scholarly journals Enhanced recovery programme for open liver resection improves hospital costs and two-year survival without increasing costs in primary care. (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris N Jones ◽  
Ben L Morrison ◽  
Leigh J S Kelliher ◽  
Matthew Dickinson ◽  
Michael Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Open Liver Resection ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

BACKGROUND The clinical benefits of enhanced recovery programmes [ERPs] have been extensively researched, but few studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of programmes. This study follows on from a previous randomised controlled trial. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and impaxct upon long-term survival of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for patients undergoing open liver resection surgery. METHODS A decision-analytic model was used to compare the study endpoint Enhanced Recovery versus standard care provided to patient with open liver resection. Outcomes obtained were costs per life-years gained. Resource use and costs were estimated from the National Health System perspective. The Decision tree and Markov Model were constructed using the original results and augmented by external data of published clinical trials. RESULTS Patients receiving Enhanced Recovery had an average life expectancy of 6.9 years versus 6.1 years in the standard group. Costs were 9538.279 GBP for ERP and 14793.05 GBP for standard treatment. This results in a cost-effectiveness ratio of -6748.33 GBP/QALY. Patients required fewer visits to their GP (p=0.006) and required less help at home with day to day activities (p=0.036). Survival at 2 years was 91.3% (ERP) vs 71.3% for the standard care group (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Enhanced Recovery for open liver resection can improve medium-term survival and is cost effective for both hospital and community settings. CLINICALTRIAL ISRCTN03274575 - http://www.controlled-trials.com

scholarly journals The cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: exploring the Italian National Health System perspective and different patient risk groups

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Lorenzoni ◽  
G. Barbieri ◽  
F. Saia ◽  
F. Meucci ◽  
G. L. Martinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Italian National Health ◽  
Valve Implantation ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Objectives To assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in Italy, considering patient groups with different surgical risk. Methods A Markov model with a 1-month cycle length, comprising eight different health states, defined by the New York Heart Association functional classes (NYHA I–IV), with and without stroke plus death, was used to estimate the CE of TAVI for intermediate-, high-risk and inoperable patients considering surgical aortic valve replacement or medical treatment as comparators according to the patient group. The Italian National Health System perspective and 15-year time horizon were considered. In the base-case analysis, effectiveness data were retrieved from published efficacy data and total direct costs (euros) were estimated from national tariffs. A scenario analysis considering a micro-costing approach to estimate procedural costs was also considered. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was expressed both in terms of costs per life years gained (LYG) and costs per quality adjusted life years (QALY). All outcomes and costs were discounted at 3% per annum. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to assess robustness of results. Results Over a 15-year time horizon, the higher acquisition costs for TAVI were partially offset in all risk groups because of its effectiveness and safety profile. ICERs were €8338/QALY, €11,209/QALY and €10,133/QALY, respectively, for intermediate-, high-risk and inoperable patients. ICER values were slightly higher in the scenario analysis. PSA suggested consistency of results. Conclusions TAVI would be considered cost-effective at frequently cited willingness-to-pay thresholds; further studies could clarify the CE of TAVI in real-life scenarios.

