scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM KONTRAK TAMBANG EMAS MELALUI ARBITRASE

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Dominicus Mere
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Gold Mining ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Domestic Courts ◽  
Public Scrutiny ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

<p><strong> </strong><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Artikel ini membahas mengenai penyelesaian sengketa dalam kontrak tambang emas melalui arbitrase. UU No. 4 Tahun 2009 menentukan bahwa setiap sengketa yang muncul dalam pelaksanaan izin pertambangan diselesaikan melalui pengadilan dan arbitrase dalam negeri sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Dalam pembahasan ini penulis berpendapat bahwa pilihan penyelesaian sengketa melalui arbitrase adalah pilihan yang tepat ketimbang pilihan litigasi di pengadilan. Hal tersebut dikarenakan arbitrasi memiliki beberapa kelebihan seperti proses penyelesaian sengketa lebih cepat, hasil kesepakatan yang bersifat “win-win solution”, serta jaminan kerahasiaan sengketa dari sorotan publik. Berdasarkan kelebihan- kelebihan tersebut, arbitrase dinilai lebih tepat untuk diterapkan dalam sengketa kontrak tambang emas di Indonesia.</p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p><strong><em>Abstract  </em>                                                                 </strong></p><p>This article discusses the settlement of disputes in the gold mining contract through arbitration. Law Number 4 of 2009 specifies that any disputes that arise in the implementation of mining license should be resolved through arbitration in domestic courts and in accordance with the provisions of the legislation. In this paper the author argues that choosing arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism is more proper than choosing court litigation. That is because arbitration has several advantages such as faster dispute resolution process, the “win-win” nature, as well as the guarantee of confidentiality from public scrutiny. Based on these advantages, arbitration is considered more appropriate to be applied in gold mining contract disputes in Indonesia.</p>

Part III Dispute Resolution Under the Bermuda Form, 16 The Arbitration Agreement

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scorey David ◽  
Geddes Richard ◽  
Harris Chris
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism

This chapter provides an overview of practical and theoretical aspects of arbitrating disputes concerning Bermuda Form policies, building upon the contents of earlier chapters. A well known feature of the Bermuda Form is its dispute resolution mechanism, namely the requirement for arbitration in London to resolve any dispute between the policyholder and the insurer that cannot be resolved or settled by early negotiation. This requirement for London arbitration is contained in Article VI.N of Form XL004, in the ‘conditions’ section of the Bermuda Form. Article VI.N is a lengthy and detailed clause that contains several subclauses addressing distinct concepts and different aspects of the dispute resolution process and arbitration procedure.

scholarly journals MAKNA LAFADZ IDRIB DALAM QS. AN-NISA AYAT 34 PERSPEKTIF ULAMA KABUPATEN MALANG

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Muhammad Lukman Haris
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Marital Relationship ◽  
Wife Beating ◽  
Domestic Life ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Street Violence ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Harmonious Family

