scholarly journals Real-world effectiveness of lenvatinib monotherapy among unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the USA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit G Singal ◽  
Saurabh P Nagar ◽  
Abby Hitchens ◽  
Keith L Davis ◽  
Shrividya Iyer
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Best Response ◽  
The Usa ◽  
First Line Treatment

Aim: This study evaluated the effectiveness of lenvatinib monotherapy for first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in a real-world setting. Materials & methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who initiated lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for uHCC (n = 233). Clinical outcomes included provider-reported best response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: Most patients (67.8%) were male. A total of 44.6% had Child-Pugh A and 39.1% had Child-Pugh B. Dose reductions were reported in 9%. Median PFS and OS were not reached. At 6 and 12 months, landmark PFS were 85.1 and 64.9%, respectively; landmark OS were 91.8 and 72.6%, respectively. Conclusion: These results affirm the clinical effectiveness of first-line lenvatinib monotherapy in uHCC.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in the real-world treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from a Canadian multicenter database (HCC CHORD).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 275-275
Author(s):  
Carla Pires Amaro ◽  
Michael J Allen ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Erica S Tsang ◽  
Howard John Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Real ◽  
First Line Therapy

275 Background: The REFLECT trial establishedlenvatinib (LEN) as a first-line treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Compared to sorafenib (S), LEN has a higher objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) with a slightly different toxicity profile. The aim of this study was to gather data regarding the efficacy and safety of LEN when used in the real-world treatment of HCC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine LEN use in HCC patients treated outside of Asia. Methods: HCC patients treated with LEN from 10 cancer centers in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and Nova Scotia between July 2018 to July 2020 were included. Overall survival (OS), PFS, disease control rate (DCR) and ORR were retrospectively analyzed and compared across first- and second-to-fourth line use of LEN. ORR was determined radiographically according to the treating physician´s opinion in clinical notes and not RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST. Toxicities were also examined. Results: A total of 220 patients were included in this analysis. Median age was 67 years, 80% were men and 25.5% East Asian. The most frequent causes of liver disease were hepatitis C (37%) and B (26%). 62% of patients received any localized treatment before LEN, of those 26% had TACE, 15% TARE and 7.7% had liver transplant. Before starting LEN 29% of patients were ECOG 0 and 59% were ECOG 1. Most patients were Child-Pugh A (81%) and BCLC stage C (75.5%). Main portal vein invasion was present in 14% of the patients. Median follow-up was 4.5 months. A total of 173 patients (79%) received LEN as first line therapy and 47 patients (21%) were treated in second-to-fourth line. Of patients receiving LEN in first line, 22 (13%) started treatment with S, but switched to LEN before progression due to poor tolerance of S. ORR, DCR, PFS and OS are shown in the table. Toxicities occurred in 86% of patients and led to dose reductions in 76 (35%) patients and drug discontinuation in 53 (24%) patients. The most common side effects were fatigue (59%), hypertension (41%), decreased appetite (25%) and diarrhea (22%). Conclusions: Outcomes of HCC patients treated in Canada with LEN in the first line are comparable to those demonstrated in the REFLECT trial, despite the inclusion of Child-Pugh B and ECOG >1 patients. LEN use in second or later lines also showed similar outcomes, although more conclusions are difficult to draw due to the small numbers. LEN appears to be effective and safe in real world practice outside of Asia in first- and second-to-fourth line treatment of HCC. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab and a taxane in first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A multicenter, retrospective, observational study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12504-e12504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Gamucci ◽  
Lucia Mentuccia ◽  
Isabella Sperduti ◽  
Alain Gelibter ◽  
Loretta D'Onofrio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

