scholarly journals Influences on Diabetes Self-Management Education Participation in a Low-Income, Spanish-Speaking, Latino Population

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Testerman ◽  
Dian Chase
2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 770-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ninfa C. Peña-Purcell ◽  
May M. Boggess ◽  
Natalia Jimenez

Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effects of a culturally sensitive, empowerment-based diabetes self-management education program for Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinos. Methods A prospective quasi-experimental repeated measures design tested the effectiveness of the ¡Si, Yo Puedo Controlar Mi Diabetes! diabetes self-management education program. In sum, 144 persons residing in 2 Texas counties at the Texas-Mexico border (Starr and Hidalgo) served as participants. Two groups were formed, an intervention and a control (wait list). Clinical (A1C), cognitive, attitudinal, behavioral, and cultural assessments were collected at baseline and 3 months. Results Demographic characteristics for the intervention and control groups were similar. Both groups were predominately female, low income, older than 40 years, and minimally acculturated. Baseline and posttest findings showed that the intervention group had a significant reduction in A1C values; median difference was 0.3 (n = 45), especially for those with higher baseline values. Participants in the intervention group also improved in their self-efficacy and self-care scores. Conclusions Findings from the study suggest that additional dissemination of a diabetes self-management education program for Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinos is warranted to improve clinical outcomes and associated diabetes self-efficacy and self-care behaviors.


2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milagros C. Rosal ◽  
Barbara Olendzki ◽  
George W. Reed ◽  
Olga Gumieniak ◽  
Jeffrey Scavron ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Keila Brown ◽  
Loretta T. Lee ◽  
Cynthia Selleck

BackgroundDiabetes self-management education (DSME) programs utilize a multidisciplinary, skills-based approach allowing participants to make self-management choices and follow a comprehensive plan of care, improving their glycemic control.ObjectiveThe purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of DSME on the reduction of hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) in overweight/obese community health center patients.MethodsThe free program met 2 hours weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. A retrospective chart review was conducted to compare baseline to post-session HgbA1c and BMI 12 weeks after completion of the program. Pre- and post-session surveys were also conducted to assess improved diabetes knowledge and confidence.ResultsMean HgbA1c decreased by 1.6% (p = .003) 12 weeks after completion of the program; however, BMI remained unchanged (p = .582). Diabetes knowledge and confidence also improved significantly following DSME (p = .000 and p = .001, respectively).ConclusionsThe study demonstrated that a reduction in HgbA1c levels and an increase in diabetes knowledge and confidence can occur in low income, community health center patients following participation in DSME.Implications for NursingCommunity health center patients who have access to free DSME can improve their health, self-efficacy, and diabetes self-management practices.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Oser ◽  
Linda Zittleman ◽  
Kristen Curcija ◽  
Bethany Kwan ◽  
Shawnecca Burke ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Over 34 million people in the United States have diabetes, with 1.5 million diagnosed every year. Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) is a crucial component of treatment to delay or prevent complications. Rural communities face many unique challenges in accessing DSMES, including geographic barriers and availability of DSMES programs that are culturally adapted to rural context. OBJECTIVE Boot camp translation (BCT) is an established approach to community-based participatory research used to translate complex clinical and scientific information into concepts, messages, and materials that are understandable, meaningful, and relevant to community members and patients. This study aimed to utilize BCT to adapt an existing DSMES program for delivery in rural primary care for English- and Spanish-speaking people with diabetes. METHODS The High Plains Research network (HPRN) Community Advisory Council (C.A.C.) partnered with researchers at the University of Colorado and University of Utah to use BCT to aid in translating medical jargon and materials from an existing DSMES program, called “Diabetes One-Day (D1D).” BCT consisted of 10 virtual meetings over a 6-month period between the C.A.C., which included 15 diverse community stakeholders. Both English-speaking and bilingual Spanish-English speaking CAC members were recruited to reflect the diversity of the rural communities in which the adapted program would be delivered. RESULTS The BCT process guided adaptations to D1D for use in rural settings (R-D1D). R-D1D adaptations reflect both content and delivery to assure that the intervention is appropriate and likely to be accepted by rural English- and Spanish-speaking people with diabetes. Additionally, BCT informed design of recruitment and program materials and identification of recruitment venues. During the BCT process the importance of tailoring materials to reflect culture differences in English- and Spanish-speaking patients was identified. CONCLUSIONS BCT was an effective strategy for academic researchers to partner with rural community members to adapt an existing DSMES intervention for delivery in rural areas to both English- and Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes. Through BCT, adaptations to recruitment materials and methods, program content and delivery, and supplemental materials were developed. The need to culturally adapt Spanish materials with input from stakeholders rather than simply translate materials into Spanish was highlighted. The importance of increasing awareness of the connection between diabetes and depression/diabetes distress, adaptations to include local foods, and the importance of the relationship between people with diabetes and their primary care practices were identified. CLINICALTRIAL Official Title: Adapting and Assessing the Feasibility of a Diabetes Self-management Education and Support Telehealth Intervention for Rural Populations to Reduce Disparities in Diabetes Care ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04600622 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04600622?term=oser&cond=diabetes&draw=2&rank=1