<p>The background of this research, is the fact often indicates that the marital relationship is not always harmonious. Sometimes a spouse fails to save the Big Dipper in the household as it faces problems that are considered to be beyond their means. Sometimes women ignore or less than the maximum husband right in doing his duty to the house and her children. This study aims to describe, how do cleric Malang Meaning Lafadz idrib on Qs. An-Nisa verse 34 and how do Malang cleric on how the settlement of disputes in domestic life which in turn can realize harmonious family. While the object of research is the Ulema Malang.The results of this Penetian, researchers finally, first, the meanings of the Salafi Ulama Lafadz idrib on Qs. AnNisa verse 34 by taking the path of violence that is hitting with the hand, while the scholars of Modern and Contemporary in meaning Lafadz Idrib ie, hit without using street violence, ie by continuously advised. Second, Salafi cleric in resolving disputes in domestic life are clubbed, Salaf allow wife beating wives who disobey the reason is still the responsibility of the husband, it is necessary to resort to violence to revive him. Modern and contemporary scholars While there are two methods to resolve disputes that occur in the home, The first is by way of violence, that is allowed to beat his wife as long as the stage-the stage prior to the beating had done well and has not produced results. The second dispute resolution process in the household is, without the use of the least violent way, which is enough to be kept advised menurus due to violence if the problem is not going to finish, and beating only produces more dangerous uprising.</p><p>Studinya bertujuan untuk menggambarkan, bagaimana ulama Malang Arti Lafadz idrib pada Qs. An-Nisa ayat 34 dan bagaimana ulama Malang tentang bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa dalam kehidupan rumah tangga yang pada gilirannya dapat mewujudkan keluarga yang harmonis. Sedangkan objek penelitian adalah Ulama Malang. Hasil Penetian ini, peneliti akhirnya, pertama, arti dari Salafi Ulam aLafadzidrib pada Qs.An - Nisa ayat 34 dengan mengambil jalan kekerasan yang memukul dengan tangan, sementara para ulama Modern dan Kontemporer dalam arti Lafadz Idribi adalah memukul tanpa menggunakan jalan kekerasan, yaitu dengan saran atau masukan, kedua, ulama salafi dalam menyelesaikan sengketa kehidupan rumah tangga dengan dipukul, ulama’ Salafi membolehkan pemukulan terhadap istri yang tidak taat alasannya adalah karena masih tanggung jawab suami, maka perlu menggunakan kekerasan untuk menghidupkan kembali kepadanya. Sedangkan para ulama’ kontemporer pertama adalah dengan cara pendekatan musyawarah, apabila belum membuahkan hasil. Proses penyelesaian sengketa kedua dalam rumah tangga adalah dengan peringatan yang keras, hindari kekerasan karena hanya menghasilkan pemberontakan lebih berbahaya.</p>

scholarly journals Peran BPSK Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Konsumen

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anik Tri Haryani ◽  
Sarjiyati Sarjiyati ◽  
Yuni Purwati
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract— The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain the role of BPSK in resolving consumer disputes and analyze the dispute resolution process BPSK. This research used normative juridical approach to the law (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The results showed that in the implementation of consumer protection in Indonesia, BPSK is spearheading role in the field to provide protection to consumers who have been harmed. The protection afforded by BPSK to consumers is through the settlement of disputes between consumers and businesses, and also through the inclusion of supervision of any agreement or document that outlines the standard clause. While the dispute settlement process is done for the sake of the stages of the stages are as follows: stage request of the applicant, ie the consumer as plaintiff; pretrial stages, namely the selection of completion method; settlement of disputes based on the decision of the parties, especially mediation, conciliation, arbitration and the decision of the Assembly. Keywords—: Role; BPSK; consumer disputes.

scholarly journals Mekanisme Majelis Tahkim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Rumah Tangga (Analisis Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Nomor 2 Tahun 2003 Seksyen 48 tentang Penambahan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Muslem Muslem ◽  
Siti Aminah Binti Abd Samat
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Assembly Process ◽  
Knowing How ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Islamic Family Law ◽  
Descriptive Method ◽  
Husband And Wife

