scholarly journals Information Integration for Machine Actionable Data Management Plans

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Miksa ◽  
Andreas Rauber ◽  
Roman Ganguly ◽  
Paolo Budroni
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Information Integration ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Reproducible Research ◽  
Free Form ◽  
Text Documents ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Standard Data ◽  
Management Plans

Data management plans are free-form text documents describing the data used and produced in scientific experiments. The complexity of data-driven experiments requires precise descriptions of tools and datasets used in computations to enable their reproducibility and reuse. Data management plans fall short of these requirements. In this paper, we propose machine-actionable data management plans that cover the same themes as standard data management plans, but particular sections are filled with information obtained from existing tools. We present mapping of tools from the domains of digital preservation, reproducible research, open science, and data repositories to data management plan sections. Thus, we identify the requirements for a good solution and identify its limitations. We also propose a machine-actionable data model that enables information integration. The model uses ontologies and is based on existing standards.

scholarly journals ELIXIR Software Management Plan for Life Sciences

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Alves ◽  
Dimitrios Bampalikis ◽  
Leyla Jael Castro ◽  
José María Fernández ◽  
Jennifer Harrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Software Management ◽  
Research Software ◽  
Management Perspective ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Machine Readable ◽  
Future Plans

Data Management Plans are now considered a key element of Open Science. They describe the data management life cycle for the data to be collected, processed and/or generated within the lifetime of a particular project or activity. A Software Manag ement Plan (SMP) plays the same role but for software. Beyond its management perspective, the main advantage of an SMP is that it both provides clear context to the software that is being developed and raises awareness. Although there are a few SMPs already available, most of them require significant technical knowledge to be effectively used. ELIXIR has developed a low-barrier SMP, specifically tailored for life science researchers, aligned to the FAIR Research Software principles. Starting from the Four Recommendations for Open Source Software, the ELIXIR SMP was iteratively refined by surveying the practices of the community and incorporating the received feedback. Currently available as a survey, future plans of the ELIXIR SMP include a human- and machine-readable version, that can be automatically queried and connected to relevant tools and metrics within the ELIXIR Tools ecosystem and beyond.

scholarly journals Plano de gestão de dados fair: uma proposta para a Fiocruz | Fair data management plan: a proposal for Fiocruz

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviane Santos de Oliveira Veiga ◽  
Patricia Henning ◽  
Simone Dib ◽  
Erick Penedo ◽  
Jefferson Da Costa Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Data Management ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Research Institutions ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Fair Principles

RESUMO Este artigo trás para discussão o papel dos planos de gestão de dados como instrumento facilitador da gestão dos dados durante todo o ciclo de vida da pesquisa. A abertura de dados de pesquisa é pauta prioritária nas agendas científicas, por ampliar tanto a visibilidade e transparência das investigações, como a capacidade de reprodutibilidade e reuso dos dados em novas pesquisas. Nesse contexto, os princípios FAIR, um acrônimo para ‘Findable’, ‘Accessible’, ‘Interoperable’ e ‘Reusable’ é fundamental por estabelecerem orientações basilares e norteadoras na gestão, curadoria e preservação dos dados de pesquisa direcionados para o compartilhamento e o reuso. O presente trabalho tem por objetivo apresentar uma proposta de template de Plano de Gestão de Dados, alinhado aos princípios FAIR, para a Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. A metodologia utilizada é de natureza bibliográfica e de análise documental de diversos planos de gestão de dados europeus. Concluímos que a adoção de um plano de gestão nas práticas cientificas de universidades e instituições de pesquisa é fundamental. No entanto, para tirar maior proveito dessa atividade é necessário contar com a participação de todos os atores envolvidos no processo, além disso, esse plano de gestão deve ser machine-actionable, ou seja, acionável por máquina.Palavras-chave: Plano de Gestão de Dados; Dado de Pesquisa; Princípios FAIR; PGD Acionável por Máquina; Ciência Aberta.ABSTRACT This article proposes to discuss the role of data management plans as a tool to facilitate data management during researches life cycle. Today, research data opening is a primary agenda at scientific agencies as it may boost investigations’ visibility and transparency as well as the ability to reproduce and reuse its data on new researches. Within this context, FAIR principles, an acronym for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable, is paramount, as it establishes basic and guiding orientations for research data management, curatorship and preservation with an intent on its sharing and reuse. The current work intends to present to the Fundação Oswaldo Cruz a new Data Management Plan template proposal, aligned with FAIR principles. The methodology used is bibliographical research and documental analysis of several European data management plans. We conclude that the adoption of a management plan on universities and research institutions scientific activities is paramount. However, to be fully benefited from this activity, all actors involved in the process must participate, and, on top of that, this plan must be machine-actionable.Keywords: Data Management Plan; Research Data; FAIR Principles; DMP Machine-Actionable; Open Science.

