scholarly journals Tribal Governance: The Business of Blockchain Authentication

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Miscione ◽  
Rafael Ziolkowski ◽  
Liudmila Zavolokina ◽  
Gerhard Schwabe
Keyword(s):  
Tribal Governance

The Constitution

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Richotte
Keyword(s):  
Federal Government ◽  
Tribal Governance ◽  
Indian Reorganization Act ◽  
The People

Chapter seven details the adoption of the superintendent’s constitution, the various groups vying for power at the time, and the community’s reaction and decision on the Indian Reorganization Act. By the early 1930’s the people of Turtle Mountain had been pursuing a claim against the federal government for decades. At the end of the Allotment Era, the federal government presented the community with a constitution that functioned less a governing document and more a tool to perpetuate control over tribal governance through the federal government. While many in the community recognized the deficiencies in the proposed constitution they nonetheless were led to believe that the constitution was a mandatory step toward a claim. Choosing the claim more than the constitution itself, Turtle Mountain ratified the proposed document. When the Indian Reorganization Act presented an alternative, the people of Turtle Mountain rejected it in fear of the consequences for the claim.

Reframing Tribal Governance in Tripura

2021 ◽  
pp. 193-203
Author(s):  
H. Theresa Darlong
Keyword(s):  
Tribal Governance

scholarly journals Tribal Governance: The Business of Blockchain Authentication

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Miscione ◽  
Rafael Ziolkowski ◽  
Liudmila Zavolokina ◽  
Gerhard Schwabe
Keyword(s):  
Tribal Governance

scholarly journals Igniting the spark: How to achieve collective ownership of a tribal language revitalisation strategy

Te Kaharoa ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hana O'Regan
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Future Generations ◽  
Political Issues ◽  
Tribal Governance ◽  
Collective Ownership ◽  
The Past ◽  
Language Revitalisation ◽  
Tribal Language

The Kāi Tahu tribal language Strategy, Kotahi Mano Kāika, Kotahi Mano Wawata – A thousand homes, a thousand dreams, is now in its 11th year and has recently been internally reviewed.  As a tribe we remain in the position of a people whose language is in the worse state of all tribes in New Zealand and we are far from achieving a level of sustainability in our efforts. The greatest challenge we have faced and continue to face, is the engagement of the majority of our kin who are non-language speakers in our revitalisation effort, and this includes a significant proportion of our tribal governance.  As the language continues to take 2nd place to the wider social and political issues facing the tribal collective, the task of revitalisation becomes increasingly challenging and esperate. This paper will discuss the strategies that have been used over the past 10 years to achieve collective ownership of our language revitailstion effort and will look the challenges ahead of us as a tribe and as language communities to achieve language sustainability for our people and future generations.

scholarly journals Role of Government Interest Sarereiket Hold in Village in District Madobag Mentawai Islands

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
Sayid Anshar
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Role Of Government ◽  
The Public ◽  
Community Environment ◽  
Tribal Governance ◽  
Mentawai Islands ◽  
Village Community ◽  
The Village

The problem in this study is How the Sarereiket Tribe Role in organizing Government in the Village of Madobag Mentawai Islands District. The purpose of this study was to determine the Role of the Sarereiket Tribe in organizing Government in Madobag Village, Mentawai Islands Regency. This study uses qualitative and descriptive methods. In this study, the population is Madobag village apparatus, village representative body (BPD), hamlets, tribal organizations, community shops and Madobag village community environment. The sample in this study is Madobag village apparatus six people, one village representative body (BPD), three hamlet heads, two community shops and two people in the Madobag  village environment. with purposive sampling technique. Based on the results of this study it is suggested that to realize good leadership at the village level, the village head must play a greater role in every village administration activity that concerns the public interest and is clearer in making decisions and being fair and being consistent in carrying out decisions especially in Sarereiket tribal governance in the village of Madobag.

Claiming Turtle Mountain's Constitution

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith, Jr. Richotte
Keyword(s):  
Federal Government ◽  
Social History ◽  
Settler Colonialism ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Tribal Governance ◽  
Indian Reorganization Act ◽  
The People ◽  
Leadership Structure ◽  
Late Nineteenth ◽  
Tribal Nation

Claiming Turtle Mountain’s Constitution examines the formation and adoption of the first constitution of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians through the eyes of the tribal members who voted to adopt it. Focusing on the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, this work of legal and social history describes the seminal moment in which the people of Turtle Mountain chose their constitution as a means to accomplish a much larger political goal: beginning a lawsuit against the federal government. By decentering the federal government, the federal actors of the time, and federal legislation such as the Indian Reorganization Act, Claiming Turtle Mountain’s Constitution reorients the tribal citizens who made this important decision at the heart of their own governance and legal, political, and social history. The Plains Ojibwe and Métis who merged together – within the vise of settler colonialism – to become the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians were distressed at the federal government’s disruption of their leadership structure, their treaty, and their reservation and for decades sought a lawsuit against the federal government to rectify these wrongs. The tribal nation adopted a constitution in 1932 that many recognized as deficient and limiting in the hopes that it would lead toward a lawsuit. Tribal citizens have lived with the consequences of this difficult choice ever since. Claiming Turtle Mountain’s Constitution argues that understanding the origins of tribal constitutions from the tribal nation’s perspective is crucial to understanding both historical and contemporary tribal governance and American constitutionalism more broadly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document