scholarly journals Patient Engagement in the Design of a Mobile Health App That Supports Enhanced Recovery Protocols for Cardiac Surgery: Development Study

10.2196/26597 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e26597
Author(s):  
Anna M Chudyk ◽  
Sandra Ragheb ◽  
David Kent ◽  
Todd A Duhamel ◽  
Carole Hyra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
End Users ◽  
Advisory Panel ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Recovery Protocols ◽  
The Impact

Background Despite the importance of their perspectives, end users (eg, patients, caregivers) are not typically engaged by academic researchers in the development of mobile health (mHealth) apps for perioperative cardiac surgery settings. Objective The aim of this study was to describe a process for and the impact of patient engagement in the development of an mHealth app that supports patient and caregiver involvement with enhanced recovery protocols during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. Methods Engagement occurred at the level of consultation and took the form of an advisory panel. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery (2017-2018) at St. Boniface Hospital (Winnipeg, Manitoba) and their caregivers were approached for participation. A qualitative exploration determined the impact of patient engagement on the development (ie, design and content) of the mHealth app. This included a description of (1) the key messages generated by the advisory panel, (2) how key messages were incorporated into the development of the mHealth app, and (3) feedback from the developers of the mHealth app about the key messages generated by the advisory panel. Results The advisory panel (N=10) generated 23 key messages to guide the development of the mHealth app. Key design-specific messages (n=7) centered around access, tracking, synchronization, and reminders. Key content-specific messages (n=16) centered around medical terms, professional roles, cardiac surgery procedures and recovery, educational videos, travel, nutrition, medications, resources, and physical activity. This information was directly incorporated into the design of the mHealth app as long as it was supported by the existing functionalities of the underlying platform. For example, the platform did not support the scheduling of reminders by users, identifying drug interactions, or synchronizing with other devices. The developers of the mHealth app noted that key messages resulted in the integration of a vast range and volume of information and resources instead of ones primarily focused on surgical information, content geared toward expectations management, and an expanded focus to include caregivers and other family members, so that these stakeholders may be directly included in the provision of information, allowing them to be better informed, prepare along with the patient, and be involved in recovery planning. Conclusions Patient engagement may facilitate the development of a detail-oriented and patient-centered mHealth app whose design and content are driven by the lived experiences of end users.

scholarly journals Patient Engagement in the Design of a Mobile Health App That Supports Enhanced Recovery Protocols for Cardiac Surgery: Development Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M Chudyk ◽  
Sandra Ragheb ◽  
David Kent ◽  
Todd A Duhamel ◽  
Carole Hyra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
End Users ◽  
Advisory Panel ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Recovery Protocols ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Despite the importance of their perspectives, end users (eg, patients, caregivers) are not typically engaged by academic researchers in the development of mobile health (mHealth) apps for perioperative cardiac surgery settings. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe a process for and the impact of patient engagement in the development of an mHealth app that supports patient and caregiver involvement with enhanced recovery protocols during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. METHODS Engagement occurred at the level of consultation and took the form of an advisory panel. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery (2017-2018) at St. Boniface Hospital (Winnipeg, Manitoba) and their caregivers were approached for participation. A qualitative exploration determined the impact of patient engagement on the development (ie, design and content) of the mHealth app. This included a description of (1) the key messages generated by the advisory panel, (2) how key messages were incorporated into the development of the mHealth app, and (3) feedback from the developers of the mHealth app about the key messages generated by the advisory panel. RESULTS The advisory panel (N=10) generated 23 key messages to guide the development of the mHealth app. Key design-specific messages (n=7) centered around access, tracking, synchronization, and reminders. Key content-specific messages (n=16) centered around medical terms, professional roles, cardiac surgery procedures and recovery, educational videos, travel, nutrition, medications, resources, and physical activity. This information was directly incorporated into the design of the mHealth app as long as it was supported by the existing functionalities of the underlying platform. For example, the platform did not support the scheduling of reminders by users, identifying drug interactions, or synchronizing with other devices. The developers of the mHealth app noted that key messages resulted in the integration of a vast range and volume of information and resources instead of ones primarily focused on surgical information, content geared toward expectations management, and an expanded focus to include caregivers and other family members, so that these stakeholders may be directly included in the provision of information, allowing them to be better informed, prepare along with the patient, and be involved in recovery planning. CONCLUSIONS Patient engagement may facilitate the development of a detail-oriented and patient-centered mHealth app whose design and content are driven by the lived experiences of end users.

scholarly journals Impact of patient engagement on the design of a mobile health technology for cardiac surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M Chudyk ◽  
Sandra Ragheb ◽  
David Kent ◽  
Todd Duhamel ◽  
Carole Hyra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Advisory Panel ◽  
Patient Journey ◽  
Mhealth Technology ◽  
The Impact

