scholarly journals The Systematic Medical Appraisal Referral and Treatment Mental Health Project: Quasi-Experimental Study to Evaluate a Technology-Enabled Mental Health Services Delivery Model Implemented in Rural India (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pallab K Maulik ◽  
Siddhardha Devarapalli ◽  
Sudha Kallakuri ◽  
Amritendu Bhattacharya ◽  
David Peiris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Primary Care Doctor ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Services Delivery ◽  
Health Project

BACKGROUND Although around 10% of Indians experience depression, anxiety, or alcohol use disorders, very few receive adequate mental health care, especially in rural communities. Stigma and limited availability of mental health services contribute to this treatment gap. The Systematic Medical Appraisal Referral and Treatment Mental Health project aimed to address this gap. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention in increasing the use of mental health services and reducing depression and anxiety scores among individuals at high risk of common mental disorders. METHODS A before-after study was conducted from 2014 to 2019 in 12 villages in Andhra Pradesh, India. The intervention comprised a community antistigma campaign, with the training of lay village health workers and primary care doctors to identify and manage individuals with stress, depression, and suicide risk using an electronic clinical decision support system. RESULTS In total, 900 of 22,046 (4.08%) adults screened by health workers had increased stress, depression, or suicide risk and were referred to a primary care doctor. At follow-up, 731 out of 900 (81.2%) reported visiting the doctor for their mental health symptoms, compared with 3.3% (30/900) at baseline (odds ratio 133.3, 95% CI 89.0 to 199.7; <i>P</i>&lt;.001). Mean depression and anxiety scores were significantly lower postintervention compared with baseline from 13.4 to 3.1 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) and from 12.9 to 1.9 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The intervention was associated with a marked increase in service uptake and clinically important reductions in depression and anxiety symptom scores. This will be further evaluated in a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial.

scholarly journals The Systematic Medical Appraisal Referral and Treatment Mental Health Project: Quasi-Experimental Study to Evaluate a Technology-Enabled Mental Health Services Delivery Model Implemented in Rural India

10.2196/15553 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. e15553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pallab K Maulik ◽  
Siddhardha Devarapalli ◽  
Sudha Kallakuri ◽  
Amritendu Bhattacharya ◽  
David Peiris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Primary Care Doctor ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Services Delivery ◽  
Health Project

Background Although around 10% of Indians experience depression, anxiety, or alcohol use disorders, very few receive adequate mental health care, especially in rural communities. Stigma and limited availability of mental health services contribute to this treatment gap. The Systematic Medical Appraisal Referral and Treatment Mental Health project aimed to address this gap. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention in increasing the use of mental health services and reducing depression and anxiety scores among individuals at high risk of common mental disorders. Methods A before-after study was conducted from 2014 to 2019 in 12 villages in Andhra Pradesh, India. The intervention comprised a community antistigma campaign, with the training of lay village health workers and primary care doctors to identify and manage individuals with stress, depression, and suicide risk using an electronic clinical decision support system. Results In total, 900 of 22,046 (4.08%) adults screened by health workers had increased stress, depression, or suicide risk and were referred to a primary care doctor. At follow-up, 731 out of 900 (81.2%) reported visiting the doctor for their mental health symptoms, compared with 3.3% (30/900) at baseline (odds ratio 133.3, 95% CI 89.0 to 199.7; P<.001). Mean depression and anxiety scores were significantly lower postintervention compared with baseline from 13.4 to 3.1 (P<.001) and from 12.9 to 1.9 (P<.001), respectively. Conclusions The intervention was associated with a marked increase in service uptake and clinically important reductions in depression and anxiety symptom scores. This will be further evaluated in a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial.

scholarly journals Operational challenges in conducting a community-based technology-enabled mental health services delivery model for rural India: Experiences from the SMART Mental Health Project

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Pallab K. Maulik ◽  
Sudha Kallakuri ◽  
Siddhardha Devarapalli
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Rural India ◽  
Operational Strategies ◽  
Health Services Delivery ◽  
Services Delivery ◽  
Health Project

