scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Bonded to Enamel with a Self-Etching Primer

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Melo Pithon ◽  
Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas ◽  
Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna ◽  
Márlio Vinícius de Oliveira ◽  
Luiz Antônio Alves Bernardes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Adhesive Properties ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Crosshead Speed ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Objective: To evaluate bonding efficacy of activated Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer (TPSEP) used at different time points with Transbond XT to bond metallic orthodontic brackets to bovine incisors. Materials and Methods: The inferior incisors of 210 bovines were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 30). TPSEPs were mixed, activated, and kept activated for 30 (group 30), 21 (group 21), 15 (group 15), 7 (group 7), 3 (group 3), or 1 (group 1) days before bonding, and in one group (group 0) TPSEP was used immediately after mixed. At day zero, incisors in each group were bonded in exactly the same way. After applying TPSEP, brackets were bonded with Transbond XT, according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 24 hours, shear bond strength (SBS) tests were performed for all samples at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and the Adhesive Remnant Index was scored. Results: There were no significant differences between the SBS of groups 0, 1, 3, 7, and 15 (P > .05) However, those groups had higher SBS (P < .05) compared with groups 21 and 30. No significant difference (P > .05) was observed between groups 21 and 30. Despite the decrease in SBS for groups 21 and 30, bond strength values were still satisfactory. Conclusion: After activation, the TPSEP mix can be stored for a period of 15 days without losing its adhesive properties.

scholarly journals Influence of topical fluoride on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and enamel white spot lesions formation

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelle Dantas MONTENARO ◽  
Heloísa Cristina VALDRIGHI ◽  
Max José Pimenta LIMA ◽  
Elisângela de Jesus CAMPOS ◽  
Milton SANTAMARIA-JR
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
White Spot ◽  
White Spot Lesions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ph Cycling ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Introduction Fluoride is considered a key element in the remineralization process of tooth enamel. Objective To evaluate the influence of a topical solution of sodium fluoride (NaF) on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and white spot lesions formation. Material and method Sixty bovine teeth were divided into three groups (n=20). Group 1 (Control): shear bond strength; Group 2: shear bond strength after pH cycling; Group 3: shear bond strength after pH cycling and treatment with 0.04% NaF solution. Groups 2 and 3 underwent pH cycling with demineralizing (6hs) and remineralizing (17hs) solutions at pH of 4.3 and 7.0 respectively for 15 days. The specimens were submitted to the shear bond strength and the Adhesive Remnant Index was verified (ARI). The specimens of each group (n=3) were qualitatively analyzed by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Kruskal-Wallis test assessed the shear bond strength and Fisher's exact test evaluated ARI, with significance level of 5%. Result There was no significant difference among the three groups in shear bond strength (p=0.2679). Significant difference was found in ARI (p=0.0199). The frequency of ARI 1 was 55% in group 1, 90% in group 2, and 80% in group 3. SEM showed difference between the enamel and bonding. Group 2 showed structural change of the enamel surface, adjacent to the bond area; and group 3 showed enamel with characteristics similar to those of group 1. Conclusion It was concluded that there was no NaF influence on the bracket shear bond strength and even in low concentrations it prevented the development of areas of demineralization of white spot lesions.

scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength Comparison between Two Orthodontic Adhesives and Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney G. Northrup ◽  
David W. Berzins ◽  
Thomas Gerard Bradley ◽  
William Schuckit
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Adhesives ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Conventional Brackets ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Objective: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of two adhesives using two types of brackets: a conventional and a self-ligating bracket system. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were collected. The premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth. All three groups were direct bonded. Groups 1 and 2 used light-cured adhesive and primer (Transbond XT) with a conventional (Orthos) and a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2), respectively. Group 3 used a light-cured primer (Orthosolo) and a light-cured adhesive (Blūgloo) with a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 40 ± 2 hours, after which they were debonded and inspected for Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring. Results: The mean shear bond strength was 15.2 MPa for group 1, 23.2 MPa for group 2, and 24.8 MPa for group 3. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test showed significant differences in bond strength (P < .001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 but no significant difference (P > .05) between groups 2 and 3. A Weibull analysis demonstrated that all three groups provided sufficient bond strength with over 90% survival rate at normal masticatory and orthodontic force levels. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference (P > .05) in ARI scores among all three groups. Conclusions: All three groups demonstrated clinically acceptable bond strength. The Damon 2 self-ligating bracket exhibited satisfactory in vitro bond strength with both adhesive systems used.

