STUDI TATA RUANG RUMAH TINGGAL SUKU TALANG MAMAK (Spatial Study Talang Mamak Tribe House)

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Gun Faisal ◽  
Dimas Wihardyanto
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Theory Method ◽  
The Core ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
Hunting And Gathering ◽  
The Social ◽  
Open Coding ◽  
Household Activities ◽  
Axial Coding

The Talang Mamak tribe, one of Indonesian tribe, still practices the hunting and gathering of natural produce despite the fact that among them have chosen to settle permanently and doing farming activities. The aim of this research is to study the characteristics of the Talang Mamak house. The method used in this research is grounded theory method, based on the open coding, axial coding as well selective coding techniques. The method used to find the variation layout of the houses and then evaluate the characters and concept of the layouts. The conclusion of this study is that the core of the Talang Mamak house is based on the connectivity of four rooms namely: Ruang Haluan, Ruang Tangah, Ruang Tampuan and Pandapuran. The house has an open layout where all daily household activities are done without barriers. The social status of the owner is identified by houses furniture and staf

scholarly journals The Creative Journey of Grounded Theory Analysis: A Guide to its Principles and Applications

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Dourdouma ◽  
Kathrin Mörtl
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Theory Method ◽  
Social Phenomenon ◽  
Theory Analysis ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
Open Coding

Grounded theory analysis is a method widely used by qualitative researchers. This method interprets empirical materials to formulate a theory about a particular social phenomenon. In this article, we describe the steps of grounded theory method, which comprises open coding of the material followed by the grouping of open codes into categories that are increasingly abstracted to capture the essential meaning of the phenomenon. This depiction is offered as a set of explicit guidelines for researchers interested in the method.

Comparative Modelling of the Social Processes of Leadership in Work Units

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Parry
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Social Processes ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Theory Method ◽  
Training Tool ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTThis research tests the extent to which the social processes of leadership, as derived from the full grounded theory method, may be tapping constructs other than those measured by existing measures of transformational leadership. The impact on work unit outcomes of two measures of transformational leadership and the social processes of leadership scale (SPL) were tested. Comparative structural equation modelling was undertaken. It was found that, with one exception – ‘active management processes’, normally classified as transactional management – measures of transformational leadership are probably pre-existing measures of the social processes of leadership in organisations. The use of the grounded theory method to research leadership is supported. Hierarchy of Abstraction Modelling is useful as a training tool and as a representation of research findings.

A Grounded Theory of Thesis Blocking

1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Rennie ◽  
Lynne Brewer
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Time Management ◽  
Great Difficulty ◽  
Theory Method ◽  
Structure Control ◽  
The Core ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
Core Category ◽  
Political Expertise

Interviews were conducted with 10 individuals who had great difficulty in completing a thesis, and with 6 students who had relatively little difficulty. A hierarchical structure of categories encapsulating the respondents' accounts was developed through the use of the grounded theory method of qualitative analysis. In this structure, control over the thesis is the core category and is supported by the two properties of dependence—independence and structuring the task. The latter property is in turn supported by project meaningfulness, political expertise, and time management. The relationships among the categories are cast into a grounded theory of thesis blocking. The implications and limitations of the theory are discussed.

scholarly journals Methodological Gravitism

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zaman
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Methodological Individualism ◽  
Theory Method ◽  
Culturally Specific ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
Social Positioning ◽  
The Social ◽  
Spouse Selection

In this paper the author presents the case of the exchange marriage system to delineate a model of methodological gravitism. Such a model is not a deviation from or alteration to the existing qualitative research approaches. I have adopted culturally specific methodology to investigate spouse selection in line with the Grounded Theory Method. This approach, indeed, suggests the unification of methodological individualism, collectivism, and the social positioning of the actor to study the complex and intricately intertwined networks of relatedness.

