scholarly journals Testing Behavior Change Techniques to Encourage Primary Care Physicians to Access Cancer Screening Audit and Feedback Reports: Protocol for a Factorial Randomized Experiment of Email Content (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gratianne Vaisson ◽  
Holly O Witteman ◽  
Zachary Bouck ◽  
Caroline A Bravo ◽  
Laura Desveaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Behavior Change ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Feedback Report ◽  
Behavior Change Techniques

BACKGROUND Cancer Care Ontario’s Screening Activity Report (SAR) is an online audit and feedback tool designed to help primary care physicians in Ontario, Canada, identify patients who are overdue for cancer screening or have abnormal results requiring follow-up. Use of the SAR is associated with increased screening rates. To encourage SAR use, Cancer Care Ontario sends monthly emails to registered primary care physicians announcing that updated data are available. However, analytics reveal that 50% of email recipients do not open the email and less than 7% click the embedded link to log in to their report. OBJECTIVE The goal of the study is to determine whether rewritten emails result in increased log-ins. This manuscript describes how different user- and theory-informed messages intended to improve the impact of the monthly emails will be experimentally tested and how a process evaluation will explore why and how any effects observed were (or were not) achieved. METHODS A user-centered approach was used to rewrite the content of the monthly email, including messages operationalizing 3 behavior change techniques: anticipated regret, material incentive (behavior), and problem solving. A pragmatic, 2x2x2 factorial experiment within a multiphase optimization strategy will test the redesigned emails with an embedded qualitative process evaluation to understand how and why the emails may or may not have worked. Trial outcomes will be ascertained using routinely collected administrative data. Physicians will be recruited for semistructured interviews using convenience and snowball sampling. RESULTS As of April 2017, 5576 primary care physicians across the province of Ontario, Canada, had voluntarily registered for the SAR, and in so doing, signed up to receive the monthly email updates. From May to August 2017 participants received the redesigned monthly emails with content specific to their allocated experimental condition prompting use of the SAR. We have not yet begun analyses. CONCLUSIONS This study will inform how to communicate effectively with primary care providers by email and identify which behavior change techniques tested are most effective at encouraging engagement with an audit and feedback report. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03124316; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03124316 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6w2MqDWGu)

scholarly journals Testing e-mail content to encourage physicians to access an audit and feedback tool: a factorial randomized experiment

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Vaisson ◽  
H. O. Witteman ◽  
S. Chipenda-Dansokho ◽  
M. Saragosa ◽  
Z. Bouck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Factorial Experiment ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Behaviour Change Techniques ◽  
E Mail

Background In Ontario, an online audit and feedback tool that provides primary care physicians with detailed information about patients who are overdue for cancer screening is underused. In the present study, we aimed to examine the effect of messages operationalizing 3 behaviour change techniques on access to the audit and feedback tool and on cancer screening rates.Methods During May–September 2017, a pragmatic 2×2×2 factorial experiment tested 3 behaviour change techniques: anticipated regret, material incentive, and problem-solving. Outcomes were assessed using routinely collected administrative data. A qualitative process evaluation explored how and why the e-mail messages did or did not support Screening Activity Report access.Results Of 5449 primary care physicians randomly allocated to 1 of 8 e-mail messages, fewer than half opened the messages and fewer than 1 in 10 clicked through the messages. Messages with problem-solving content were associated with a 12.9% relative reduction in access to the tool (risk ratio: 0.871; 95% confidence interval: 0.791 to 0.958; p = 0.005), but a 0.3% increase in cervical cancer screening (rate ratio: 1.003; 95% confidence interval: 1.001 to 1.006; p = 0.003). If true, that association would represent 7568 more patients being screened. No other significant effects were observed.Conclusions For audit and feedback to work, recipients must engage with the data; for e-mail messages to prompt activity, recipients must open and review the message content. This large factorial experiment demonstrated that small changes in the content of such e-mail messages might influence clinical behaviour. Future research should focus on strategies to make cancer screening more user-centred.

scholarly journals Involvement of Primary Care Physicians in the Decision Making and Care of Patients With Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (33) ◽  
pp. 3969-3975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren P. Wallner ◽  
Paul Abrahamse ◽  
Jaspreet K. Uppal ◽  
Christopher R. Friese ◽  
Ann S. Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Patient Reported

