scholarly journals Haematological Parameters in Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Care Centre Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
pp. 751-754
Author(s):  
Pruthvi D ◽  
Pavan Ramarao Kulkarni ◽  
Uma Raghavendra Jamkhandi ◽  
Shivakumar Sanganagouda Inamdar

BACKGROUND Neonatal septicaemia is a bacterial infection with positive blood culture in first four weeks of life. The early sepsis screen is vital as it detects earlier and benefits the clinician to treat the infection reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. We wanted to evaluate various haematological screening parameters and C-reactive protein (CRP) in blood culture positive neonates in sepsis. METHODS This prospective study was conducted for a period of one year. Blood samples from hundred clinically suspected neonatal septicaemia cases were subjected to aerobic culture and sepsis screen tests like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation ratio (ESR), total WBC count, absolute neutrophil count, immature / total neutrophil count (I / T) ratio and platelet count. The culture results were correlated with the sepsis screen tests. RESULTS Of the hundred cases studied, 18 % were blood culture positive and 66 % were males. Early onset septicaemia was more common, seen in 64 % of cases than late onset septicaemia (26 %) cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest organism isolated in 38.46 % of cases followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae & E. Coli. Among the haematological parameters, the positivity was best with Creactive protein (94.44 %) followed by immature & mature neutrophil ratio (I / M) (94.44 %), I / T ratio (88.88 %) and the least with absolute neutrophil count (66.0 %). Any two or more parameters were positive in 94.44 % of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS Sepsis screen has good sensitivity, specificity and is a valuable aid for early diagnosis of neonatal septicaemia. Sepsis screen is simple, cost effective, less time consuming and easy to perform. As an individual test C-reactive protein has shown highest sensitivity, specificity and is a sensitive and responsive indicator of neonatal sepsis. KEYWORDS Blood Culture, Neonatal Septicaemia, Sepsis Screen

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-217
Author(s):  
Abebe Sorsa

Introduction:Nowadays various biochemical markers, such as C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin and tumor necrosis factor alpha, have been proposed as a potential marker for screening neonatal sepsis. In the current study, we tried to see the diagnostic significance of White Blood Cell (WBC) count and CRP in diagnostic screening of neonatal sepsis.Methods:A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2016 to April 2017 in Asella Teaching and Referral Hospital. Data were entered into EPI-INFO version 3.5.1 for cleanup and then exported to SPSS version 17 for further analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were used to assess the accuracy of CRP and WBC count taking blood culture as gold standard.Results:Data of 303 neonates with clinical sepsis were analyzed. Positive CRP and abnormal WBC were reported in 136(45%) and 99(32.7%) of study subjects respectively. Blood culture turned to be positive in 88(29.4%) of study subjects. The Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV and NPV of WBC count were 59.5 %, 79.6%, 52%, 64.5% respectively while the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CRP were 65.6%, 78%, 42% and 91% respectively. By combining both WBC and CRP, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV improve to 78.5%, 83%, 60% and 93% respectively. CRP positivity rate was comparable across gram positive and gram negative bacteria while high WBC count were more reported among gram positive sepsis than gram negative ( OR 4.8, (95% CI 1.45-15.87, P 0.01)Conclusion:Based on this study’s finding, it can be concluded that CRP alone or in combination with WBC count showed better diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidra Younis ◽  
Muhammad Ali Sheikh ◽  
Amjad Ali Raza

Sepsis is the most common cause of neonatal mortality and is responsible for 30-50% of total neonatal deaths each year in developing countries. The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Creactive protein (CRP) in neonatal sepsis. Fifty nine consecutive patients with risk factors and clinical features suggestive of CRP sepsis were selected as per operational definition and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Detailed physical examination was carried out. Blood sample for culture and CRP was taken from all the patients. Results of blood culture and CRP were noted down in the performa. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software version 16. Among selected patients 31/59 (52.5%) were male whereas 28/59 (47.5%) were female. Mean age of all patients was 15.47+7.26 days and mean weight was 2.94+0.63Kg. Temperature instability was present in 79.7%, Tachypnea in 69.5%, Tachycardia in 66.1%, delayed capillary refill in 64.4% and oliguria in 55.9%. Blood cultures were positive in 64.4% and raised CRP was found in 64.5%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive of raised CRP was found to be 97.3%, 95.2%, 97.3% and 95.2% respectively. In conclusion this study show that C-reactive protein has high sensitivity and specificity for establishing the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis which is comparable to that of blood culture results.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 890
Author(s):  
Gunjan Mehrotra

Background: Sepsis is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in the newborn. Early diagnosis and treatment is vital to improve outcome. Neonatal sepsis in newborn is characterized by paucity of signs and symptoms and is due to invasion and spread through the body of non-pathogenic/ pathogenic & Gram positive / negative organism. It is subtle disease, the general characteristic of bacterial infection in neonatal period are influenced more by response of the infant than the causative organism. The present study was therefore carried out to determine the usefulness of C-reactive protein (CRP) for evaluation of neonatal sepsis in tertiary care hospital.Methods: Neonates with clinical suspicion of sepsis were prospectively studied out from June 2006 to January 2008. Blood was obtained from each subject recruited for the qualitative estimation of CRP. Blood culture was used as gold standard for diagnosis of NNS.Results: Of 50 neonates studied, 34 (68%) had positive CRP while 31 (62%) had positive blood culture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CRP were 90.32%, 42.10%, 71.79% and 72.72% respectively.Conclusions: The qualitative method of estimating CRP which is cheap and rapid has moderate sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
Chiranjib Barua ◽  
Md Nurul Anwar ◽  
Md Shahidullah ◽  
Shahadat Hossain ◽  
Sharmila Barua ◽  
...  