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henna Riemenschneider ◽  
Sarama Saha ◽  
Stephan van den Broucke ◽  
Helle Terkildsen Maindal ◽  
Gerardine Doyle ◽  
...  

Background. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is considered essential for improving the prevention and care of diabetes through empowering patients to increase agency in their own health and care processes. However, existing evidence regarding DSME in the EU Member States (EU MS) is insufficient to develop an EU-wide strategy. Objectives. This study presents the state of DSME in the 28 EU MS and contrasts it with 3 non-EU countries with comparable Human Development Index score: Israel, Taiwan, and the USA (ITU). Because type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) disproportionately affects minority and low-income groups, we paid particular attention to health literacy aspects of DSME for vulnerable populations. Methods. Data from multiple stakeholders involved in diabetes care were collected from Feb 2014 to Jan 2015 using an online Diabetes Literacy Survey (DLS). Of the 379 respondents (249 from EU MS and 130 from ITU), most were people with diabetes (33% in the EU MS, 15% in ITU) and care providers (47% and 72%). These data were supplemented by an expert survey (ES) administered to 30 key informants. Results. Access to DSME varies greatly in the EU MS: an average of 29% (range 21% to 50%) of respondents report DSME programs are tailored for people with limited literacy, educational attainment, and language skills versus 63% in ITU. More than half of adult T2DM patients and children/adolescents participate in DSME in EU MS; in ITU, participation of T1DM patients and older people is lower. Prioritization of DSME (6.1 ± 2.8 out of 10) and the level of satisfaction with the current state of DSME (5.0 ± 2.4 out of 10) in the EU MS were comparable with ITU. Conclusion. Variation in availability and organization of DSME in the EU MS presents a clear rationale for developing an EU-wide diabetes strategy to improve treatment and care for people with diabetes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 1322-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise B. Murphy ◽  
Teresa J. Brady ◽  
Michael A. Boring ◽  
Kristina A. Theis ◽  
Kamil E. Barbour ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e036963
Author(s):  
Chaisiri Angkurawaranon ◽  
Iliatha Papachristou Nadal ◽  
Poppy Alice Carson Mallinson ◽  
Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish ◽  
Orawan Quansri ◽  
...  

IntroductionType 2 diabetes mellitus is among the foremost health challenges facing policy makers in Thailand as its prevalence has more than tripled over the last two decades, accounting for considerable death, disability and healthcare expenditure. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) programmes show promise in improving diabetes outcomes, but this is not routinely used in Thailand. This study aims to test a culturally tailored DSME model in Thailand, using a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial comparing a nurse-led model, a peer-assisted model and standard care. We will test which model is effective and cost effective to improve cardiovascular risk and control of blood glucose among people with diabetes.Methods and analysis21 primary care units in northern Thailand will be randomised to one of three interventions, enrolling a total of 693 patients. The primary care units will be randomised (1:1:1) to participate in a culturally-tailored DSME intervention for 12 months. The three-arm trial design will compare effectiveness of nurse-led, peer-assisted (Thai village health volunteers) and standard care. The primary trial outcomes are changes in haemoglobin A1c and cardiovascular risk score. A process evaluation and cost effectiveness evaluation will be conducted to produce policy relevant guidance for the Thai Ministry of Public Health. The planned trial period will start in January 2020 and finish October 2021.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from Thailand and the UK. We will share our study data with other researchers, advertising via our publications and web presence. In particular, we are committed to sharing our findings and data with academic audiences in Thailand and other low-income and middle-income countries.Trial registration numberNCT03938233.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document