scholarly journals Outsourcing the Remote Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Medical Care Quality Improvement Project

JMIR Cardio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e9815
Author(s):  
Gabriele Giannola ◽  
Riccardo Torcivia ◽  
Riccardo Airò Farulla ◽  
Tommaso Cipolla
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Remote Management

Background Remote management is partially replacing routine follow-up in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Although it reduces clinical staff time compared with standard in-office follow-up, a new definition of roles and responsibilities may be needed to review remote transmissions in an effective, efficient, and timely manner. Whether remote triage may be outsourced to an external remote monitoring center (ERMC) is still unclear. Objective The aim of this health care quality improvement project was to evaluate the feasibility of outsourcing remote triage to an ERMC to improve patient care and health care resource utilization. Methods Patients (N=153) with implanted CIEDs were followed up for 8 months. An ERMC composed of nurses and physicians reviewed remote transmissions daily following a specific remote monitoring (RM) protocol. A 6-month benchmarking phase where patients’ transmissions were managed directly by hospital staff was evaluated as a term of comparison. Results A total of 654 transmissions were recorded in the RM system and managed by the ERMC team within 2 working days, showing a significant time reduction compared with standard RM management (100% vs 11%, respectively, within 2 days; P<.001). A total of 84.3% (551/654) of the transmissions did not include a prioritized event and did not require escalation to the hospital clinician. High priority was assigned to 2.3% (15/654) of transmissions, which were communicated to the hospital team by email within 1 working day. Nonurgent device status events occurred in 88 cases and were communicated to the hospital within 2 working days. Of these, 11% (10/88) were followed by a hospitalization. Conclusions The outsourcing of RM management to an ERMC safely provides efficacy and efficiency gains in patients’ care compared with a standard in-hospital management. Moreover, the externalization of RM management could be a key tool for saving dedicated staff and facility time with possible positive economic impact. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01007474; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01007474

scholarly journals Outsourcing the Remote Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Medical Care Quality Improvement Project (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Giannola ◽  
Riccardo Torcivia ◽  
Riccardo Airò Farulla ◽  
Tommaso Cipolla
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Remote Management

BACKGROUND Remote management is partially replacing routine follow-up in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Although it reduces clinical staff time compared with standard in-office follow-up, a new definition of roles and responsibilities may be needed to review remote transmissions in an effective, efficient, and timely manner. Whether remote triage may be outsourced to an external remote monitoring center (ERMC) is still unclear. OBJECTIVE The aim of this health care quality improvement project was to evaluate the feasibility of outsourcing remote triage to an ERMC to improve patient care and health care resource utilization. METHODS Patients (N=153) with implanted CIEDs were followed up for 8 months. An ERMC composed of nurses and physicians reviewed remote transmissions daily following a specific remote monitoring (RM) protocol. A 6-month benchmarking phase where patients’ transmissions were managed directly by hospital staff was evaluated as a term of comparison. RESULTS A total of 654 transmissions were recorded in the RM system and managed by the ERMC team within 2 working days, showing a significant time reduction compared with standard RM management (100% vs 11%, respectively, within 2 days; <italic>P</italic>&lt;.001). A total of 84.3% (551/654) of the transmissions did not include a prioritized event and did not require escalation to the hospital clinician. High priority was assigned to 2.3% (15/654) of transmissions, which were communicated to the hospital team by email within 1 working day. Nonurgent device status events occurred in 88 cases and were communicated to the hospital within 2 working days. Of these, 11% (10/88) were followed by a hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS The outsourcing of RM management to an ERMC safely provides efficacy and efficiency gains in patients’ care compared with a standard in-hospital management. Moreover, the externalization of RM management could be a key tool for saving dedicated staff and facility time with possible positive economic impact. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01007474; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01007474

scholarly journals Is There a Future for Remote Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Management?

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haran Burri ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Device Management ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Remote Management ◽  
Cast Doubt ◽  
Implanted Devices

In the era of communication technology, remote monitoring has been a paradigm shift in the way patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices are managed. It has been endorsed by scientific societies and is being increasingly adopted in the clinical setting. Despite the various advantages associated with this strategy, data on improved clinical outcome are still sparse. The recently published study on the remote management of heart failure using implanted devices and formalised follow-up procedures, which turned out to be negative, has cast doubt on whether remote monitoring should still be used. This article provides a critical appraisal of the study, and discusses the issue of remote data management.

Canadian Registry of Electronic Device Outcomes: remote monitoring outcomes in the Abbott battery performance alert—a multicentre cohort

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharath Kumar ◽  
Jason Davis ◽  
Bernard Thibault ◽  
Iqwal Mangat ◽  
Benoit Coutu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Device Performance ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Multicentre Cohort

Abstract Aims Cardiac implantable electronic devices with device advisories have the potential of device malfunction. Remote monitoring (RM) of devices has been suggested to allow the identification of abnormal device performance and permit early intervention. We sought to describe the outcomes of patients with and without RM in devices subject to the Abbott Premature Battery Depletion (PBD) advisory with data from a Canadian registry. Methods and results Patients with an Abbott device subject to the PBD advisory from nine implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanting centres in Canada were included in the registry. The use of RM was identified from baseline and follow-up data in the registry. The primary outcome was detection of PBD and all-cause mortality. A total of 2666 patients were identified with a device subject to the advisory. In all, 1687 patients (63.2%) had RM at baseline. There were 487 deaths during follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 0.7 years, mortality was higher in those without a remote monitor compared with RM at baseline (24.7% vs. 14.5%; P &lt; 0.001). Pre-mature battery depletion was identified in 36 patients (2.1%) with RM vs. 7 (0.7%) without RM (P = 0.004). Time to battery replacement was significantly reduced in patients on RM (median 5 vs. 13 days, P = 0.001). Conclusion The use of RM in patients with ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy under advisory improved detection of PBD, time to device replacement, and was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. The factors influencing the association with mortality are unknown and deserve further study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document