The Effect of Peri-Bracket Excess Adhesive on Shear Bond Strength and Enamel–Adhesive Interface Morphology With Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy: An In Vitro Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 232020682098739
Author(s):  
Banan Almashali ◽  
Nasser Alqahtani ◽  
Ahmed Almahdy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Laser Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Confocal Laser ◽  
Adhesive Interface ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Interface Characteristics ◽  
Group 1

Aim: To evaluate the effect of leaving excess adhesive around orthodontic brackets on the shear bond strength and on the enamel–adhesive interface characteristics. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty four human premolars were randomly divided into two groups according to the test performed. For the shear bond strength, 120 teeth were bonded with stainless steel orthodontic brackets using Transbond XT light cure adhesive composites. After positioning the bracket and before light curing, excess adhesive was removed according to the test group: group 1, all excess adhesive was removed (0 mm excess); group 2, 1 mm excess adhesive was left; group 3, 2 mm excess adhesive was left; shear bond strength was measured immediately and after three months of natural aging using a universal testing machine; and adhesive remnant index scores were also evaluated. For the enamel–adhesive interface characteristics, 24 teeth were bonded with stainless steel orthodontic brackets using Transbond XT light cure adhesive composites mixed with Rhodamine B fluorescent dye, excess adhesive was removed in the same manner according to the test groups, and teeth were evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results: Time did not significantly affect the bond strength results ( P = .888) but the amount of excess adhesive significantly affected the results ( P < .05). Interaction terms were not significant ( P = .337). In both immediate and aged conditions, group 1 (0 mm excess) presented the highest bond strength results (MPa; P < .05). No significant difference was found in adhesive remnant index scores or enamel–adhesive interface characteristics. Conclusion: Excess adhesive around orthodontic bracket does not increase shear bond strength.

scholarly journals The effect of tooth bleaching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using self-etching primer systems

2013 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 055-060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Akin ◽  
Sertac Aksakalli ◽  
Faruk Ayhan Basciftci ◽  
Abdullah Demir
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Carbamide Peroxide ◽  
Peroxide Bleaching ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACTObjective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of 10% carbamide peroxide and 38% hydrogen peroxide bleaching agents on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using self-etching primer systems.Methods: Forty five freshly extracted human premolar teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 15 teeth each: control (group 1), 10% carbamide peroxide at-home bleached (group 2), and 38% hydrogen peroxide in-office bleached (group 3). Three weeks later, all brackets were bonded using a self-etching primer system. The shear bond strength of these brackets was measured and recorded in MPa. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were determined after the brackets failed. Data were analyzed using Kruskal- Wallis test, pairwise comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test and ARI scores were analyzed using a chi-square test at a significance level of P<.05.Results: The shear bond strengths of group 1 (mean: 17.7 ± 9.7 MPa) were significantly higher (P<.05) than those of group 3 (mean: 9.9 ± 5.4 MPa). No significant differences were found between group 2 (mean: 12.3 ± 4.7) and either group 1 or group 3 (P>.05). ARI scores did not differ significantly among the 3 groups.Conclusions: The use of 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching does not significantly reduce shear bond strength values. In contrast, use of 38% hydrogen peroxide bleaching significantly reduces these values. (Eur J Dent 2013;7:55-60)

scholarly journals Bond Strength of an Amorphous Calcium Phosphate–Containing Orthodontic Adhesive