Neonatal septicemia is a clinical syndrome of systemic illness accompanied by bacteremia occuring in the first 28 days of life. Neonatal septicemia is one of the major causes of neonatal death in developing countries. Early diagnosis and treatment can prevent neonatal mortality and morbidity. The present study includes: 1) usefulness of CRP (C-reactive protein), Total Leucocyte Count, Platelet Count and Blood Culture in early diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis, 2) significance of serial CRP in diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. 3) the prognostic value of CRP in neonatal sepsis. This is a prospective study done in neonatal ward, Chittagong Medical College Hospital and carried out from January 2008 to January 2011. Sample size was 300. One hundred fifty neonates with suspected sepsis as cases and 150 healthy babies as control were enrolled in this study. Seventy two percent of cases neonates were preterm and low birth weight. Common risk factors for neonatal septicemia which were identified in this study; preterm (72%), low birth weight (72%), premature rupture membrane (60%), chorioamnionitis (26%) and maternal urinary tract infection (16%) . Out of 150 cases of suspected neonatal sepsis total 80.7%% had raised CRP, in initial sample 70.39% were CRP positive and in 2nd sample additional 9.31% case were CRP positive . In control group 91% were CRP negative. CRP was positive in 100% of culture proven sepsis. Sensitivity of CRP was 80.67% and specificity of CRP was 76.44%. Leucocytosis was observed in 7% of cases and leucopenia was found in 11% of cases. In 82 % cases leucocyte count was found normal. In control group, 95% had normal leucocyte count and 5% had leucocytosis but no leucopenia. Sensitivity of leucocyte count was 18% and specificity was 20.68%. Thrombocytopenia was found in 28% of case group. Out of 150 cases only 15.33% yielded growth of organisms in blood culture. Klebsiella was the most common pathogen isolated which was followed by E.coli and Strph. aureus. Sensitivity of blood culture was 15.33% and specificity was 100% Therefore serial CRP can be taken as alternative method for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis specially in developing countries where blood culture is not readily available.J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2014; 32: 61-65


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-153
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Murray

The article by Philip and Hewitt (Pediatrics 65:1036-1041, 1980) on the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was interesting, but their conclusions may be misleading. They demonstrated that when at least two of five screening tests were positive (band/total neutrophils, leukocyte counts, latex C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and latex haptoglobin), neonatal sepsis could be accurately predicted in 28 of 30 (93%) infants. Two or more tests were also positive for 43 of 346 (12%) infants without proven sepsis.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2485-2485
Author(s):  
Iheanyi Okpala ◽  
Ndubuisi Uwaezuoke ◽  
Ifeoma Emodi ◽  
Anthony Ikefuna ◽  
Tagbo Oguonu

