scholarly journals Dysproteinemias and Glomerular Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Leung ◽  
Maria E. Drosou ◽  
Samih H. Nasr

Dysproteinemia is characterized by the overproduction of an Ig by clonal expansion of cells from the B cell lineage. The resultant monoclonal protein can be composed of the entire Ig or its components. Monoclonal proteins are increasingly recognized as a contributor to kidney disease. They can cause injury in all areas of the kidney, including the glomerular, tubular, and vascular compartments. In the glomerulus, the major mechanism of injury is deposition. Examples of this include Ig amyloidosis, monoclonal Ig deposition disease, immunotactoid glomerulopathy, and cryoglobulinemic GN specifically from types 1 and 2 cryoglobulins. Mechanisms that do not involve Ig deposition include the activation of the complement system, which causes complement deposition in C3 glomerulopathy, and cytokines/growth factors as seen in thrombotic microangiopathy and precipitation, which is involved with cryoglobulinemia. It is important to recognize that nephrotoxic monoclonal proteins can be produced by clones from any of the B cell lineages and that a malignant state is not required for the development of kidney disease. The nephrotoxic clones that do not meet requirement for a malignant condition are now called monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Whether it is a malignancy or monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance, preservation of renal function requires substantial reduction of the monoclonal protein. With better understanding of the pathogenesis, clone-directed strategies, such as rituximab against CD20 expressing B cell and bortezomib against plasma cell clones, have been used in the treatment of these diseases. These clone-directed therapies been found to be more effective than immunosuppressive regimens used in nonmonoclonal protein–related kidney diseases.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Leung

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a premalignant condition signifying the presence of a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. By connotation, it should not meet the definition of multiple myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or lymphoma. In addition, it cannot be responsible for any end-organ damage. Similar to polyclonal immunoglobulins (Ig), monoclonal gammopathy has been increasingly recognized as an important cause of kidney disease. The recent introduction of the term “monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance” (MGRS) highlights this importance. MGRS is similar to MGUS in which the B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder has not reached a state considered to be malignant, but differentiates itself by the presence of a monoclonal gammopathy related kidney disease. This distinction is important since it separates MGRS, which is not benign, from the MGUS condition, which is benign. It also allows for a better classification of kidney diseases caused by monoclonal gammopathies. There are many renal diseases and lesions that have been identified to be secondary to MGRS. In addition, MGRS-associated renal diseases can mimic polyclonal Ig mediated kidney diseases. Kidney biopsy with immunofluorescence is the key for diagnosing MGRS-related kidney diseases. Once the diagnosis is made, a specific evaluation is needed for the diagnosis and treatment of MGRS-related kidney diseases that differs from the polyclonal Ig counterparts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Filippone ◽  
Eric D. Newman ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Rakesh Gulati ◽  
John L. Farber

Monoclonal gammopathies result from neoplastic clones of the B-cell lineage and may cause kidney disease by various mechanisms. When the underlying clone does not meet criteria for a malignancy requiring treatment, the paraprotein is called a monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS). One rarely reported kidney lesion associated with benign paraproteins is thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), provisionally considered as a combination signifying MGRS. Such cases may lack systemic features of TMA, such as a microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and the disease may be kidney limited. There is no direct deposition of the paraprotein in the kidney, and the presumed mechanism is disordered complement regulation. We report three cases of kidney limited TMA associated with benign paraproteins that had no other detectable cause for the TMA, representing cases of MGRS. Two of the cases are receiving clone directed therapy, and none are receiving eculizumab. We discuss in detail the pathophysiological basis for this possible association. Our approach to therapy involves first ruling out other causes of TMA as well as an underlying B-cell malignancy that would necessitate direct treatment. Otherwise, clone directed therapy should be considered. If refractory to such therapy or the disease is severe and multisystemic, C5 inhibition (eculizumab or ravulizumab) may be indicated as well.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena V Zakharova ◽  
Tatyana A Makarova ◽  
Ekaterina S Stolyarevich ◽  
Olga A Vorobyeva

