A case report of suspicious lung cancer or atypical mycobacteria amidst the pandemic era

Author(s):  
Maria Mitri ◽  
Mirna Waked
2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. E3-E5
Author(s):  
Murat Guvener ◽  
Halil Ucar ◽  
Mustafa Tok ◽  
Omer Dogan ◽  
Isil Yildiz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81
Author(s):  
Sawang Saenghirunvattana ◽  
Chittisak Napairee ◽  
Somsak Geraplangsub

2021 ◽  
pp. 101439
Author(s):  
Kyosuke Seguchi ◽  
Kei Nakashima ◽  
Toshiki Terao ◽  
Gaku Takeshita ◽  
Tatsuya Nagai ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yungu Chen ◽  
Yiu Sing Tsang ◽  
Xiaoxia Chou ◽  
Jiong Hu ◽  
Qing Xia

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110191
Author(s):  
Pinar Gursoy

Introduction Most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer tumors that have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have deletion mutations in exon 19 or exon 21, or both.In recent years, targeted therapies in lung cancer have increased survival, but the development of resistance to these drugs poses a major problem. Thesubstitution of methionineforthreonine at position 790 (T790M) mutation,is primarily responsible for this resistance. However, after osimertinib used in T790M positivepatients treatment options are generally limited to chemotherapy. Case report We reported the efficacy of erlotinib, which we reapplied due to the disappearance of the resistance mutation after osimertinib in a 68-year-old patient using osimertinib after erlotinib. Management and outcome: In the patient using erlotinib due to exon 19 deletion when progression was observed and T790M positivity was detected, osimertinib treatment was initiated. However, when T790M was found to be negative with rebiopsy in progression after osimertinib, a complete response was achieved by restarting erlotinib. Discussion The strategy of restarting erlotinib treatment with negative T790M mutation detected in biopsies of patients with osimertinib resistance may be an acceptable treatment option.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document