Purpose Collaborative care between cancer specialists and primary care providers (PCPs) may improve the delivery of high-quality cancer care. Yet, patient perspectives about how involved the PCPs were in their breast cancer care and treatment decisions remain unknown. Patients and Methods A weighted random sample of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer in 2013 to 2014, as reported to the SEER registries in Los Angeles, California, and Georgia, were sent a survey approximately 6 months after diagnosis (N = 2,279, 71% response rate). The distributions of patient-perceived PCP quality (six questions about PCP access and awareness of values) and the following three measures of patient-reported PCP involvement were assessed: how informed the respondent felt her PCP was about her breast cancer (engagement); how often the respondent talked with her PCP (communication); and how often the respondent felt the PCP participated in treatment decisions (participation). Adjusted mean scores of patient-reported satisfaction with and deliberation about the surgical treatment decision were then compared across levels of PCP engagement, communication, and participation using multivariable linear regression. Results The majority of women in this sample perceived high PCP quality (63.6%), high PCP breast cancer engagement (66.2%), and high PCP communication (69.1%). More than a third of women (35.4%) reported that their PCP participated in their treatment decisions. Higher PCP engagement was associated with higher decision satisfaction when compared with low PCP engagement (adjusted P = .003). Conclusion Patient perceptions of PCP quality and PCP involvement in breast cancer care during treatment are high for most women, and PCPs often participate in breast cancer treatment decisions. However, PCP involvement did not lead to meaningful improvements in patients’ appraisals of their decision making.

scholarly journals Online Ratings of Primary Care Physicians: Comparison of Gender, Training, and Specialty

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110077
Author(s):  
Daliah Wachs ◽  
Victoria Lorah ◽  
Allison Boynton ◽  
Amanda Hertzler ◽  
Brandon Nichols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Female Physicians ◽  
Online Ratings ◽  
And Gender

The purpose of this study was to explore patient perceptions of primary care providers and their offices relative to their physician’s philosophy (medical degree [MD] vs doctorate in osteopathic medicine [DO]), specialty (internal medicine vs family medicine), US region, and gender (male vs female). Using the Healthgrades website, the average satisfaction rating for the physician, office parameters, and wait time were collected and analyzed for 1267 physicians. We found female doctors tended to have lower ratings in the Midwest, and staff friendliness of female physicians were rated lower in the northwest. In the northeast, male and female MDs were rated more highly than DOs. Wait times varied regionally, with northeast and northwest regions having the shortest wait times. Overall satisfaction was generally high for most physicians. Regional differences in perception of a physician based on gender or degree may have roots in local culture, including proximity to a DO school, comfort with female physicians, and expectations for waiting times.

scholarly journals Acceptability, utility, and cost of an mHealth cancer screening education application for training primary care physicians in India

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujha Subramanian ◽  
Regi Jose ◽  
Anoop Lal ◽  
Paul Augustine ◽  
Madeleine Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Primary Care Physicians

Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices in Alabama: A Survey of Primary Care Physicians

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Chapman ◽  
Keith Nicholls ◽  
Margaret M. Sullivan ◽  
Susan Crutchfield ◽  
Thomas Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Screening Practices

Are primary care physicians aware of peripheral artery disease risk reduction and management in the Saudi healthcare transformation era? A health cluster observational study

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110443
Author(s):  
Sultan Alsheikh ◽  
Hesham AlGhofili ◽  
Omar A Alayed ◽  
Abdulkareem Aldrak ◽  
Kaisor Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Artery Disease

Introduction Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are often underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of the recommended target levels of blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin A1C, and knowledge and attitude about PAD risk reduction therapies among physicians working in primary care settings in Saudi Arabia. Methods This observational cross-sectional study included family medicine consultants, residents, and general practitioners working in a health cluster in the capital city of Saudi Arabia using a self-administered questionnaire. Results Of the 129 physicians who completed the survey, 55% had completed PAD-related continuing medical education hours within the past 2 years. Despite this, the knowledge score of the recommended target levels was high in only 13.2% of the participants. Antiplatelet therapy was prescribed by 68.2% of the participants. Conclusion Here we identified the knowledge and action gaps among primary care providers in Saudi Arabia. Physicians had an excellent attitude about screening for and counseling about risk factors. However, they showed less interference in reducing these risk factors. We recommend addressing these knowledge gaps early in medical school and residency programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document