Mindfulness-Based Strengths Practice (MBSP) Group Intervention: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Priscilla Prasath ◽  
Crystal Morris
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Positive Outcomes ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Effective Group ◽  
Inclusion Results

A systematic review was conducted to examine the evidence base for Mindfulness-Based Strengths Practice (MBSP) as a group intervention. Four studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Results indicate MBSP is an effective group intervention yielding significant positive outcomes. Recommendations for researchers and group practitioners are provided.

scholarly journals Implementing Digital Storytelling for Health-Related Outcomes in Older Adults: Protocol for a Systematic Review

10.2196/15512 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e15512
Author(s):  
Jennifer Stargatt ◽  
Sunil Bhar ◽  
Jahar Bhowmik ◽  
Abdullah Al Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Digital Storytelling ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Psychological Comorbidities ◽  
Health Related

Background The number of older adults is increasing rapidly worldwide. Older adults face a unique set of challenges and may experience a range of psychological comorbidities. Advances in multimedia technology have allowed for digital storytelling to be utilized as an intervention for health-related outcomes. Objective The primary aim of the proposed systematic review is to examine the reported health-related outcomes for older adults engaged in digital storytelling. The review also aims to examine the methods associated with digital storytelling, characteristics of digital story products, and implementational considerations. Methods This protocol adheres to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will systematically search selected electronic databases to identify studies that meet our eligibility criteria. From the included studies, data will be extracted and synthesized using a narrative approach and summarized in tables. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results Systematic searches, data extraction and analysis, and writing of the systematic review are expected to be completed by the end of 2019. Conclusions The proposed systematic review will summarize the existing studies using digital storytelling to improve health-related outcomes for older adults. Results from this review will provide an evidence base for the development of digital storytelling interventions that are effective and implementable with older adults. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/15512

A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence for the Use of Lifestyle Planning in People with Learning Disabilities

1999 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Rowe ◽  
A. Rudkin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Current Evidence Base

Lifestyle planning (LP) for people with learning disabilities is largely supported by qualitative rather than quantitative research. LP is a time-consuming and potentially resource-intensive area of practice which is becoming more prevalent in the UK. We present the first systematic review of the qualitative evidence base for the use of LP in people with learning disabilities. Such evidence concerns the special characteristics of LP and its outcomes in descriptive rather than quantitative terms. Qualitative research is usually aimed at enhancing validity by grounding theory in data collected. Twenty-one studies passed eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review, but only ten provided any outcome data, the others being concerned with process only. A replicable search strategy was employed and the resulting original data sources were critically reviewed with respect to major concepts and categories in the areas of: planning process, choices and preferences, ethics and outcomes. Explicitly person-centred approaches such as essential lifestyle planning are contrasted with more service-led methods such as individual programme planning. There are major methodological limitations in much of the available literature and suggestions for future research to clarify matters are made. The current evidence base suggests that no form of LP has significantly better outcomes than any other form and that it is not clear if LP in general enhances outcomes. Ongoing use of person centred planning in particular is informed by ethical considerations and is evolving in its structure and function.

scholarly journals Intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prevention: a systematic review on factors affecting adherence

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e037036
Author(s):  
Richard Greenall ◽  
Rachel E Davis
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention

ObjectiveVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially fatal complication of hospitalisation. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is one approach to reducing the likelihood of a VTE. Adherence to IPC is known to be inadequate though the reasons for this remain unclear. This systematic review explores factors that affect adherence to IPC in the inpatient context.MethodsInformation sources—EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were searched for literature between January 1960 and May 2019. Eligibility criteria—studies were included if they focused on inpatient care and examined factors affecting adherence to IPC devices.ResultsIncluded studies—a total of 20 out of 1476 studies were included. Synthesis of results—eight factors were identified that affected adherence: patient discomfort (n=8), healthcare professionals’ knowledge and behaviours (n=6), mobilisation (n=6), equipment supply and demand (n=3), the use of guidelines (n=3), intensive care context (n=2), computer-assisted prescribing (n=2) and patients’ knowledge of IPC (n=1).ConclusionOverall while the evidence base is quite limited, a number of factors were shown to affect adherence to IPC. These findings could be used to inform future research and quality improvement efforts to increase adherence in this very important, but currently under-researched area.

