The Effects of Prophylactic Ozone Pretreatment of Enamel on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Total or Self-Etch Adhesive Systems

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study is to determine (1) shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets bonded with self-etch and total-etch adhesive after ozone treatment (2) bond failure interface using a modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).Methods: 52 premolars were randomly assigned into four groups (n=13) and received the following treatments: Group 1: 30 s Ozone (Biozonix, Ozonytron, Vehos Medikal, Ankara, Turkey) application + Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer (SEP) (3M) + Transbond XT (3M), Group 2: Transbond Plus SEP + Transbond XT, Group 3: 30 s Ozone application + 37% orthophosphoric acid + Transbond XT Primer (3M) + Transbond XT, Group 4: 37% orthophosphoric acid + Transbond XT Primer + Transbond XT. All samples were stored in deionised water at 37oC for 24 hours. Shear debonding test was performed by applying a vertical force to the base of the bracket at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min.Results: The mean SBS results were Group 1: 10.48 MPa; Group 2: 8.89 MPa; Group 3: 9.41 MPa; Group 4: 9.82 MPa. One-Way Variance Test revealed that the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P=0.267). Debonded brackets were examined by an optical microscope at X16 magnification to determine the bond failure interface using a modified ARI. The results were (mean) Group 1: 2.38; Group 2: 1.31; Group 3: 3.00; Group 4: 1.92. Multiple comparisons showed that Groups 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 4 were statistically different (P=0.014, P<.001 and P=0.025).Conclusions: Ozone treatment prior to bracket bonding does not affect the shear bond strength. (Eur J Dent 2010;4:367-373)

Download Full-text

Evaluation of shear bond strength of composite to porcelain according to surface treatment

Brazilian Dental Journal ◽

10.1590/s0103-64402003000200011 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

pp. 132-135 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Claudia Minami Kussano ◽

Gerson Bonfante ◽

José Gilmar Batista ◽

João Henrique Nogueira Pinto

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Surface Treatment ◽

Hydrofluoric Acid ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Room Temperature ◽

Force Load ◽

Group 4 ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

This study evaluated the shear bond strength of porcelain/composite using 40 metal + porcelain + composite cylindrical specimens divided into 4 groups, according to porcelain surface treatment: 1) no treatment, 2) mechanical retentions performed with diamond burs, 3) etching with phosphoric acid+silane, and 4) etching with hydrofluoric acid+silane. After being stored in distilled water at room temperature for one week, the specimens were submitted to a shear force (load) and the data were analyzed statistically (ANOVA). The means (in Mpa) of the groups were: 4.71 (group 1); 4.81 (group 2); 11.76 (group 3); 11.07 (group 4). There were no statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 2 and between groups 3 and 4.

Download Full-text

A Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercially Available Dentin Desensitizers on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resins: An in vitro Study

Journal of Contemporary Dentistry ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1109 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 65-68

Author(s):

Shruti Patil ◽

Prajna Shetty

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Comparative Evaluation ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Group 4 ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

ABSTRACT Background The dentin desensitizers available for in-office application for prevention and/or treatment of post restorative dentinal hypersensitivity, act by blocking the open dentinal tubules. In doing so, they may influence the bond strength of the restorative resins. Thus, the aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of desensitizers on the shear bond strength of dentin adhesives and to check the extent of dentinal tubule occlusion caused by these desensitizers. Materials and Methods Sixty-four premolars were randomly divided into four groups of sixteen each. The middle depth dentin was exposed by on the buccal surface and was etched using 37% phosphoric acid and rinsed. They were assigned to, Group 1: Gluma desensitizer, Group 2: Vivasens desensitizer, Group 3: Gluma Comfort Bond and desensitizer, and Group 4: Adper Single Bond 2. Composite resin post of 2 mm in height and width were built on these specimens. The samples were then mounted in acrylic resin blocks. Universal testing machine was used to test the shear bond strength. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's test. Results The mean values of the shear bond strength were for: Group 1—18.61 ± 1.03 MPa, Group 2—17.53 ± 1.36 MPa, Group 3—22.63 ± 1.61 MPa and Group 4—23.12 ± 1.02 MPa. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) among the groups. Conclusion The use of dentin desensitizers’ influences bond strength between the tooth and the adhesive. Among the various agents, the single bottle system containing Gluma comfort bond and desensitizer had the best adhesion among the desensitizer groups. How to cite this article Patil S, Naik B, Shetty P. A Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercially Available Dentin Desensitizers on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resins: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent 2015;5(2):65-68.

