scholarly journals Usefulness of Preoperative Planning by Three-dimensional Planning Software for Pedicle Screw Placement in Thoracolumbar Surgeries: Misplacement Rate and Associated Risk Factors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonori Ozaki ◽  
Kentaro Yamada ◽  
Hiroaki Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Planning Software ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

scholarly journals Anatomic considerations for C2 pedicle screw placement: the use of computerized tomography measurements

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-83
Author(s):  
Adebukoa Onibokun ◽  
Simona Bistazzoni ◽  
Marco Sassi ◽  
Larry T. Khoo
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Computerized Tomography ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
C2 Pedicle Screw ◽  
Anatomical Knowledge ◽  
Axial Ct ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pedicle Width

OBJECTIVE: more detailed anatomical knowledge of the C2 pedicle is required to optimize and minimize the risk of screw placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the linear and angular dimensions of the true C2 pedicle using axial CT. METHODS: ninety three patients (47 males, 46 females mean age 48 years) who had cervical spinal CT imaging performed were evaluated for this study. Axial images of the C2 pedicle were selected and the following pedicle parameters were determined: pedicle width (PW, the mediolateral diameter of the pedicle isthmus, perpendicular to the pedicle axis) and pedicle transverse angle (PTA, that is, the angle between the pedicle axis and the midline of the vertebral body). RESULTS: the overall mean pedicle width was 5.8 1.2mm. The mean pedicle width in males (6.01.3mm) was greater than that in the female subjects (5.6 1.1mm). This difference was not found to be statistically significant (p=.6790). The overall mean pedicle transverse angle was 43.93.9 degrees. The mean PTA in males was 43.23.8 degrees, while that in females was 44.73.7 degrees. CONCLUSION: preoperative planning is absolutely mandatory, particularly in determining not only screw trajectory, but in analyzing individual patient anatomy and reception to a C2 pedicle screw.

scholarly journals Design and basic research on accuracy of a novel individualized three-dimensional printed navigation template in atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0214460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Long Chen ◽  
Ya-Fen Xie ◽  
Jian-Xin Li ◽  
Wu Wu ◽  
Guan-Nan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Navigation Template

Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 817-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Bledsoe ◽  
Doug Fenton ◽  
Jeremy L. Fogelson ◽  
Eric W. Nottmeier
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Dimensional Image ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screw ◽  
Upper Thoracic

Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimoto Ishikawa ◽  
Tokumi Kanemura ◽  
Go Yoshida ◽  
Zenya Ito ◽  
Akio Muramoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cervical Pedicle ◽  
Grade 3

Object The authors performed a retrospective clinical study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (3D FN). Methods The study involved 62 consecutive patients undergoing posterior stabilization of the cervical spine between 2003 and 2008. Thirty patients (126 screws) were treated using conventional techniques (CVTs) with a lateral fluoroscopic view, whereas 32 patients (150 screws) were treated using 3D FN. Screw positions were classified into 4 grades based on the pedicle wall perforations observed on postoperative CT. Results The prevalence of perforations in the CVT group was 27% (34 screws): 92 (73.0%), 12 (9.5%), 6 (4.8%), and 16 (12.7%) for Grade 0 (no perforation), Grade 1 (perforation < 1 mm), Grade 2 (perforation ≥ 1 and < 2 mm), and Grade 3 (perforation ≥ 2 mm), respectively. In the 3D FN group, the prevalence of perforations was 18.7% (28 screws): 122 (81.3%), 17 (11.3%), 6 (4%), and 5 (3.3%) for Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the prevalence of Grade 1 or higher perforations between the CVT and 3D FN groups. A higher prevalence of malpositioned CPSs was seen in Grade 2 or higher (17.5% vs 7.3%, p < 0.05) in the 3D FN group and Grade 3 (12.7% vs 7.3%, p < 0.05) perforations in the CVT group. The ORs for CPS malpositioning in the CVT group were 2.72 (95% CI 1.16–6.39) in Grade 2 or higher perforations and 3.89 (95% CI 1.26–12.02) in Grade 3 perforations. Conclusions Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation can improve the accuracy of CPS insertion; however, severe CPS malpositioning that causes injury to the vertebral artery or neurological complications can occur even with 3D FN. Advanced techniques for the insertion of CPSs and the use of modified insertion devices can reduce the risk of a malpositioned CPS and provide increased safety.

