Diabetogenic Effects of Growth Hormone: The Role of the Adrenals in Nitrogen Loss

Diabetes ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. H. Gaebler ◽  
R. Glovinsky ◽  
T. Vitti ◽  
T. G. Maskaleris
Keyword(s):  
1965 ◽  
Vol 209 (5) ◽  
pp. 910-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Katorski ◽  
Patrick F. Delaney ◽  
Paul F. Fenton

Nitrogen balance of mice was affected adversely when they received protein and a carbohydrate-fat mixture at different times of day. Administration of growth hormone overcame this adverse effect, although in the dosage employed the hormone had no measurable effect when protein and carbohydrate-fat were administered simultaneously. In other experiments we showed that fat feeding reduced the loss of nitrogen. Administration of fat and growth hormone (in a dose which by itself was ineffective) reduced the nitrogen loss to minimal levels. In animals which had previously become adapted to high-fat rations, fat showed a large nitrogen-sparing action which could not be further enhanced by growth-hormone treatment. The data suggest that one function of growth hormone is to speed adaptation to efficient fat utilization which is reflected in nitrogen retention.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Jan M. Wit ◽  
Sjoerd D. Joustra ◽  
Monique Losekoot ◽  
Hermine A. van Duyvenvoorde ◽  
Christiaan de Bruin

The current differential diagnosis for a short child with low insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and a normal growth hormone (GH) peak in a GH stimulation test (GHST), after exclusion of acquired causes, includes the following disorders: (1) a decreased spontaneous GH secretion in contrast to a normal stimulated GH peak (“GH neurosecretory dysfunction,” GHND) and (2) genetic conditions with a normal GH sensitivity (e.g., pathogenic variants of <i>GH1</i> or <i>GHSR</i>) and (3) GH insensitivity (GHI). We present a critical appraisal of the concept of GHND and the role of 12- or 24-h GH profiles in the selection of children for GH treatment. The mean 24-h GH concentration in healthy children overlaps with that in those with GH deficiency, indicating that the previously proposed cutoff limit (3.0–3.2 μg/L) is too high. The main advantage of performing a GH profile is that it prevents about 20% of false-positive test results of the GHST, while it also detects a low spontaneous GH secretion in children who would be considered GH sufficient based on a stimulation test. However, due to a considerable burden for patients and the health budget, GH profiles are only used in few centres. Regarding genetic causes, there is good evidence of the existence of Kowarski syndrome (due to <i>GH1</i> variants) but less on the role of <i>GHSR</i> variants. Several genetic causes of (partial) GHI are known (<i>GHR</i>, <i>STAT5B</i>, <i>STAT3</i>, <i>IGF1</i>, <i>IGFALS</i> defects, and Noonan and 3M syndromes), some responding positively to GH therapy. In the final section, we speculate on hypothetical causes.


2003 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 4748-4753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Ranke ◽  
Anders Lindberg ◽  
David D. Martin ◽  
Bert Bakker ◽  
Patrick Wilton ◽  
...  

Endocrine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Aguilar ◽  
Manuel Tena-Sempere ◽  
Leonor Pinilla

1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (S423) ◽  
pp. 82-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
RG Rapaport ◽  
M. Bozzola
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document