Download Full-text

An Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Self-Etch Adhesive on Pre-etched Enamel: An in vitro Study

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1446 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 14 (6) ◽

pp. 1036-1038

Author(s):

Abdul Mujeeb ◽

Bhadra Rao ◽

Satti Narayana Reddy ◽

Kanchan Mehta ◽

G Saritha

Keyword(s):

Statistical Analysis ◽

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Occlusal Surfaces ◽

Group 3 ◽

The Mean ◽

Group 2 ◽

Self Etch ◽

Group 1

ABSTRACT Aim To determine the shear bond strength of self-etch adhesive G-bond on pre-etched enamel. Materials and methods Thirty caries free human mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic purpose were used for the study. Occlusal surfaces of all the teeth were flattened with diamond bur and a silicon carbide paper was used for surface smoothening. The thirty samples were randomly grouped into three groups. Three different etch systems were used for the composite build up: group 1 (G-bond self-etch adhesive system), group 2 (G-bond) and group 3 (Adper single bond). Light cured was applied for 10 seconds with a LED unit for composite buildup on the occlusal surface of each tooth with 8 millimeters (mm) in diameter and 3 mm in thickness. The specimens in each group were tested in shear mode using a knife-edge testing apparatus in a universal testing machine across head speed of 1 mm/ minute. Shear bond strength values in Mpa were calculated from the peak load at failure divided by the specimen surface area. The mean shear bond strength of all the groups were calculated and statistical analysis was carried out using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results The mean bond strength of group 1 is 15.5 Mpa, group 2 is 19.5 Mpa and group 3 is 20.1 Mpa. Statistical analysis was carried out between the groups using one-way ANOVA. Group 1 showed statistically significant lower bond strength when compared to groups 2 and 3. No statistical significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.05). Conclusion Self-etch adhesive G-bond showed increase in shear bond strength on pre-etched enamel. How to cite this article Rao B, Reddy SN, Mujeeb A, Mehta K, Saritha G. An Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Self-Etch Adhesive on Pre-etched Enamel: An In vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(6):1036-1038.

Download Full-text

Effect of Different Bonding Conditions on the Shear Bond Strength of Two Compomers to Bovine Dentin

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice ◽

10.5005/jcdp-7-4-9 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 7 (4) ◽

pp. 9-16 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Hend Al-Nahedh ◽

Nasrien Ateyah

Keyword(s):