Background:Monoclonal immunoglobulin–mediated kidney disease with various patterns of damage may occur in patients with B-cell malignancies and non-malignant monoclonal gammopathies, and the latter are actually merged under the umbrella of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Amyloidosis is the most well-known monoclonal immunoglobulin–related kidney damage. We focused on the rarer conditions and aimed to evaluate the non-amyloid spectrum of monoclonal immunoglobulin–mediated patterns of renal damage in real clinical practice.Methods:A single-center non-interventional retrospective study included 45 patients with pathology-proven non-amyloid monoclonal immunoglobulin–mediated kidney disease, followed during 2002–2018. Disease duration, proteinuria, serum creatinine, need for dialysis at the time of kidney biopsy, clinical diagnosis, and kidney pathology findings were analyzed.Results:No significant differences in the median age, disease duration at the time of biopsy, or main clinical presentation of kidney disease were found between patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance and patients with B-cell malignancies. Pathology patterns like proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits, membranous nephropathy, C3 glomerulopathy, cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis, and combinations of light chain proximal tubulopathy with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease, and of C3 glomerulopathy with light chain proximal tubulopathy were found in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance setting only. In contrast, light chain proximal tubulopathy alone, anti-glomerular basement glomerulonephritis, and combinations of cast nephropathy with light chain proximal tubulopathy, and cast nephropathy with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease were associated with multiple myeloma only. Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease, intracapillary monoclonal immunoglobulin M deposits, and cast nephropathy alone were seen in both settings.Conclusion:The presence of monoclonal gammopathy in patients with proteinuria and/or impaired kidney function demands kidney biopsy. Neither duration of kidney disease nor its clinical presentation allows differentiating malignant and non-malignant causes of monoclonal immunoglobulin–mediated renal damage. Several pathology patterns, even cast nephropathy, can be found both in cases of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance and in cases of B-cell malignancies. Dual patterns of damage, including combinations of organized and non-organized deposits, or organized deposits with monoclonal immunoglobulin–induced damage without monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition, constitute up to 9%, mostly in multiple myeloma cases.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Francis K. Buadi ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
...  

Abstract IgD monoclonal gammopathies are uncommon. They are seen rarely as a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and are present in 1%-2% of patients with multiple myeloma. In light-chain amyloidosis, IgD monoclonal proteins are found in ap-proximately 1% of patients. When an IgD monoclonal protein is found, amyloidosis is often omitted from the differential diagnosis. In the present study, we reviewed the natural history of IgD-associated amyloidosis among 53 patients seen over 41 years. The distribution of clinical syndromes suggests that these patients have a lower frequency of renal and cardiac involvement. The overall survival of these patients does not appear to be different from that of patients who have light-chain amyloidosis associated with another monoclonal protein.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (22) ◽  
pp. 3583-3590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Paul Fermand ◽  
Frank Bridoux ◽  
Robert A. Kyle ◽  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Brendan M. Weiss ◽  
...  

Abstract Recently, the term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) was introduced to distinguish monoclonal gammopathies that result in the development of kidney disease from those that are benign. By definition, patients with MGRS have B-cell clones that do not meet the definition of multiple myeloma or lymphoma. Nevertheless, these clones produce monoclonal proteins that are capable of injuring the kidney resulting in permanent damage. Except for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis with heart involvement in which death can be rapid, treatment of MGRS is often indicated more to preserve kidney function and prevent recurrence after kidney transplantation rather than the prolongation of life. Clinical trials are rare for MGRS-related kidney diseases, except in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis. Treatment recommendations are therefore based on the clinical data obtained from treatment of the clonal disorder in its malignant state. The establishment of these treatment recommendations is important until data can be obtained by clinical trials of MGRS-related kidney diseases.


