scholarly journals Foreign Investor’s Interest and Tax Avoidance: Contingency Perspectives Depended on Country’s Protection Level and Law Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Dielanova Wynni Yuanita ◽  
Christine Novita Dewi ◽  
Arief Zuliyanto Susilo ◽  
Kusharyanti Kusharyanti
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Investor Protection ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Protection Level ◽  
Contingent Behavior ◽  
Avoidance Contingency ◽  
Avoidance Behaviors

This study investigates differences in firms’ tax avoidances between multinational and national. Furthermore, it investigates the differences between firms’ contingent behavior because of the country’s investor protection level and law systems. This research takes into account the firms’ tax avoidance phenomenon. Besides that, it proposes novelties as follows. First, this study highlights that multinational firms tend to avoid taxes higher than national ones. Second, it induces the dividend catering theory related to the country’s investor protection. The latest, it persuades that country’s investor protection, and law systems make firms contingent on their tax avoidance behaviors. This study finds that firms where they live in high investors’ protection countries and common law did higher tax avoidance than others. The findings imply that these firms could grow higher than others. It means that this study suggests economic consequences. The consequence is that a country should increase its investors’ protection level and somehow redefine its law systems. Therefore, it could enhance its capital market and subsequently improve the national welfares.

Investor protection: effects of takeover convergence

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyoti Dixit ◽  
Poonam Singh ◽  
Arunima Haldar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Investor Protection ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Emerging Economy ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Global Standards ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanism

Purpose Takeovers play a critical role as an external corporate governance mechanism to ensure investor protection. There is a long-standing debate on whether the convergence of corporate governance to global standards can enable emerging economies to ensure investor protection. This paper aims to analyse the evolution of the takeover code, namely, Securities Exchange Board of India’s Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (2011) in India from the lens of investor protection. It then compares the takeover provisions in India, the USA, the UK, Singapore and Australia to examine the extent of convergence and its implications for investor protection. Design/methodology/approach Using a cross-national comparative analysis of takeover mechanisms in common law countries, the study analyses the extent and relevance of convergence in form. The focus of the comparison is on regulations governing offer size, offer price, creeping acquisition and initial trigger limit for the mandatory open offer. Findings The findings suggest that certain provisions such as the initial trigger threshold for the mandatory offer and the offer prices of the Indian takeover code are converging with the standards in common law countries. However, the offer price determination based on market prices may not reflect true market value in an inefficient market like India. Other provisions such as creeping acquisition and offer size are not only diverging from the international standards but are also inconsistent with the key objective of investor protections of the Indian regulator. Research limitations/implications Indian takeover regulation needs to converge to higher global standards to ensure adherence to improved investor protection. This needs to be done for the initial trigger limit for mandatory bid and offer prices, after accounting for the differences in institutional structure. The Indian regulators need to revisit provisions on the initial trigger, creeping acquisition to converge to the broader principle of investor protection. Originality/value This technical paper provides a comprehensive depiction of takeover mechanisms in an emerging economy context as a means of investor protection. Further using a comparative lens, it analyses the relevance of convergence of takeover laws. Thus, advances the theoretical knowledge of limited extant work on external corporate governance mechanism in an emerging economy context.

scholarly journals Are Less Developed Countries More Exposed to Multinational Tax Avoidance? Method and Evidence from Micro-Data

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 790-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Johannesen ◽  
Thomas Tørsløv ◽  
Ludvig Wier
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Less Developed Countries ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Profit Shifting ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Data Requirements

Abstract This paper uses a global dataset with information about 210,000 corporations in 142 countries to investigate whether tax avoidance by multinational firms is more prevalent in less-developed countries. The paper proposes a novel approach to studying cross-border profit shifting, which has relatively low data requirements and is therefore particularly well-suited for the context of developing countries. The results consistently show that the sensitivity of reported profits to profit-shifting incentives is negatively related to the level of economic and institutional development. This may explain why many developing countries opt for low corporate tax rates in spite of urgent revenue needs and severe constraints on the use of other tax bases.