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff A. Foster ◽  
David W. Berzins ◽  
Thomas G. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Amorphous Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Objective: To determine whether an amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)-containing adhesive has an acceptable level of shear bond strength to be used as an orthodontic adhesive. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted premolars were randomly divided into three groups for orthodontic bonding. Group 1 used a composite resin adhesive (Transbond XT), group 2 was bonded with an ACP-containing adhesive (Aegis Ortho), and group 3 used a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji Ortho LC). All bonded teeth were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 40 ± 2 hours prior to debonding. Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were recorded for each specimen. Results: The mean shear bond strengths for the three test groups were: group 1 (15.2 ± 3.6 MPa), group 2 (6.6 ± 1.5 MPa), and group 3 (8.3 ± 2.8 MPa). A one-way analysis of variance showed a significant difference in bond strengths between the groups. A post hoc Tukey test showed group 1 to be significantly (P &lt; .001) greater than groups 2 and 3. A Kruskal-Wallis test and a Mann-Whitney U-test showed groups 1 and 3 exhibited lower ARI scores than group 2, but a majority of specimens in each group had greater than 50% of the cement removed along with the bracket during debonding. Conclusions: The ACP-containing adhesive demonstrated a low, but satisfactory bond strength needed to function as an orthodontic adhesive.

scholarly journals Effect of fluoride solutions on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 698-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela da Rocha Leódido ◽  
Hianna Oliveira Fernandes ◽  
Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto ◽  
Cristina Dupim Presoto ◽  
Matheus Coêlho Bandéca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tooth Surfaces ◽  
Pre Treatment

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets after pre-treatment with different fluoride solutions. This study used 48 freshly extracted sound bovine incisors that were randomly assigned to 4 experimental groups (n=12). CG: (control) without treatment; NF: 4 min application of neutral fluoride; APF: application of 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) for 4 min; and SFV: application of 5% sodium fluoride varnish for 6 h. For each group, after surface treatment, prophylaxis of enamel and bracket bonding with Transbond XT composite resin (3M) were performed following the manufacturer's specifications. The shear bond strength was performed with a universal testing machine 24 h after fixing the brackets. The tooth surfaces were analyzed to verify the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). There was statistically significant difference among the groups (p<0.0001). CG and NF groups presented significantly higher bond strength than APF and SFV. There was no significant difference between CG and NF or between APF and SFV (p>0.05). The analysis of ARI scores revealed that most failures occurred at the enamel-resin interface. It may be concluded that the pre-treatment of enamel with 1.23% APF and 5% SFV prior to fixing orthodontic brackets reduces shear bond strength values.

scholarly journals Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Four Types of Orthodontic Brackets with Different Base Technologies

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 273-278
Author(s):  
Gaurang H. Chaudhary ◽  
Gianina Salton Mattevi ◽  
Peter Thiuri Gakunga
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acid Etch ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets systems with four different base technologies. Materials and Methods Maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into four groups of thirty specimens each: (1) Master Series™ conventional twin, (2) T3™ self-ligating, (3) Victory series™ conventional twin, and (4) H4™ self-ligating brackets. Maxillary first premolars were bracketed using an acid-etch composite system, and the SBS measured using an Instron Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. The ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were performed with significance predetermined at P ≤ 0.05. Results The overall mean bond strengths were 8.49 ± 2.93, 10.85 ± 3.34, 9.42 ± 2.97, and 9.73 ± 2.62 for the Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 brackets, respectively. One-way ANOVA test gave an F = 3.182 with a P = 0.026. The Group 1 and Group 2 were observed to have statistically significant difference with a P = 0.014. Conclusions The T3 self-ligating one-piece design with microetched Quadra Grip™ base brackets had the highest bond strength. The SBS difference between Group 2, Group 3, and Group 4 was not significant, but the difference between Group 2 and Group 1 was statistically significant.

scholarly journals Influence of bleaching and desensitizing gel on bond strength of orthodontic brackets

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Alves Rodrigues Britto ◽  
Adriana Simoni Lucato ◽  
Heloisa Cristina Valdrighi ◽  
Sílvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Bovine Enamel ◽  
Group 1