Author(s):  
Richard B Fulton ◽  
Suran L Fernando

Background The potential for serum free light chain (sFLC) assay measurements to replace urine electrophoresis (uEPG) and to also diminish the need for serum immunofixation (sIFE) in the screening for monoclonal gammopathy was assessed. A testing algorithm for monoclonal protein was developed based on our data and cost analysis. Methods Data from 890 consecutive sFLC requests were retrospectively analysed. These included 549 samples for serum electrophoresis (sEPG), 447 for sIFE, and 318 for uEPG and urine immunofixation (uIFE). A total of 219 samples had sFLC, sEPG, sIFE and uEPG + uIFE performed. The ability of different test combinations to detect the presence of monoclonal proteins was compared. Results The sFLC κ/ λ ratio (FLC ratio) indicated monoclonal light chains in 12% more samples than uEPG + uIFE. The combination of sEPG and FLC ratio detected monoclonal proteins in 49% more samples than the combination of sEPG and sIFE. Furthermore, the sEPG + FLC ratio combination detected monoclonal protein in 6% more samples than were detected by the combined performance of sEPG, sIFE, uEPG and uIFE. However, non-linearity of the assay, the expense of repeat determinations due to the narrow measuring ranges, and frequent antigen excess checks were found to be limitations of the sFLC assay in this study. Conclusion The FLC ratio is a more sensitive method than uIFE in the detection of monoclonal light chains and may substantially reduce the need for onerous 24 h urine collections. Our proposed algorithm for the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy incorporates the sFLC assay, resulting in a reduction in the performance of labour intensive sIFE and uEPG + uIFE while still increasing the detection of monoclonal proteins.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Paul J. Hampel ◽  
David L. Murray ◽  
Rajiv K. Pruthi ◽  
Aishwarya Ravindran ◽  
Dong Chen ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Autoantibody effects of monoclonal proteins have been described in multiple organ systems. We previously found a 5-fold higher prevalence than expected of monoclonal gammopathy (MG) in adults with TMA (21% versus 4.2%; Ravindran A et al, Kidney Int 2017). Here we investigated the prevalence of MG in patients undergoing evaluation for TMA with an ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) activity assay performed as part of routine clinical care to evaluate for a signal of possible autoantibody pathophysiology in patients with immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP). METHODS: WAfter IRB approval, waste plasma samples from patients who had ADAMTS13 activity and inhibitor assay (Lifecodes, ATS-13, Immucor) were archived. Eligible patients included those with the following: i) ADAMTS13 activity level < 30% (n=26), ii) ADAMTS13 activity level >30% but with prior documentation of a value < 30% (n=4). A control cohort (n=49) of patients with ADAMTS13 activity level >30% (and no prior samples with a level < 30% recorded) was also included. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry detection (MALDI-TOF) was used for MG assessment. Mass spectrometry findings of only an IgG kappa MG appearing consistent with rituximab were reviewed and considered negative for MG if the patients had received rituximab prior to sample collection. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed and the following patients were excluded: i) <18 years of age (n=4), ii) iTTP in remission (n=4) at the time of sample collection, and iii) absence of microangiopathy (n=11). RESULTS: Sixty patients met eligibility criteria with the following final diagnoses: iTTP (n=14), transplant-associated TMA (n=12), infection (n=11), malignancy (n=6), complement-mediated TMA (n=5), drug-induced TMA (DITMA; n=5), shock liver (n=2), pancreatitis (n=1), cryoglobulinemia (n=1), and multifactorial (n=3). The median age was 56.5 years (yr) (standard deviation 14.4, range18-81) and 58% of patients were female. The median age was similar among patients with (57 yr) and those without MG (56 yr). Median ADAMTS-13 activity of the whole study population was 52% (0-100%); 6/14 patients with an inhibitor screen performed on the same sample had a positive result; median titer was 1.2 Bethesda units (range <0.4 - 2.8). Treatments of the acute presentation included corticosteroids (n=32), plasma exchange (n=21), rituximab (n=9), and eculizumab (n=4). None of these patients received a multiple myeloma-type treatment regimen as part of their acute management. A MG was identified in 25 patients: monoclonal in 14 patients, biclonal in 10 patients, and triclonal in 1 pt. Among the 14 patients with a single monoclonal protein, the distribution of heavy and light chains was as follows: IgG (9; 64%), IgM (3; 21%), IgA (2; 14%), lambda (8; 57%), kappa (6; 43%). Receipt of immune-modifying treatment at the time of sample draw was identified in 24 patients (9/25 with a monoclonal protein, 15/35 without a monoclonal protein; not statistically significant by 2-tail Fisher's exact test [p=0.79]), including cancer-directed therapy (n=9), graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis (n=8), solid organ transplant anti-rejection therapy (n=5), and autoimmune disease treatment (n=2). Overall, the proportion of patients with monoclonal gammopathy was similar between iTTP and other diagnoses, detailed in Table 1. Among the 14 pt with iTTP, 4 had a monoclonal protein (IgG kappa [n=2], IgA lambda [n=2]). Additionally, 1 pt with iTTP had biclonal proteins (IgG kappa and IgA kappa), which was consistent with a known prior history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. A monoclonal protein was present in 2 of the 6 pt with a detectable inhibitor titer (0.6 and <0.4 Bethesda units). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing evaluation for iTTP with ADAMTS-13 activity testing had a high prevalence of monoclonal proteins across variable underlying diagnoses. In this heterogeneous cohort there was no significant association between iTTP and the presence of MG to support an autoantibody pathophysiologic role. Disclosures Murray: The Binding Site: Patents & Royalties: Patent Use of Mass Spec to identify monoclonal proteins licensed to The Binding Site. Pruthi:HEMA Biologics: Honoraria; Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Genentech Inc.: Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria.


