MEKANISME DIFUSI KEBIJAKAN PADA TAHAP PERUMUSAN AGENDA Studi kasus Wacana RUU pelindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Yudha Kurniawan ◽  
Aditya Batara Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Agenda Setting ◽  
General Data

enelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan proses difusi kebijakan pada tahap perumusan agenda (agenda-setting) Rancangan Undang-Undang Pelindungan Data Pribadi (RUU PDP) di Indonesia. Difusi kebijakan dapat dimaknai secara umum sebagai sebuah proses pengadopsian kebijakan di suatu negara yang dipengaruhi oleh dinamika penerapan kebijakan yang sama di negara/wilayah lain. Dalam siklus pembuatan kebijakan, proses difusi kebijakan di tahap perumusan agenda dapat terjadi melalui dua mekanisme yakni pembelajaran dan emulasi. Mekanisme pembelajaran menekankan pada evaluasi aktor  difusi yang bertumpu pada aspek efektivitas atau implikasi praktis kebijakan yang akan diadopsi berdasarkan pengalaman di wilayah/negara lain. Sementara itu, emulasi menekankan pada evaluasi aktor difusi kebijakan berdasarkan pada aspek-aspek normatif. Secara empirik, Kedua mekanisme ini kemudian diidentifikasi secara kualitatif melalui metode analisa konten terhadap pemberitaan seputar RUU PDP sejak tahun 2015 hingga tahun 2020. Dari hasil analisa terhadap 115 artikel pemberitaan, ditemukan bahwa sebanyak 77 aktor memberikan pernyataan publik terkait perdebatan mengenai kebutuhan akan RUU PDP. Data yang dikumpulkan oleh peneliti juga menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah, DPR, organisasi masyarakat sipil, dan perguruan tinggi menjadi institusi-institusi yang paling dominan dalam tahap perumusan agenda RUU PDP. Sementara itu, terkait proses difusi kebijakan, mekanisme pembelajaran paling banyak diidentifikasi dari data yang diperoleh. Dalam hal ini, pernyataan publik terkait mekanisme pembelajaran paling banyak dikemukakan oleh Kemkominfo. Terakhir, penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa kebijakan EU GDPR (European Union General Data Protection) menjadi referensi kebijakan yang paling banyak muncul dalam pemberitaan terkait RUU PDP dalam dua tahun terakhir.

scholarly journals Data Sharing Under the General Data Protection Regulation

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035
Author(s):  
Antonia Vlahou ◽  
Dara Hallinan ◽  
Rolf Apweiler ◽  
Angel Argiles ◽  
Joachim Beige ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
The European Union ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Personal Data Protection ◽  
Protection Legislation ◽  
General Data ◽  
Almost All

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) became binding law in the European Union Member States in 2018, as a step toward harmonizing personal data protection legislation in the European Union. The Regulation governs almost all types of personal data processing, hence, also, those pertaining to biomedical research. The purpose of this article is to highlight the main practical issues related to data and biological sample sharing that biomedical researchers face regularly, and to specify how these are addressed in the context of GDPR, after consulting with ethics/legal experts. We identify areas in which clarifications of the GDPR are needed, particularly those related to consent requirements by study participants. Amendments should target the following: (1) restricting exceptions based on national laws and increasing harmonization, (2) confirming the concept of broad consent, and (3) defining a roadmap for secondary use of data. These changes will be achieved by acknowledged learned societies in the field taking the lead in preparing a document giving guidance for the optimal interpretation of the GDPR, which will be finalized following a period of commenting by a broad multistakeholder audience. In parallel, promoting engagement and education of the public in the relevant issues (such as different consent types or residual risk for re-identification), on both local/national and international levels, is considered critical for advancement. We hope that this article will open this broad discussion involving all major stakeholders, toward optimizing the GDPR and allowing a harmonized transnational research approach.

The Second Internet: The Brussels Bourgeois Internet

2021 ◽  
pp. 77-91
Author(s):  
Kieron O’Hara
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Public Space ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Privacy Rights ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Internet Privacy ◽  
Data Protection Directive ◽  
General Data ◽  
Data Protection Law

This chapter describes the Brussels Bourgeois Internet. The ideal consists of positive, managed liberty where rights of others are respected, as in the bourgeois public space, where liberty follows only when rights are secured. The exemplar of this approach is the European Union, which uses administrative means, soft law, and regulation to project its vision across the Internet. Privacy and data protection have become the most emblematic struggles. Under the Data Protection Directive of 1995, the European Union developed data-protection law and numerous privacy rights, including a right to be forgotten, won in a case against Google Spain in 2014, the arguments about which are dissected. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) followed in 2018, amplifying this approach. GDPR is having the effect of enforcing European data-protection law on international players (the ‘Brussels effect’), while the European Union over the years has developed unmatched expertise in data-protection law.

scholarly journals GDPR implementation as the main reason for the regional fragmentation in the online mediasphere

2021 ◽  
Vol 273 ◽  
pp. 08099
Author(s):  
Mikhail Smolenskiy ◽  
Nikolay Levshin
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Main Role ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Protection Measures ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Personal Data Protection ◽  
The Usa ◽  
General Data