Objective The aims of this study were to describe the impact of patient engagement on the initial design and content of a mobile health (mHealth) technology that supports enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) for cardiac surgery. Methods Engagement occurred at the level of consultation and took the form of an advisory panel. Patients that underwent cardiac surgery (2017-2018) at St. Boniface Hospital (Winnipeg, Manitoba) and consented to be contacted about future research, and their caregivers, were approached for participation. A qualitative exploration was undertaken to determine advisory panel members key messages about, and the impact of, patient engagement on mHealth technology design and content. Results Ten individuals participated in the advisory panel. Key design-specific messages centered around access, tracking, synchronization, and reminders. Key content-specific messages centered around roles of cardiac surgery team members and medical terms, educational videos, information regarding cardiac surgery procedures, travel before/after surgery, nutrition (i.e., what to eat), medications (i.e., drug interactions), resources (i.e., medical devices), and physical activity (i.e., addressing fears and providing information, recommendations, and instructions). These key messages were a rich source of information for mHealth technology developers and were incorporated as supported by the existing capabilities of the underlying technology platform. Conclusions Patient engagement facilitated the development of a mHealth technology whose design and content were driven by the lived experiences of cardiac surgery patients and caregivers. The result was a detail-oriented and patient-centered mHealth technology that helps to empower and inform patients and their caregivers about the patient journey across the perioperative period of cardiac surgery.

scholarly journals Expanding Enhanced Recovery Protocols for Cardiac Surgery to Include the Patient Voice: a Scoping Review Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebojša Oravec ◽  
Rakesh C. Arora ◽  
Brian Bjorklund ◽  
April Gregora ◽  
Caroline Monnin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Recovery Protocols

Abstract Background Cardiac surgery is becoming increasingly common in older, more vulnerable adults. A focus on timely and complete medical and functional recovery has led to the development of enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) for a number of surgical procedures and subspecialties, including cardiac surgery (ERAS® Cardiac). An element that is often overlooked in the development and implementation of ERPs is the involvement of key stakeholder groups, including surgery patients and caregivers (e.g., family and/or friends). The aim of this study is to describe a protocol for a scoping review of cardiac patient and caregiver preferences and outcomes relevant to cardiac surgery ERPs. Methods Using Arskey and O’Malley’s six-stage framework for scoping review methodologies with adaptions from Levac et al., a scoping review of existing literature describing patient- and caregiver-identified preferences and outcomes as they relate to care received in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery will be undertaken. The search for relevant articles will be conducted using electronic databases (i.e., the Cochrane Library, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase), as well as through a search of the grey literature (e.g., CPG Infobase, Heart and Stroke Foundation, ProQuest Theses and Dissertations, Google Advanced and Prospero). Published and unpublished full-text articles written in English, published after the year 2000, and that relate to the research question will be included. Central to the design of this scoping review is our collaboration with two patient partners who possess lived experience as cardiac surgery patients. Discussion This review will identify strategies that can be integrated into ERPs for cardiac surgery which align with patient- and caregiver-defined values. Broadly, it is our goal to demonstrate the added value of patient engagement in research to aid in the success of system change processes.

scholarly journals Expanding enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery to include the patient voice: A scoping review protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebojša Oravec ◽  
Rakesh C. Arora ◽  
Brian Bjorklund ◽  
April Gregora ◽  
Caroline Monnin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Recovery Protocols

Abstract BackgroundCardiac surgery is becoming increasingly common in older, more vulnerable adults. A focus on timely and complete medical and functional recovery has led to the development of enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) for a number of surgical procedures and subspecialties, including cardiac surgery (ERAS® Cardiac). An element that is often overlooked in the development and implementation of ERPs is the involvement of key stakeholder groups, including surgery patients and caregivers (e.g., family and/or friends). The aim of this study is to describe a protocol for a scoping review of cardiac patient and caregiver preferences and outcomes relevant to cardiac surgery ERPs. MethodsUsing Arskey and O’Malley’s six-stage framework for scoping review methodologies with adaptions from Levac et al., a scoping review of existing literature describing patient- and caregiver-identified preferences and outcomes as they relate to care received in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery will be undertaken. The search for relevant articles will be conducted using electronic databases (i.e., the Cochrane Library, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase), as well as through a search of the grey literature (e.g., CPG Infobase, Heart and Stroke Foundation, ProQuest Theses and Dissertations, Google Advanced and Prospero). Published and unpublished full-text articles written in English, published after the year 2000, and that relate to the research question will be included. Central to the design of this scoping review is our collaboration with two patient partners who possess lived experience as cardiac surgery patients.DiscussionThis review will identify strategies that can be integrated into ERPs for cardiac surgery which align with patient- and caregiver-defined values. Broadly, it is our goal to demonstrate the added value of patient engagement in research to aid in the success of system change processes.

scholarly journals Expanding enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery to include the patient voice: a scoping review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebojša Oravec ◽  
Rakesh C. Arora ◽  
Brian Bjorklund ◽  
April Gregora ◽  
Caroline Monnin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Recovery Protocols