scholarly journals Indoor Nature Interventions for Health and Wellbeing of Older Adults in Residential Settings: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. e184-e199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola L Yeo ◽  
Lewis R Elliott ◽  
Alison Bethel ◽  
Mathew P White ◽  
Sarah G Dean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Public Health Practice ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Residential Settings ◽  
Health And Wellbeing ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Effective Public Health

Abstract Background and Objectives Having contact with nature can be beneficial for health and wellbeing, but many older adults face barriers with getting outdoors. We conducted a systematic review of quantitative studies on health and wellbeing impacts of indoor forms of nature (both real and simulated/artificial), for older adults in residential settings. Research Design and Methods Search terms relating to older adults and indoor nature were run in 13 scientific databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, AgeLine, Environment Complete, AMED, PsychINFO, EMBASE, HMIC, PsychARTICLES, Global Health, Web of Knowledge, Dissertations and Theses Global, and ASSIA). We also pursued grey literature, global clinical trials registries, and a range of supplementary methods. Results Of 6,131 articles screened against eligibility criteria, 26 studies were accepted into the review, and were quality-appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool. The participants were 930 adults aged over 60. Nature interventions and health/wellbeing outcomes were heterogeneous, which necessitated a narrative synthesis. The evidence base was generally weak, with 18 of 26 studies having a high risk of bias. However, several higher-quality studies found indoor gardening and horticulture programs were effective for cognition, psychological wellbeing, social outcomes, and life satisfaction. Discussion and Implications There is inconsistent evidence that indoor nature exposures are beneficial for older care residents. We expect that successful interventions were, at least partly, facilitating social interaction, supporting feelings of autonomy/control, and promoting skill development, that is, factors not necessarily associated with nature per se. Higher-quality studies with improved reporting standards are needed to further elucidate these mechanisms.

scholarly journals Examining Challenges to Incorporate End Users in the Development of Digital Health Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Duffy ◽  
Greg Christie ◽  
Sylvain Moreno
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Complex Interventions ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
End Users ◽  
Digital Design ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Healthcare Outcomes ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

BACKGROUND Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) are rapidly evolving the landscape of healthcare. Multiple studies have shown their propensity to extend both the quality and reach of interventions. However, failure to improve DHI development is linked to failed uptake and health outcomes. This dilemma is further conflicted by the colliding backdrops of the digital and health industries respectively, which approach, understand and involve end users differently in the framing of a DHI. OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review is to assess the challenges to incorporate end users in the development of digital health interventions, to identify emerging hybridised solutions, and to identify limitations and gaps for areas of future investigation. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) will be used to structure this protocol. A systematic search of the PsycInfo, PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, CINAHL and IEEE Xplore databases will be conducted. Additionally, the PerSPEcTiF guidelines for complex interventions will be consulted. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any discrepancies will then be discussed and resolved. Two reviewers will independently extract and validate data from the included studies into a standardised form and conduct quality appraisal. RESULTS As of February 2020, we have completed a preliminary literature search examining challenges to incorporate end users in the development of DHI. Systematic searches, data extraction and analysis, and writing of the systematic review are expected to be completed by August 2021. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review aims to provide an effective summary of challenges to incorporate end users in the development of DHIs. Results from this review will provide an evidence base for a more harmonised approach to end users that satisfies the needs of healthcare outcomes and digital design and development respectively.

scholarly journals Healthcare experiences of perpetrators of domestic violence and abuse: a systematic review and meta-synthesis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e043183
Author(s):  
Marilia A Calcia ◽  
Simran Bedi ◽  
Louise M Howard ◽  
Heidi Lempp ◽  
Sian Oram
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Social Consequences ◽  
Healthcare Staff ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Domestic Violence And Abuse