scholarly journals Choice across 10 pharmacologic combination strategies for type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BMC Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyan Gu ◽  
Lizheng Shi ◽  
Hui Shao ◽  
Xiaoyong Wang ◽  
Xiaoqian Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Oral Drug ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Treatment Comparison ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Background Clinical guidelines recommend a stepped-escalation treatment strategy for type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Across multiple treatment strategies varying in efficacy and costs, no clinical or economic studies directly compared them. This study aims to estimate and compare the cost-effectiveness of 10 commonly used pharmacologic combination strategies for T2DM. Methods Based on Chinese guideline and practice, 10 three-stepwise add-on strategies were identified, which start with metformin, then switch to metformin plus one oral drug (i.e., sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, α-glucosidase inhibitor, glinide, or DPP-4 inhibitor) as second line, and finally switch to metformin plus one injection (i.e., insulin or GLP-1 receptor agonist) as third line. A cohort of 10,000 Chinese patients with newly diagnosed T2DM was established. From a healthcare system perspective, the Cardiff model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the strategies, with clinical data sourced from a systematic review and indirect treatment comparison of 324 trials, costs from claims data of 1164 T2DM patients, and utilities from an EQ-5D study. Outcome measures include costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and net monetary benefits (NMBs). Results Over 40-year simulation, the costs accumulated for a patient ranged from $7661 with strategy 1 to $14,273 with strategy 10, while the QALY gains ranged from 13.965 with strategy 1 to 14.117 with strategy 8. Strategy 7 was dominant over seven strategies (strategies 2~6, 9~10) with higher QALYs but lower costs. Additionally, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $30,787/QALY (i.e., 3 times GDP/capita for China), strategy 7 was cost-effective compared with strategy 1 (ICER of strategy 7 vs. 1, $3371/QALY) and strategy 8 (ICER of strategy 8 vs. 7, $132,790/QALY). Ranking the strategies by ICERs and NMBs, strategy 7 provided the best value for money when compared to all other strategies, followed by strategies 5, 9, 8, 1, 3, 6, 10, 2, and 4. Scenario analyses showed that patients insist on pharmacologic treatments increased their QALYs (0.456~0.653) at an acceptable range of cost increase (ICERs, $1450/QALY~$12,360/QALY) or even at cost saving compared with those not receive treatments. Conclusions This study provides evidence-based references for diabetes management. Our findings can be used to design the essential drug formulary, infer clinical practice, and help the decision-maker design reimbursement policy.

Cost-Effectiveness of Skin Surveillance Through a Specialized Clinic for Patients at High Risk of Melanoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline G. Watts ◽  
Anne E. Cust ◽  
Scott W. Menzies ◽  
Graham J. Mann ◽  
Rachael L. Morton
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life ◽  
High Risk Clinic

Purpose Clinical guidelines recommend that people at high risk of melanoma receive regular surveillance to improve survival through early detection. A specialized High Risk Clinic in Sydney, Australia was found to be effective for this purpose; however, wider implementation of this clinical service requires evidence of cost-effectiveness and data addressing potential overtreatment of suspicious skin lesions. Patients and Methods A decision-analytic model was built to compare the costs and benefits of specialized surveillance compared with standard care over a 10-year period, from a health system perspective. A high-risk standard care cohort was obtained using linked population data, comprising the Sax Institute’s 45 and Up cohort study, linked to Medicare Benefits Schedule claims data, the cancer registry, and hospital admissions data. Benefits were measured in quality-adjusted life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken for all model parameters. Results Specialized surveillance through the High Risk Clinic was both less expensive and more effective than standard care. The mean saving was A$6,828 (95% CI, $5,564 to $8,092) per patient, and the mean quality-adjusted life-year gain was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.35). The main drivers of the differences were detection of melanoma at an earlier stage resulting in less extensive treatment and a lower annual mean excision rate for suspicious lesions in specialized surveillance (0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91) compared with standard care (2.55; 95% CI, 2.34 to 2.76). The results were robust when tested in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Specialized surveillance was a cost-effective strategy for the management of individuals at high risk of melanoma. There were also fewer invasive procedures in specialized surveillance compared with standard care in the community.

Cost-Effectiveness of Deferasirox (Exjade®) Versus No Chelation In Patients with Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Canadian Perspective

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4962-4962
Author(s):  
Khalid El Ouagari ◽  
Kristen Migliaccio-Walle ◽  
Helen Lau ◽  
Duygu Bozkaya
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Chelation Therapy ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Base Case ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Healthcare System Perspective ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Canadian Healthcare