Phosphoric Acid ◽

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Acid Etching ◽

Group 4 ◽

Mode Of Failure ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 5 ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Abstract Aim Despite the improvements to compomer materials, the bond strength of these materials remains inferior to .composite/resin bonding. systems and limits their clinical use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of acidic conditioning with phosphoric acid and Prompt L-Pop (PLP) on the shear bond strength of two compomers Dyract AP (DAP) and Composan Glass (CG) to dentin. Methods and Materials Sixty extracted bovine teeth were used to test the shear bond strength of two compomers to flat dentin labial surfaces. The dentin specimens were randomly assigned to six groups of ten specimens each: Group 1: DAP and Prime & Bond NT (PBNT); Group 2: DAP/PBNT with a 15 second dentin etch prior to bonding; Group 3: DAP placed with PLP adhesive; Group 4: CG and Compobond NE (CBNE); Group 5: CG/CBNE with a 15 second dentin etch; and Group 6: CG placed with PLP adhesive. The specimens were stored at 37°C with 100% humidity for 24 hours then mounted and sheared using an Instron Universal Testing Machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results were recorded in Mega Pascals (MPa). The sheared specimens were examined under a light microscope, and the type of failure (adhesive, cohesive, or mixed) was recorded. Results The mean dentin shear bond strength value (MPa) for the groups was: Group 1 (11.6±3.9); Group 2 (13.2±3.3); Group 3 (12.4±2.0); Group 4 (13.0±4.3); Group 5 (19.3±3.7); and Group 6 (13.1±3.0). One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests detected a significantly higher bond strength (P ≤ 0.003) for group 5. For groups 1, 3, 4, and 6, the mode of failure was mostly adhesive. When acid etching of dentin was performed (groups 2 and 5), cohesive fracture within dentin was the predominant mode of failure. Acid etching and the use of PLP significantly reduced the number of adhesive fractures and reduced variability in the shear bond strength results. Conclusions Acid etching significantly increased the shear bond strength of CG to dentin but did not affect DAP. The application of PLP resulted in a shear bond strength not statistically different from PBNT or CPNE. CG bond to dentin is improved with acid etching using phosphoric acid. However, PLP provided no significant improvement in the shear bond strength of DAP and CG. Citation Al-Nahedh H, Ateyah N. Effect of Different Bonding Conditions on the Shear Bond Strength of Two Compomers to Bovine Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 September;(7)4:009-016.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Four Types of Orthodontic Brackets with Different Base Technologies

APOS Trends in Orthodontics ◽

10.4103/apos.apos_91_17 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 ◽

pp. 273-278

Author(s):

Gaurang H. Chaudhary ◽

Gianina Salton Mattevi ◽

Peter Thiuri Gakunga

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Group 4 ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Acid Etch ◽

Group 3 ◽

The Difference ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets systems with four different base technologies. Materials and Methods Maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into four groups of thirty specimens each: (1) Master Series™ conventional twin, (2) T3™ self-ligating, (3) Victory series™ conventional twin, and (4) H4™ self-ligating brackets. Maxillary first premolars were bracketed using an acid-etch composite system, and the SBS measured using an Instron Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. The ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were performed with significance predetermined at P ≤ 0.05. Results The overall mean bond strengths were 8.49 ± 2.93, 10.85 ± 3.34, 9.42 ± 2.97, and 9.73 ± 2.62 for the Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 brackets, respectively. One-way ANOVA test gave an F = 3.182 with a P = 0.026. The Group 1 and Group 2 were observed to have statistically significant difference with a P = 0.014. Conclusions The T3 self-ligating one-piece design with microetched Quadra Grip™ base brackets had the highest bond strength. The SBS difference between Group 2, Group 3, and Group 4 was not significant, but the difference between Group 2 and Group 1 was statistically significant.

Download Full-text

Fracture resistance of incisal tooth fragment reattached with different adhesive materials and retentive techniques

Revista Odonto Ciência ◽

10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28095 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 32 (4) ◽

pp. 163

Author(s):

Fábio Herrmann Coelho-de-Souza ◽

Guilherme Fossá ◽

Flávia Ávila Pereira ◽

Celso Afonso Klein-Júnior ◽

Maria Carolina Guilherme Erhardt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Fracture Resistance ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Adhesive System ◽