scholarly journals The establishment of a Norwegian node in RDA

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trond Kvamme ◽  
Philipp Conzett
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Exchange ◽  
The United States ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Sensitive Data ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Inclusive Approach ◽  
Processing And Storage

Norway has been selected as a new national node in RDA (Research Data Alliance). Until the end of the project in May 2020, the node will be engaging with research communities, supporting national agendas, and contributing to the EU Open Science Strategy to ensure capillary uptake of RDA principles and outputs. Moreover, they will be working to increase the participation in RDA nationally. The Norwegian RDA node (NO-RDA) will be run by a consortium of seven partners, each of them with specific roles in the activities around the node, and led by NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data. NO-RDA will focus on supporting the implementation of RDA outputs and recommendations and on areas of strategic importance for the Nordic region, such as Data Management Plans, FAIR Data Stewardship and management of sensitive data in research within the framework of current international and statutory regulations. In addition to NSD the node consists of NTNU, UiB, UiO, UiT, Unit og Uninett/Sigma2. The Research Data Alliance (RDA) was launched as a community-driven initiative in 2013 by the European Commission, the United States Government's National Science Foundation and National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Australian Government’s Department of Innovation with the goal of building the social and technical infrastructure to enable open sharing and re-use of data. RDA has a grass-roots, inclusive approach covering all data lifecycle stages, engaging data producers, users and stewards, addressing data exchange, processing, and storage. It has succeeded in creating the neutral social platform where international research data experts meet to exchange views and to agree on topics including social hurdles on data sharing, education and training challenges, data management plans and certification of data repositories, disciplinary and interdisciplinary interoperability, as well as technological aspects.

scholarly journals Solving legal puzzles is not easy – supporting creating Data Management Plans in three scientific disciplines: chemistry, economics, and civil engineering

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Szuflita-Żurawska ◽  
Anna Wałek
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Civil Engineering ◽  
Academic Staff ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Scientific Disciplines ◽  
Management Plans

Open Science Competence Center at the Gdańsk University of Technology Library was established upon the Bridge of Data project at the end of 2018. Our main goals include providing support for the academic community for broad issues associated with Open Science, especially with Open Research Data. Our team of professionals help researchers in many topics such as: "what kinds of data you need to share", "how to make your data openly available to others", or "how to create a Data Management Plan" – that recently has been the most popular and demanding service.  One of the main challenges to support academic staff with Data Management Plans is dealing with the legal impediments to provide open access and reusing of research data for publicly funded scientific projects. The lack of understanding the legal issues in opening research is a significant barrier to facilitate Open Science. Much public-funded research requires to prepare a Data Management Plan that, among other items, provides information about ownership and user rights. One of the most common activity for scholars is choosing which license (if any) they are supposed to use in terms of the dissemination the scientific output. However, in many cases, resolving the right license for research data is not enough. Academic staff faces many tensions with a lack of clarity around legal requirements and obstacles. The increasing researchers' need for understanding and describing conflicting issues (e.g. patenting) results in looking for professional and knowledgeable support at the university. We examine the most frequent legal issues arising among DMPs from the three scientific disciplines: chemistry (e.g. ethical papers), economics (e.g. data value cycle), and civil engineering (e.g. complexity of construction data). In our presentation, we would like to introduce the main identified problems and show how mapping and benchmarking occurring problems among those disciplines help us to establish more efficient legal support for researchers. 

Qualitative Data Management and Analysis within a Data Repository

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 640-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcy G. Antonio ◽  
Kara Schick-Makaroff ◽  
James M. Doiron ◽  
Laurene Sheilds ◽  
Lacie White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Data Management ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Data Repository ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Research Teams ◽  
Geographically Dispersed ◽  
Audio Recordings ◽  
Field Notes ◽  
Period Data

Data repositories can support secure data management for multi-institutional and geographically dispersed research teams. Primarily designed to provide secure access, storage, and sharing of quantitative data, limited focus has been given to the unique considerations of data repositories for qualitative research. We share our experiences of using a data repository in a large qualitative nursing research study. Over a 27-month period, data collected by this 15-member team from 83 participants included photos, audio recordings and transcripts of interviews, and field notes. The data repository supported the secure collection, storage, and management of over 1,800 files with data. However, challenges were introduced during analysis that required negotiations about the structure and processes of the data repository. We discuss strengths and limitations of data repositories, and introduce practical strategies for developing a data management plan for qualitative research, which is supported through a data repository.

scholarly journals pISA-tree - a data management framework for life science research projects using a standardised directory tree

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Petek ◽  
Maja Zagorscak ◽  
Andrej Blejec ◽  
Ziva Ramsak ◽  
Anna Coll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Life Science ◽  
Source Code ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Reproducible Research ◽  
Public Repository ◽  
Management Framework ◽  
Fair Principles ◽  
R Packages

