scholarly journals Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in High Risk Patients: Correlates of Quality of Care

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davorina Petek ◽  
Janko Kersnik
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Izvleček Izhodišča: Bolezni srca in ožilja (BSO) predstavljajo vodilni vzrok smrti v večini evropskih držav, njihovo preprečevanje pa predstavlja pomembno nalogo osnovnega zdravstvenega varstva. Ocena dejavnikov tveganja in usmerjene preventivne aktivnosti so posebej pomembne pri visokoogroženih bolnikih. Pomembno je poznati tudi dejavnike, ki vplivajo na uspešnost preventive teh bolezni. Metode: V presečno raziskavo je bilo z naključnim stratificiranim vzorčenjem vključenih 36 slovenskih ambulant. Vsaka ambulanta je iz registra visokoogroženih vključila 30 bolnikov, ki so izpolnili vprašalnik o življenjskem slogu, kakovosti življenja, samooceni zdravja in o uporabi zdravstvenih storitev. Vir podatkov o dejavnikih tveganja BSO so bile kartoteke bolnikov, z vprašalnikom o ambulanti pa so bila pridobljena vprašanja o obremenjenosti, projektih kakovosti, izobraževanju, informacijski tehnologiji, o preventivnih aktivnostih. Rezultati: Sodelovalo je 871 bolnikov iz 36 ambulant (80,6 % predvidenega vzorca), starih 62,4 leta (SD±8,6). 22,4 % je bilo kadilcev; priporočeno raven aerobne telesne aktivnosti je vzdrževalo 330 (48,8 %) sodelujočih, najmanj urejen dejavnik tveganja pa je bil indeks telesne mase (29,3kg/m2). V multivariatnem modelu so vsi dejavniki (ambulante, bolniki in zdravniki) statistično značilno napovedali urejenost dejavnikov tveganja (p<0,005, F=2,7, R2 =0,087). Neodvisne spremenljivke bolje urejenih dejavnikov tveganja so bile: ženski spol, višja starost in višja izobrazba bolnika, uporaba informacijskega sistema v ambulanti, organizacija srčno-žilne preventive in zdravnikova profesionalna aktivnost v projektih preventive. Zaključki: Urejenost dejavnikov tveganja je v največji meri odvisna od značilnosti ambulante, predvsem organizacije na področju preventive, ter od strokovne aktivnosti zdravnika. Vplivajo tudi nekatere splošne značilnosti bolnika. Pomembni so še drugi dejavniki, ki niso bili vključeni v model.

scholarly journals Clinical profiles and quality of care of subjects with type 2 diabetes according to their cardiovascular risk: an observational, retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basilio Pintaudi ◽  
Alessia Scatena ◽  
Gabriella Piscitelli ◽  
Vera Frison ◽  
Salvatore Corrao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently defined cardiovascular risk classes for subjects with diabetes. Aim of this study was to explore the distribution of subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by cardiovascular risk groups according to the ESC classification and to describe the quality indicators of care, with particular regard to cardiovascular risk factors. Methods The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 Italian diabetes centers participating in the AMD Annals initiative. Patients with T2D were stratified by cardiovascular risk. General descriptive indicators, measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of other complications and overall quality of care were evaluated. Results Overall, 473,740 subjects with type 2 diabetes (78.5% at very high cardiovascular risk, 20.9% at high risk and 0.6% at moderate risk) were evaluated. Among people with T2D at very high risk: 26.4% had retinopathy, 39.5% had albuminuria, 18.7% had a previous major cardiovascular event, 39.0% had organ damage, 89.1% had three or more risk factors. The use of DPP4-i markedly increased as cardiovascular risk increased. The prescription of secretagogues also increased and that of GLP1-RAs tended to increase. The use of SGLT2-i was still limited, and only slightly higher in subjects with very high cardiovascular risk. The overall quality of care, as summarized by the Q score, tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular risk increased. Conclusions A large proportion of subjects with T2D is at high or very high risk. Glucose-lowering drug therapies seem not to be adequately used with respect to their potential advantages in terms of cardiovascular risk reduction. Several actions are necessary to improve the quality of care.

Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors: the value of FMD assessment in high risk patients is limited

2014 ◽  
pp. 254-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Mizia-Stec ◽  
Joanna Wieczorek ◽  
Michał Orszulak ◽  
Magdalena Mizia ◽  
Klaudia Gieszczyk-Strózik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Flow Mediated Dilatation ◽  
Risk Patients

High urinary levels of resveratrol metabolites are associated with a reduction in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in high-risk patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Zamora-Ros ◽  
Mireia Urpi-Sarda ◽  
Rosa M. Lamuela-Raventós ◽  
Miguel Ángel Martínez-González ◽  
Jordi Salas-Salvadó ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Urinary Levels ◽  
Risk Patients

Adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet and reduced prevalence of clustered cardiovascular risk factors in a cohort of 3204 high-risk patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 589-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Sánchez-Taínta ◽  
Ramón Estruch ◽  
Mónica Bulló ◽  
Dolores Corella ◽  
Enrique Gómez-Gracia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Risk Patients

Background The Mediterranean food pattern (MeDiet) has been suggested to have beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors. Scarcity of assessment of this effect on large samples of patients at high risk is, however, observed. Our objective was to estimate the association between adherence to MeDiet and the prevalence of risk factors in 3204 asymptomatic high-risk patients. Design Cross-sectional assessment of baseline characteristics of participants in a primary prevention trial. Methods Participants were assessed by their usual primary-care physicians to ascertain the prevalence of diet-related cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or obesity) using standard diagnostic criteria. A dietitian interviewed each participant to obtain a 14-point score measuring the degree of adherence to MeDiet. Results Adherence to MeDiet was inversely associated with individual risk factors and, above all, with the clustering of them. The multivariate adjusted odds ratio to present simultaneously the four risk factors for those above the median value of the MeDiet score was 0.67 (95% confidence interval: 0.53–0.85). The multivariate odds ratios for successive categories of adherence to MeDiet were 1 (ref.), 1.03, 0.85, 0.70 and 0.54 ( P for trend ≤0.001). Conclusion Following a MeDiet was inversely associated with the clustering of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and hypercholesterolemia among high-risk patients.

scholarly journals Patterns of care of subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes according to their cardiovascular risk

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Pintaudi, B.
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Very High

AIM OF THE STUDY To explore the distribution by cardiovascular risk groups according to the classification promoted by the ESC (European Society of Cardiology) of subjects with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes cared for by Italian diabetologists and to describe the quality indicators of care, with particular regard to cardiovascular risk factors. DESIGN AND METHODS The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 diabetes centers participating in the Annals AMD initiative and active in the year 2018. Patients with T1D or T2D were stratified by cardiovascular risk, in accordance with the recent ESC guidelines. General descriptive indicators and measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of other complications and overall quality of care were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 29,368 adults with T1D and 473,740 subjects with T2D were evaluated. Among subjects with T1D: 64.7% were at very high cardiovascular risk, 28.5% at high risk and the remaining 6.8% at moderate risk. Among subjects with T1D at very high-risk: 54.7% had retinopathy, 29.0% had albuminuria, 7.3% had a history of major cardiovascular event, 47.3% had organ damage, 48.9% had three or more risk factors, and 70.6% had a diabetes duration of over 20 years. Among subjects with T2D: 78.5% were at very high cardiovascular risk, 20.9% at high risk and the remaining 0.6% at moderate risk. Among those with T2D at very high risk: 39.0% had organ damage, 89.1% had three or more risk factors, 18.7% had a previous major cardiovascular event, 26,4% had retinopathy, 39.5% had albuminuria. With regard to the glucose-lowering drugs: the use of DPPIV-i increased markedly as cardiovascular risk increased; the use of secretagogues also increased and, although within low percentages, also the use of GLP1-RA tended to increase. The use of SGLT2-i is also still limited, and only slightly higher in subjects with very high cardiovascular risk. In both types of diabetes, the overall quality of care, as summarized by the Q score values, tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular riskincreased. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of a large population such as that of the AMD Annals database allowed to highlight the characteristics and quality indicators of care of subjects with T1D and T2D in relation to cardiovascular risk classes. A large proportion of subjects appear to be at high or very high risk. Glucose-lowering drug therapies seem not to be adequately used with respect to the potential advantages in terms of reduction of cardiovascular risk of some drug categories (GLP1-RA and SGLT2-i) and, conversely, with respect to the potential risks related to the use of other pharmacological classes (sulfonylureas). Several actions are necessary to optimize care and improve the quality of care for both subjects with T1D and T2D. KEY WORDS type 1 diabetes; type 2 diabetes; cardiovascular risk; quality indicators of care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document