Clinical Performance of a New Transparent Chlorhexidine Gluconate Central Venous Catheter Dressing

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Olson ◽  
James M. Heilman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Or Education

Abstract As the sciences of vascular access and infection prevention rapidly advance healthcare professionals are often faced with new technologies designed to help, but which are often so complicated to use that they cause unforeseen problems. As a vascular access team at a major mid-western hospital, we evaluated the ease-of-use and the performance characteristics of a new transparent catheter dressing, 3M Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN) containing the antimicrobial chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), with a variety of central venous catheters insertion sites in comparison to a standard non-antimicrobial dressing Tegaderm® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN). Following IRB approval, sixty-three consenting patients were enrolled and randomized; 33 in the CHG antimicrobial dressing group and 30 in the standard dressing group. Thirty six patients had peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), 20 had intrajugular insertions (IJ), and 7 had subclavian insertions. The new 3M Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN) was evaluated for its ability to permit visualization of the insertion site, ease of use, ease of using correctly, ability to secure the catheter and absorb exudates and remain transparent. The new 3M Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN) was found to be as easy to use in central venous catheter care clinical practice as the standard of care non-antimicrobial transparent adhesive dressing. No additional training or education was required to properly use it. This dressing was applied and removed like standard transparent adhesive dressings, but offered many advantages over standard dressings. Advantages include that it is antimicrobial, handles moderate bleeding, remains transparent and appears to offer greater catheter securement than the Tegaderm® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN) standard dressing. The CHG gel pad also conformed well to the catheter.

A Stuck Hemodialysis Central venous Catheter

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Field ◽  
J. Pugh ◽  
J. Asquith ◽  
S. Davies ◽  
A.D. Pherwani
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous

Background A growing number of hemodialysis patients are dependent upon central venous catheters (CVCs) for long-term vascular access. Although many complications of CVCs have been documented, the phenomenon of the stuck catheter is described relatively infrequently. Case report We describe a case where attempts to remove the line by exploration of the jugular insertion site in theater were unsuccessful and the line was internalized. Discussion The case is then discussed with all available cases in the literature to suggest principles of managing and preventing the stuck catheter phenomenon.

scholarly journals Successful removal of a central venous catheter misplaced in the right subclavian artery using an intravascular stent: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruka Yoshida ◽  
Shinichiro Ikemoto ◽  
Yasuyuki Tokinaga ◽  
Kanako Ejiri ◽  
Tomoyuki Kawamata
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Subclavian Artery ◽  
Axillary Artery ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Thrombotic Complications ◽  
Successful Removal ◽  
Intravascular Stent ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background Cannulation of a central venous catheter is sometimes associated with serious complications. When arterial cannulation occurs, attention must be given to removal of a catheter. Case presentation A 62-year-old man was planned for emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair. After the induction of anesthesia, a central venous catheter was unintentionally inserted into the right subclavian artery. We planned to remove the catheter. Since we considered that surgical repair would be highly invasive for the patient, we decided to remove it using a percutaneous intravascular stent. A stent was inserted through the right axillary artery. The stent was expanded immediately after the catheter was removed. Post-procedural angiography revealed no leakage from the catheter insertion site and no occlusion of the right subclavian and vertebral arteries. There were no obvious hematoma or thrombotic complications. Conclusions A catheter that has been misplaced into the right subclavian artery was safely removed using an intravascular stent.

Hemodynamics Alterations Induced by Central Venous Catheter in Vascular Access for Hemodialysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saulo Gonçalves ◽  
Mário Silva ◽  
Matheus Costa ◽  
Thabata Lucas ◽  
Rudolf Huebner
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous

CE Article: Central Venous Catheter Infection in Canadian Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients: A 5-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Olivia Saqui ◽  
G. Fernandes ◽  
J. Allard
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Catheter Infection ◽  
Significant Health

Highlights A lower CVC infection rate suggests an improvement in practice and education. CVC infection remains a complication that often requires significant health care resources. Use of tunneled CVC and patient education on catheter care reduces CVC infection rates.

