scholarly journals International Regulations for Bioequivalence Approval of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Vinod Gaikwad ◽  
Prajakta Patil ◽  
Atmaram Pawar ◽  
Kakasaheb Mahadik
Keyword(s):  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Drug Products ◽  
International Regulations ◽  
Orally Inhaled Drug Products ◽  
Drug Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Health Canada

Bioequivalence (BE) is established between the brand drug and the generic drug to allow the linking of preclinical and clinical testing conducted on the reference listed drug. Regulatory agencies around the globe have come up with the guidance for locally acting orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) for bioequivalence approaches. The prime intent of the present article is to compare approaches of different international regulatory authorities such as Health Canada, European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration that have published guidance related to locally acting OIDPs. Moreover, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation, India, has published guidelines for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. BE recommendations from global regulatory agencies were based on comparison for different parameters, namely inhaler device, formulation, reference product’s selection, in-vitro as well as in-vivo studies (pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical studies). In the case of in-vivo studies, details about study design, dose choices, inclusion/ exclusion criteria of the subject, study period, endpoint study, and equivalence acceptance criteria were discussed in the present review article.

Alternativas farmacéuticas: ¿pueden ser intercambiables?

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
Miriam del Carmen Carrasco-Portugal ◽  
Francisco Javier Flores-Murrieta
Keyword(s):  
Generic Substitution ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Reference Formulation ◽  
Active Moiety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pharmaceutical Form ◽  
Extent Of Absorption

Pharmaceutical alternatives are products with the same active moiety, but different salt, ester or pharmaceutical form. Regulatory agencies have different criteria for this kind of drug. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) accepts the generic substitution using these alternatives, whereas the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only authorizes generic substitution of pharmaceutical equivalents. The objective of this paper is to describe some relevant aspects that should be considered before deciding on making a generic substitution with pharmaceutical alternatives. It is important to note that a pharmaceutical alternative must show no significant difference in the rate and extent of absorption (bioequivalence) in a well-conducted in vivo study when compared with the reference formulation. Current Mexican regulations state that generic substitution is possible using pharmaceutical alternatives when bioequivalence is demonstrated in in vivo studies conducted under the NOM-177-SSA1-2013 criteria. In conclusion, generic substitution with pharmaceutical alternatives is possible if these products demonstrate in vivo bioequivalence when compared with the reference product.

In Silico Trial Approach For Biomedical Products: A Regulatory Perspective

2022 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jobin Jose ◽  
Shifali S. ◽  
Bijo Mathew ◽  
Della Grace Thomas Parambi
Keyword(s):  
In Silico ◽  
Regulatory Authority ◽  
Computational Modelling ◽  
The United States ◽  
Regulatory Process ◽  
Modelling And Simulation ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
European Medicines Agency

Abstract: The modern pharmaceutical industry is creating a transition from traditional methods to advanced technologies like artificial intelligence. In the current scenario, continuous efforts are being made to incorporate computational modelling and simulation in drug discovery, development, design, and optimization. With the advancement in technology and modernization, many pharmaceutical companies are approaching in silico trials to develop safe and efficacious medicinal products. To obtain marketing authorization for a medicinal product from the concerned National regulatory Authority, manufacturers must provide evidence for the safety, efficacy, and quality of medical products in the form of in vitro or in vivo methods. However, more recently this evidence was provided to regulatory agencies in the form of modelling and simulation, i.e., in silico evidence. Such evidence (computational or experimental) will only be accepted by the regulatory authorities if it considered as qualified by them and this will require the assessment of the overall credibility of the method. One must consider the scrutiny provided by the regulatory authority to develop or use the new in silico evidence. The United States Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency are the two regulatory agencies in the world that accept and encourage the use of modelling and simulation within the regulatory process. More efforts must be made by other regulatory agencies worldwide to incorporate such new evidence, i.e., modelling and simulation (in silico) within the regulatory process. This review article focuses on the approaches of in silico trials, its verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification involved in the regulatory evaluation of biomedical products that utilize predictive models.

In vitro and in vivo studies of new cationic Zn(II)‐benzonaphthoporphyrazines as photosensitizers for PDT

2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 645-651
Author(s):  
M. Peeva ◽  
M. Shopova ◽  
U. Michelsen ◽  
D. Wöhrle ◽  
G. Petrov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vivo Studies

Effect of caffeine on theophyliine on cerebral blood flow response to brain activation: In vitro and in vivo studies

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S198-S198
Author(s):  
Joseph R Meno ◽  
Thien-son K Nguyen ◽  
Elise M Jensen ◽  
G Alexander West ◽  
Leonid Groysman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Brain Activation ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Blood Flow Response ◽  
Flow Response

Effects of Unfractionated and Low Molecular Weight Heparins on Platelet Thromboxane Biosynthesis “In Vivo”

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (06) ◽  
pp. 942-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Landolfi ◽  
Erica De Candia ◽  
Bianca Rocca ◽  
Giovanni Ciabattoni ◽  
Armando Antinori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Heparin Administration ◽  
To Receive

SummarySeveral “in vitro” and “in vivo” studies indicate that heparin administration may affect platelet function. In this study we investigated the effects of prophylactic heparin on thromboxane (Tx)A2 biosynthesis “in vivo”, as assessed by the urinary excretion of major enzymatic metabolites 11-dehydro-TxB2 and 2,3-dinor-TxB2. Twenty-four patients who were candidates for cholecystectomy because of uncomplicated lithiasis were randomly assigned to receive placebo, unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin or unfractionaed heparin plus 100 mg aspirin. Measurements of daily excretion of Tx metabolites were performed before and during the treatment. In the groups assigned to placebo and to low molecular weight heparin there was no statistically significant modification of Tx metabolite excretion while patients receiving unfractionated heparin had a significant increase of both metabolites (11-dehydro-TxB2: 3844 ± 1388 vs 2092 ±777, p <0.05; 2,3-dinor-TxB2: 2737 ± 808 vs 1535 ± 771 pg/mg creatinine, p <0.05). In patients randomized to receive low-dose aspirin plus unfractionated heparin the excretion of the two metabolites was largely suppressed thus suggesting that platelets are the primary source of enhanced thromboxane biosynthesis associated with heparin administration. These data indicate that unfractionated heparin causes platelet activation “in vivo” and suggest that the use of low molecular weight heparin may avoid this complication.

Effectiveness of the integration of quercetin, turmeric, and N-acetylcysteine in reducing inflammation and pain associated with endometriosis. In-vitro and in-vivo studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Fadin ◽  
Maria C. Nicoletti ◽  
Marzia Pellizzato ◽  
Manuela Accardi ◽  
Maria G. Baietti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vivo Studies
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document