Abstract Abstract 4962 Introduction: Guidelines for the treatment of MDS recommend iron chelation therapy (ICT) in iron-overloaded lower-risk patients with MDS and candidates for stem cell transplantation. In particular, recent reports indicate that ICT may improve overall survival (OS) in transfusion-dependent patients with low or intermediate-1 (int-1) MDS as per international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) criteria. Deferasirox is a once-daily oral chelator, with easy administration and potentially better compliance. The goal of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of deferasirox compared to receiving no chelation therapy in transfusion-dependent patients with lower-risk MDS from a Canadian healthcare system perspective. Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of deferasirox compared to receiving no chelation therapy in transfusion-dependent patients with lower-risk (eg, IPSS low or int-1) MDS. The data used in the model were obtained from published or presented studies. Model outcomes, including life years (LY) gained, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, developing complications of iron overload, progressing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), death, and direct medical costs of ICT, transfusion, complications and AML, were estimated for each treatment group based on a simulation of 1000 patient lives. Finally, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated as the ratio of total medical costs to LY and QALY gains. Extensive one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the effects of changes in key model parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. The outcomes of the model were evaluated over a 20-year time frame and discounted annually at the rate of 5%. Costs are reported in 2009 Canadian dollars (CAD$). Results: Under base case assumptions, patients receiving deferasirox were less likely to progress to cardiac disease, AML, and death compared to patients receiving no chelation therapy. Adding deferasirox was projected to increase OS by 4.46 years (undiscounted); discounting for time, OS was projected to be increased by 2.93 years. Furthermore, undiscounted QALYs were increased by 4.20 years and discounted QALYs, by 2.99 years. The clinical benefits of deferasirox are obtained at an additional expected discounted total lifetime cost of CAD$185,429. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were therefore estimated to be CAD$62,001/QALY gained and CAD$63,286/LY saved. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed the base case results to be robust with respect to variations in assumptions and estimates. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve shows that deferasirox was preferred to no treatment in 96% of simulations when the willingness to pay for a QALY was CAD$100,000. Conclusion: The results of our analysis indicate that deferasirox offers a cost-effective treatment option for patients with lower-risk MDS as the ICER is within the thresholds that are considered acceptable (ie, $50,000 to $100,000 per QALY gained), from a Canadian healthcare system perspective. Additional clinical studies are ongoing to evaluate event-free survival with deferasirox in patients with lower-risk MDS and transfusional iron overload. Disclosures: El Ouagari: Novartis: Employment. Migliaccio-Walle: Novartis: Research Funding. Lau: Novartis: Employment. Bozkaya: Novartis: Research Funding.

Anticoagulation in Ambulatory Cancer Patients

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2071-2071
Author(s):  
Allyson Pishko ◽  
Kenneth J. Smith ◽  
Margaret V. Ragni
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Relative Mortality ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Abstract 2071 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is increased in patients with malignancy, occurring in up to 20%, and is a major cause of cancer mortality. VTE prophylaxis is currently recommended for inpatients with malignancy and in those undergoing surgery (Chest 2008). Despite evidence that low molecular weight heparin (LWMH) has anti-tumor effect and improves short-term survival (Cochrane, 2011), the cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation in ambulatory cancer patients is unknown. Methods: We constructed a Markov model to evaluate prophylactic AC in ambulatory cancer patients with no previous VTE, during 4 months of chemotherapy following diagnosis. In the model, AC was enoxaparin. Major and minor bleeding risk, VTE risk, mortality, and other clinical parameters were obtained from the Cochrane 2011 analysis and other published studies. Drug costs were based on average wholesale price. Outcomes included medical costs, effectiveness measured by mortality reduction, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 24-month time horizon. Results: Base case results are shown in the Table. Compared with no LMWH, primary prophylaxis with LMWH in ambulatory cancer patients over a 4-month period was associated with a relative mortality risk of 0.92 over 24 months (relative risk reduction of 0.08), at a gain of 0.0484 QALY, for an ICER of $76,922/QALY gained, well within the accepted $100,000/QALY threshold. The results were not sensitive to variation in VTE relative risk (RR) with AC (base case RR 0.55), nor to AC-associated major bleeding (base case RR 1.3) or minor bleeding (base case RR 1.05) risks. Variation of the relative mortality risk with AC to ≥ 0.94, or the cost of AC (Figure) to ≥ $1,429/month (base $1,132), increased the ICER to >$100,000/QALY. Discussion: Prophylactic AC appears cost-effective in ambulatory cancer patients during the first four months of chemotherapy. Clinical trials will be needed to confirm the survival benefit of LMWH prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Economic evaluation of a nurse-led home and clinic-based secondary prevention programme to prevent progressive cardiac dysfunction in high-risk individuals: The Nurse-led Intervention for Less Chronic Heart Failure (NIL-CHF) randomized controlled study