ObjectivesDomestic violence and abuse (DVA) is highly prevalent, with severe adverse consequences to the health and well-being of survivors. There is a smaller evidence base on the health of DVA perpetrators and their engagement with healthcare services. This review examines the experiences of perpetrators of DVA of accessing healthcare services and the barriers and facilitators to their disclosure of abusive behaviours in these settings.DesignA systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Data sourcesA systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, HMIC, BNID, CINAHL, ASSIA, IBSS, SSCI (peer-reviewed literature) and NDLTD, OpenGrey and SCIE Online (grey literature). Each database was searched from its start date to 15 March 2020. Eligibility criteria required that studies used qualitative or mixed methods to report on the experiences of healthcare use by perpetrators of DVA. A meta-ethnographic method was used to analyse the extracted data.ResultsOf 30,663 papers identified, six studies (n=125 participants; 124 men, 1 woman) met the inclusion criteria. Barriers to disclosure of DVA to healthcare staff included perpetrators’ negative emotions and attitudes towards their abusive behaviours; fear of consequences of disclosure; and lack of trust in healthcare services’ ability to address DVA. Facilitators of disclosure of DVA and engagement with healthcare services were experiencing social consequences of abusive behaviours; feeling listened to by healthcare professionals; and offers of emotional and practical support for relationship problems by healthcare staff.ConclusionsDVA perpetration is a complex issue with multiple barriers to healthcare engagement and disclosure. However, healthcare services can create positive conditions for the engagement of individuals who perpetrate abuse.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017073818.

scholarly journals One year into the COVID-19 pandemic: What do we know so far from studies assessing risk and mitigation of droplet aerosolisation during endonasal surgery? A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Williams ◽  
Samuel Leong
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
World Health Organisation ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Important Variable ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
World Health ◽  
Endonasal Surgery ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
One Year

Objectives As we pass the anniversary of the declaration of a global pandemic by the World Health Organisation, it invites us to reflect upon the inescapable changes that coronavirus has wrought upon ENT and, in particular, rhinological practice. As it remains unclear when we will globally emerge from the shadow of COVID-19, a critical analysis of the evidence base on both the assessment and mitigation of risk is vital for ENT departments worldwide. This article presents a systematic review of the literature examining articles which consider either the quantification of risk or strategies to mitigate risk specifically in the setting of rhinological surgery. Design Systematic literature review. Results The literature search yielded a total of 3406 returns with 24 articles meeting eligibility criteria. A narrative synthesis stratified results into two broad themes: those which made an assessment as to the aerosolisation of droplets during sinus surgery, further subdivided into work which considered macroscopically visible droplets and that which considered smaller particles, and those studies which examined the mitigation of this risk. Conclusion Studies considering the aerosolisation of both droplets and smaller particles suggest endonasal surgery carries significant risk. Whilst results both highlight a range of innovative adjunctive strategies and support suction as an important variable to reduce aerosolisation, appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) should be considered mandatory for all healthcare professionals involved in rhinological surgery given studies have demonstrated that close adherence to PPE use is effective at preventing COVID-19 infection.

scholarly journals What is the effect of giving the grazers access to additional nutrient sources on biodiversity in semi-natural pastures? A systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Envall ◽  
Jan Bengtsson ◽  
Simon Jakobsson ◽  
Maj Rundlöf ◽  
Charlotte Åberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Nutrient Sources ◽  
History Of ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Two Stages

