scholarly journals Tackling hypoglycemia in children: teams, targets and technology

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
Thomas Danne
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Diabetes Education ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Glycemic Variability ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Glycemic Targets ◽  
Bolus Insulin

On the occasion of the Somogyi Award lecture this review focusses on the current advances in tackling hypoglycemia in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes providing evidence for the importance of multidisciplinary teams, ambitious glycemic targets and implementation of diabetes technology. Meal-related intensified insulin replacement with differential substitution of basal- and bolus insulin is the therapy of choice in the care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The use of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring devices is increasing rapidly, with the type of insulin therapy (insulin pen or pump) depending on the age of the patients and family preference. Education appropriate to the age and current challenges is essential for the children's participation in everyday life as undisturbed as possible. New parameters like time in range and time below range suitable for identifying high glycemic variability as risk factor for severe hypoglycemia complement the HbA1c targets and the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) in a shared decision making on therapeutic adjustments between the diabetes team and people with diabetes. Automated insulin delivery as a hybrid closed loop or dosing advice using artificial intelligence are becoming a clinical reality. However, diabetes education as a team approach, defining clear targets with outcomes evaluated in multinational registries like SWEET remain important for shaping the future of pediatric diabetology.

scholarly journals Liraglutide as additional treatment for type 1 diabetes

2011 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Varanasi ◽  
Natalie Bellini ◽  
Deepti Rawal ◽  
Mehul Vora ◽  
Antoine Makdissi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Dose ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glycemic Variability ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
The Body ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Bolus Insulin

ObjectiveTo determine whether the addition of liraglutide to insulin to treat patients with type 1 diabetes leads to an improvement in glycemic control and diminish glycemic variability.Subjects and methodsIn this study, 14 patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes on continuous glucose monitoring and intensive insulin therapy were treated with liraglutide for 1 week. Of the 14 patients, eight continued therapy for 24 weeks.ResultsIn all the 14 patients, mean fasting and mean weekly glucose concentrations significantly decreased after 1 week from 130±10 to 110±8 mg/dl (P<0.01) and from 137.5±20 to 115±12 mg/dl (P<0.01) respectively. Glycemic excursions significantly improved at 1 week. The mean s.d. of glucose concentrations decreased from 56±10 to 26±6 mg/dl (P<0.01) and the coefficient of variation decreased from 39.6±10 to 22.6±7 (P<0.01). There was a concomitant fall in the basal insulin from 24.5±6 to 16.5±6 units (P<0.01) and bolus insulin from 22.5±4 to 15.5±4 units (P<0.01).In patients who continued therapy with liraglutide for 24 weeks, mean fasting, mean weekly glucose concentrations, glycemic excursions, and basal and bolus insulin dose also significantly decreased (P<0.01). HbA1c decreased significantly at 24 weeks from 6.5 to 6.1% (P=0.02), as did the body weight by 4.5±1.5 kg (P=0.02).ConclusionLiraglutide treatment provides an additional strategy for improving glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. It also leads to weight loss.

Diabetes Device Downloading: Benefits and Barriers Among Youth With Type 1 Diabetes

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110595
Author(s):  
Benjamin A. Palmer ◽  
Karissa Soltys ◽  
M. Bridget Zimmerman ◽  
Andrew W. Norris ◽  
Eva Tsalikian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Insulin Dose ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fear Of Hypoglycemia ◽  
Glycemic Targets

Background: The majority of youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) fail to meet glycemic targets despite increasing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use. We therefore aimed to determine the proportion of caregivers who review recent glycemic trends (“retrospective review”) and make ensuant insulin adjustments based on this data (“retroactive insulin adjustments”). We additionally considered that fear of hypoglycemia and frequency of severe hypoglycemia would be associated with performing retrospective review. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of youth with T1D, collecting demographics, diabetes technology usage, patterns of glucose data review/insulin dose self-adjustment, and Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS). Results: Nineteen percent of eligible caregivers (191/1003) responded. Performing retrospective review was associated with younger child age (12.2 versus 15.4, P = .0001) and CGM use (92% versus 73%, P = .004), but was not associated with a significant improvement in child’s HbA1c (7.89 versus 8.04, P = .65). Retrospective reviewers had significantly higher HFS-behavior scores (31.9 versus 27.7, P = .0002), which remained significantly higher when adjusted for child’s age and CGM use ( P = .005). Linear regression identified a significant negative association between HbA1c (%) and number of retroactive insulin adjustments (0.24 percent lower mean HbA1c per additional adjustment made, P = .02). Conclusions: Retrospective glucose data review is associated with improved HbA1c when coupled with data-driven retroactive insulin adjustments. Barriers to data downloading existed even in this cohort of predominantly CGM-using T1D families.