Majelis Tahkim sebagai proses penyelesaian sengketa (syiqāq) yang melibatkan pertemuan suami dan isteri bersama dengan Hakam untuk tujuan perdamaian atau perceraian dengan lafaz talak atau dengan khuluk. Berdasarkan fakta empiris menyatakan bahwa salah satu provinsi yang paling menonjol menggunakan metode Majelis Tahkim ini adalah Provinsi Selangor. Sebagaimana yang diketahui oleh penulis bahwa praktek Majelis Tahkim di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam menggunakan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam yang diterapkan khusus di Provinsi Selangor sahaja yang berbeda dengan provinsi yang lain di Malaysia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan gambaran bagaimana praktek Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Nomor 2 Tahun 2003 Seksyen 48 mengenai penambahan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam (Negeri Selangor) terhadap pelaksanaan Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga (syiqāq) di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam. Penulisan skripsi ini adalah bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana mekanisme Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga dan keunggulan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam yang digunakan. Oleh itu, penulisan ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analisis. Dari hasil penelitian penulis dapat disimpulkan bahwa mekanisme Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam menggunakan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam terdapat beberapa keunggulan antaranya menjelaskan tentang Hakam dan proses Majelis Tahkim secara rinci sebagai panduan Hakam. Seterusnya, proses Majelis Tahkim ini mampu mengurangi beban Mahkamah Syariah dalam menyelesaikan kasus yang banyak di meja Mahkamah. Oleh hal yang demikian, diharapkan bagi pihak kerajaan perundangan untuk memberlakukan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam ini bagi semua provinsi di Malaysia agar Hakam mendapatkan panduan lebih mendalam terkait Hakam dan proses Majelis Tahkim. Tahkim Assembly as a dispute resolution process (SYIQĀQ) involving a husband and wife meeting along with Hakam for peace or divorce with the pronunciation of Talak or with Khuluk. According to empirical facts, it states that one of the most prominent provinces using the method of the Tahkim assembly is Selangor province. As it is known by the authors that the practice of the Tahkim assembly in Shah Alam Sharia court used the essential methods applied in the province of Selangor only different from other provinces in Malaysia. This study aims to obtain an overview of the enactment of Islamic Family Law number 2 the year 2003 section 48 on the addition of the Hakam methods (Selangor State) on the implementation of the Tahkim assembly in the settlement of household disputes (SYIQĀQ) in the Syariah low court of Shah Alam. The writing of this thesis is aimed at knowing how the Tahkim assembly mechanisms in the settlement of household disputes and the excellence of the Hakam methods used. Thus, this writer uses a descriptive method of analysis. From the results of the author's research can be concluded that the mechanism of the Tahkim assembly in the settlement of household disputes in Shah Alam Syariah low court using the essential methods there are several advantages between explaining Hakam and the process of Tahkim assembly in detail as a guide to Hakam. Subsequently, the Tahkim assembly process was able to reduce the burden of sharia Court in resolving many cases at the Court table. Therefore, it is expected for the legal government to enforce this Hakam method for all provinces in Malaysia for Hakam to obtain a more in-depth guide to the Hakam and the process of the Tahkim assembly.

scholarly journals International Legal and Economic Aspects of Dispute Resolution within the WTO in the Context of International Integration

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-71
Author(s):  
V. P. Kirilenko ◽  
Yu. V. Mishalchenko ◽  
A. N. Shchepova
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The World ◽  
System Functioning ◽  
Dispute Settlement System ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

The article discusses issues related to the settlement of disputes within the framework of the World Trade Organization, as well as assesses the advantages and disadvantages of this system. The specific problems of the dispute settlement system functioning today are considered, and options for optimizing the dispute resolution mechanism and various ways to improve the effectiveness of legal remedies in cases of non-compliance with decisions are proposed. Special attention is paid to the latest topical disputes involving the Russian Federation, the European Union, Ukraine, China and USA resolved within the framework of the World Tr ade Organization, as well as to the crisis faced by the organization due to the absence of a permanent appeals body.

scholarly journals Sen, justice and the private realm of dispute resolution

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-373
Author(s):  
Debbie De Girolamo
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Private Realm ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Popular Justice ◽  
Substantive Justice ◽  
Ethnographic Data

AbstractThe attainment of justice through a private dispute-resolution process, such as the mediation process, is an elusive objective. With the prominent place mediation has been given in civil justice, debates about the ability of mediation to deliver substantive justice are relevant, particularly when proponents of the process argue that mediation offers some form of justice to its participants, while critics argue that it provides no justice. This paper explores the issue of justice in the private dispute-resolution process of mediation and its ability to deliver a substantive form of justice (rather than procedural or popular justice, which is often seen as the type of justice, if any, that is provided by mediation). It does so through an analysis of ethnographic data of the mediation process using Amartya Sen's justice framework set out inThe Idea of Justice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document