Background: There are large gaps in the delivery of mental health care in low- and middle-income countries such as India, and the problems are even more acute in rural settings due to lack of resources, remoteness, and lack of infrastructure, amongst other factors. The Systematic Medical Appraisal Referral and Treatment (SMART) Mental Health Project was conceived as a mental health services delivery model using technology-based solutions for rural India. This paper reports on the operational strategies used to facilitate the implementation of the intervention. Method: Key components of the SMART Mental Health Project included delivering an anti-stigma campaign, training of primary health workers in screening, diagnosing and managing stress, depression and increased suicide risk and task sharing of responsibilities in delivering care; and using mobile technology based electronic decision support systems to support delivery of algorithm based care for such disorders. The intervention was conducted in 42 villages across two sites in the state of Andhra Pradesh in south India. A pre-post mixed methods evaluation was done, and in this paper operational challenges are reported. Results: Both quantitative and qualitative results from the evaluation from one site covering about 5000 adults showed that the intervention was feasible and acceptable, and initial results indicated that it was beneficial in increasing access to mental health care and reducing depression and anxiety symptoms. A number of strategies were initiated in response to operational challenges to ensure smoother conduct of the project and facilitated the project to be delivered as envisaged. Conclusions: The operational strategies initiated for this project were successful in ensuring the delivery of the intervention. Those, coupled with other more systematic processes have informed the researchers to understand key processes that need to be in place to develop a more robust study, that could eventually be scaled up.

scholarly journals Integrating Mental Health into Primary Care Using a Population Based Approach: Six Years Outcome of Aro Primary Care Mental Health Programme for Ogun State, Nigeria

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Ogun State ◽  
Primary Health

Introduction: Integration of mental health services into Primary Health Care (PHC) is a proven way of reducing the treatment gap in developing countries. A major constraint to scaling up mental health services in developing countries is scarcity of mental health professionals. A practical solution is to adopt task shifting and task sharing strategies involving Primary Health Care Workers (PHW). One of the major challenges of such integrative services is their long term outcomes and sustainability. The Neuropsychiatric Hospital Aro, Abeokuta, Nigeria embarked on mental health services provision across primary health care facilities in Ogun state six (6) years ago. Objective: This report describes the development, challenges of the programme and presents a post-implementation evaluation after 6 years of its commencement. Methods: Applying a population based expansion of pilot- tested integration model of Aro Primary Care Mental Health Programme (APCMHP) for Ogun State, 80 PHC workers were trained using an adapted mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) intervention guide to assess and treat/refer 5 priority conditions: Psychosis, Depression, Epilepsy, Alcohol and Substance abuse and Other Significant Emotional Complaints (OSEC).There was mental health service provision in 40 designated PHC centers across Ogun state. There was support and supervision of the trained health workers by field supervisors, supplementary training and re-training for skill sustenance, periodic stakeholders meeting with Local Government Service Commission, zonal consultants’ review, financial and other resources commitment by the hospital, monthly programme evaluation and monitoring by the faculty members. We reviewed caseload of patients managed by trained PHC Workers since commencement of the programme in November 2011 till October 2017 (6 years period) using descriptive statistics. Appropriate ethical approval was obtained. Results: During the six-year period (November 2011-October 2017), 2194 cases (average of 366 new cases yearly) were identified and treated by Trained Health Workers (THWs). About 90% of cases were Psychosis and Epilepsy. There was a steady attrition of THWs and at the end of the sixth year only 29% of the THWs remained within the programme. Treatment outcomes were fair as over 50% of patients had ≥ 3 follow-up visits, symptom remission of ≥ 30% and a subjective improvement in Global Ratings. Conclusion: Our project has demonstrated that it is feasible, practicable and cost effective with community acceptance to scale up mental health services at primary care setting in Nigeria using adapted mhGAP-IG document. The need to understand the dynamics and econometrics of sustainable primary mental health services is indicated.

scholarly journals Impact of integrated district level mental health care on clinical and functioning outcomes of people with depression and alcohol use disorder in Nepal: a non-randomised controlled study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. D. Jordans ◽  
E. C. Garman ◽  
N. P. Luitel ◽  
B. A. Kohrt ◽  
C. Lund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Primary Care Mental Health ◽  
Treatment Groups