Abstract Introduction The severity of sickle cell disease (SCD) increases with absolute neutrophil count (ANC, Eur J Haematol. 1998; 60: 267-8) and expression of adhesion molecules by leukocytes (Eur J Haematol. 2002; 69: 135 -144.). Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM 1) on vascular endothelium mediates leukocyte adherence to the blood vessel wall. This contributes to vaso-occlusion, the main mechanism of tissue damage in SCD. Micro-RNA 221 (MIR 221) regulates the gene for ICAM-1 (J Cell Science 2011; 124, 999-1006). How the severity of SCD relates with expression of MIR 221 was evaluated in this study. Methods Following IRB approval and informed consent by appropriate persons, 25 healthy HbAA control persons and 73 HbSS patients (45M, 28F; age 2-18 yrs) were consecutively enrolled from University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu. Patients who had blood transfusion in the previous 3 months were excluded. Information from medical records and clinical assessment was used to determine the SCD Severity Score according to the system previously validated by Cameron et al (J Nat Med Assoc. 1983; 75: 483-7). This system assigns scores to age at which the first symptom of SCD occurred, number of hospital admissions due to SCD per year, number of painful episodes per year, type of sickle cell crisis, number of major organ complications of SCD, pneumococcal sepsis, and the degree of failure to thrive assessed with patient's height and weight percentiles. A total score up to 4 indicates mild, 5-8 moderate, and 9-21 severe SCD. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and Hb level were determined with an automated blood analyser, plasma level of soluble ICAM-1 (sICAM-1) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and expression of MIR 221 in leukocytes by polymerase chain reaction with fluorescent probes to enable quantification. To obtain a composite picture of the relationship between study parameters, 4mls of venous blood from each patient was analysed during vaso-occlusive crisis; and 4 weeks after the crisis had resolved (steady state). To help evaluate the degree of resolution of the crisis and the level of inflammation in each patient, the concentration of C-reactive protein was measured by ELISA in blood samples taken during crisis and steady state. The GraphPad Prism statistical package version 5.03 was used for data analyses. Following D'Agostino and Pearson's Omnibus normality test which showed that the values of MIR 221expression, sICAM 1 concentration, and ANC did not have a normal (Gaussian) distribution, median values and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analyses of these data. Results Based on Cameron Severity Scores, 25 patients had mild, 36 moderate and 12 severe SCD. The mean severity score for all patients was 5.85± 2.31. Median leukocyte MIR-221 of 3,092 copies/5ul of cDNA in steady state was comparable to 3,764 copies/5ul of cDNA in crisis (p = 0.6, Table 1). Both values were significantly higher than the median leukocyte MIR221 of 1428 copies/5ul of cDNA in healthy HbAA controls; P<0.0001. The quantity of MIR221 in leukocytes in mild SCD (median 3092 copies/5ul of cDNA) was significantly different from that in moderate disease (median 4004 copies/5ul of CDNA) which, in turn, differed significantly from that in severe SCD (median 5587 copies/5ul of cDNA, p< 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis Test). Spearman's correlation coefficient (Rho) between the Cameron Severity Scores in patients with severe SCD and the quantity of MIR 221 in leukocytes during steady state was high at 0.72 (Table 2). The quantity of MIR 221 in leukocytes during steady state emerged as a stronger correlate of SCD severity than ANC (Table 3). As crisis resolved and steady state returned, the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.0003) and ANC (Wilcoxon matched pairs test; p<0.0001) reduced. Conclusions The strong correlation between severity of SCD and the quantity of leukocyte MIR 221 in steady state suggests that leukocyte MIR 221 is a candidate biomarker for assessing the severity of SCD. The quantity of MIR 221 in leukocytes, unlike ANC, did not change significantly from crisis to steady state in this study; and could be a more consistent and stronger index of SCD severity than absolute neutrophil count. As a regulator of the gene for ICAM 1 which contributes to leukocyte adhesion and organ damage, the role of MIR 221 in SCD deserves further studies in view of the potential benefit of anti-adhesion therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Hawk

SEPSIS IS ONE OF THE MOST COMMON diagnostic challenges in the NICU. Currently a definitive diagnosis can be made only with the gold-standard blood culture, which is generally not available for 48 hours.1,2 Difficulty obtaining a large enough sample to detect a positive blood culture, as well as increased use of antenatal antibiotics, has complicated the ability to make a definitive diagnosis of sepsis.3 If left untreated, sepsis can increase morbidity and mortality. Therefore, many infants are treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotics.4,5 Two kinds of tests would be most helpful in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: one that quickly confirms the diagnosis and one that conclusively rules it out. In fact, a diagnostic sepsis marker with a high negative predictive value (the value representing patients without sepsis who are correctly diagnosed) might reduce the short- and long-term adverse effects of antibiotics, health care costs, and length of hospital stay.6 Despite extensive investigation no single test meets the criteria that would make it an ideal marker for the early diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn.5,7,8 Generally, screening includes a complete blood count with differential and may be accompanied by other adjunctive tests such as a C-reactive protein (CRP).9–11 This column examines CRP, an acute phase reactant (APR), as a diagnostic marker for neonatal sepsis.


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 580
Author(s):  
Carlo Pietrasanta ◽  
Andrea Ronchi ◽  
Claudia Vener ◽  
Chiara Poggi ◽  
Claudia Ballerini ◽  
...  

In the context of suspected neonatal sepsis, early diagnosis and stratification of patients according to clinical severity is not yet effectively achieved. In this diagnostic trial, we aimed to assess the accuracy of presepsin (PSEP) for the diagnosis and early stratification of supposedly septic neonates. PSEP, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) were assessed at the onset of sepsis suspicion (T0), every 12–24 h for the first 48 h (T1–T4), and at the end of antibiotic therapy (T5). Enrolled neonates were stratified into three groups (infection, sepsis, septic shock) according to Wynn and Wong’s definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) according to the severity of clinical conditions were assessed. We enrolled 58 neonates with infection, 77 with sepsis, and 24 with septic shock. PSEP levels were higher in neonates with septic shock (median 1557.5 pg/mL) and sepsis (median 1361 pg/mL) compared to those with infection (median 977.5 pg/mL) at T0 (p < 0.01). Neither CRP nor PCT could distinguish the three groups at T0. PSEP’s AUC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.854–0.943) for sepsis and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.885–0.988) for septic shock. Maximum Youden index was 1013 pg/mL (84.4% sensitivity, 88% specificity) for sepsis, and 971.5 pg/mL for septic shock (92% sensitivity, 86% specificity). However, differences in PSEP between neonates with positive and negative blood culture were limited. Thus, PSEP was an early biomarker of neonatal sepsis severity, but did not support the early identification of neonates with positive blood culture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document