Regulation and Challenges of Biosimilars in European Union

Author(s):  
Vikram ◽  
Aakash Deep ◽  
Manita

Background: Biological products comprise the most complex and diverse types of drugs that are made by living cells. The use of biological products has increased significantly in recent decades and has contributed significantly to improving the efficacy of treatment in many diseases. Patent protection for pharmaceutical products, including biological products, generally expires about 20 years after development. Expiration of patents of biological innovative medicines allows regulatory authorities to approve copies of biological medicines, such as medicines called similar biological products (biosimilar) and to enter in clinical use. Biosimilar products are comparable but not identical with innovator biological products and are not a generic version of the innovator biological product. While biosimilars are subjected to rigorous characterization and clinical trials to demonstrate their safety and efficacy, in the case of biosimilars certain regulatory requirements apply for registration. Biosimilars are very complex and large molecules and minor changes in the manufacturing process can have important implications in their safety and efficacy profiles. To ensure that biosimilar reaches their potential in clinical application, intensive Pharmacovigilance system and risk management plan must be established to demonstrate the true similarity between the biosimilar products and original biological products. Biosimilars are part of the growing sector of the pharmaceutical industry and normally used by human beings since manufacturers of biosimilars face some challenges in regulatory approval and manufacturing of biosimilars in the European Union. Objectives: The current manuscript will provide the information regarding the regulation of biosimilar products with guidelines and challenges faced by manufacturers during approved and manufacturing of biosimilar products in the European Union. This manuscript also provides the status of approved and rejected biosimilars by EMA (European Medicine Agency). Conclusion: Biosimilars may reduce costs when patent protection of biological products expires and compared to the original products, savings are not as large as seen with traditional generics. In the coming years, there will be an increasing number of biological and biosimilar products available on the market, highlighting the need for specific short and long term post-marketing surveillance programs for these medicines. It is essential to understand how the concept of compatibility, interchangeability will be managed and regulated in the future. An important aspect for future a high quality, clinical and non-clinical studies will be conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biosimilars. Scientific guidelines on biosimilar issued by the EMA (European Medicine Agency) that established a process to demonstrate the similarity between a biosimilar product and the innovator reference product.

Author(s):  
Bello S.M.

The biotechnology industry is a relatively new a distinct field that involve using living organism to produce desired product. This industry includes firms that develop, manufacture, and market pharmaceutical products, agricultural products, environmental control product, e.t.c. based on advanced biotechnology research. Although the growth in the global biotechnology industry neared double digits the past two years, the threat of entry into the market is weak due to high barriers to entry. However, because of the ease and low-cost production using biotechnology, it has increased competition in some product. Leading European nations with strong biotech sectors such as the UK and Germany are investing heavily in regenerative medicine (RM), seeking competitive advantage in this emerging sector. However, in the broader biopharmaceutical sector the European Union (EU) is outperformed by the US on all metrics, reflecting longstanding problems: limited venture capital finance, a fragmented patent system, and relatively weak relations between academia and industry. The current global downturn has exacerbated these difficulties. The crisis comes at a time when the European Union is reframing its approach to the governance of innovation and renewing its commitment to the goal of making Europe the leading player in the global knowledge economy.


Author(s):  
Stuart O. Schweitzer ◽  
Z. John Lu

The main scientific and technical aspects of new drug registration, including pathways to marketing authorization approval, clinical study design and method, and requirement of and specifications for Good Clinical Practice, Good Laboratory Practice, and Good Manufacturing Practice, are all quite similar between Europe and the United States. Differences do exist, however. This chapter provides a closer examination of the drug regulatory regime in the European Union. After providing a brief history of the European Medicines Agency, the chapter examines the agency’s organizational structure and role in ensuring the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products for Europe, and discusses the regulatory pathways for generics and biosimilars in the EU. The chapter also looks at recent trends in international drug approval lags.


2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maida Todić

Extensive and complete documentation must be presented for marketing authorization of a medicinal product in the EU. Presented documentation should prove quality, safety and efficacy of the medicinal product. It is ensured that the applicant supplies the authorities with complete information. The legislation in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina has also taken more steps towards those European directions.The presentation and content of the dossier in the European Union has been redefined. The “old” EU format will be replaced with the Common Technical Document (EU CTD format) agreed in 2000, within the International Conference on Harmonization framework. These two formats are intended to coexist during the transition period until July 2003. The CTD is an internationally agreed upon format for the preparation of a well structured presentation for applications to be submitted to regulatory authorities in the three ICH regions of Europe, US and Japan.


SAGE Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401455358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Hughes

Author(s):  
Philip Whitehead

Since the Agricultural Revolution 12,000 years ago, human beings have demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to carve up the world between us and them, have and have nots. This cleaving of humanity reflects fertile soil for the production and reproduction of the pejorative, demonised, and relegated other which is the subject of this book. From ancient empires, stepping into the classical age of Greece and Rome, to more recent political tyrannies, the refugee crisis, and the problem with the European Union, this chapter explores and illustrates the long reach of pejorative othering. It doing so it frames the subject to provide critical and urgent insights into a pressing problem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document