Abstract Background Cardiac surgery is becoming increasingly common in older, more vulnerable adults. A focus on timely and complete medical and functional recovery has led to the development of enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) for a number of surgical procedures and subspecialties, including cardiac surgery (ERAS® Cardiac). An element that is often overlooked in the development and implementation of ERPs is the involvement of key stakeholder groups, including surgery patients and caregivers (e.g., family and/or friends). The aim of this study is to describe a protocol for a scoping review of cardiac patient and caregiver preferences and outcomes relevant to cardiac surgery ERPs. Methods Using Arksey and O’Malley’s et al six-stage framework for scoping review methodologies with adaptions from Levac et al. (Represent Interv: 1–18, 2012), a scoping review of existing literature describing patient- and caregiver-identified preferences and outcomes as they relate to care received in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery will be undertaken. The search for relevant articles will be conducted using electronic databases (i.e., the Cochrane Library, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase), as well as through a search of the grey literature (e.g., CPG Infobase, Heart and Stroke Foundation, ProQuest Theses and Dissertations, Google Advanced, and Prospero). Published and unpublished full-text articles written in English, published after the year 2000, and that relate to the research question will be included. Central to the design of this scoping review is our collaboration with two patient partners who possess lived experience as cardiac surgery patients. Discussion This review will identify strategies that can be integrated into ERPs for cardiac surgery which align with patient- and caregiver-defined values. Broadly, it is our goal to demonstrate the added value of patient engagement in research to aid in the success of system change processes.

A Clinical Observational Study on the Application of Enhanced Recovery After Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Liao ◽  
Ping Che ◽  
Jun-Cai Li ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Xiong Yan
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Medical Costs ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: The safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) are unclear. The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the impact of ERAS protocols for LPD.Methods: Between March 2016 and December 2018, a total of 34 consecutive patients with ERAS for LPD were prospectively enrolled and compared with 68 consecutive patients previously treated for non-ERAS after LPD during an equal time frame. The intraoperative and postoperative data were collected and comparatively analyzed. Results: The mean length of postoperative hospital stay (15.8±3.4 and 23.1±5.1 days, P<0.001) and total medical costs (¥14.3±4.8 x104 and ¥15.8±4.9 x104, P=0.017) were reduced significantly in ER group than those in non-ER group. The operation time (462.7±117.0 vs 450.9±109.8 min, P=0.627) and intraoperative blood loss (523.5±270.0 vs 537.5±241.8 mL, P=0.800) were similar in the two groups. The complications of patients with ERAS protocols were not increased (P>0.05). No difference in mortality and readmission rates was found.Conclusions: The ERAS is safe and effective in the perioperative period of LPD. It could effectively reduce the length of postoperative stay and medical costs, and does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications.

scholarly journals Effect of Mechanical Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass On End-Expiratory Lung Volume in The Perioperative Period of Cardiac Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Trancart ◽  
Nathalie Rey ◽  
Vincent Scherrer ◽  
Véronique Wurtz ◽  
Fabrice Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Lung Volume ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Tertiary Teaching ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Residual Capacity ◽  
Tertiary Teaching Hospital ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Many studies explored the impact of ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass period. However, its effect on Functional residual capacity or End Expiratory Lung Volume (EELV) has not been specifically studied. Our objective was to compare the effect of two ventilation strategies during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on EELV. Methods observational monocenter study in a tertiary teaching hospital. Adult patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery by sternotomy were included and ventilated on the GE Carescape R860® ventilator. Maintenance of ventilation during CPB was left to the discretion of the medical team, with division between "ventilated" and "non-ventilated" groups afterwards. Iterative per and postoperative measurements of EELV were carried out by nitrogen washin-washout technique. Results 40 patients were included, 20 in each group. EELV was not significantly different between the ventilated versus non-ventilated groups at the end of surgery (1796±586ml vs. 1844±524ml; p=1). No significant difference between the two groups was observed on oxygenation, duration of mechanical ventilation, need postoperative respiratory support, occurrence of pneumopathy and radiographic atelectasis. Conclusion Maintaining mechanical ventilation during CPB does not seem to allow a better preservation of EELV in our population.

scholarly journals The impact of preoperative education in satisfaction and postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Antonia Kalogianni ◽  
Georgios Georgiadis ◽  
Olga Katselou ◽  
Olga Kadda ◽  
Aikaterini Sotiropoulou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Preoperative Education ◽  
Elective Cardiac Surgery ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The effectiveness of preoperative education in postoperative course of cardiac surgery patients has been questioned. Aim: To estimate the impact of preoperative education in satisfaction and postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Material and Method: A quasi-experimental trial was conducted. Sixty nine patients who admitted for elective cardiac surgery were divided randomly in intervention (34) and control group (35). Intervention group received written and verbal education based on patient centered communication by specially trained nurses. Patients’ satisfaction, postoperative complications and hospital length of stay (LOS) was measured. Results: Scores on all dimensions of satisfaction were greater for intervention group (p<0,001).No difference found for complications in intensive care unit (ICU) (p=0,150) in both groups. The total complications was lower (p=0,028) in intervention group with a lower proportion of arrhythmia (p=0,011). The median LOS in ICU was shorter for intervention group (p=0,035). No difference found in median hospital LOS in either group. Conclusions: Nurse-led preoperative education increases satisfaction of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and may have an effect on LOS shortening and complications control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document