We have developed pISA-tree, a straightforward and flexible data management solution for organisation of life science project-associated research data and metadata. It enables on-the-fly creation of enriched directory tree structure (project/Investigation/Study/Assay) via a series of sequential batch files in a standardised manner based on the ISA metadata framework. The system supports reproducible research and is in accordance with the Open Science initiative and FAIR principles. Compared with similar frameworks, it does not require any systems administration and maintenance as it can be run on a personal computer or network drive. It is complemented with two R packages, pisar and seekr, where the former facilitates integration of the pISA-tree datasets into bioinformatic pipelines and the latter enables synchronisation with the FAIRDOMHub public repository using the SEEK API. Source code and detailed documentation of pISA-tree and its supporting R packages are available from https://github.com/NIB-SI/pISA-tree.

scholarly journals The Open-Specimen Movement

BioScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn P Colella ◽  
Ryan B Stephens ◽  
Mariel L Campbell ◽  
Brooks A Kohli ◽  
Danielle J Parsons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Explicit Integration ◽  
Cultural Shift ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Annual Reporting

Abstract The open-science movement seeks to increase transparency, reproducibility, and access to scientific data. As primary data, preserved biological specimens represent records of global biodiversity critical to research, conservation, national security, and public health. However, a recent decrease in specimen preservation in public biorepositories is a major barrier to open biological science. As such, there is an urgent need for a cultural shift in the life sciences that normalizes specimen deposition in museum collections. Museums embody an open-science ethos and provide long-term research infrastructure through curation, data management and security, and community-wide access to samples and data, thereby ensuring scientific reproducibility and extension. We propose that a paradigm shift from specimen ownership to specimen stewardship can be achieved through increased open-data requirements among scientific journals and institutional requirements for specimen deposition by funding and permitting agencies, and through explicit integration of specimens into existing data management plan guidelines and annual reporting.

scholarly journals Current Protocols: Open and Reproducible Research on OSF

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Sullivan ◽  
Alexander Carl DeHaven ◽  
David Thomas Mellor
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Version Control ◽  
Reproducible Research ◽  
Research Practices ◽  
Share Data

By implementing more transparent research practices, authors have the opportunity to stand out and showcase work that is more reproducible, easier to build upon, and more credible. The scientist gains by making work easier to share and maintain within their own lab, and the scientific community gains by making underlying data or research materials more available for confirmation or making new discoveries. The following protocol gives the author step by step instructions for using the free and open source OSF to create a data management plan, preregister their study, use version control, share data and other research materials, or post a preprint for quick and easy dissemination.

scholarly journals Understanding the Data Management Plan as a Boundary Object through a Multi-stakeholder perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Live Kvale ◽  
Nils Pharo
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Boundary Object ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Stakeholder Perspective ◽  
Common Goals ◽  
Multi Stakeholder

A three-phase Delphi study was used to investigate an emerging community for research data management in Norway and their understanding and application of data management plans (DMPs). The findings reveal visions of what the DMP should be as well as different practice approaches, yet the stakeholders present common goals. This paper discusses the different perspectives on the DMP by applying Star and Griesemer’s theory of boundary objects (Star & Griesemer, 1989). The debate on what the DMP is and the findings presented are relevant to all research communities currently implementing DMP procedures and requirements. The current discussions about DMPs tend to be distant from the active researchers and limited to the needs of funders and institutions rather than to the usefulness for researchers. By analysing the DMP as a boundary object, plastic and adaptable yet with a robust identity (Star & Griesemer, 1989), and by translating between worlds where collaboration on data sharing can take place we expand the perspectives and include all stakeholders. An understanding of the DMP as a boundary object can shift the focus from shaping a DMP which fulfils funders’ requirements to enabling collaboration on data management and sharing across domains using standardised forms.

scholarly journals Dealing with Data: Science Librarians’ Participation in Data Management at Association of Research Libraries Institutions

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Antell ◽  
Jody Bales Foote ◽  
Jaymie Turner ◽  
Brian Shults
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Academic Libraries ◽  
Data Science ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Funding Agency ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
Association Of Research Libraries

As long as empirical research has existed, researchers have been doing “data management” in one form or another. However, funding agency mandates for doing formal data management are relatively recent, and academic libraries’ involvement has been concentrated mainly in the last few years. The National Science Foundation implemented a new mandate in January 2011, requiring researchers to include a data management plan with their proposals for funding. This has prompted many academic libraries to work more actively than before in data management, and science librarians in particular are uniquely poised to step into new roles to meet researchers’ data management needs. This study, a survey of science librarians at institutions affiliated with the Association of Research Libraries, investigates science librarians’ awareness of and involvement in institutional repositories, data repositories, and data management support services at their institutions. The study also explores the roles and responsibilities, both new and traditional, that science librarians have assumed related to data management, and the skills that science librarians believe are necessary to meet the demands of data management work. The results reveal themes of both uncertainty and optimism—uncertainty about the roles of librarians, libraries, and other campus entities; uncertainty about the skills that will be required; but also optimism about applying “traditional” librarian skills to this emerging field of academic librarianship.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document