On Emergence and Forcing in Information Systems Grounded Theory Studies: The Case of Strauss and Corbin

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Seidel ◽  
Cathy Urquhart
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Constructivist Grounded Theory ◽  
Basic Rule ◽  
Theory Method ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
Axial Coding ◽  
The Impact

Grounded theory method (GTM), which has been increasingly used in the information systems (IS) field, is a contested method. GTM has even been viewed as a family of methods by Antony Bryant and Kathy Charmaz in the respected ‘Handbook of Grounded Theory’. One debate that is of particular relevance is about the metaphor of ‘emergence’ and the most basic rule of GTM - that researchers should not force preconceived conceptualizations on data. This debate has its origins in a dispute between the two co-founders of grounded theory, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss. Glaser criticized Strauss for the introduction of the stage of axial coding and the use of one single coding paradigm. In his view, the paradigm is too rigid, forces data, hinders emergence, and leads to conceptual description instead of grounded theory. It is perhaps surprising then, that this debate has so far been conducted without any empirical evidence in support of the proposition that the Strauss and Corbin version of grounded theory might result in forcing. In this article, we analyse IS studies in top journals where Straussian grounded theory procedures - which have found most adherents in the IS discipline - are utilized. We provide detailed insights into the use and the impact of axial coding and the coding paradigm. We find that the researchers’ use of Straussian coding procedures in the IS field is on a level that is conscious and deliberative. We relate our findings to the broader debate about the contested nature of GTM, and find that axial coding and the coding paradigm are an exemplar that shows that GTM is an evolving method that is subject to idiosyncratic interpretations and flexible deployment. Our findings, we argue, are in line with the more recent development of constructivist grounded theory that holds that grounded theories are not discovered, they are constructed, based on conscious decisions and interpretive acts. We also put forward three propositions, and five guidelines, intended to assist IS researchers in constructing grounded theories using Straussian coding procedures, while adhering to the primacy of avoiding preconceptions.

Comparative Modelling of the Social Processes of Leadership in Work Units

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Parry
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Social Processes ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Theory Method ◽  
Training Tool ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTThis research tests the extent to which the social processes of leadership, as derived from the full grounded theory method, may be tapping constructs other than those measured by existing measures of transformational leadership. The impact on work unit outcomes of two measures of transformational leadership and the social processes of leadership scale (SPL) were tested. Comparative structural equation modelling was undertaken. It was found that, with one exception – ‘active management processes’, normally classified as transactional management – measures of transformational leadership are probably pre-existing measures of the social processes of leadership in organisations. The use of the grounded theory method to research leadership is supported. Hierarchy of Abstraction Modelling is useful as a training tool and as a representation of research findings.

scholarly journals PERAN PEMUDA STARTUP DALAM MENDORONG EKONOMI DAERAH: SEBUAH PENELITIAN GROUNDED THEORY

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-125
Author(s):  
Ahmad Dahlan ◽  
Ahmad Munir ◽  
Muslim Salam
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Data Interpretation ◽  
Local Economy ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Job Opportunities ◽  
The Social ◽  
Open Coding ◽  
Axial Coding ◽  
Document Review ◽  
The Impact

The main focus of this research was to see the role of young startups in the local economy.  This research was qualitative using grounded theory.  The choice of this method was based on the purpose of the research being carried out, which was to build a theory based on data obtained from young startup participants in seeing job opportunities open up and improving community welfare.  The steps taken to obtain data were interviews, observation, and document review.  The data was analyzed based on the constructivism data analysis model in the form of data transcription and data interpretation through open coding, axial coding, and selective coding.  Researchers using grounded theory were intended to explain the impact of the phenomenon of youth startups on the regional economy and unemployment which was extracted from information from participants, especially among young startups.  The conclusion obtained from this research was that job opportunities will be opened to the community not only by using the theory "the more companies the more work opportunities" but also job opportunities will be opened to the community if companies or startups develop jobs that are in accordance with the social conditions of the community in an area

The Grounded Theory Method

2020 ◽  
pp. 166-199
Author(s):  
Antony Bryant
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Theory Method ◽  
Grounded Theory Method ◽  
Per Se ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Key Aspects

The term grounded theory was introduced to the research lexicon by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in the 1960s, particularly with the publication of The Discovery of Grounded Theory in 1967. The term itself is somewhat misleading since it does not refer to a theory per se but rather to a method that facilitates the development of new theoretical insights—grounded theories. In this chapter the method is outlined, together with some background to its appearance and subsequent developments. Some key aspects are demonstrated using brief examples and exercises. Later sections describe the main features, procedures, outputs, and evaluation criteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document