e12504 Background: Pertuzumab (P) , Trastuzumab (T) and Docetaxel (D) is standard first-line treatment in patients (pts) with HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This multicenter retrospetive observational study was performed to evaluate the activity of P and T in combination with D or Paclitaxel (Tx) in real world HER2 + MBC pts. Methods: We identified HER2 + MBC pts treated with P, T and D or Ptx optionally followed by P, T and endocrine therapy (ET) maintenance in hormone positive (HR+) BC, in 17 Italian cancer centres between 09/2012 and 08/2016. Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Log-rank test was used to assess differences between subgroups. Results: 191 pts were included in our analysis. Pts characteristics: median age 54 years (range 29-80); PS 0 in 127 (67%) pts and PS 1 in 54 (28%); 107 (56%) had visceral metastases (mts), 23 (12%) only bone mts and 28 (15%) brain mts, 130 (68%) were ER/PgR +. 76 pts (40%) were metastatic at diagnosis; 148 (78) were treated with D while 43 (22%) with Tx. The ORR was 78% (CI 95% 72-84), RC 18% and RP 60%, only 10 (5%) had PD. To date, of the 54 pts treated with ET maintenance, 26% had a further improvement of response (7 pts had RC). At median follow-up of 17 months (mo) (range 6- 52), median PFS was 20 mo (95% CI 14-26) and median OS at 2 years was 80%. No differences in PFS were found for age (p = 0.92), PS (p = 0.18), receptor status (p = 0.57), visceral mts (p = 0.54) and chemotherapy (cht) type (p = 0.47), whereas number of mts site (1 vs > 1) affected PFS (28 vs 16 mo, p = 0.002). Moreover median PFS in naïve pts and in pts pretreated with only cht was 28 mo (95% CI, 20-36) and 27 mo (95% CI, 16-38) respectively, whereas in pts pretreated with T it was 12 mo (95% CI 16-38 p 0.002). In HR+ pts ET maintenance together with P and T had an impact on PFS (28 vs 15 mo, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our analysis confirms, in real world HER2 MBC pts, the efficacy of P, T and a taxane combination in first line treatment; in this population PFS was shorter in pts pretreated with T. ET maintenance in association with P and T in HR+ pts improved PFS. Data collection is ongoing and update results will be presented.

Progression-free survival as a predictor of overall survival in patients with advanced breast cancer: A real-world study from the China National Cancer Center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12590-e12590
Author(s):  
Hongnan Mo ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Qing Li ◽  
Pin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

e12590 Background: Use of progression-free survival (PFS) as a clinical trial endpoint in first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer is attractive, but would be enhanced by establishing a correlation between PFS and overall survival (OS). Methods: From January 2003 to December 2012, 1851 patients with advanced breast cancer at start of first-line therapy were enrolled in this real-world study. An independent cohort of patients hospitalized in 2013 was used for external validation. All data were collected from the Database of China National Cancer Cancer. Results: The correlation coefficient (Pearson’s r) between PFS and OS was 0.807 in patients only receiving endocrine therapy as first-line treatment, 0.643 in those treated with chemotherapy, and 0.642 in the whole cohort. Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that PFS = 12 months was the optimal cutoff value for predicting patient’s survival. The median OS was 30.0 months (95% CI 27.8-32.2) in the PFS < 12 months group, and 69.0 months (95% CI 60.8-77.2) in the other group (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with patients who did not progress at 12 months, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death was 2.681 (95% CI, 2.301-3.124; P < 0.0001) for patients with PFS < 12 months. Subgroup analysis based on patient’s age, molecular subtype, visceral metastasis and types of first-line treatment further confirmed that PFS < 12 months was associated with significant poor prognosis in all these subgroups. In patients with luminal type of breast cancer, the HR for death was 2.567 (95%CI 2.147-3.069; P < 0.0001) for patients with PFS < 12 months. Notably, for these patients with luminal type breast cancer who had progressed within 12 months after first-line treatment, addition of chemotherapy in the second-line therapy would surprisingly have adverse effects on patients’ survival when compared with endocrine therapy alone (HR = 1.627, 95%CI 1.016-2.604, P = 0.043). The findings were externally validated in the independent cohort. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first real-world study revealed that PFS at 12 months in first-line therapy predict OS of patients with advanced breast cancer.

scholarly journals The Cost-Effectiveness of Lenvatinib in the Treatment of Advanced or Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma from a Canadian Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Brandon M. Meyers ◽  
Arndt Vogel ◽  
Paul Marotta ◽  
Petr Kavan ◽  
Laveena Kamboj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Canadian Perspective ◽  
The Cost ◽  
First Line Treatment

Lenvatinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor indicated for the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). In the Phase III REFLECT trial, lenvatinib was noninferior in the primary endpoint of overall survival versus sorafenib, the only systemic therapy funded in Canada prior to the introduction of lenvatinib. Lenvatinib also demonstrated statistically significant improvement compared to sorafenib in secondary endpoint progression-free survival, time to progression, and objective response rate. The aim of this analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib versus sorafenib for the first-line treatment of patients with uHCC from a Canadian perspective. A cost-utility analysis was conducted using partitioned survival modelling, with health states representing progression-free disease, progressed disease, and death. Health effects were measured using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs were represented in Canadian dollars. Clinical inputs were derived from the REFLECT trial, with outcomes extrapolated using parametric survival models. EQ-5D data collected in REFLECT were used to determine health state utility values, and estimates of resource use came from a survey of clinicians. The model predicted incremental costs of-$5,021 and incremental QALYs of 0.17, making lenvatinib dominant over sorafenib. The model demonstrates lenvatinib to be a cost-effective use of resources versus sorafenib in Canada for the treatment of uHCC. Overall costs are lower compared with sorafenib, while health benefits are greater, with modelled progression-free and overall survival extended by 4.1 and 2.6 months in the lenvatinib arm, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document