scholarly journals VARIETY OF RHETORICS IN POLITICAL SPEECH PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO AND JOKO WIDODO IN EDUCATIONAL FIELD

Humanus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
Noermanzah Noermanzah ◽  
Emzir Emzir ◽  
Ninuk Lustyantie
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Discourse Practice ◽  
Educational Field ◽  
Dramatic Variation

The study aims to provide an understanding of the range of rhetoric in the political speech of the President of Indonesian Republic Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Joko Widodo, especially in the field of education. The research method used is the critical discourse analysis method of Norman Fairclough model. Data collection techniques used are documentation techniques, note-taking techniques, and interviews. Data analysis techniques are operated by connecting micro, meso, and macro elements in dimensions, such as: (a) text, (b) discourse practice, and (b) socio-cultural practices. The result of the research shows the rhetoric in the political speech of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Joko Widodo in the field of education which are compiled by the staf of presidential documents are as followed: 54,25% of the argumentation, 31,21% of the hortatory variety, 5,32% of  the exposition, 4,25% of persuasion, 2,48% of  informative variety,  1,06 % of narrative range, 0,71% of descriptive variation, 0,35% of dramatic variation, and 0,35% of  procedural variation. The variety of rhetoric used aims to deliver educational programs that have been made, promises, and wishes or expectations to improve the quality of education in Indonesia, especially in the reform era.Keywords:  variety of rhetoric, state speech, educationRAGAM RETORIKA DALAM PIDATO KENEGARAAN PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO DAN JOKO WIDODO PADA BIDANG PENDIDIKAN AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan memberikan pemahaman tentang ragam retorika dalam pidato kenegaraan Presiden Republik Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan Joko Widodo khususnya dalam bidang pendidikan. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode analisis wacana kritis model Norman Fairclough. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik dokumentasi, teknik catat, dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data dengan cara menghubungkan unsur mikro, meso, dan makro pada dimensi: (a) teks, (b) praktik wacana, dan (b) praktik sosial budaya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ragam retorika yang terdapat dalam pidato kenegaraan Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan Joko Widodo dalam bidang pendidikan yang disusun bersama tim kerjanya, yaitu ragam argumentasi terdapat 54,25%, ragam hortatori terdapat 31,21%, ragam eksposisi terdapat 5,32%, ragam persuasi terdapat 4,25%, ragam informatif terdapat 2,48%, ragam narasi terdapat 1,06%, ragam deskriptif terdapat 0,71%, ragam dramatik terdapat 0,35%, dan ragam prosedural terdapat 0,35%. Ragam retorika yang digunakan bertujuan untuk menyampaikan program pendidikan yang telah dilakukan, janji,  dan keinginan atau harapan untuk memperbaiki mutu pendidikan di Indonesia khususnya pada era reformasi.Kata kunci: ragam retorika, pidato kenegaraan, bidang pendidikan

scholarly journals President Joko Widodo’s Rhetorical Technique of Arguing in the Presidential Speeches of the Reform Era

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Noermanzah ◽  
Emzir ◽  
Ninuk Lustyantie
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Reform Era ◽  
Presidential Speech ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Discourse Practice

A good speech has the power in presenting the rhetorical argument, therefore it is required a study corresponds to the speech preparation with rhetorical techniques to argue, especially in the presidential speech of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Joko Widodo of reform era in the field of education. The research method was the critical discourse analysis method of Norman Fairclough model. Data collection techniques used were documentation techniques, note-taking techniques, and interviews. Data analysis techniques were administered by connecting micro, meso, and macro elements in dimensions: (a) text, (b) discourse practice, and (b) socio-cultural practices. The results show that President Joko Widodo and his team used the argument technique: 1) The introduction has two patterns: (a) claim and ground; and (b) claims. 2) The trunk or content section has a pattern: (a) claim and ground; (b) claim, ground, and claim; (c) claim, ground, and warrant; (d) claim, ground, and possible; and (e) claim, ground, warrant and backing with each sub topic or argument, minimally and dominantly comprising claim and ground. 3) The closing section has a pattern: (a) claim, ground, and claim; (b) claim. The rhetorical technique of arguing in a presidential speech aims at explaining the plans of educational programs, undertaken educational programs, and the promise and expectation to improve the quality of education in Indonesia during the reform era.

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Political Purpose

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.