Abstract Background Integration of mental health services into primary healthcare is proliferating in low-resource countries. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different compositions of primary care mental health services for depression and alcohol use disorder (AUD), when compared to usual primary care services. Methods We conducted a non-randomized controlled study in rural Nepal. We compared treatment outcomes among patients screening positive and receiving: (a) primary care mental health services without a psychological treatment component (TG); (b) the same services including a psychological treatment (TG + P); and (c) primary care treatment as usual (TAU). Primary outcomes included change in depression and AUD symptoms, as well as disability. Disability was measured using the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule. Symptom severity was assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire for depression, the 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test for AUD. We used negative binomial regression models for the analysis. Results For depression, when combining both treatment groups (TG, n = 77 and TG + P, n = 60) compared to TAU (n = 72), there were no significant improvements. When only comparing the psychological treatment group (TG + P) with TAU, there were significant improvements for symptoms and disability (aβ = − 2.64; 95%CI − 4.55 to − 0.74, p = 0.007; aβ = − 12.20; 95%CI − 19.79 to − 4.62; p = 0.002, respectively). For AUD, when combining both treatment groups (TG, n = 92 and TG + P, n = 80) compared to TAU (n = 57), there were significant improvements in AUD symptoms and disability (aβ = − 15.13; 95%CI − 18.63 to − 11.63, p < 0.001; aβ = − 9.26; 95%CI − 16.41 to − 2.12, p = 0.011; respectively). For AUD, there were no differences between TG and TG + P. Patients’ perceptions of health workers’ skills in common psychological factors were associated with improvement in depression patient outcomes (β = − 0.36; 95%CI − 0.55 to − 0.18; p < 0.001) but not for AUD patients. Conclusion Primary care mental health services for depression may only be effective when psychological treatments are included. Health workers’ competencies as perceived by patients may be an important indicator for treatment effect. AUD treatment in primary care appears to be beneficial even without additional psychological services.

scholarly journals Building a network to support people in suicide risk in Rio de Janeiro, from Primary Care to Mental Health Services

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio Rocha ◽  
Fabiane Minozzo ◽  
Debora Silva Teixeira ◽  
Laura de Carvalho Moraes Sarmento ◽  
Sandra Fortes
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Rio De Janeiro ◽  
Suicide Risk

scholarly journals A Multi-Site Study of Mental Disorders in the Mozambican Health Care System

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia Gouveia ◽  
Kathryn Lovero ◽  
Wilza Fumo ◽  
Afonso Mazine Tiago Fumo ◽  
Palmira Dos Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Public Mental Health

Abstract BackgroundIn Mozambique, human and financial resources for public mental health services are extremely limited. Understanding the mental health needs of those seeking healthcare can inform efficient targeting of mental health services. We examined if the frequency of mental disorders in a health facility varied based on the level of specialization of such facility, from primary care without mental health specialists (PrCMH-), to those with mental health specialists (PrCMH+) and tertiary care (TerC), where both inpatient and outpatient mental health services are available.MethodsParticipants were adults seeking health or mental health services at six facilities (2 PrCMH+, 3 PrCMH-, and 1 TerC) in the cities of Maputo and Nampula in Mozambique. Mental disorders were assessed by the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) 4.0.0. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics and MINI diagnoses across the three types of health facilities. Multiple logistic regression models determined the likelihood that a person seeking services at each type of facility would have any mental disorder, common mental disorders (CMD), severe mental disorders (SMD), substance use disorders (SUD), and moderate-to-high suicide risk, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. ResultsOf the 612 total participants, 52.6% (n=322) were positive for at least one mental disorder: 37.1% were positive for CMD, 28.9% for SMD, 13.2% for SUD, and 10.5% had suicide risk. Presence of any mental disorder was highest in TerC (62.5%) and lowest in PrCMH- (48.4%). Adjusting for sociodemographic covariates, participants in PrCMH+ were significantly more likely to have SMD (OR: 1.85, 95%CI: 1.10-3.11) and SUD (OR: 2.79, 95%CI: 1.31-5.94) than participants in PrCMH-; participants in TerC were more likely to have CMD (OR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.01-2.87) and SUD (OR: 2.57, 95%CI: 1.14-5.79) than in PrCMH-. Suicide risk was the only condition that did not differ across facility types.ConclusionsAs anticipated, people with mental disorders were more likely to be cared for at facilities with mental health specialists. However, our study suggests there is a remarkably high frequency of mental disorders across different types of facilities within the Mozambican healthcare system. These results suggest a need to increase mental health services at the primary care level.

scholarly journals Perception of service users and their caregivers on primary care-based mental health services: a qualitative study in Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. P. Luitel ◽  
M. J. D. Jordans ◽  
P. Subba ◽  
I. H. Komproe
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Service Users ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Primary Health