Challenges of Monitoring Tax Compliance by Multinational Firms: Evidence from Chile

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 500-505
Author(s):  
Sebastián Bustos ◽  
Dina Pomeranz ◽  
José Vila-Belda ◽  
Gabriel Zucman
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Tax Compliance ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Profit Shifting ◽  
Effective Tax Rates ◽  
Arm’S Length Principle ◽  
Debt Shifting

This paper reviews common challenges of taxing multinational firms, using Chile as a case study. We briefly describe key international tax avoidance methods: profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions through transfer pricing and debt shifting. We discuss the prevalent policy to tax multinationals--the arm's length principle--and alternative proposals using apportionment formulas. Novel data from Chile show that multinationals make up a large share of GDP but report lower profit and effective tax rates than local firms. In 2011, Chile implemented a reform following OECD guidelines to enforce the arm's length principle. We discuss potential effects on tax collection and welfare.

scholarly journals Prospectus Liability and Investor Protection in Quebec Law

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 745-796
Author(s):  
Robert Demers
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Investor Protection ◽  
Prospectus Liability ◽  
Donne Lieu

Une corporation qui désire obtenir du capital sur le marché public doit informer les épargnants de son intention et renseigner ces personnes sur la nature et le sérieux de l'entreprise. La décision de participer au financement d'une corporation ne se prend qu'après avoir consulté le prospectus, le document essentiel d'une telle démarche. Pour assurer le succès d'une telle sollicitation financière, les promoteurs ont parfois exagéré la situation réelle de la compagnie et n'ont pas hésité à faire de fausses représentations sur la santé économique de leurs entreprises. L'incidence de la fraude et de la négligence à ce stade du financement public a donc donné lieu à une jurisprudence abondante dans la Province et à des législations spéciales. Cet article étudie, à la lumière de notre droit provincial, cet aspect bien particulier du droit corporatif tout en examinant de façon incidente l'approche de nos tribunaux et du Législateur au problème de préserver dans leur intégrité les règles du droit civil québécois face à l'assaut séculaire de la common law.

scholarly journals Private law and public regulation for investor protection in the asset management industry: aims and practices of transposing the UK model in China

2020 ◽  
pp. 1023263X2095837
Author(s):  
Dr Joseph Lee ◽  
Mr Yonghui Bao
Keyword(s):  
Asset Management ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Investor Protection ◽  
Duty Of Care ◽  
Fiduciary Duties ◽  
Legal Transplant ◽  
Regulatory Approach ◽  
Enforcement Mechanisms ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Asset Managers

The paper discusses how asset managers are regulated in the UK in order to provide investor protection and market confidence. Fiduciary duties and the duty of care in the English common law, statutory laws, the rules of the FCA, and other industry codes are examined to provide an explanation of the UK regulatory approach to the asset management industry. The paper then discusses the extent to which a legal transplant of the UK model to China may be feasible as the asset management industry is currently being reformed in China. Recommendations are made for China to develop an independent asset management industry, to provide more investment outlets for investors, and to have effective enforcement mechanisms of laws and rules to deliver market confidence and investor protection.

scholarly journals Aggressive Tax Planning and Corporate Tax Avoidance: The Case Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-38
Author(s):  
Adzhar Sulaiman ◽  
Kamil Md. Idris ◽  
Saliza Abdul Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Tax Planning ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Policy Responses ◽  
Tax Practitioners ◽  
The Media ◽  
Inland Revenue

There have been increasing literature on aggressive tax planning and corporate tax avoidance, which focus on economic consequences (Ksovreli, 2015; Hanlon & Heitzman, 2010). Campaigners have targeted tax-avoiding corporations through the media, citing the enormous amount of tax losses (Hasseldine, Holland & Van der Rijt, 2012). It is pertinent that policy-makers and tax authorities to take action against tax avoiders and tax intermediaries. This paper focuses on the tax avoidance structures identified during tax audits and investigations and further contributes to an understanding of tax avoidance structures and models. The key models identified are related to the abuse of tax incentives and the use of corporate restructuring to minimize or reduced tax exposures. Based on the Case Management System of the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia, we identify the key structures, their roles and incentives, and outline the tax avoidance schemes. The study summarizes a range of policy responses to tax avoidance, including anti-avoidance rules, disclosure rules and the regulation of tax intermediaries such as tax practitioners.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document