“If indeed this is the will of the Ekiti people”

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-484
Author(s):  
Ayodeji A. Adedara
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Epistemic Uncertainty ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Actor ◽  
Generic Structure ◽  
Fair Competition ◽  
The Will ◽  
Emerging Democracy

Abstract Based on the idea that the quality of a democracy may be measured against the quality of its public communication, this paper deploys Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to investigate a Nigerian gubernatorial concession speech in discursive terms. It argues that as an uncommon genre in political discourse in an emerging democracy this hybridised speech both indexes a growing culture of ‘fair competition’ in Nigeria’s eighteen-year-old civilian rule and presents the incumbent as a deft political actor who strategically claims political capital. The paper examines the text’s generic structure, the political and other actors mentioned or implied in it, its manipulation of pronominal references for rhetorical effect, as well as the epistemic uncertainty implied by a query-concession sequence noticed in it. Drawing on the concession speech literature, the paper charts a course for studying the concession speech as an emerging genre in a neonatal democracy like Nigeria.

scholarly journals Analisis Wacana Kritis Konsepsi Relasi Agama dan Negara Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mufatihatul Islam ◽  
Sudono Syueb
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Text Analysis ◽  
Mass Communication ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Communication Media ◽  
The Political ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religion And State

One of the political religious organizations whose influence is strong enough is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia with Islamic Political Discourse Khilafah Islamiyah. The political discourse adopted by Hizb ut-Tahrir certainly reap the controversy in Indonesia whose status is the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which is based on the ideology of Pancasila. Various efforts were made by Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia to enforce its political discourse to penetrate mass communication media such as magazines, tabloids and weekly bulletins. The construction of news in such a way is also always in the sequence as interesting and sepersuasif possible as to influence its readers.Critical discourse analysis is a model of media text analysis that will construct how a medium writes its message, through critical discourse analysis to know the purpose of writing the news. In this study, researchers will construct news content on Al Wa'ie magazine Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia especially on the news "Religion Religion and State" in Rubric Afkar.Keywords: Discourse Analysis, Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, Politic

scholarly journals GENDER DOMINATION IN LOCAL NEWSPAPERS

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariani Amri
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Cultural Practice ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Daily Newspapers ◽  
Practice Level ◽  
News Stories ◽  
Local Newspapers ◽  
Discourse Practice

<p>This study was held at Fajar and Tribun Timur offices in Makassar. This research is described<br />through texts, discourse practice, and socio-cultural practice by using CDA (Critical Discourse Analysis) from<br />Norman Faircloughs’ model. The model includes textual level, discourse practice level, and socio-cultural<br />practice level. The type of this research is qualitative approach. This approach tries to get closer to what is being<br />studied, that is gender domination in Fajar and Tribun Timur daily newspapers. It aims at in-depth and holistic<br />understanding of gender domination in newspapers. Its flexibility is well suited to make interpretation to<br />describe the facts and the phenomena of gender in newspapers as the way they are based on the data found. The<br />research aims; to identify the domination of gender in Fajar and Tribun Timur daily newspapers, to analyse how<br />gender dominations are expressed in those daily newspapers, and to analyse the effect of gender domination on<br />news stories in those newspapers. The result of this research shows that Fajar and Tribun Timur daily are still<br />male dominated discourse in the news-making process which influences the news stories printed in those<br />newspapers. Gender domination in Fajar and Tribun Timur daily newspapers as a discourse has been proven to<br />affect our views on news stories text, news stories production, and socio-cultural practices.</p>

scholarly journals PIDATO JOKO WIDODO SETELAH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: REPRESENTASI IDEOLOGI DAN KEKUASAAN (JOKO WIDODO’S SPEECH FOLLOWING THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF INDONESIA JUDGEMENT: THE REPRESENTATION OF IDEOLOGY AND POWER)

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Pujiningtyas Pujiningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
The People ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Data Source ◽  
The Republic

Joko Widodo as the elected president delivered his political speech following the judgement of The Constitutional Court of Indonesia regarding the lawsuit of the election of the president and vice president of the Republic of Indonesia for the 2019-2024 period. In the judgement, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia affirmed to reject the lawsuit and decided Joko Widodo and Ma’ruf Amin as the elected President and Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia. Thus, such political speech cannot be considered as independent. In his speech, Joko Widodo conveyed statement and ideology through language. Therefore, Joko Widodo’s speech was analyzed using the Huckin model for critical discourse analysis approach which was carried out using qualitative descriptive methods. The data source was Joko Widodo’s speech after the judgement of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia broadcasted nationwide. The analysis was carried out to look for genre, framing, foregrounding or backgrounding, presuppositions, and differences in topics, as well as analysis of sentences and words. The result shows that Joko Widodo used straightforward and explicit language and was presented in an argumentative and persuasive manner. The delivering of the speech used the language relations and power so that the ideology conveyed and was accepted by the people of Indonesia.AbstrakJoko Widodo sebagai presiden terpilih menyampaikan pidato politiknya usaiMahkamah Konstitusi memutuskan gugatan perkara hasil pemilihan presiden dan wakil presiden Republik Indonesia periode 2019--2024. Dalam putusan itu, Mahkamah Konstitusi menegaskan menolak gugatan yang diajukan oleh Tim Pemenangan Prabowo Subianto dan Sandiaga S. Uno dan memutuskan Joko Widodo dan Ma’ruf Amin sebagai Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia terpilih. Berkenaan dengan itu, pidato politik itu tidak dapat dipandang berdiri sendiri. Joko Widodo dalam pidatonya menyampaikan pernyataan dan ideologi melalui bahasa. Oleh karena itu, pidato Joko Widodo dianalisis dengan pendekatan analisiswacana kritis model Huckin. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Sumber data dalam penelitian adalah pidato Joko Widodo usai putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang disiarkan secara nasional oleh media massa. Analisis dilakukan untuk melihat genre, framing, foregrounding atau backgrounding, praanggapan, dan perbedaan topik, serta analisis kalimat dan kata. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa Joko Widodo menggunakan bahasa lugas dan eksplisit dan disampaikan secara argumentatif dan persuasif. Penyampaian itu menggunakan relasi bahasa dan kekuasaan sehingga ideologi yang disampaikan dapat diterima secara positif oleh rakyat Indonesia.