Abstract Background Integration of mental health services into primary health care systems has been advocated as a strategy to minimize the tremendous mental health treatment gap, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Barriers to integration of mental health into primary health care have been widely documented; however, very little is known about the perception of service users and their caregivers on primary care-based mental health services. This study assessed service users’ and caregivers’ perceptions of mental health services provided by trained primary health care workers in Nepal. Methods A qualitative study was conducted among people with depression, psychosis, alcohol use disorder and epilepsy, and their caregivers in Chitwan, a district in southern Nepal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 service users and 38 caregivers to assess their perceptions about the accessibility of the services, types of services they received, skills and competencies of health care providers, satisfaction and barriers to receiving services. Results Overall, both service users and caregivers were satisfied with the mental health services provided by primary health care providers. They also perceived health workers to be competent and skillful because the services they received were effective in reducing their mental health problems. Both psychological and pharmacological services were made available free of cost, however, they considered psychological services more effective than pharmacological treatment. Major challenges and difficulties accessing services were associated with frequent transfer of trained health workers, non-availability of the same health care provider at follow-ups, frequent stock-out of medicines or non-availability of required medicines, lack of a confidential space for consultation in health facilities, and stigmatizing and negative behavior of some health workers. Conclusion The results demonstrated that both service users and caregivers perceived primary care-based mental health services to be accessible, acceptable and effective. The key recommendations emerging from this study for improving mental health services in primary care include the provision of a separate cadre of psychosocial workers to provide psychological interventions, developing quick and efficient mechanisms for the procurement and supply of psychotropic medicines, establishing a confidential place within health facilities for consultation, and further training of health workers to reduce stigma.

scholarly journals Assessment and Management of Suicide Risk in Primary Care

Crisis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Saini ◽  
David While ◽  
Khatidja Chantler ◽  
Kirsten Windfuhr ◽  
Navneet Kapur
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Primary Care Practices ◽  
Risk Assessment And Management

Background: Risk assessment and management of suicidal patients is emphasized as a key component of care in specialist mental health services, but these issues are relatively unexplored in primary care services. Aims: To examine risk assessment and management in primary and secondary care in a clinical sample of individuals who were in contact with mental health services and died by suicide. Method: Data collection from clinical proformas, case records, and semistructured face-to-face interviews with general practitioners. Results: Primary and secondary care data were available for 198 of the 336 cases (59%). The overall agreement in the rating of risk between services was poor (overall κ = .127, p = .10). Depression, care setting (after discharge), suicidal ideation at last contact, and a history of self-harm were associated with a rating of higher risk. Suicide prevention policies were available in 25% of primary care practices, and 33% of staff received training in suicide risk assessments. Conclusion: Risk is difficult to predict, but the variation in risk assessment between professional groups may reflect poor communication. Further research is required to understand this. There appears to be a relative lack of suicide risk assessment training in primary care.

scholarly journals Process evaluation of a district mental healthcare plan in Nepal: a mixed-methods case study

BJPsych Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagendra P. Luitel ◽  
Erica Breuer ◽  
Anup Adhikari ◽  
Brandon A. Kohrt ◽  
Crick Lund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Healthcare Plan ◽  
Facilitating Factors ◽  
Psychotropic Medicines

Background The PRogramme for Improving Mental Health carE (PRIME) evaluated the process and outcomes of the implementation of a mental healthcare plan (MHCP) in Chitwan, Nepal. Aims To describe the process of implementation, the barriers and facilitating factors, and to evaluate the process indicators of the MHCP. Method A case study design that combined qualitative and quantitative methods based on a programme theory of change (ToC) was used and included: (a) district-, community- and health-facility profiles; (b) monthly implementation logs; (c) pre- and post-training evaluation; (d) out-patient clinical data and (e) qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers. Results The MHCP was able to achieve most of the indicators outlined by the ToC. Of the total 32 indicators, 21 (66%) were fully achieved, 10 (31%) partially achieved and 1 (3%) were not achieved at all. The proportion of primary care patients that received mental health services increased by 1200% over the 3-year implementation period. Major barriers included frequent transfer of trained health workers, lack of confidential space for consultation, no mental health supervision in the existing system, and stigma. Involvement of Ministry of Health, procurement of new psychotropic medicines through PRIME, motivation of health workers and the development of a new supervision system were key facilitating factors. Conclusions Effective implementation of mental health services in primary care settings require interventions to increase demand for services and to ensure there is clinical supervision for health workers, private rooms for consultations, a separate cadre of psychosocial workers and a regular supply of psychotropic medicines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document