scholarly journals Effectiveness of technology-based distance interventions promoting physical activity: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Hakala ◽  
A Rintala ◽  
J Immonen ◽  
J Karvanen ◽  
A Heinonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Meta Regression

scholarly journals How much physical activity do people with schizophrenia engage in? A systematic review, comparative meta-analysis and meta-regression

2016 ◽  
Vol 176 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 431-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendon Stubbs ◽  
Joseph Firth ◽  
Alexandra Berry ◽  
Felipe B. Schuch ◽  
Simon Rosenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Meta Regression

Temporal Trends in Children’s School Day Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Robert Glenn Weaver ◽  
Rafael M. Tassitano ◽  
Maria Cecília M. Tenório ◽  
Keith Brazendale ◽  
Michael W. Beets
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
North America ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vigorous Physical Activity ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
School Day ◽  
Meta Regression

Background: Evidence from a limited sample of countries indicates that time for physical education and recess during school have declined. Schools are called to provide children with 30 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated temporal trends in children’s school day MVPA. Methods: Three online databases were searched to identify studies with objectively measured MVPA, during school hours, in school aged children (5–18 y). Multilevel random-effects meta-analyses estimated MVPA by year, and meta-regression analyses estimated temporal trends in school day MVPA. Results: Studies (N = 65) providing 171 MVPA estimates, representing 60,779 unique children, from 32 countries, and spanning 2003–2019 were identified. Most studies were conducted in North America (n = 33) or Europe (n = 21). School day MVPA ranged from 18.1 (95% confidence interval, 15.1–21.1) to 47.1 (95% confidence interval, 39.4–54.8) minutes per day in any given year. Meta-regression analyses indicated that MVPA declined from 2003 to 2010 (approximately 15 min decline), plateaued from 2010 to 2015 (approximately 1 min decrease), and increased from 2015 to 2019 (approximately 5 min increase). Conclusions: School day MVPA decreased from 2003 to 2010 and has recently begun to increase. However, the majority of the evidence is from North America and Europe with some evidence from Oceania and very little evidence from Asia to South America.

scholarly journals Physical activity referral scheme components: a study protocol for systematic review and meta-regression

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e049549
Author(s):  
Eriselda Mino ◽  
Wolfgang Geidl ◽  
Inga Naber ◽  
Anja Weissenfels ◽  
Sarah Klamroth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Physical Activity Promotion ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Intervention Component ◽  
Activity Promotion ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionIn its attempt to establish effective physical activity promotion methods, research on physical activity referral schemes (PARS) is attracting significant attention. Sometimes known as physical activity on prescription schemes, PARS involve a well-defined procedure whereby a primary healthcare professional introduces a participant to the topic of physical activity and employs prescription or referral forms to connect the participant to physical activity opportunities, such as local fitness offers. The planned systematic review will focus on these referral routes and scheme components and how they are integrated into various PARS models worldwide. We seek to identify the evidence-based core components that play the most important roles in the effectiveness of PARS.Methods and analysisThe development and reporting of the protocol follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We plan to conduct a systematic main literature search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, HTA, SpringerLink and other databases. We will include studies that report outcomes on physical activity, PARS uptake and adherence rates or descriptive information about PARS models. We intend for all review stages, citation screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment to be conducted by at least two independent reviewers. As a broad spectrum of study designs, including randomised and non-randomised studies of interventions and mixed methods, will be eligible, we will use three separate tools to assess the risk of bias in individual studies. The data will be primarily synthesised narratively, following Intervention Component Analysis. If the data allow, we will perform a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the impact of specific PARS components on effect sizes.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review does not require formal ethics approval. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and international conferences to reach the scientific community.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021233229.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of Altruistic and Game-playing Love

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Dabiriyan Tehrani ◽  
Sara Yamini
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Game Playing ◽  
Love Styles ◽  
Collectivistic Culture ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Collectivistic Cultures ◽  
The Relationship

This systematic review aimed to find attitudes toward Altruistic and Game-playing love styles across individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Addressing major moderators concerning Altruistic and Game-playing love styles are the secondary objectives of this review. This review included 102 articles comprising samples from 37 countries (N = 41997). The findings of this meta-analysis show that there is a collectivistic and individualistic difference in Game-playing but not in the Altruistic love style. Collectivistic and individualistic cultures, on average, demonstrate the same perception concerning the Altruistic love style, whereas collectivistic culture shows the Game-playing love style more strongly. To explain the role of moderators in key measures, the subgroup analysis and meta-regression show that both Game-playing and Altruistic love styles decline by increasing the length of the relationship. Likewise, having children affects these love styles such that the Altruistic love style is improved, and the Game-playing love style is reduced by the presence of children in families.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document