Do Risk Disclosures Relating to the Use of Financial Instruments Matter? Evidence from the Australian Metals and Mining Sector

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (04) ◽  
pp. 1950017
Author(s):  
Kevin Huu Phat Thai ◽  
Jacqueline Birt
Keyword(s):  
Value Relevance ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
Regulatory Changes ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Risk Disclosures ◽  
Risk Reporting

This paper investigates the value relevance of risk disclosures relating to the use of financial instruments in the Australian metals and mining sector. The metals and mining sector is the largest sector in Australia by the number of companies and includes several of the world’s largest diversified resource producers. Using a manually constructed disclosure index based on AASB 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, we find that financial instrument-related risk disclosures provide useful information to equity investors. In terms of individual risk category, liquidity risk is shown to be the most informative risk disclosure. We contribute to a stream of the literature examining the informativeness of risk disclosures. The results of this study have implications for several stakeholders regarding the quality assessment of risk reporting. In addition, the findings are of interest to standard setters since further regulatory changes are under consideration to improve the presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.

scholarly journals Investors’ Responses on SOE’s Liquidity Risk Disclosures: Case of Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32
Author(s):  
Ira Geraldina ◽  
Hilda Rossieta ◽  
Ratna Wardhani
Keyword(s):  
Value Relevance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Financial Accounting ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Risk Disclosures

This study aims to examine the value relevance of liquidity risk disclosure of Indonesia listed state owned enterprises after Indonesia Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, Disclosure of Financial Instruments (Revised in 2010 and 2014). This study uses 20 Indonesia listed state owned enterprises during period of 2012-2017 or 115 firm years as final samples. Using panel data analysis, this study shows that liquidity risk disclosure is relevant information for investors in Indonesia stock exchange. Investors response differently on liquidity risk disclosure before and after the announcement windows period of financial reports. The main contribution of this is examining the value relevance of liquidity risk disclosure of Indonesia listed state owned enterprises.

Risk Disclosures in the Annual Reports of Italian Listed Companies

2014 ◽  
pp. 141-168
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Neri ◽  
Antonella Russo
Keyword(s):  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Risk Disclosures ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Increases In Risk ◽  
Risk Reporting

The study examines the relevance of risk reporting in the field of firm voluntary disclosure with an empirical work on Italian listed firms. The motivation of this study is the implementation of the Directive 51/2003/CE in Italy (D.Lgs. 32/2007), a sample of companies listed on the Italian Stock Exchange is selected to investigate the relationship between risk disclosure and company characteristics. This paper explores whether there are significant increases in risk reporting over a period of five years and investigates if risk disclosure is influenced only by new law requirement or also by other possible drivers. A content analysis is performed to obtain a measure of risk narrative disclosure. Then several hypothesis tests are carried out to verify whether there are any corporate differences between companies with different levels of risk disclosure, using univariate and multivariate analysis. Our results on the first question document significant increases in Italian companies' levels of risk disclosures. We find also that the disclosure is not only determined by the new law requirements but also by other drivers such as company size.

scholarly journals Risk Disclosure and Firm Value: Evidence from the United Kingdom

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (55) ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Tache Marta
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Ifrs 7 ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Risk Disclosures

Abstract The International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) aimed to increase the decision usefulness of firms’ risk disclosures with the 2007 introduction of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 7. Specifically, listed firms were mandated to provide information to the market on both their (1) exposure and (2) risk management, which are associated with holding their financial instruments. This study investigates whether IFRS 7 financial instruments and their disclosures are associated with firm valuation. Using data on premiumlisted United Kingdom (UK) companies, for the period 2007–2019, I find evidence that firm value (proxied by Tobin's Q) is negatively associated with the quantity of IFRS 7 interest and credit risk disclosures. I further find that the market value decreases with the presence of quantitative information tabulated in the disclosures. The findings of this study have important implications for the IASB's standard-setting process.

scholarly journals ENVIRONMENTAL RISK DISCLOSURE PRACTICE IN MALAYSIA: AN EMPHASIS ON PLANTATION INDUSTRY

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Haslinda Yusoff ◽  
Faizah Darus ◽  
Mustaffa Mohamed Zain ◽  
Yussri Sawani ◽  
Tamoi Janggu
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Risk ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Environmental Conservation ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Initial Idea ◽  
Disclosure Practice ◽  
Risk Reporting

The aim of this study is to investigate the environmental-related risk management practices of publicly listed companies in Malaysia. A content analysis on the 2012 to 2014 annual and sustainability reports of all companies in the plantation industry has been carried out. Using a disclosure rating index, the quantity and quality of the environmental-related risks disclosures have been examined. The results reveal that the quantity and quality of disclosures are rather low and minimal. “Pollution and abatement-commitment” is found to be the most disclosed category and information, followed by “environmental conservation-energy”, whilst, “pollution and abatement–noise outdoor” is the least disclosed one. Generally, majority of the disclosures showed a decreasing trend. These findings generally put forward an initial idea that the plantation companies in Malaysia gave minimal attention to environmental risk reporting henceforth signify that disclosure practice is not critical to their sustainability agenda and value creation.

