Clinical Features of Treatment-related Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Case Series

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 3519-3526
Author(s):  
KOTARO SUZUKI ◽  
TOMOAKI TERAKAWA ◽  
NAOE JIMBO ◽  
RENA INABA ◽  
YUZO NAKANO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer

scholarly journals Clinical features of neuroendocrine prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 7-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenza Conteduca ◽  
Clara Oromendia ◽  
Kenneth W. Eng ◽  
Rohan Bareja ◽  
Michael Sigouros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer

scholarly journals Radiotherapy of oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Rogowski ◽  
Mack Roach ◽  
Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann ◽  
Christian Trapp ◽  
Rieke von Bestenbostel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Oligometastatic Disease ◽  
Psma Pet ◽  
Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Factors

Abstract Background Due to improved imaging sensitivity, the term “oligometastatic” prostate cancer disease is diagnosed more often, leading to an increasing interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). There are two types of radiation based MDT applied when treating oligometastatic disease: (1) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) generally used for bone metastases; or (2) SBRT for isolated nodal oligometastases combined with prophylactic elective nodal radiotherapy. This review aims to summarize current evidence data, which may shed light on the optimal management of this heterogeneous group of patients. Methods A systematic review of the Medline database through PubMed was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All relevant studies published up to November 2020 were identified and screened. Fifty-six titles were included. Besides outcome parameters, different prognostic and predictive factors were assessed, including site of metastases, time between primary treatment and MDT, use of systemic therapies, hormone sensitivity, as well as pattern of recurrence. Findings Evidence consists largely of retrospective case series and no consistent precise definition of oligometastasis exists, however, most investigators seem to acknowledge the need to distinguish between patients presenting with what is frequently called “synchronous” versus “metachronous” oligometastatic disease. Available data on radiotherapy as MDT demonstrate high local control rates and a small but relevant proportion of patients without progressive disease after 2 years. This holds true for both hormone sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer diseases. The use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging increased dramatically. Radiation doses and field sizes varied considerably among the studies. The search for relevant prognostic and predictive factors is ongoing. Conclusions To our best knowledge this review on oligometastatic prostate cancer included the largest number of original articles. It demonstrates the therapeutic potential and challenges of MDT for oligometastatic prostate cancer. Prospective studies are under way and will provide further high-level evidence.

scholarly journals Clinical features and predictors of severity in COVID-19 patients with critical illness in Singapore

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ser Hon Puah ◽  
◽  
Barnaby Edward Young ◽  
Po Ying Chia ◽  
Vui Kian Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Plateau Pressure ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Ventilatory Management

AbstractWe aim to describe a case series of critically and non-critically ill COVID-19 patients in Singapore. This was a multicentered prospective study with clinical and laboratory details. Details for fifty uncomplicated COVID-19 patients and ten who required mechanical ventilation were collected. We compared clinical features between the groups, assessed predictors of intubation, and described ventilatory management in ICU patients. Ventilated patients were significantly older, reported more dyspnea, had elevated C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase. A multivariable logistic regression model identified respiratory rate (aOR 2.83, 95% CI 1.24–6.47) and neutrophil count (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.34–4.26) on admission as independent predictors of intubation with area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.928 (95% CI 0.828–0.979). Median APACHE II score was 19 (IQR 17–22) and PaO2/FiO2 ratio before intubation was 104 (IQR 89–129). Median peak FiO2 was 0.75 (IQR 0.6–1.0), positive end-expiratory pressure 12 (IQR 10–14) and plateau pressure 22 (IQR 18–26) in the first 24 h of ventilation. Median duration of ventilation was 6.5 days (IQR 5.5–13). There were no fatalities. Most COVID-19 patients in Singapore who required mechanical ventilation because of ARDS were extubated with no mortality.

scholarly journals Clinical features of prostate-specific antigen bounce after 125I brachytherapy for prostate cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-655
Author(s):  
Katsumaro Kubo ◽  
Koichi Wadasaki ◽  
Tomoki Kimura ◽  
Yuji Murakami ◽  
Mitsuru Kajiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
125I Brachytherapy

scholarly journals Radical prostatectomy outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective case series of Thai patients

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Sirisopana ◽  
Pocharapong Jenjitranant ◽  
Premsant Sangkum ◽  
Kittinut Kijvikai ◽  
Suthep Pacharatakul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The incidence of prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients (RTR) is similar to the general population. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard of care in the management of clinically localized cancer, but is considered complicated due to the presence of adhesions, and the location of transplanted ureter/kidney. To date, a few case series or studies on RP in RTR have been published, especially in Asian patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety and report the experience with RP on RTR. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data of 1270 patients who underwent RP from January 2008 to March 2020, of which 5 patients were RTR. All available baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data (operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, length of hospital stay, complication), pathological stage, Gleason score, surgical margin status, and pre/postoperative creatinine were reviewed. Results Of the 5 RTR who underwent RPs (1 open radical prostatectomy (ORP), 1 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), 2 robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALRP), and 1 Retzius-sparing RALRP (RS-RALRP)) prostatectomy, the mean age (± SD) was 70 (± 5.62) years. In LRP and RALRP cases, the standard ports were moved slightly medially to prevent graft injury. The mean operative time ranged from 190 to 365 min. The longest operative time and highest EBL (630 ml) was the ORP case due to severe adhesion in Retzius space. For LRP and RALRP cases, the operative times seemed comparable and had EBL of ≤ 300 ml. All RPs were successful without any major intra-operative complication. There was no significant change in graft function. The restorations of urinary continence were within 1 month in RS-RALRP, approximately 6 months in RALRP, and about 1 year in ORP and LRP. Three patients with positive surgical margins had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence at the first follow-up and 1 had later PSA recurrence. Two patients with negative margins were free from biochemical recurrence at 47 and 3 months after their RP. Conclusions Our series suggested that all RP techniques are safe and feasible mode of treatment for localized prostate cancer in RTR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document