Timing of referral for vascular access for hemodialysis: Analysis of the current status and the barriers to timely referral

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 659-665
Author(s):  
Suh Min Kim ◽  
Ahram Han ◽  
Sanghyun Ahn ◽  
Sang-il Min ◽  
Jongwon Ha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Progression Of Kidney Disease ◽  
Current Guidelines ◽  
Timely Referral ◽  
Late Referral

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend the placement of vascular access 6 months before the anticipated start of hemodialysis therapy; however, many patients start hemodialysis using a central venous catheter. We investigated the timing of referral for vascular access, the vascular access type at hemodialysis initiation, and the barriers to a timely referral. Methods: The study involved a retrospective review of 237 patients for whom the first vascular access for hemodialysis was created between January and November 2017. Results: Among the 237 patients, 58.2% were referred before hemodialysis initiation, while 41.8% were referred after hemodialysis initiation. Among the 138 patients, 55, 59, and 24 patients were referred more than 6 months, between 2 and 6 months, and within 2 months before hemodialysis initiation, respectively. Within these subgroups, 3.6%, 10.2%, and 75.0% patients underwent hemodialysis initiation with a central venous catheter, respectively. Among the 99 patients referred after hemodialysis initiation, the reasons for late referral were as follows: unexpected rapid progression of kidney disease (n = 23), noncompliance (n = 21), late visit to the nephrologist (initial visit within 2 months of hemodialysis initiation; n = 14), change of treatment strategy from peritoneal dialysis or transplants (n = 9), and unknown reasons (n = 32). Conclusion: Only 23% of patients were referred for vascular access 6 months before the anticipated hemodialysis therapy. In addition, 53% of patients initiated hemodialysis with a central venous catheter. Avoidance of catheter insertion was mostly successful in patients referred 2 months before hemodialysis initiation. The most common modifiable barrier to the timely referral was noncompliance.

scholarly journals Early prophylaxis of central venous catheter-related thrombosis using 1% chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressings: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Yamashita ◽  
Ayako Takamori ◽  
Akira Nakagawachi ◽  
Yoshinori Tanigawa ◽  
Yohei Hamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gel ◽  
Catheter Related Thrombosis

Abstract To determine the prophylactic effect of using combined 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine gel-impregnated dressings (CGCD) on catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in critically ill patients. This retrospective cohort study was performed in an intensive care unit from November 2009 to August 2014. The CRT incidence diagnosed with ultrasound examination was compared between patients applying CGCD and combined 10% aqueous povidone-iodine and standard transparent dressings (PITD) after central venous catheter insertion into the internal jugular vein for ≥ 48 h. CRT was stratified into early (within 7 days) and late (days 8–14) thromboses. Multivariate analyses using logistic regression models clarified the relationships between early- and late-CRT risks and skin antiseptic and catheter site dressing combinations. CRT occurred in 74 of 134 patients (55%), including 52 with early CRT and 22 with late CRT. Patients receiving CGCD had a significantly lower incidence of early CRT than those receiving PITD (odds ratio = 0.18; 95% confidence interval = 0.07–0.45, p  < .001). No significant association was evident between using CGCD and late CRT (p  = .514). Compared to PITD, CGCD reduced the CRT risk over 7 days in critically ill patients. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000037492.

scholarly journals Comparison of mechanical complications of central venous catheter according to the insertion site in an intensive care unit of Bangladesh

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-119
Author(s):  
Debasish Kumar Saha ◽  
Suraiya Nazneen ◽  
ASM Areef Ahsan ◽  
Madhurima Saha ◽  
Kaniz Fatema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Arterial Puncture ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Femoral Site ◽  
Mechanical Complications ◽  
Catheter Tip

Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is very common in intensive care unit (ICU). CVC is usually inserted in subclavian, internal jugular and femoral veins. However, CVC insertion may lead to significant mechanical complications. Our aim was to detect the occurrence of CVC related mechanical complications according to different insertion site. Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out during the period of May 2016 to July 2019 in Department of Critical Care Medicine, BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, enrolling 349 adult patients requiring new CVC insertion in ICU. Results: Among 349 study subjects, 167 CVC were inserted through subclavian vein, 88 through internal jugular and 94 through femoral vein. There was no significant difference among three groups (subclavian / internal jugular / femoral) in terms of age, gender distribution, presence of co-morbid illness.Total mechanical complicationsin study population was 43 (12.3 %) including pneumothorax (14, 4.0%), arterial puncture (10, 2.9%), hemorrhage (11, 3.2%), catheter tip malposition (6, 1.7%), hemothorax (1, 0.3%) and lost guidewire (1, 0.3%). Pneumothorax was more with internal jugular (9.1%) than subclavian (3.6 %) route, which was statistically significant (p=0.007). Although hemorrhage and arterial puncture events were higher with femoral site than subclavian or internal jugular, which were not significant. Catheter tip malposition occurred in 4 (2.4%) patients with subclavian insertion and 2 (2.3%) patients with internal jugular site, no such event in femoral site. Hemothorax and lost guidewire occurred in only 1 patient with subclavian and internal jugular site respectively. Site-wise total mechanical complications were higher in internal jugular (17.0%) followed bysubclavian (10.8%) site and femoral site (10.6%). Conclusion: In this study, though not statistically significant, CVC related mechanical complications occurred more in subclavian site than in internal jugular or femoral insertion site. Birdem Med J 2020; 10(2): 115-119

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document