The Joint Effect of Presentation Format and Disclosure Balance on Investors’ Reactions to Sensitivity Disclosures of Hedging Instruments

Author(s):  
Wenhuan Liu ◽  
Hun-Tong Tan ◽  
Tu Xu ◽  
Jixun Zhang

Derivative-related risk disclosure has been a key issue in accounting regulation and research, and sensitivity analysis is the most popular form of quantitative derivative-related disclosure. In an experiment, we find that, relative to disclosing potential losses only, disclosing both potential gains and potential losses associated with hedged items and derivatives leads to favorable investor reactions when information about net risk after hedging is omitted from the disclosure, but not when net risk is shown. We further show that disclosing net risk in addition to hedged-item and derivative risks is as effective at lowering investors’ risk perceptions as disclosing potential gains. Finally, we demonstrate that disclosing net risk and disclosing potential gains affect investors’ judgments through different mechanisms. Our results have important implications for investors, managers, and regulators.

2013 ◽  
pp. 81-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Durst

Intangibles are viewed as the key drivers in most industries, and current research shows that firms voluntarily disclose information about their investments in intangibles and their potential benefits. Yet little is known of the risks relating to such resources and the disclosures firms make about such risks. In order to obtain a more balanced and complete picture of firms' activities, information about the risky side of their intangibles is also needed. This exploratory study provides some descriptive insights into intangibles-related risk disclosure in a sample of 16 large banks from the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), Germany and Italy. Annual report data is analyzed using the three Intellectual Capital dimensions. Study findings illustrate the variety of intangibles-related risk disclosure as demonstrated by the banks involved.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (04) ◽  
pp. 1950017
Author(s):  
Kevin Huu Phat Thai ◽  
Jacqueline Birt

This paper investigates the value relevance of risk disclosures relating to the use of financial instruments in the Australian metals and mining sector. The metals and mining sector is the largest sector in Australia by the number of companies and includes several of the world’s largest diversified resource producers. Using a manually constructed disclosure index based on AASB 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, we find that financial instrument-related risk disclosures provide useful information to equity investors. In terms of individual risk category, liquidity risk is shown to be the most informative risk disclosure. We contribute to a stream of the literature examining the informativeness of risk disclosures. The results of this study have implications for several stakeholders regarding the quality assessment of risk reporting. In addition, the findings are of interest to standard setters since further regulatory changes are under consideration to improve the presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia A. Cunningham ◽  
Robert Yu ◽  
Tina Shih ◽  
Sharon Giordano ◽  
Lorna H. McNeill ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2222
Author(s):  
Meredith Chapman ◽  
Matthew Thomas ◽  
Kirrilly Thompson

The equestrian industry reports high rates of serious injuries, illness and fatalities when compared to other high-risk sports and work environments. To address these ongoing safety concerns, a greater understanding of the relationship between human risk perception, values and safety behaviours is required. This paper presents results from an international survey that explored relationships between a respondents’ willingness to take risk during daily activities along with, their perceptions of risk and behaviours during horse-related interactions. Respondents’ comments around risk management principles and safety-first inspirations were also analysed. We examined what humans think about hazardous situations or activities and how they managed risk with suitable controls. Analysis identified three important findings. First, safe behaviours around horses were associated with safety training (formal and/or informal). Second, unsafe behaviours around horses were associated with higher levels of equestrian experience as well as income from horse-related work. Finally, findings revealed a general acceptance of danger and imminent injury during horse interactions. This may explain why some respondents de-emphasised or ‘talked-down’ the importance of safety-first principles. In this paper we predominantly reported quantitative findings of respondents self-reported safety behaviours, general and horse-related risk perceptions despite injury or illness. We discussed the benefits of improved safety-first principles like training, risk assessments, rider-horse match with enriched safety communications to enhance risk-mitigation during human–horse interactions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-648
Author(s):  
Joann Varickanickal ◽  
Elijah Bisung ◽  
Susan J Elliott

Abstract Inadequate access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) exposes many vulnerable populations, especially women and girls, to preventable diseases around the world. This paper reports findings from a photovoice project that explored water-related risk perceptions and health outcomes among women in Nyanchwa, Kenya. Thirteen women in four age categories were recruited for this study in July 2016 using the ‘snowball’ technique. From the results, inadequate access to WaSH was associated with increased water collection burden on women and children; environmental pollution; poor educational outcomes; loss of time due to water collection and poor sanitation infrastructure. Some barriers to change identified include financial barriers and inadequate government support. The identified risks and barriers are important considerations for the design, evaluation and mainstreaming of WaSH programs in resource constrained settings.


Risk Analysis ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agustin Robles Morua ◽  
Kathleen E. Halvorsen ◽  
Alex S. Mayer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document