DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF LABORATORY MARKERS OF NEONATAL SEPSIS IN PREMATURE INFANTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-100
Author(s):  
G.V. Kulizhnikov ◽  
◽  
E.G. Furman ◽  
A.V. Nikolenko ◽  
◽  
...  

Neonatal sepsis (NS) is the leading cause of mortality in premature newborns. It is a difficult diagnostic task for clinicians. This article provides a review of the literature on laboratory markers of NS. The latest methods for the diagnosis of sepsis in premature infants in various studies are considered in the article. The results of studying the diagnostic value of a general blood test, cytokines, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, prespepsin, microRNA polymorphism, bacterial blood culture, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as diagnostic significance – sensitivity, specificity, prognostic value of positive and negative results are presented.

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-217
Author(s):  
Abebe Sorsa

Introduction:Nowadays various biochemical markers, such as C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin and tumor necrosis factor alpha, have been proposed as a potential marker for screening neonatal sepsis. In the current study, we tried to see the diagnostic significance of White Blood Cell (WBC) count and CRP in diagnostic screening of neonatal sepsis.Methods:A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2016 to April 2017 in Asella Teaching and Referral Hospital. Data were entered into EPI-INFO version 3.5.1 for cleanup and then exported to SPSS version 17 for further analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were used to assess the accuracy of CRP and WBC count taking blood culture as gold standard.Results:Data of 303 neonates with clinical sepsis were analyzed. Positive CRP and abnormal WBC were reported in 136(45%) and 99(32.7%) of study subjects respectively. Blood culture turned to be positive in 88(29.4%) of study subjects. The Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV and NPV of WBC count were 59.5 %, 79.6%, 52%, 64.5% respectively while the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CRP were 65.6%, 78%, 42% and 91% respectively. By combining both WBC and CRP, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV improve to 78.5%, 83%, 60% and 93% respectively. CRP positivity rate was comparable across gram positive and gram negative bacteria while high WBC count were more reported among gram positive sepsis than gram negative ( OR 4.8, (95% CI 1.45-15.87, P 0.01)Conclusion:Based on this study’s finding, it can be concluded that CRP alone or in combination with WBC count showed better diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.


2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 1291-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maysaa El Sayed Zaki ◽  
Hesham El Sayed

Abstract Context.—Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is mandatory. Various markers are used to diagnose the condition. Objective.—To evaluate the diagnostic value of various clinical data and hematologic parameters, such as total leukocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, immature to total neutrophil ratio, and soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin) in identification and outcome of neonatal sepsis. Design.—Newborn infants with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit at Mansoura University Children's Hospital during the period between July 2007 and December 2007 were eligible for study. In addition, 30 healthy neonates were included in the study. Complete hematologic and microbiologic laboratory investigations were performed, and serum E-selectin was measured. Results.—Plasma sE-selectin levels were significantly higher (P < .001) in infected infants (mean [SD], 156.9 [77.0] ng/mL) than in noninfected (mean [SD], 88.8 [47.1] ng/mL) and healthy infants (mean [SD], 8.67 [3.74] ng/ mL). Infants with gram-negative sepsis had higher sE-selectin levels than did those with gram-positive sepsis (P = .04). C-reactive protein was the best laboratory test for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 97%, respectively. Performing sE-selectin with C-reactive protein or immature to total ratio tests increased the specificity, but reduced the sensitivity, of the tests for the determination of neonatal sepsis. Plasma sE-selectin levels were higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (P = .01) and were higher in those with hemodynamic dysfunction than in those without hemodynamic dysfunction (P < .001). Conclusions.—We conclude that plasma sE-selectin levels are elevated in neonatal sepsis. Significant elevation was associated with gram-negative sepsis. Plasma sE-selectin had low diagnostic value when used alone or in combination with other tests; however, it can be used as a prognostic indicator for the outcome of neonatal sepsis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
pp. 751-754
Author(s):  
Pruthvi D ◽  
Pavan Ramarao Kulkarni ◽  
Uma Raghavendra Jamkhandi ◽  
Shivakumar Sanganagouda Inamdar

BACKGROUND Neonatal septicaemia is a bacterial infection with positive blood culture in first four weeks of life. The early sepsis screen is vital as it detects earlier and benefits the clinician to treat the infection reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. We wanted to evaluate various haematological screening parameters and C-reactive protein (CRP) in blood culture positive neonates in sepsis. METHODS This prospective study was conducted for a period of one year. Blood samples from hundred clinically suspected neonatal septicaemia cases were subjected to aerobic culture and sepsis screen tests like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation ratio (ESR), total WBC count, absolute neutrophil count, immature / total neutrophil count (I / T) ratio and platelet count. The culture results were correlated with the sepsis screen tests. RESULTS Of the hundred cases studied, 18 % were blood culture positive and 66 % were males. Early onset septicaemia was more common, seen in 64 % of cases than late onset septicaemia (26 %) cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest organism isolated in 38.46 % of cases followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae & E. Coli. Among the haematological parameters, the positivity was best with Creactive protein (94.44 %) followed by immature & mature neutrophil ratio (I / M) (94.44 %), I / T ratio (88.88 %) and the least with absolute neutrophil count (66.0 %). Any two or more parameters were positive in 94.44 % of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS Sepsis screen has good sensitivity, specificity and is a valuable aid for early diagnosis of neonatal septicaemia. Sepsis screen is simple, cost effective, less time consuming and easy to perform. As an individual test C-reactive protein has shown highest sensitivity, specificity and is a sensitive and responsive indicator of neonatal sepsis. KEYWORDS Blood Culture, Neonatal Septicaemia, Sepsis Screen


