose: To determine the relationship between breast cancer screening knowledge and intent to receive a mammogram within 6 months in a sample of Mexican-origin women living in El Paso, Texas. Methods: A total of 489 uninsured Mexican-origin women were assigned to treatment or control and completed surveys at pre- and postintervention. Pre-post associations between breast cancer screening knowledge and intent were tested. Results: Participants were on average were 56.7 years of age and spoke primarily Spanish (92.6%). Most of the samples had not had a mammogram in 3 or more years (51.6%) and 14.6% had never had a mammogram. At baseline, the majority intended to be screened for breast cancer within the next 6 months (93.4%). At postintervention, half of the intervention group changed their 6-month intent to be screened for breast cancer from likely to unlikely. Change in intent was associated with a change in knowledge of risk of having a first child by the age of 30 and breast cancer being rare after the age of 70. Discussion: Intent to be screened for breast cancer in Mexican-origin women may be influenced by the type of knowledge. Conclusions: Change in screening knowledge may influence perceived risk that influences intention to be screened.

scholarly journals Decision aid on breast cancer screening reduces attendance rate: results of a large-scale, randomized, controlled study by the DECIDEO group

Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 12885-12892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelie Bourmaud ◽  
Patricia Soler-Michel ◽  
Mathieu Oriol ◽  
Véronique Regnier ◽  
Fabien Tinquaut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Attendance Rate ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Prophylactic Effect of Memantine in Docetaxel Induced Neuropathy in Patients With Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pegah Mohammadzadeh ◽  
Elnaz Shaseb ◽  
Zohreh Sanaat ◽  
Parvin Sarbakhsh ◽  
Nasrin Gholami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control

Abstract Purpose Peripheral neuropathy is a complication of taxane that in severe cases can limit the optimal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of memantine in prevention of docetaxel induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, 40 women between the ages of 18 and 64 years with non-metastatic breast cancer (stages I to III) were included (registry number: IRCT20160310026998N9 and registry date: 26 March 2019). All patients were treated with the AC-T regimen (with docetaxel). Patients in intervention group received memantine at a dose of 20 mg for 8 weeks at the beginning of the first cycle of docetaxel. Patients in control group did not take any medication for neuropathy prevention. To assess the neuropathy, DN4 and CTCAE questionnaires were used at baseline, one months, three months and six months after the intervention. Results The DN4 questionnaire score was remarkably less in memantine group in follow up one (p-value: 0.033) and three (p < 00.1). The CTCAE follow up score did not change during study. The Neuropathy duration and Neuropathy onset, were shown significant difference between the intervention and control groups, p = 0.050 and p = 0.001, respectively. From 40 patients, 8 (40%) in memantine group and 2 (10%) in control group, did not experience any kind of neuropathy. Conclusion Data showed that prophylactic administration of memantine 20 mg/day has been effective in prevention of severity and incidence of docetaxel induced neuropathy in patients with breast cancer.

scholarly journals Breast cancer application protocol: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a self-management app for breast cancer survivors

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e034655
Author(s):  
Andy S K Cheng ◽  
Xiangyu Liu ◽  
Peter H F Ng ◽  
Cindy T T Kwok ◽  
Yingchun Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Readiness For Change ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionThe eHealth technologies that are being designed for chronic disease constitute a global trend towards health assessment and self-management. However, most of these approaches tend to focus on a single symptom or problem rather than on the multiple problems that are characteristic of many of these chronic illnesses. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of and adherence to a self-management application (app) that identifies multiple problem areas related to surviving breast cancer as the targeted chronic illness.Methods and analysisThis is a randomised controlled study. Eligible participants will be allocated randomly into either an intervention group or a control group at a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group will be assigned to the self-management app (‘Be-with-You’), while the control group will use a general health app (‘Sham’ app). The primary outcomes will include the differences between the two groups in their health literacy, problem-solving skills and self-management skills. The secondary outcomes will include group differences in self-efficacy, readiness for change and health-related quality of life. All of these outcomes will be measured at baseline and at 4 weeks and 12 weeks after intervention. In addition, usability of these two mobile apps will be measured at 4 weeks and 12 weeks after intervention. The planned sample size is 476.Ethics and disseminationThe Human Subjects Ethics Sub-committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University approved the study (HSEARS20190922001, 24 September 2019). Dissemination of findings will occur at the local, national and international levels.Trial registration numberChiCTR1900026244.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of An Educational Intervention of Breast Cancer Screening Practices Uptake, Knowledge, and Beliefs among Yemeni Female School Teachers in Klang Valley, Malaysia: A Study Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1167
Author(s):  
Noman ◽  
Shahar ◽  
Abdul Rahman ◽  
Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Teachers ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Klang Valley ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Breast cancer is the most common cancer spread among women worldwide. Whereas many studies have discussed the significance of breast cancer screening among women in various countries, few have attempted to discuss this topic among female school teachers. As teachers educate and communicate with students, this may play an essential role in health education and in promoting healthy behavior, such as breast cancer screening. The primary goal of this study is to develop and implement an educational intervention of breast cancer screening and evaluate its effectiveness among Yemeni female school teachers in Malaysia. This was carried out as per the health belief model. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted among 183 Yemeni female school teachers in twelve schools in Klang Valley, Malaysia. A random assignment of the target schools was made to include them within the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group were offered a 90-minute session for one-day educational intervention on breast cancer screening. On the other hand, participants in the control group were offered the same educational materials at the end of the study. Relevant data was collected at baseline, one month following the intervention, and then three- and six-months follow-up assessments. Analysis of such data was done via IBM SPSS software 25.0 by generalized estimating equations (GEE) to assess the differential changes over time. A primary outcome embodied in breast cancer screening practice uptake was expected. Secondary outcomes include the target group's knowledge on and beliefs of breast cancer screening. This study intends to contribute to the credibility and effectiveness of utilizing a theory-based breast cancer screening intervention in order to raise the awareness of women on conducting breast cancer screening.

