scholarly journals Complex questions command complex analyses: comparative effectiveness of drug treatment strategies in atrial fibrillation

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Raluca Ionescu-Ittu ◽  
Louise Pilote
BMJ ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 348 (may13 3) ◽  
pp. g3009-g3009 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. B. Loymans ◽  
A. Gemperli ◽  
J. Cohen ◽  
S. M. Rubinstein ◽  
P. J. Sterk ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 172 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raluca Ionescu-Ittu ◽  
Michal Abrahamowicz ◽  
Cynthia A. Jackevicius ◽  
Vidal Essebag ◽  
Mark J. Eisenberg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1456
Author(s):  
Carlo Lavalle ◽  
Michele Magnocavallo ◽  
Martina Straito ◽  
Luca Santini ◽  
Giovanni Battista Forleo ◽  
...  

Transcatheter ablation was increasingly and successfully used to treat symptomatic drug refractory patients affected by supraventricular arrhythmias. Antiarrhythmic drug treatment still plays a major role in patient management, alone or combined with non-pharmacological therapies. Flecainide is an IC antiarrhythmic drug approved in 1984 from the Food and Drug Administration for the suppression of sustained ventricular tachycardia and later for acute cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and for sinus rhythm maintenance. Currently, flecainide is mostly used for sinus rhythm maintenance in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients without structural cardiomyopathy although recent studies enrolling different patient populations have demonstrated a good effectiveness and safety profile. How should we interpret the results of the CAST after the latest evidence? Is it possible to expand the indications of flecainide, and therefore, its use? This review aims to highlight the main characteristics of flecainide, as well as its optimal clinical use, delineating drug indications and contraindications and appropriate monitoring, based on the most recent evidence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3129
Author(s):  
Riyaz A. Kaba ◽  
Aziz Momin ◽  
John Camm

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a global disease with rapidly rising incidence and prevalence. It is associated with a higher risk of stroke, dementia, cognitive decline, sudden and cardiovascular death, heart failure and impairment in quality of life. The disease is a major burden on the healthcare system. Paroxysmal AF is typically managed with medications or endocardial catheter ablation to good effect. However, a large proportion of patients with AF have persistent or long-standing persistent AF, which are more complex forms of the condition and thus more difficult to treat. This is in part due to the progressive electro-anatomical changes that occur with AF persistence and the spread of arrhythmogenic triggers and substrates outside of the pulmonary veins. The posterior wall of the left atrium is a common site for these changes and has become a target of ablation strategies to treat these more resistant forms of AF. In this review, we discuss the role of the posterior left atrial wall in persistent and long-standing persistent AF, the limitations of current endocardial-focused treatment strategies, and future perspectives on hybrid epicardial–endocardial approaches to posterior wall isolation or ablation.


Author(s):  
Alexandros Briasoulis ◽  
Amgad Mentias ◽  
Alexander Mazur ◽  
Paulino Alvarez ◽  
Enrique C. Leira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document