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (02) ◽  
pp. 072-078
Author(s):  
Senem Alkan Ozdemir ◽  
Ruya Colak ◽  
Ezgi Yangin Ergon ◽  
Sebnem Calkavur

Abstract Objective Noninvasive markers have been increasingly used as a diagnostic marker for sepsis detection and monitoring of the disease. The aim of this observational, prospective pilot study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of urinary soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (sTREM-1) and urine C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the late onset neonatal sepsis and to compare them with serum CRP levels. Materials and Methods Sixty-six infants with clinical sepsis were included. Urine sTREM-1 and urine CRP were collected at the diagnosis of late-onset sepsis. All laboratory investigations were also noted from the infants. Results There were no significant differences between characteristics of the infants. Culture-positive neonates had significantly higher urine sTREM-1 than culture-negative neonates (p < 0.001). Using a cut-off point for urine sTREM-1 of 129 pg/mL, the sensitivity was 0.63, the specificity was 0.84, positive predictive value was 0.80, negative predictive value was 0.70. Urine sTREM-1 and urine CRP were recollected on the seventh day of sepsis treatment and it was found that the levels of sTREM-1 and CRP decreased. Conclusion This is the first study in the literature which evaluates the place of urine sTREM-1 and urine CRP in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Urine sTREM-1 and urine CRP may be useful in the diagnosis of sepsis and in evaluating the effect of antibiotic treatment.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferhat Cekmez ◽  
Fuat Emre Canpolat ◽  
Merih Çetinkaya ◽  
Seçil Aydinöz ◽  
Gokhan Aydemir ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 456-462
Author(s):  
Qiang Guo ◽  
Chuanqin Xu ◽  
Chao Sun ◽  
Yubao Zhao ◽  
Weifu Zhang

AbstractThe timely and accurate diagnosis of ascites is of great significance for early treatment and prognostication. This study explored the value of soluble myeloid triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 1 (sTREM-1) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for assessing ascites. A total of 133 patients with ascites who received treatment at the Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University between September 2015 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The ascites in 22, 45, 33 and 33 patients were tuberculous, bacterial, tumorous, and transudative, respectively. Healthy volunteers (n=30) who received a health examination at the same hospital during the same period constituted the control group. Before treatment, both ascitic sTREM-1 and CRP showed significant differences among the ascites subgroups (P<0.001), with the highest levels in the bacterial subgroup. Serum sTREM-1 and CRP also showed significant differences among the groups. A correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between sTREM-1 and CRP. ROC curves of the bacterial subgroup showed that when the optimal cutoff point was set to 20.2, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the serum sTREM-1 index were 0.933, 0.955, 0.914, and 0.965, respectively. sTREM-1 may provide more diagnostic value than CRP for the diagnosis of bacterial ascites.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimon Izhakian ◽  
Walter G. Wasser ◽  
Benjamin D. Fox ◽  
Baruch Vainshelboim ◽  
Mordechai R. Kramer

Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of pleural C-reactive protein (CRP) biomarker levels in identifying parapneumonic effusions.Methods. A single-center, retrospective review of 244 patients diagnosed with pleural effusions was initiated among patients at the Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, between January 2011 and December 2013. The patients were categorized into 4 groups according to their type of pleural effusion as follows: heart failure, malignant, post-lung transplantation, and parapneumonic effusion.Results. The pleural CRP levels significantly differentiated the four groups (p<0.001) with the following means: parapneumonic effusion,5.38±4.85 mg/dL; lung transplant,2.77±2.66 mg/dL; malignancy,1.19±1.51 mg/dL; and heart failure,0.57±0.81 mg/dL. The pleural fluid CRP cut-off value for differentiating among parapneumonic effusions and the other 3 groups was 1.38 mg/dL. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 84.2%, 71.5%, 37%, and 95%, respectively. A backward logistic regression model selected CRP as the single predictor of parapneumonic effusion (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.37–1.89).Conclusions. Pleural fluid CRP levels can be used to distinguish between parapneumonic effusions and other types of exudative effusions. CRP levels < 0.64 mg/dL are likely to indicate a pleural effusion from congestive heart failure, whereas levels ≥ 1.38 mg/dL are suggestive of an infectious etiology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document