2020 ◽  
pp. 98-104
Author(s):  
Zh. M. Kozich ◽  
L. A. Smirnova ◽  
V. N. Martinkov

Multiple myeloma is an incurable malignancy of hematopoietic tissue characterized by lesions of the bone marrow, presence of multiple destructive processes within bone tissue, kidney damage, and infectious complications. Up to 60 % cases of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma debut from monoclonal gammopathy.Monoclonal gammopathies are a large group of diseases whose distinctive feature is the secretion of pathologic immunoglobulins called monoclonal proteins (synthesized in abundant quantities immunoglobulins of one class or/and type whose chemical structure, molecular mass, and immunological features have been changed). Most often monoclonal protein is a biomarker of clonal cell proliferation. Besides plasma cell tumors paraprotein secretion is often common for other lymphoproliferative diseases, some kidney diseases, systemic diseases of connective tissue, primary amyloidosis, solid tumors, liver lesions, sarcoidosis, Gaucher disease, Sjogren syndrome, cold agglutinin diseases, and some meurologic pathologies.The article presents the main clinical and pathologic features of monoclonal gammopathy and multiple myeloma and describes clinical cases indicative of complicated diagnosis of multiple myeloma and the necessity for continuous monitoring of patients with monoclonal gammopathy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (12) ◽  
pp. 82-87
Author(s):  
L V Kozlovskaya ◽  
V V Rameev ◽  
T V Androsova ◽  
I N Kogarko ◽  
B S Kogarko ◽  
...  

The article deals with the so-called monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), which is being actively explored in the world and has been recently investigated in Russia. It indicates the principles of identifying the phenotypes of MGUS and criteria for assessing the risk of its progression to cancer. There is an update on the possible involvement of monoclonal proteins in the pathogenesis of certain non-neoplastic kidney diseases, renal injuries in particular. The paper gives their classification and enumerates differential diagnostic techniques, including the Freelite method, a highly sensitive one to determine free light chains (FLC), prognostic criteria, and approaches to treating each separate form in relation to the phenotype of a monoclonal protein. The authors present their own data on detection rates for MGUS at a multidisciplinary hospital and a clinical case of MGUS-associated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, by justifying a treatment regimen containing bortezomib (velcade).


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Insara Jaffer Sathick ◽  
Nelson Leung

The kidney is often involved in diseases associated with monoclonal proteins. In large part, this is due to the physiology and glomerular architecture leading to interactions between the monoclonal proteins and nephron. A variety of pathologic lesions have been described in the kidney as a result of monoclonal immunoglobulins. The spectrum of kidney diseases associated with plasma cell dyscrasias is quite broad and involves almost the entire nephron. This is due to the different types of monoclonal proteins (light chain, heavy chain, and entire immunoglobulin), the highly variable nature of immunoglobulins, and the diversity of paraproteinemias themselvesIt is important for the nephrologist to recognize these conditions because the treatment of plasma cell dyscrasias has vastly improved over the past decade. This chapter discusses myeloma cast nephropathy, amyloidosis, and other glomerulopathies. Figures show paraproteinemia-associated kidney disease, and an algorithm for the typing of amyloidosis. Tables list a classification of amyloidosis affecting the kidney, distinguishing features of diseases with organized deposits, and classification of cryoglobulinemia. This review contains 2 figures, 3 tables, and 105 references. Key words: myeloma cast nephropathy, amyloidosis, glomerulopathies, monoclonal immunoglobulins, monoclonal proteins, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance, MGRS


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document