Five-year Clinical Evaluation of 300 Teeth Restored with Porcelain Laminate Veneers Using Total-etch and a Modified Self-etch Adhesive System

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Aykor ◽  
E. Ozel
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Tissue Response ◽  
Gingival Tissue ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Laminate Veneers ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Postoperative Sensitivity

Clinical Relevance Total-etch (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) and two-step self-etch (AdheSE) adhesive systems were successful in terms of marginal adaptation, cavosurface discoloration, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, satisfaction with restoration shade and gingival tissue response in a five-year follow-up.

Clinical Evaluation of a Two-step Etch&Rinse and a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive System in Class II Restorations: Two-year Results

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Ermis ◽  
O. Kam ◽  
E. U. Celik ◽  
U. B. Temel
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The two-step etch&rinse and the two-step self-etch adhesive systems tested in this study demonstrated similar clinical performance in Class II cavities after two years.

scholarly journals Randomized Clinical Trial of Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth: Effect of Adhesive System after Three Years

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Secil Bektaş Donmez ◽  
Melek D. Turgut ◽  
Serdar Uysal ◽  
Pinar Ozdemir ◽  
Meryem Tekcicek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
The Self ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of composite restorations placed with different adhesive systems in primary teeth. In 32 patients, 128 composite restorations were placed using a split-mouth design as follows (4 groups/patient): three-step etch-and-rinse (Group 1), two-step etch-and-rinse (Group 2), two-step self-etch (Group 3), and one-step self-etch (Group 4). The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 18, and 36 months according to the FDI criteria. There was no significant difference between the adhesive systems in retention of the restorations (p>0.05). Over time, there was a statistically significant decrease in marginal adaptation in all groups, whereas surface and marginal staining significantly increased in Groups 3 and 4 (p<0.05). The etch-and-rinse adhesive systems resulted in better marginal adaptation than the self-etch adhesive systems (p<0.05). It was concluded that preetching of the primary enamel might help improve the clinical performance of the self-etch adhesive systems in primary teeth.

scholarly journals Resin Composite Restorations of Permanent Incisors with Crown Fractures: A Case Report with a Six-year Follow-up

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Ozel ◽  
M. Karapinar-Kazandag ◽  
M. Soyman ◽  
G. Bayirli
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The teeth in this report were restored with a two-step self-etch adhesive system and a microhybrid resin composite. The teeth present with an excellent clinical performance and patient acceptance at the end of a six-year recall.

Microleakage After Thermocycling of 4 Etch and Rinse and 3 Self-etch Adhesives With and Without a Flowable Composite Lining

10.2341/05-55 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Guéders ◽  
J. F. Charpentier ◽  
A. I. Albert ◽  
S. O. Geerts
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Composite Lining ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance This study indicates that etch and rinse adhesive systems are less prone to microleakage than self-etch systems.

Influence of Adhesive Systems on Interfacial Dentin Gap Formation In Vitro

10.2341/05-53 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Loguercio ◽  
A. Reis ◽  
G. Bortoli ◽  
R. Patzlaft ◽  
S. Kenshima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Gap Formation ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Etch & rinse systems showed better initial interfacial adaptation than self-etch systems. The differences disappeared after 6-months water storage. The thicker the hybrid layer formed by self-etching adhesives, the lower the immediate gap formation.

scholarly journals Bond strength to dentin of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Alves dos SANTOS ◽  
Eliane Alves de LIMA ◽  
Mônica Maria de Albuquerque PONTES ◽  
Alexandre Batista Lopes do NASCIMENTO ◽  
Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende MONTES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Stereo Microscope ◽  
Diamond Disc ◽  
Self Etch

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bond strength to dentin of the Single Bond (3M ESPE) and XP Bond (Dentsply) total-etch and Adper SE Plus (3M ESPE) self-etch adhesive systems. METHODS: Fifteen healthy human third molars were randomly allocated across three different groups of five teeth each according to the adhesive system. The occlusal portion of each tooth was removed under refrigeration using a flexible diamond disc (EXTEC, Enfield, CT, USA) down to an area of dentin that did not reveal enamel, as confirmed under a 40X stereo microscope (Ramsor, São Paulo, Brazil). A standardized smear layer was created with #600 grit silicon-carbide paper. The adhesive systems were applied as per manufacturer recommendations, with the exception of the Adper SE Plus system, which was triple-polymerized. Composite resin blocks (5 mm) were placed on the dentin surface. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37ºC. Using a flexible diamond disc (EXTEC, Enfield, CT, USA), toothpick-like specimens with an adhesive area of less than 1 mm² were obtained. A microtensile bond test was then carried out using a universal testing machine (KRATOS) with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were used for comparisons. RESULTS: The bond strength values obtained with each adhesive system were as follows: XP Bond, 96.24 MPa; Adper Single Bond, 72.39 MPa; Adper SE Plus, 49.91 MPa. CONCLUSION: In terms of bond strength to dentin, conventional adhesives outperform self-etching systems.

Influence of Thermal and Mechanical Load Cycling on Microtensile Bond Strengths of Total and Self-etching Adhesive Systems

10.2341/05-20 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. H. O. Mitsui ◽  
A. R. Peris ◽  
A. N. Cavalcanti ◽  
G. M. Marchi ◽  
L. A. F. Pimenta
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Mechanical Load ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
System Type ◽  
Load Cycling ◽  
Bond Strengths

Clinical Relevance Bond strength is affected by the combination of thermal and mechanical load cycling. However, results vary greatly with the number of mechanical cycles and adhesive system type (total or self-etching).

scholarly journals Durability of Enamel Bonding Using One-step Self-etch Systems on Ground and Unground Enamel

10.2341/08-58 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Reis ◽  
S. K. Moura ◽  
A. Pellizzaro ◽  
K. Dal-Bianco ◽  
A. M. Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The improvement of resin-enamel bond strengths after using Si-C paper and diamond burs for enamel preparation is material dependent. No degradation of enamel bond strength could be observed for any one-step self-etch adhesive system after 12 months of water storage.

scholarly journals Marginal Permeability of Self-etch and Total-etch Adhesive Systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Owens ◽  
W. W. Johnson ◽  
E. F. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Class V ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Surface Anatomy ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Decreased leakage was associated with Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (total etch) and iBond (self-etch) systems in Class V resin composite restorations. All adhesive systems performed best when bonded to enamel compared to dentin surface anatomy. Clinicians should be aware that strict adherence to manufacturer instructions, when using these materials, is of primary importance.

In Vitro Evaluation of Giomers Microleakage After Exposure to 33% Hydrogen Peroxide: Self-etch vs Total-etch Adhesives

10.2341/05-16 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Deliperi ◽  
D. N. Bardwell ◽  
C. Wegley ◽  
M. D. Congiu
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Dye Penetration ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Microleakage of a total-etch adhesive system was not influenced by the application of hydrogen peroxide; conversely, enamel dye penetration significantly increased for a self-etching primer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document