scholarly journals Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parizad Avari ◽  
Vanessa Moscardo ◽  
Narvada Jugnee ◽  
Nick Oliver ◽  
Monika Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Glycemic Variability ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Freestyle Libre ◽  
The Impact

Background: The I-HART CGM study has shown that real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has greater beneficial impact on hypoglycemia than intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes at high risk (Gold score ≥4 or recent severe hypoglycemia using insulin injections). In this subanalysis, we present the impact of rtCGM and iscCGM on glycemic variability (GV). Methods: Forty participants were recruited to this parallel group study. Following two weeks of blinded rtCGM (DexcomG4), participants were randomized to rtCGM (Dexcom G5; n = 20) or iscCGM (Freestyle Libre; n = 20) for eight weeks. An open-extension phase enabled participants on rtCGM to continue for a further eight weeks and those on iscCGM to switch to rtCGM over this period. Glycemic variability measures at baseline, 8- and 16-week endpoints were compared between groups. Results: At the eight-week endpoint, between-group differences demonstrated significant reduction in several GV measures with rtCGM compared to iscCGM (GRADE%hypoglycemia, index of glycemic control [IGC], and average daily risk range [ADRR]; P < .05). Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring reduced mean average glucose and glycemic variability percentage and GRADE%hyperglycemia compared with rtCGM ( P < .05). At 16 weeks, the iscCGM group switching to rtCGM showed significant improvement in GRADE%hypoglycemia, personal glycemic status, IGC, and ADRR. Conclusion: Our data suggest most, but not all, GV measures improve with rtCGM compared with iscCGM, particularly those measures associated with the risk of hypoglycemia. Selecting appropriate glucose monitoring technology to address GV in this high-risk cohort is important to minimize the risk of glucose extremes and severe hypoglycemia. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03028220

Short and long-term glycemic variability associated with severe hypoglycemia and retinopathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martín Borja Sanz ◽  
Gimeno Sergio Roman ◽  
Peteiro Miranda Carlos Miguel ◽  
Ortez Toro Jose Jorge ◽  
Ana Agudo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Glycemic Variability ◽  
Short And Long Term

Glycemic Variability and Insulin Needs in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Supplemented with Vitamin D: A Pilot Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karem Mileo Felício ◽  
Ana Carolina Contente Braga de Souza ◽  
Joao Felicio Abrahao Neto ◽  
Franciane Trindade Cunha de Melo ◽  
Carolina Tavares Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glycemic Variability

scholarly journals Anxiety, depression, and glycemic control during Covid-19 pandemic in youths with type 1 diabetes

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cusinato ◽  
Mariangela Martino ◽  
Alex Sartori ◽  
Claudia Gabrielli ◽  
Laura Tassara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Psychological Impact ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Glucose Variability ◽  
Threshold Score ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives Our study aims to assess the impact of lockdown during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on glycemic control and psychological well-being in youths with type 1 diabetes. Methods We compared glycemic metrics during lockdown with the same period of 2019. The psychological impact was evaluated with the Test of Anxiety and Depression. Results We analyzed metrics of 117 adolescents (87% on Multiple Daily Injections and 100% were flash glucose monitoring/continuous glucose monitoring users). During the lockdown, we observed an increase of the percentage of time in range (TIR) (p<0.001), with a significant reduction of time in moderate (p=0.002), and severe hypoglycemia (p=0.001), as well as the percentage of time in hyperglycemia (p<0.001). Glucose variability did not differ (p=0.863). The glucose management indicator was lower (p=0.001). 7% of youths reached the threshold-score (≥115) for anxiety and 16% for depression. A higher score was associated with lower TIR [p=0.028, p=0.012]. Conclusions Glycemic control improved during the first lockdown period with respect to the previous year. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were associated with worse glycemic control; future researches are necessary to establish if this improvement is transient and if psychological difficulties will increase during the prolonged pandemic situation.

