Western Law, Russian Justice: Dostoevsky, the Jury Trial, and the Law

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 506
Author(s):  
Ronald D. LeBlanc ◽  
Gary Rosenshield
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Gary Rosenshield

Gary Rosenshield é PhD pela Universidade de Wisconsin-Madison e foi professor emérito do departamento de Língua e Literatura Eslavas na mesma universidade. Autor de Western Law, Russian Justice: Dostoesvky, the Jury Trial, and the Law e Pushkin and the Genres of Madness: The Masterpieces of 1833. Publicou também o estudo Crime and Punishment: The Techniques of the Omniscient Author (Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press, 1978), do qual foram traduzidos a introdução e dois capítulos: “O narrador, Raskólnikov e o epílogo” e “O ponto de vista elevado”. Joseph Frank, no capítulo em que aborda o processo de criação de Crime e castigo, cita, em nota, esse estudo, recomendando-o como uma “análise cuidadosa e perspicaz” e “um dos melhores estudos dedicados ao romance” (FRANK, Joseph. Dostoiévski: Os anos milagrosos, 1865-1871. São Paulo: Edusp, 2003, p. 125). Victor Terras engrossa o coro elogioso ao afirmar tratar-se de uma “excelente análise”


Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Habiburrahman Habiburrahman

This paper describes the polemic of the distribution of waris for foster child in the study of Islamic law and the laws and regulations in Indonesia. The distribution of estate to foster child was regulated in article 209 in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Thus, this is a signal that the influence of customary law and Western law had entered in KHI . Therefore, by this paper, Author would like to emphasize that the distri­bu­tion of waris to the foster child by using the concept of wasiat wajibah in KHI is wrong. It is not based on the shari'ah (qath‘iy al-dilâlah), but rather based on logic of the law and humanitarian considerations, and it is zhan­niy al-dilâlah. Thus, author sure that the distribution of waris by one third (1/3) of estate to the foster child by using the concept of wasiat wajibah is an erroneous ijtihad, cotradiction with the texts, and could be detrimental to the main heirs.


Author(s):  
Oleh Yemets ◽  
Olha Zlahoda ◽  
Yevhen Shapovalenko

The purpose of the article is to study the genesis of national legislation in the field of operational investigative activities in independent Ukraine, with the subsequent identification of conceptual problems, as well as the development and publication of proposals to address them taking into account the experience of post-Soviet countries. It is established that the process of formation and becoming of the legal basis for the work of operative subdivisions of authorized state bodies is not complete and it must be continued, as there are problems even with definition of conceptual bases of such activity, in particular related to the requirements of current legislation regarding its grounds. It is a question of whether the operative subdivisions should initiate operative-investigative cases and conduct operational investigative activities or send materials about preparations for a crime to the pre-trial investigation body, except for minor gravity, that is, about crimes being prepared, as well as persons preparing crimes. To solve the problem, we propose to discuss amendments to article 6 of the Law of Ukraine «On operational investigative activities», which would exclude from the list of grounds for conducting for operational investigative activities such as the availability of sufficient information obtained in accordance with the law, requiring verification by means of operational investigative measures, about crimes being prepared, as well as persons preparing crimes. At the same time, information about crimes being prepared, as well as persons who are preparing crimes, should be immediately entered into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations, except for minor ones, and preparation for a crime should be investigated immediately by an investigator. This model is more consistent with the work of Western law enforcement agencies, but, as the study showed, is not typical of post-Soviet countries. These proposals, as well as alternative ones, on the harmonization of operational investigative and Criminal procedure legislation require professional discussion, but changes in one form or another are inevitable. The obtained and published results can be used by scientists in further research in this area, as well as law enforcement officers in the conduct of operational investigative activities and crime investigations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-143
Author(s):  
Anthony Carty

Abstract The Western international law of territory starts from a standpoint of the priority of the State over its population. The latter is merely an object of the ownership of the State. Title to territory rests on dominant evidence of State activity. The activity of so-called private individuals or economic activity of peoples do not count towards title to territory in the case law of international tribunals. This article contests the foundations of such a perspective. The so-called Western law of territory was devised by Western States to divide up among themselves the territory of non-Western ‘non-peoples’, culminating in the racist Island of Palmas Arbitration. Carl Schmitt provides the makings of an alternative history of the law of territory. It is, and should be, the law of the homelands of peoples, historically located on particular spaces. Peoples precede States, which are merely institutions used by Peoples to protect and administer their homelands. Whatever the difficulties of locating the homelands to which Peoples belong, escape into the so-called Western law of territory as a way to ‘Peace through the Rule of Law’ is an illusion – described contemptuously by the political theorist Raymond Aron as a Law of empty spaces. Without justice, there is no law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document