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess, in vitro, the influence of bleaching gel and the use of desensitizing agent over bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to bovine enamel. METHODS: One hundred bovine incisors were selected and randomly divided into five groups (n = 20): Group 1, control group (without bleaching); Group 2, bleached with 35% hydrogen peroxide; Group 3, bleached with 35% hydrogen peroxide (three applications, 15 minutes each) and desensitizing agent applied for 10 minutes; Group 4, bleached with 35% hydrogen peroxide for 40 minutes; Group 5, bleached with 35% hydrogen peroxide for 40 minutes with desensitizing agent applied for 10 minutes. Brackets were bonded 7 days after bleaching and submitted to shear bond strength test after 24 hours at a compression rate of 1 mm/minute. After fracture, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was assessed under stereoscopic at 40 x magnification. Shear strength data (MPa) were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test with significance level set at 5%. RESULTS: Group 5 (29.33 MPa) showed significantly higher bond strength than Group 1 (19.19 MPa), Group 2 (20.59 MPa) and Group 4 (23.25 MPa), but with no difference in comparison to Group 3. There was no significant difference among the other groups. The adhesive remnant index showed predominance of score 3, that is, all resin remained adhered to enamel for all groups. CONCLUSION: Bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide with calcium associated with desensitizing agent application produced higher bond strength values of brackets bonded to bovine enamel.

scholarly journals Effects of Different Chlorhexidine Formulations on Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Brackets

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bülent Çatalbas ◽  
Ertuğrul Ercan ◽  
Ali Erdemir ◽  
Ibrahim Erhan Gelgor ◽  
Yahya Orçun Zorba
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Objective: To test the hypothesis that the application of different chlorhexidine formulations to the etched enamel will not affect shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and Methods: Forty-four freshly extracted human premolars were collected and stored in distilled water. The teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric and were rinsed and dried. The teeth then were divided into four equal groups. While Group 1 served as a control, Groups 2 to 4 were treated before bonding with a chlorhexidine formulation that included solution (2%), gel (1%), and mouthwash (0.2%). Orthodontic brackets were bonded with Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). Bond strength results were evaluated with the use of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P &lt; .05) and post hoc tests. Modes of failures were verified by means of scanning electron microscopy. Results: Although no statistically significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 4 (P &gt; .05), both were statistically superior to Groups 2 and 3 (P &lt; .05). In this in vitro study, the observed measures for Groups 2 and 3 (14.5–10.6 MPa) were lower than those for Groups 1 and 4 (27.3–24.9 MPa), but these values were much higher than those required for clinical use (6–8 MPa). Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. The application of chlorhexidine mouth rinse before bonding had no significant effect on the SBS value, and the application of chlorhexidine solution and gel significantly decreased SBS.

scholarly journals The Effects of Prophylactic Ozone Pretreatment of Enamel on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Total or Self-Etch Adhesive Systems

2010 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. 367-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevi Burcak Cehreli ◽  
Asli Guzey ◽  
Neslihan Arhun ◽  
Alev Cetinsahin ◽  
Bahtiyar Unver
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthophosphoric Acid ◽  
Ozone Treatment ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study is to determine (1) shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets bonded with self-etch and total-etch adhesive after ozone treatment (2) bond failure interface using a modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).Methods: 52 premolars were randomly assigned into four groups (n=13) and received the following treatments: Group 1: 30 s Ozone (Biozonix, Ozonytron, Vehos Medikal, Ankara, Turkey) application + Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer (SEP) (3M) + Transbond XT (3M), Group 2: Transbond Plus SEP + Transbond XT, Group 3: 30 s Ozone application + 37% orthophosphoric acid + Transbond XT Primer (3M) + Transbond XT, Group 4: 37% orthophosphoric acid + Transbond XT Primer + Transbond XT. All samples were stored in deionised water at 37oC for 24 hours. Shear debonding test was performed by applying a vertical force to the base of the bracket at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min.Results: The mean SBS results were Group 1: 10.48 MPa; Group 2: 8.89 MPa; Group 3: 9.41 MPa; Group 4: 9.82 MPa. One-Way Variance Test revealed that the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P=0.267). Debonded brackets were examined by an optical microscope at X16 magnification to determine the bond failure interface using a modified ARI. The results were (mean) Group 1: 2.38; Group 2: 1.31; Group 3: 3.00; Group 4: 1.92. Multiple comparisons showed that Groups 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 4 were statistically different (P=0.014, P<.001 and P=0.025).Conclusions: Ozone treatment prior to bracket bonding does not affect the shear bond strength. (Eur J Dent 2010;4:367-373)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document