scholarly journals Dinamika Modernisasi Hukum Islam: Tinjauan Historis dalam Pembacaan Mazhab Sociological Jurisprudence

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-112
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zayyadi

This article explores the dynamics of the modernization of Islamic law using the sociological approach. The legal theory used is the history of modern law as a comparative Islamic law in the Muslim world related to its influence in Indonesia. The author associates the sociological jurisprudence with the dynamics of modernization of Islamic law in the Muslim world including Indonesia. The sociological jurisprudence is applied in the study of marriage law issues that still need efforts to modernize the law, because these problems continue to develop and the legal position must always be dynamic in responding to sociological problems that always live in society. Various theoretical influences in the sociology of law and also the sociological jurisprudence have a wider impact on the sociology of Islamic law. This effort to modernize Islamic law is part of the development of modernization theory in the sociology of law, which synergizes integratively between law and society and society and law proportionally. This article seeks to apply the sociology of law in general and the sociological jurisprudence in particular about family law with the case of sociological problems of Islamic law in Muslim societies such as Turkey, Egypt, and Indonesia.

Author(s):  
Leonard Wood

This article examines legislation as an instrument of Islamic law in the history of the Islamic world and in Islamic legal theory, with particular emphasis on the scholarly analysis of whether Islamic law can be legislated at all, and if so, how. It first reviews the scholarship on legislation in the Islamic world before the mid-nineteenth-century Ottoman reforms (tanzimat)—the “premodern” centuries. It then considers legislation after the mid-nineteenth century—the “modern” centuries—by looking at scholars’ preoccupations with the apparent novelty of modern legislation and its debatable Islamicity. It also discusses empirical dilemmas underlying these preoccupations and competing scholarly approaches to theorizing and studying the proper relationship between legislation and Islam. The article concludes by suggesting four paths forward in the analysis of legislation as an instrument of Islamic law.


Author(s):  
أسماء أكلي (Asmaa Akli) ◽  
وراضية باشوش (& Radhia Bachouch)

تناول هذا البحث بالدراسة واحدة من أهم معضلات العالم الإسلامي وهي الاعتداء على رموزه من خلال سب نبيها محمد  والاستهزاء به، فكان من الواجب أن يكون هناك بحث موضوعي يرد ويسدد ويوجه مسار مواجهة هذه التعديات، فجاء هذا البحث موضحا أحد أساليب مواجهة الدعوة في القديم والحديث، مبينا مخالفتها للنظم والمعايير الأخلاقية والذوق الحضاري، وبيان حكمها ليس في التشريع الإسلامي فقط، وإنما في الدساتير والمواثيق الدولية. وقد خلصت الدراسة إلى بيان أساليب الرد في الصدر الأول من الإسلام، وكذلك  زمن الصحابة رضي الله عنهم، والعصر الحاضر، منتهية باقتراح خطة حكيمة لصد هذا العدوان.*****************************************************This research studies one of the main problems of the Muslim world which is the attack on its symbols by insulting and mocking the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.). There is an urgent need of an objective research on this subject that should respond, correct, and direct the course of facing these attacks. This research focuses on one of the methods used in both old and new propagation, explaining how it is in conflict with the ethical system and standards and civilizational decency, and elaborating its ruling which is not only in Islamic law, but also in the international covenants and conventions. The study includes discussion of the methods of rebuttal as found in the early history of Islam, during the time of ØaÍÉbah, and the present era, proposing a wise plan to repel this aggression.


1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-86
Author(s):  
Abuhamid M. Abdul-Qadir

Professor Ahmed Hasan has made a great contribution to the understandingof the early history of Islamic jurisprudence up to the time of al Shafi'i (d. 204A.H.). A few works. such as The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence byProfessor Joseph Schacht, have been published on the early development ofIslamic jurisprudence. and Hasan's work is a valuable addition. Islamic jurisprudenceis a dynamic, ongoing, and virtually limitless subject. The communitycannot survive without it as long as new issues arise to be resolved andIslamized. Thi field of study helps the community to move forward, encouragingmembers to solve new problems that arise in their social lives. Hasan discusseshow jurists debate one another over the extraction of God's law and how.ultimately, uch debates have developed Islamic jurisprndence and the differentlegal schools. ljma' (consensus) and qiyas (analogy) did not exist at the time ofthe Prophet; they developed through ijtihtid, based on the principle sources theQur'an and Sunnah. The subject has a kind of progressive flow, tide, and dynamiccharacter. Hasan divide his book into seven chapter, beside an introductionand a concluding discussion. He also includes a bibliography and an index. Theauthor chose a period in the history of jurisprudence for which sources for synthesisare difficult co obcain. He shows the historical development of lslamicjurisprudence in the first two centuries of Hijrah based mainly on the work ofMalik. Abu Yusuf, al Shaybani and al Shafi'i.This book is designed for readers who are particularly interested in Islamiclaw and history. In the introduction the author describes the meaning of fiqh andother allied terms. He analyzes the origins of the early schools of law-such asthe schools of Medina and Iraq-that developed through the work of scholarswho extracted God's law from the revealed sources. Further analysis by theauthor suggests that after the middle of the second century A.H., scholars weregenerally engaged in independent thinking on law. ln the same way. al Shafi'ideveloped his own legal theory and brought consistency into law. After him theregional character of the early schools began to disintegrate and faithfulness toone master and his principles gradually predominated.The author discusses the sources of Islamic law beginning with the developmentof the main five categories of judgment of Muslims' aces, namely, theobligatory. the recommended, the neutral, the disapproved, and the prohibited.These categories are ultimately based on four sources: the Qur'an, the Sunnah,ijma' and qiyas. The author first deal with the Qur'an, briefly pointing out thatit is the primary source of legislation and guidance. The author discusses thedoctrine of the abrogation of individual verses in the Qur'an (naskh) in a separatechapter, pointing out the development of the theory of naskh and its significantrole in Islamic jurisprudence. Although naskh is an established doctrine inthe field of Islamic jurisprudence, the author's long analysis of naskh suggeststhat since the Qur'an is eternal there can be no reasonable ground for the thesis ...


HUMANIKA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Agus Sarono

Bank interest is considered usury. One is to be scrutinized if the bank interest as usury, because usury is often mentioned in the texts is characterized oppress and torment the community. As with the conventional bank interest, how many small and medium enterprises which helped because Free Master in conventional banks. Problems found in the writing of this paper is; Why people ignore the MUI fatwa on usury interest as knife analysis; Unger critical legal theory, theory of responsiveness Nonet Sezlnick, the theory of legal culture Lawrence M Friedman progressive Satjipto Rahardjo and Usul Fiqh used to find alternative meanings of texts relating to usury From search and review of the problems concluded that after the birth of four Imam Muslim schools stuck in the mindset of the four Imams Madzhab and afraid to ijtihad. Therefore, the Muslims thought of usury is not far from what has been inferred by the four Imam mazdhab. Finally Islamic law really can not answer the development of society. Bank interest is equated with usury which both born differ in the time span, the different communities of the background, a different effect. Therefore interest rates clearly differ from usury and should not be equated with riba. That is why people ignore the MUI fatwa in business transactions. Should the scholars 'move from positivistic Jurisprudence to understanding Sociological Jurisprudence positivistic Jurisprudence.Oleh Hence the scholars can use the legal pluralisme approach in defining legal meaning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document