Abstract Background Semi-natural pastures are unfertilized grasslands with a long history of traditional low-input grazing management. This kind of pastures are recognized for their high species richness. However, as a consequence of modernization of agriculture, many of the semi-natural pastures have been lost during the last century, leading to a serious threat to farmland biodiversity. Semi-natural pastures are relatively low in productivity. Hence, to increase profitability, farmers may want to give the grazing animals access to additional nutrient sources. This can be done either as supplementary feeding, or by fencing the semi-natural pastures into the same enclosure as improved, more nutrient-rich, pastures. These practices are, however, controversial. It is argued that since semi-natural pastures are species-rich partly because they are nutrient-poor, introducing additional nutrients into the system should be avoided. Accordingly, in Sweden, these interventions are often prohibited while receiving financial subsidies for management of semi-natural pastures. However, since many farmers are dependent on such support to maintain their pastures, these prohibitions often cause problems. The question has been raised whether giving the grazers access to additional nutrient sources really affect the biodiversity in semi-natural pastures, as is assumed. The primary aim of the proposed systematic review is to answer this question. Method Peer-reviewed and grey literature will be searched for using bibliographic databases, search engines, specialist websites and stakeholder contacts. The references will be screened for relevance according to a predefined set of eligibility criteria. The criteria will be tested and clarified iteratively, until consistency in interpretations is achieved. Thereafter, the literature will be screened in two stages, first based upon title and abstract and then by examining full texts. Full text screening will be performed with blinded decisions by two independent reviewers. Each relevant study will then be critically appraised, based on a set of predefined validity criteria. A narrative synthesis will be provided, outlining the evidence base in terms of bibliographic information and study metadata. If possible, quantitative syntheses based on meta-analyses will be performed. Identified relevant knowledge gaps will be highlighted and discussed.

scholarly journals More evidence is needed. Iron, incident cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 241-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane E. Hosking ◽  
Scott Ayton ◽  
Nigel Beckett ◽  
Andrew Booth ◽  
Ruth Peters
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Longitudinal Outcomes ◽  
Dementia Incidence ◽  
Dietary Records ◽  
Study Characteristics ◽  
Quality And Outcomes

Background: Our aim was to systematically review the relationship between iron and incident cognitive decline or dementia from midlife onwards. Methods: Systematic review of eligible studies using Medline, Embase and PsycINFO® for the period from 1 January 1986 to 2 December 2016 (CRD42016023800), where study populations had a mean age of over 50 years and were free of cognitive impairment or dementia at baseline. Two authors independently extracted data according to eligibility criteria and assessed study characteristics, quality and outcomes. Disagreement was resolved by discussion. Results: A total of 1185 relevant records were identified with 12 full-text articles eligible for review. Six studies were excluded, leaving six texts to be included. Sample size ranged from 90 to 7173, with an average follow up of approximately 11.5 years. Baseline iron measures included brain iron ( n = 2), iron-related biomarkers in blood and plasma ( n = 2), and iron intake estimates from dietary records ( n = 2). Outcomes were dementia incidence ( n = 2) and longitudinal outcomes on neuropsychological tests ( n = 4). Bias was evident across studies in one or more of the following: recruitment, iron exposure, outcome assessments, potential confounders, missing data or attrition. Conclusions: Diversity across the small number of identified studies precludes conclusions regarding the role of iron in cognitive decline or dementia. Our review highlights substantial gaps in the evidence base and the need for more comprehensive, higher quality studies in this area.

How effective is group intervention in the treatment for unaccompanied and accompanied refugee minors with mental health difficulties: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 002076402110577
Author(s):  
Ryan Hutchinson ◽  
Natalie King ◽  
Pallab Majumder
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Group Therapy ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Positive Outcome ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Qualitative Measure ◽  
Future Direction ◽  
Refugee Minors

Background: Unaccompanied refugee minors (URM) are at significantly higher risk of trauma exposure and mental illness. Research examining the most effective treatments for this population is limited. Aims: To study the available research evidence on outcomes from various group interventions in this population. The objective is to investigate if these can be used clinically in future interventions. Methods: Systematic review was carried out for patient outcomes where group therapy was used as treatment in URM. Studies with ARM (Accompanied refugee minors) were included because of similarities between these groups and because many studies were mixed population. Results: Seventeen papers met eligibility criteria with a total of N = 1,119 participants. About 80% studies with a quantitative component reported improvements, and 69% of the studies that carried out statistical analyses reported statistically significant improvements in mental health symptoms. Every qualitative measure reported positive outcome for the participants. Studies with URM tended to show improved outcomes more often than studies exclusively with ARM. Conclusions: The evidence demonstrates the efficacy of group therapy in improving mental health outcomes, although the number of studies with robust methodology is small. Group intervention has potential to improve engagement and outcomes of URM with mental illness. Future direction for research is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document