Group 4 ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 5 ◽

Adhesive Materials ◽

Group 1

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated in vitro the shear bond strength of experimentally fractured human tooth fragments reattached with different adhesive materials and retentive techniques.METHODS: Forty-eight sound mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=8). Their incisal edges were cut off in 5 groups, representing an enamel-dentin fracture. Intact teeth were used as control (Group 1). The fragment edges were reattached with adhesive system (Scotch Bond Multipurpose – 3M ESPE) (Group 2), adhesive system and composite resin (ICE – SDI) (Group 3), adhesive system and composite resin with circumferential bevel (Group 4), adhesive system and composite resin with internal dentin groove (Group 5), and adhesive system and composite resin with the circumferential bevel and internal dentin groove (Group 6). Shear bond strength was determined in a universal testing machine. Fracture modes were identified by light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis was used to analysis resistance to fracture and fracture patterns.RESULTS: The results showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) among groups. The intact teeth (Group 1) showed higher fracture resistance than the other groups. Groups 2 and 6 did not differ and were statistically superior to other techniques. Group 4 presented statistically higher than in Group 5, which in turn was more resistant than Group 3.CONCLUSIONS: None of the fragment reattachment techniques was able to achieve the strength of sound teeth. Fragments reattached only with adhesive system or with adhesive system and composite resin with the circumferential bevel and internal dentin groove showed the best performance for resistance to fracture.

Download Full-text

Shear Bond Strength Comparison between Two Orthodontic Adhesives and Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets

The Angle Orthodontist ◽

10.2319/022406-79 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 77 (4) ◽

pp. 701-706 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Rodney G. Northrup ◽

David W. Berzins ◽

Thomas Gerard Bradley ◽

William Schuckit

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Orthodontic Adhesives ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Conventional Brackets ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 2 ◽

Post Hoc ◽

Group 1

Abstract Objective: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of two adhesives using two types of brackets: a conventional and a self-ligating bracket system. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were collected. The premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth. All three groups were direct bonded. Groups 1 and 2 used light-cured adhesive and primer (Transbond XT) with a conventional (Orthos) and a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2), respectively. Group 3 used a light-cured primer (Orthosolo) and a light-cured adhesive (Blūgloo) with a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 40 ± 2 hours, after which they were debonded and inspected for Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring. Results: The mean shear bond strength was 15.2 MPa for group 1, 23.2 MPa for group 2, and 24.8 MPa for group 3. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test showed significant differences in bond strength (P < .001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 but no significant difference (P > .05) between groups 2 and 3. A Weibull analysis demonstrated that all three groups provided sufficient bond strength with over 90% survival rate at normal masticatory and orthodontic force levels. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference (P > .05) in ARI scores among all three groups. Conclusions: All three groups demonstrated clinically acceptable bond strength. The Damon 2 self-ligating bracket exhibited satisfactory in vitro bond strength with both adhesive systems used.

Download Full-text

Dentin Bond Strength of Composites with Self-etching Adhesives Using LED Curing Lights

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice ◽

10.5005/jcdp-8-5-34 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 8 (5) ◽

pp. 34-42 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Yonca Korkmaz ◽

Nuray Attar

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Significance Level ◽

Group 4 ◽

Group 6 ◽

Group 3 ◽

Curing Light ◽

Group 5 ◽

Group 2 ◽

Self Etch

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of light-emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCUs) compared with halogen LCUs on the shear bond strength (SBS) of one nanofill composite (Filtek Supreme) and one microhibrid composite (Artemis) with self-etch adhesives. Methods and Materials The buccal surfaces of 60 non-carious extracted human molars were flattened to expose dentin and, subsequently, polished for 60 seconds with 600-grit wet silicon carbide abrasive paper. Specimens were assigned into six groups (n=10) according to composite material, self-etch adhesive, and curing light used as follows: Group 1: Adper Prompt L-Pop (AP) and Filtek Supreme (FS) using an Elipar Free Light (EFL); Group 2: AP and FS using an Elipar Free Light 2 (EFL2); Group 3: AP and FS using a Hilux Expert (HE) light, Group 4: AdheSE (AS)+Artemis (AR) using an EFL; Group 5: AS+AR using an EFL2; and Group 6: AS+AR using a HE light. The specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles (5°C–55°C) and then loaded to failure in a Zwick universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/minute. SBS values were calculated as megapascals (MPa) and statistically analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test at a significance level of 0.05. Results Mean SBS (± standard deviations) values were as follows: Group1: 15.99±5.18; Group 2: 18.76±6.71; Group 3: 17.70±5.04; Group 4: 16.93±3.99; Group 5: 18.01±5.19, and Group 6: 17.46±5.40. There were no statistically significant differences for SBS to dentin among the groups tested. Conclusion The LED curing lights used in the study seem to be comparable with the halogen curing light for nanofill and microhybrid composites used in conjunction with self-etching systems in dentin. The EFL2 reduces curing time, which can be considered as an advantage. Citation Korkmaz Y, Attar N. Dentin Bond Strength of Composites with Self-etching Adhesives Using LED Curing Lights. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 July;(8)5:034-042.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser Versus Conventional Acid Etching