scholarly journals Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study

Neurospine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 839-844
Author(s):  
Qi Zhang ◽  
Ming-Xing Fan ◽  
Xiao-Guang Han ◽  
Ya-Jun Liu ◽  
Da He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Severe Obesity ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
Screw Position

Objective: To identify potential risk factors of unsatisfactory screw position during robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation.Methods: A retrospective analysis of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation performed in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 was conducted. Research data was collected from the medical record and imaging systems. Univariate tests were performed on the potential risk factors (patient’s characteristics and surgical factors) of unsatisfactory screw position during robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation. For statistically significant variables in univariate tests, a logistic regression test was used to identify independent risk factors for unsatisfactory screw position.Results: A total of 780 pedicle screws placed in 163 robot-assisted surgeries were analyzed. The rate of perfect screw positions was 93.08%, and the unsatisfactory rate was 6.92%. In patients with severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) (odds ratio [OR], 2.459; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.199–5.044; p = 0.014), osteoporosis (T ≤ -2.5) (OR, 1.857; 95% CI, 1.046–3.295; p = 0.034), and the segments 3 levels away from the tracker (OR, 2.216; 95% CI, 1.119–4.387; p = 0.022), robot-assisted pedicle screw placement has a higher risk of screw malposition.Conclusion: During robot-assisted pedicle screw placement for patients with severe obesity, osteoporosis, and segments 3 levels away from the tracker, vigilance should be maintained during surgery to avoid postoperative complications due to unsatisfactory screw position.

Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl Lau ◽  
Samuel W. Terman ◽  
Rakesh Patel ◽  
Frank La Marca ◽  
Paul Park
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw

Object A reported risk factor for adjacent-segment disease is injury to the superior facet joint from pedicle screw placement. Given that the facet joint is not typically visualized during percutaneous pedicle screw insertion, there is a concern for increased facet violation (FV) in minimally invasive fusion procedures. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the incidence of FV among patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The impact of O-arm navigation compared with traditional fluoroscopy on FV in MITLIF is also assessed, as are risk factors for FV. Methods The authors identified a consecutive population of patients who underwent MITLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw placement, as well as a matched cohort of patients who underwent open TLIF. Postoperative CT imaging was assessed to determine intraarticular FV due to pedicle screw placement. Patients were stratified into minimally invasive and open TLIF groups. Within the MITLIF group, the authors performed a subanalysis of image guidance methods used in cases of FV. Two-tailed Student t-test, ANOVA, chi-square testing, and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 282 patients were identified, with a total of 564 superior pedicle screw placements. The MITLIF group consisted of 142 patients with 284 screw insertions. The open TLIF group consisted of 140 patients with 280 screw insertions. Overall, 21 (7.4%) of 282 patients experienced FV. A total of 21 screws violated a facet joint for a screw-based FV rate of 3.7% (21 of 564 screws). There were no significant differences between the MITLIF and open TLIF groups in the percentage of patients with FV (6.3% vs 8.6%) and or the percentage of screws with FV (3.2% vs 4.3%) (p = 0.475 and p = 0.484, respectively). Further stratifying the MI group into O-arm navigation and fluoroscopic guidance subgroups, the patient-based rates of FV were 10.8% (4 of 37 patients) and 4.8% (5 of 105 patients), respectively, and the screw-based rates of FV were 5.4% (4 of 74 screws) and 2.4% (5 of 210 screws), respectively. There was no significant difference between the subgroups with respect to patient-based or screw-based FV rates (p = 0.375 and p = 0.442, respectively). The O-arm group had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.021). BMI greater than 29.9 was independently associated with higher FV (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.65–8.53, p = 0.039). Conclusions The findings suggest that minimally invasive pedicle screw placement is not associated with higher rates of FV. Overall violation rates were similar in MITLIF and open TLIF. Higher BMI, however, was a risk factor for increased FV. The use of O-arm fluoroscopy with computer-assisted guidance did not significantly decrease the rate of FV.

Design and Application of a Novel Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printed Drill Navigational Guiding in Atlantoaxial Pedicle Screw Placement

2018 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. e1-e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinwei Pu ◽  
Mengchen Yin ◽  
Junming Ma ◽  
Yujie Liu ◽  
Guanghui Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Design And Application
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document