An exploratory study of intangibles risk disclosure in annual reports of banking companies from the UK, US, Germany and Italy - Some descriptive insights

2013 ◽  
pp. 81-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Durst
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
The United States ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Key Drivers ◽  
The Uk

Intangibles are viewed as the key drivers in most industries, and current research shows that firms voluntarily disclose information about their investments in intangibles and their potential benefits. Yet little is known of the risks relating to such resources and the disclosures firms make about such risks. In order to obtain a more balanced and complete picture of firms' activities, information about the risky side of their intangibles is also needed. This exploratory study provides some descriptive insights into intangibles-related risk disclosure in a sample of 16 large banks from the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), Germany and Italy. Annual report data is analyzed using the three Intellectual Capital dimensions. Study findings illustrate the variety of intangibles-related risk disclosure as demonstrated by the banks involved.

Judging the Relevance of Fair Value for Financial Instruments

2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 2075-2098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Koonce ◽  
Karen K. Nelson ◽  
Catherine M. Shakespeare
Keyword(s):  
Value Relevance ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Counterfactual Reasoning ◽  
Financial Instrument ◽  
Relevance Judgments

ABSTRACT We conduct three experiments to test if investors' views about fair value are contingent on whether the financial instrument in question is an asset or liability, whether fair values produce gains or losses, and whether the item will or will not be sold/settled soon. We draw on counterfactual reasoning theory from psychology, which suggests that these factors are likely to influence whether investors consider fair value as providing information about forgone opportunities. The latter, in turn, is predicted to influence investors' fair value relevance judgments. Results are generally supportive of the notion that judgments about the relevance of fair value are contingent. Attempts to influence investors' fair value relevance judgments by providing them with information about forgone opportunities are met with mixed success. In particular, our results are sensitive to the type of information provided and indicate the difficulty of overcoming investors' (apparent) strong beliefs about fair value. Data Availability: Contact the authors.

Firm Use of Cybersecurity Risk Disclosure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanying Jiang ◽  
Joseph Legoria ◽  
Kenneth Reichelt ◽  
Stephanie Walton
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Response Behavior ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Market Reactions ◽  
External Stakeholders ◽  
Risk Disclosures

Increasingly, firms are subject to rising cybersecurity risks. One way that firms can communicate cybersecurity uncertainty and reduce information asymmetry with external stakeholders is through cybersecurity risk disclosures. SEC (2011, 2018) guidance encourages the disclosure of significant cybersecurity risk factors. However, not all firms provide informative or quality disclosures following a cybersecurity breach event. In this study, we examine the firm use of cybersecurity risk disclosures after a cybersecurity breach. We find that not all breached firms alter their cybersecurity disclosure behavior similarly following a breach. Rather, firm prior breach experience and breach-related market reactions impact the provision of additional cybersecurity disclosures. Our study provides initial evidence on when firms provide additional cybersecurity disclosures post-breach and informs regulators and policymakers on how firms utilize cybersecurity risk disclosures as a response behavior.

Classifying the Contents of Cybersecurity Risk Disclosure through Textual Analysis and Factor Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arion Cheong ◽  
Kyunghee Yoon ◽  
Soohyun Cho ◽  
Won Gyun No
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Textual Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Methodology ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Internal Control Weaknesses ◽  
Risk Disclosures

Cybersecurity has garnered much attention due to the increasing frequency and cost of cybersecurity incidents in recent years and become a significant concern for organizations and governments. Regulators such as the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) have also shown an interest in cybersecurity and the quality of cybersecurity risk disclosures. This paper examines the informativeness of cybersecurity risk disclosures when cybersecurity incidents or related internal control weaknesses are reported. In particular, we propose a quantitative methodology, which is a combination of textual analysis and factor analysis, for classifying cybersecurity risk disclosures into nine factors. Our results show different disclosing patterns among firms depending on whether they had cybersecurity incidents and internal control weaknesses. Further, our analysis indicates that firms disclose control-related factors to mediate the negative effect of disclosing vulnerability-related factors. This study provides various stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and researchers, with insight into the informativeness of cybersecurity risk disclosures.

scholarly journals Investigating risk disclosures in Italian integrated reports

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1149-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Guthrie ◽  
Francesca Manes Rossi ◽  
Rebecca Levy Orelli ◽  
Giuseppe Nicolò
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Integrated Reporting ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Risk Disclosures ◽  
Do So

Purpose The paper identifies the types of risks disclosed by Italian organisations using integrated reporting (IR). This paper aims to understand the level and features of risk disclosure with the adoption of IR. Design/methodology/approach The authors use risk classifications already provided in the literature to develop a content analysis of Italian organisations’ integrated reports published. Findings The content analysis reveals that most of the Italian organisations incorporate many types of risk disclosure into their integrated reports. Organisations use this alternative form of reporting to communicate risk differently from how they disclose risks in traditional annual financial reporting. That is, the study finds that the organisations use their integrated reports to disclose a broader group of risks, related to the environment and society, and do so using narrative and visual representation. Originality/value The paper contributes to a narrow stream of research investigating risk disclosure provided through IR, contributing to the understanding of the role of IR in representing an organisational risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document