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Political Purpose

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.

scholarly journals ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS PADA PIDATO POLITIK MANTAN KETUA UMUM PARTAI GOLKAR ABURIZAL BAKRIE (CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON POLITICAL SPEECH BY THE FORMER HEAD OF GOLKAR, ABU RIZAL BAKRIE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Herlina Yuni Astuti
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Social Contexts ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

AbstractCritical Discourse Analysis on Political Speech by The Former Head of Golkar,Abu Rizal Bakrie. Discourse is a unit of language based on words used tocommunicate in social contexts. Therefore, it cannot be denied that language isan effective tool in all aspects of life, including on the political stage. This studyaims to analyze the structure of the political speech of the former chairman of theGolkar Party, Aburizal Bakrie, entitled "Flowing But Not Drifting". The type ofthis research is descriptive qualitative with the Van Dijk's model of criticaldiscourse analysis. The results of this study indicate that the macro structure ofthe ARB speech text is "Flowing But Not Drifting". In the study of the textsuperstructure, ARB's speech was arranged in a simple way which then becamea strategy in delivering a discourse in front of the cadres. The final element ofvan Dijk's critical discourse analysis study is the micro or semantic structure.The ARB speech consists of background elements, details, presuppositions andnominalization in the semantic section. The use of pronouns, and the tenses usedare active and passive sentences, and tend to use aspects of conditionalcoherence. ARB also tends to use diction in a style that leads to the use oflanguage that is simple and easy to understand because it starts the speech bygiving greetings, thanks and also insertion of a pantun, which is understood as away to give a more positive nuance to the Golkar Party.Key words: CDA, speech, politics, Golkar, ARB AbstrakAnalisis Wacana Kritis Pada Pidato Politik Mantan Ketua Umum PartaiGolkar Aburizal Bakrie. Wacana merupakan satuan bahasa berdasarkan katayang digunakan untuk berkomunikasi dalam konteks sosial. Oleh karena itu,tidak bisa dipungkiri lagi bahwa bahasa adalah alat yang efektif dalam segalaaspek kehidupan termasuk dalam panggung politik. Penelitian ini bertujuanuntuk menganalisis struktur pidato politik mantan ketua umum Partai Golkar,Aburizal Bakrie, yang berjudul “Mengalir Tapi Tak Hanyut”. Jenis penelitian iniadalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode analisis wacana kritis model Van Dijk.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa struktur makro teks pidato ARBadalah “Mengalir Tapi Tak Hanyut”. Pada kajian sisi superstruktur teks, pidatoARB tersusun secara sederhana yang kemudian menjadi sebuah strategi dalammenyampaikan suatu wacana di hadapan para kader. Elemen terakhir darikajian analisis wacana kritis oleh van Dijk adalah struktur mikro atau semantik.Pidato ARB terdiri dari elemen latar, detail, pra-anggapan dan nominalisasipada bagian semantik. Penggunaan kata ganti, dan bentuk kalimat yangdigunakan adalah kalimat aktif dan pasif, serta cenderung menggunakan aspekkoherensi kondisional. ARB juga cenderung menggunakan diksi dengan gayayang mengarah kepada penggunaan bahasa yang sederhana dan mudahdipahami karena mengawali pidato dengan memberi salam, ucapan terima kasihdan juga disisipi sebuah pantun, yang mana hal tersebut dipahami sebagai carauntuk memberikan nuansa yang lebih positif atas Partai Golkar.Kata-kata kunci:AWK, pidato, politik, Golkar, ARB

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document