Patient Demographics and Clinical Outcomes Among Type 1 Diabetes Patients Using Continuous Glucose Monitors: Data From T1D Exchange Real-World Observational Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110497
Author(s):  
Daniel J. DeSalvo ◽  
Nudrat Noor ◽  
Cicilyn Xie ◽  
Sarah D. Corathers ◽  
Shideh Majidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Electronic Health Record Data ◽  
Diabetes Patients

Background: The benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) on glycemic management have been demonstrated in numerous studies; however, widespread uptake remians limited. The aim of this study was to provide real-world evidence of patient attributes and clinical outcomes associated with CGM use across clinics in the U.S. based T1D Exchange Quality Improvement (T1DX-QI) Collaborative. Method: We examined electronic Health Record data from eight endocrinology clinics participating in the T1DX-QI Collaborative during the years 2017-2019. Results: Among 11,469 type 1 diabetes patients, 48% were CGM users. CGM use varied by race/ethnicity with Non-Hispanic Whites having higher rates of CGM use (50%) compared to Non-Hispanic Blacks (18%) or Hispanics (38%). Patients with private insurance were more likely to use CGM (57.2%) than those with public insurance (33.3%) including Medicaid or Medicare. CGM users had lower median HbA1c (7.7%) compared to nonusers (8.4%). Rates of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and severe hypoglycemia were significantly higher in nonusers compared to CGM users. Conclusion: In this real-world study of patients in the T1DX-QI Collaborative, CGM users had better glycemic control and lower rates of DKA and severe hypoglycemia (SH) events, compared to nonusers; however, there were significant sociodemographic disparities in CGM use. Quality improvement and advocacy measures to promote widespread and equitable CGM uptake have the potential to improve clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Teleassistance for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Pilot Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Parise ◽  
Linda Tartaglione ◽  
Antonio Cutruzzolà ◽  
Maria Ida Maiorino ◽  
Katherine Esposito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glycemic Variability ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Virtual Visits

BACKGROUND Telemedicine use in chronic disease management has markedly increased during health emergencies due to COVID-19. Diabetes and technologies supporting diabetes care, including glucose monitoring devices, software analyzing glucose data, and insulin delivering systems, would facilitate remote and structured disease management. Indeed, most of the currently available technologies to store and transfer web-based data to be shared with health care providers. OBJECTIVE During the COVID-19 pandemic, we provided our patients the opportunity to manage their diabetes remotely by implementing technology. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 virtual visits on glycemic control parameters among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during the lockdown period. METHODS This prospective observational study included T1D patients who completed 2 virtual visits during the lockdown period. The glucose outcomes that reflected the benefits of the virtual consultation were time in range (TIR), time above range, time below range, mean daily glucose, glucose management indicator (GMI), and glycemic variability. This metric was generated using specific computer programs that automatically upload data from the devices used to monitor blood or interstitial glucose levels. If needed, we changed the ongoing treatment at the first virtual visit. RESULTS Among 209 eligible patients with T1D, 166 completed 2 virtual visits, 35 failed to download glucose data, and 8 declined the visit. Among the patients not included in the study, we observed a significantly lower proportion of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) users (n=7/43, 16% vs n=155/166, 93.4% and n=9/43, 21% vs n=128/166, 77.1%, respectively; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) compared to patients who completed the study. TIR significantly increased from the first (62%, SD 18%) to the second (65%, SD 16%) virtual visit (<i>P</i>=.02); this increase was more marked among patients using the traditional meter (n=11; baseline TIR=55%, SD 17% and follow-up TIR=66%, SD 13%; <i>P</i>=.01) than among those using CGM, and in those with a baseline GMI of ≥7.5% (n=46; baseline TIR=45%, SD 15% and follow-up TIR=53%, SD 18%; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) than in those with a GMI of &lt;7.5% (n=120; baseline TIR=68%, SD 15% and follow-up TIR=69%, SD 15%; <i>P</i>=.98). The only variable independently associated with TIR was the change of ongoing therapy. The unstandardized beta coefficient (B) and 95% CI were 5 (95% CI 0.7-8.0) (<i>P</i>=.02). The type of glucose monitoring device and insulin delivery systems did not influence glucometric parameters. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that the structured virtual visits help maintain and improve glycemic control in situations where in-person visits are not feasible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document