The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies not only to the territory of the European Union, but also to all information systems containing data of EU’s citizens around the world. Misusing or carelessly handling personal data bring fines of up to 20 million euros or 4% of the annual turnover of the offending company. This article analyzes the main trends in the global implementation of the GDPR. Authors considered and analyzed results of personal data protection measures in nineteen regions: The USA, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Russia, South Korea and Thailand, as well as the European Union and a handful of other. This allowed identifying a direct pattern between the global tightening of EU’s citizens personal data protection and the fragmentation of the global mediasphere into separate national segments. As a result of the study, the authors conclude that GDPR has finally slowed down the globalization of the online mediasphere, playing a main role in its regional fragmentation.

scholarly journals Are Browse-wrap Agreements Legally Binding: As Analysed Across Multiple Jurisdictions

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 1333-1336
Author(s):  
Aashana Chandak
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
European Union ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
The United States ◽  
The European Union ◽  
General Data ◽  
Adequate Communication ◽  
Multiple Jurisdictions

Browse-wrap agreements are e-contracts that lack the element of express consent which creates ambiguity in their enforcement across countries like India and Canada. The United States of America has through a plethora of case laws attempted to follow a framework with a adequate communication of notice system which is subjected to consumer protection concerns. With the recent enforcement of the General Data Protection Regulations(GDPR)in the European Union it has led to the complete abandonment of the browse-wrap agreements due to the lack of the consentbeing explicitly provided. Leading to the rise in the recognition of theclick-wrap agreements being adopted as a standardized form of e-commerce contracts across jurisdictions

The Short-Run Effects of the General Data Protection Regulation on Technology Venture Investment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Jia ◽  
Ginger Zhe Jin ◽  
Liad Wagman
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
The European Union ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Venture Investment ◽  
Short Run ◽  
General Data

Jia et al. study the effects of the General Data Protection Regulation on technology venture investment in the European Union.

scholarly journals ‘Is Anthropology Legal?’

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-41
Author(s):  
Cassandra Yuill
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Data Processing ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
African Studies ◽  
The European Union ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Ethnographic Fieldwork ◽  
Anthropological Research ◽  
General Data ◽  
The University

AbstractIn May 2018, the European Union (EU) introduced the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) with the aim of increasing transparency in data processing and enhancing the rights of data subjects. Within anthropology, concerns have been raised about how the new legislation will affect ethnographic fieldwork and whether the laws contradict the discipline’s core tenets. To address these questions, the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London hosted an event on 25 May 2018 entitled ‘Is Anthropology Legal?’, bringing together researchers and data managers to begin a dialogue about the future of anthropological work in the context of the GDPR. In this article, I report and reflect on the event and on the possible implications for anthropological research within this climate of increasing governance.

scholarly journals The Policy Effect of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on the Digital Public Health Sector in the European Union: An Empirical Investigation

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bocong Yuan ◽  
Jiannan Li
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Personal Health ◽  
The European Union ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
General Data

The rapid development of digital health poses a critical challenge to the personal health data protection of patients. The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR) works in this context; it was passed in April 2016 and came into force in May 2018 across the European Union. This study is the first attempt to test the effectiveness of this legal reform for personal health data protection. Using the difference-in-difference (DID) approach, this study empirically examines the policy influence of the GDPR on the financial performance of hospitals across the European Union. Results show that hospitals with the digital health service suffered from financial distress after the GDPR was published in 2016. This reveals that during the transition period (2016–2018), hospitals across the European Union indeed made costly adjustments to meet the requirements of personal health data protection introduced by this new regulation, and thus inevitably suffered a policy shock to their financial performance in the short term. The implementation of GDPR may have achieved preliminary success.

scholarly journals Impact of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on Health Data Management in a European Union Candidate Country: A Case Study of Serbia (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branko Marovic ◽  
Vasa Curcin
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Health System ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Candidate Country ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Personal Data Protection ◽  
General Data ◽  
The Eu

UNSTRUCTURED As of May 2018, all relevant institutions within member countries of the European Economic Area are required to comply with the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or face significant fines. This regulation has also had a notable effect on the European Union (EU) candidate countries, which are undergoing the process of harmonizing their legislature with the EU as part of the accession process. The Republic of Serbia is an example of such a candidate country, and its 2018 Personal Data Protection Act mirrors the majority of provisions in the GDPR. This paper presents the impact of the GDPR on health data management and Serbia’s capability to conduct international health data research projects. Data protection incidents reported in Serbia are explored to identify common underlying causes using a novel taxonomy of contributing factors across aspects and health system levels. The GDPR has an extraterritorial application for the non-EU data controllers who process the data of EU citizens and residents, which mainly affects private practices used by medical tourists from the EU, public health care institutions frequented by foreigners, as well as expatriates, dual citizens, tourists, and other visitors. Serbia generally does not have well-established procedures to support international research collaborations around its health data. For smaller projects, contractual arrangements can be made with health data providers and their ethics committees. Even then, organizations that have not previously participated in similar ventures may require approval or support from health authorities. Extensive studies that involve multisite data typically require the support of central health system institutions and relevant research data aggregators or electronic health record vendors. The lack of a framework for preparation, anonymization, and assurance of privacy preservation forces researchers to rely heavily on local expertise and support. Given the current limitation and potential issues with the legislation, it remains to be seen whether the move toward the GDPR will be beneficial for the Serbian health system, medical research, protection of personal data and privacy rights, and research capacity. Although significant progress has been made so far, a strategic approach is needed at the national level to address insufficient resources in the area of data protection and develop the personal data protection environment further. This will also require a targeted educational effort among health workers and decision makers, aiming to improve awareness and develop skills and knowledge necessary for the workforce.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document