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoko Maru ◽  
Joshua Byrnes ◽  
Melinda J Carrington ◽  
Yih-Kai Chan ◽  
Simon Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Dysfunction ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
The Cost

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a long-term, nurse-led, multidisciplinary programme of home/clinic visits in preventing progressive cardiac dysfunction in patients at risk of developing de novo chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods: A trial-based analysis was conducted alongside a pragmatic, single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial of 611 patients (mean age: 66 years) with subclinical cardiovascular diseases (without CHF) discharged to home from an Australian tertiary referral hospital. A nurse-led home and clinic-based programme (NIL-CHF intervention, n = 301) was compared with standard care ( n=310) in terms of life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthcare costs. The uncertainty around the incremental cost and QALYs was quantified by bootstrap simulations and displayed on a cost-effectiveness plane. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, there were no significant between-group differences in life-years (−0.056, p=0.488) and QALYs (−0.072, p=0.399), which were lower in the NIL-CHF group. The NIL-CHF group had slightly lower all-cause hospitalization costs (AUD$2943 per person; p=0.219), cardiovascular-related hospitalization costs (AUD$1142; p=0.592) and a more pronounced reduction in emergency/unplanned hospitalization costs (AUD$4194 per person; p=0.024). When the cost of intervention was added to all-cause, cardiovascular and emergency-related readmissions, the reductions in the NIL-CHF group were AUD$2742 ( p=0.313), AUD$941 ( p=0.719) and AUD$3993 ( p=0.046), respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD$50,000/QALY, the probability of the NIL-CHF intervention being better-valued was 19%. Conclusions: Compared with standard care, the NIL-CHF intervention was not a cost-effective strategy as life-years and QALYs were slightly lower in the NIL-CHF group. However, it was associated with modest reductions in emergency/unplanned readmission costs.

scholarly journals Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection

2013 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
pp. 1015-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jones ◽  
L. Kelliher ◽  
M. Dickinson ◽  
A. Riga ◽  
T. Worthington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Open Liver Resection

Model to assess the cost-effectiveness of new treatments for depression

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrik Sobocki ◽  
Mattias Ekman ◽  
Hans Ågren ◽  
Bengt Jönsson ◽  
Clas Rehnberg
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Full Remission ◽  
Life Years ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
The Cost

Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop a model to assess the cost-effectiveness of a new treatment for patients with depression.Methods: A Markov simulation model was constructed to evaluate standard care for depression as performed in clinical practice compared with a new treatment for depression. Costs and effects were estimated for time horizons of 6 months to 5 years. A naturalistic longitudinal observational study provided data on costs, quality of life, and transition probabilities. Data on long-term consequences of depression and mortality risks were collected from the literature. Cost-effectiveness was quantified as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from the new treatment compared with standard care, and the societal perspective was taken. Probabilistic analyses were conducted to present the uncertainty in the results, and sensitivity analyses were conducted on key parameters used in the model.Results: Compared with standard care, the new hypothetical therapy was predicted to substantially decrease costs and was also associated with gains in QALYs. With an improved treatment effect of 50 percent on achieving full remission, the net cost savings were 20,000 Swedish kronor over a 5-year follow-up time, given equal costs of treatments. Patients gained .073 QALYs over 5 years. The results are sensitive to changes in assigned treatment effects.Conclusions: The present study provides a new model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of treatments for depression by incorporating full remission as the treatment goal and QALYs as the primary outcome measure. Moreover, we show the usefulness of naturalistic real-life data on costs and quality of life and transition probabilities when modeling the disease over time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document