Frontiers in Dentistry ◽

10.18502/fid.v18i14.6139 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Elahe Soltanmohamadi Borujeni ◽

Javad Chalipa ◽

Ardavan Etemadi ◽

Maryam Nasiri ◽

Mohammad Javad Kharrazifard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Er:Yag Laser ◽

Yttrium Aluminium Garnet ◽

Acid Etching ◽

Group 4 ◽

Laser Conditioning ◽

Adhesive Remnant Index ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 2

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index and enamel cracks in bonding and rebonding of brackets to enamel, conditioned with erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser and conventional acid-etching. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two bovine lower incisors were randomly divided into four groups consisting of group 1 (acid-conditioning in both bondings), group 2 (acid-conditioning in first and laser-conditioning in second bonding), group 3 (laser-conditioning in first- and acid-conditioning in second bonding), and group 4 (laser-conditioning in both bondings). After bracket placement, the samples were thermocycled and tested for SBS in both bonding procedures. Adhesive remnant index scores and enamel cracks were also determined. Tukey's test and one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis (P<0.05). Results: Mean SBS in the first bonding was 23.59MPa in groups 1 and 2, and 6.9MPa in groups 3 and 4. (P<0.001). The acid-etched teeth had a significantly lower SBS in rebonding, regardless of the reconditioning method (P<0.001). The SBS of the teeth conditioned with Er:YAG laser in the first bonding did not show significant changes in rebonding, although mean SBS was higher compared to the first bonding (P=0.675). Bonding most often failed at the enamel-adhesive interface and enamel cracks were observed in a few teeth. Conclusion: The method of primary enamel preparation can affect SBS in rebonding. Based on our results, the mean SBS of Er:YAG-conditioned groups was clinically acceptable in bonding and rebonding, although it was lower compared to the acidetched samples.

Download Full-text

Microleakage of a resin sealan using diferents adhesive systems

REVISTA ODONTOLOGÍA PEDIÁTRICA ◽

10.33738/spo.v14i2.39 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

Author(s):

K Licla

Keyword(s):

Orthophosphoric Acid ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Adhesive Systems ◽

Group 4 ◽

Fifth Generation ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 2 ◽

Sealant Group ◽

Group 1

Objetive: To compare the microleakage of a resinsealant using fifth generation adhesive systems,seventh generation with or without preconditioningof orthophosphoric acid at 37%. Materials and Methods: An in vitro study wasmade on 60 human premolars, randomized into4 groups of 15 elements each. Group 1 (control):phosphoric acid at 37%, sealant; Group 2: orthophosphoricacid, adhesive of fifth generation, sealant; Group 3: adhesive of seventh generation,sealant; Group 4: orthophosphoric acid, adhesiveof seventh generation, sealant. They were puton a thermocycler, 500 cycles (5° y 55°C) per 30seconds on higher and lower temperatures, afterthat the specimens were drawn for 24 hours on1% methylene blue, cut off on a bucco-lingualway and evaluated on a stereomicroscope on 16x.Chi square test was used with a 0.05 significancelevel. Results: The greater percentage of microleakageshowed: control-adhesive without (53.3%), fifthgeneration (20%), the seventh generation (80%)and conditioning with orthophosphoric acid andadhesive seventh generation (67.7%). Conclusion: Microfiltration grade adhesivesealant fifth generation was lower than using theother adhesives.

Download Full-text