EFFECTIVENESS OF AN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ABOUT BREAST CANCER AND BREAST CANCER SELF-EXAMINATION ON PERCEPTION AND PRACTICE AMONG WOMEN IN ALJEERAIF WEST ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT (2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
Amel Eltaib Elagib ◽  
Ibrahim Ismail Mohammed ◽  
SamiaYousif Idris ◽  
Jaafar Abdelrahman Omar ◽  
Somia Bilal Babiker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Administrative Unit ◽  
Self Examination ◽  
And Control

In Sudan, cancer incidence has been growing considerably in recent years and is likely to continue to grow creating a big burden on the health system resources. The aim of this study is to assess the baseline Perception and Practice about breast cancer and breast self-examination (BSE) and to nd out the effectiveness of an educational program about breast cancer and BSE on Perception and Practice among women in AlJeeraif West Administrative Unit. Community based intervention study with pre-post and control was carried out among 200 women who were recruited by means of multistage sampling. The sample size was divided equally into intervention and control groups. Baseline data was collected from both groups through direct interview, using structured close ended questionnaire. Educational program was implemented for the intervention group. Four months after the intervention, women in the study and control groups were exposed to the same questionnaire. Chi-square, paired t-test and independent t-test (difference of difference) were conducted in the course of the data analyses. There was statistically signicant difference in the intervention group pre-post program in all of the HBM components in the intervention group (p value0.000), while in the control group statistically signicant difference existed only in perceived barrier (p value.004) and perceived benet (p value.000) and over all perception (p value .016) with no signicant difference in other (HBM) components. In the intervention group practice and performance scores were highly signicant pre-post program (p value 0.000), where as in the control group only practice was signicant (p value 0.001). There were statistically signicant differences in the mean difference of performance, practice and perceptions between the intervention and control groups (p-value .000). The results of this study have conrmed the effectiveness of educational program based on the health belief model on improving perceptions and practice of breast cancer and breast self-examination.

scholarly journals Evaluation issues in the Swedish Two-County Trial of breast cancer screening: An historical review

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laszlo Tabar ◽  
Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen ◽  
Chen-Yang Hsu ◽  
Wendy Yi-Ying Wu ◽  
Amy Ming-Fang Yen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Historical Review ◽  
Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Mammographic Screening ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Full Account ◽  
Research Issues

Objectives To summarize debate and research in the Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening on key issues of trial design, endpoint evaluation, and overdiagnosis, and from these to infer promising directions for the future. Methods A cluster-randomized controlled trial of the offer of breast cancer screening in Sweden, with a single screen of the control group at the end of the screening phase forms the setting for a historical review of investigations and debate on issues of design, analysis, and interpretation of results of the trial. Results There has been considerable commentary on the closure screen of the control group, ascertainment of cause of death, and cluster randomization. The issues raised were researched in detail and the main questions answered in publications between 1989 and 2003. Overdiagnosis issues still remain, but methods of estimation taking full account of lead time and of non-screening influences on incidence (taking place mainly before 2005) suggest that it is a minor phenomenon. Conclusion Despite resolution of issues relating to this trial in peer-reviewed publications dating from years, or even decades ago, issues that already have been addressed continue to be raised. We suggest that it would be more profitable to concentrate efforts on current research issues in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document