Lessons learned from clinical trials of asthma

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 410-413
Author(s):  
Paul A. Greenberger

Exacerbations of persistent or intermittent asthma should be anticipated by physicians and health-care professionals. Patients who are likely to experience an exacerbation often have a history of an exacerbation in the previous year, and the absolute eosinophil count in peripheral blood is ≥ 400/μL. Similarly, expectorated or induced sputum eosinophilia of ≥2% is associated with exacerbations. These phenotypic findings have led to effective biologic therapies, which target eosinophils or immunoglobulin E or the T-helper type 2 phenotype, especially in children, adolescents, and adults with frequent exacerbations. In children, a reduced forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) to forced vital capacity ratio can be associated with future exacerbations, although the FEV1 may be in the normal range, even with children who have persistent severe asthma. Asthma control questionnaires did not differentiate between children with or children without a future exacerbation. Alternatively, in adults, the lower baseline FEV1 (2.3 L [74% predicted] versus 2.5 L [78% predicted]) identified patients more likely to have a future exacerbation compared with patients who were not having an exacerbation. After correcting for FEV1, the asthma control questionnaire data were associated with exacerbations. In adolescents (ages ≥ 12 years) and adults with persistent mild asthma, most (73%) did not have sputum eosinophilia, and some of these patients responded well to the anticholinergic, tiotropium, which would argue differently from administration of an inhaled corticosteroid as first-line controller therapy. In a three-track study of patients with persistent mild asthma, as-needed budesonide-formoterol and scheduled budesonide were associated with approximately one-half of the annual exacerbation rate of as-needed albuterol. In patients with persistent moderate-to-severe asthma, tiotropium added to controller therapy caused an increase in FEV1 without improving the asthma control questionnaire findings. There were two studies that explored whether either quadrupling or quintupling the inhaled corticosteroid at the first sign of loss of control of asthma would provide meaningful reductions of severe exacerbations of asthma, but the findings did not support this strategy. Both biologic therapies and environmental control (dust mite impermeable encasings) have resulted in reductions of exacerbations in patients with persistent moderate and severe asthma.

Thorax ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2020-215168
Author(s):  
David J Jackson ◽  
John Busby ◽  
Paul E Pfeffer ◽  
Andrew Menzies-Gow ◽  
Thomas Brown ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) is the world’s largest national severe asthma registry collecting standardised data on referrals to UK specialist services. Novel biologic therapies have transformed the management of type 2(T2)-high severe asthma but have highlighted unmet need in patients with persisting symptoms despite suppression of T2-cytokine pathways with corticosteroids.MethodsDemographic, clinical and treatments characteristics for patients meeting European Respiratory Society / American Thoracic Society severe asthma criteria were examined for 2225 patients attending 15 specialist severe asthma centres. We assessed differences in biomarker low patients (fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) <25 ppb, blood eosinophils <150/μL) compared with a biomarker high population (FeNO ≥25 ppb, blood eosinophils ≥150/µL).ResultsAge (mean 49.6 (14.3) y), age of asthma onset (24.2 (19.1) y) and female predominance (62.4%) were consistent with prior severe asthma cohorts. Poor symptom control (Asthma Control Questionnaire-6: 2.9 (1.4)) with high exacerbation rate (4 (IQR: 2, 7)) were common despite high-dose treatment (51.7% on maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS)). 68.9% were prescribed biologic therapies including mepolizumab (50.3%), benralizumab (26.1%) and omalizumab (22.6%). T2-low patients had higher body mass index (32.1 vs 30.2, p<0.001), depression/anxiety prevalence (12.3% vs 7.6%, p=0.04) and mOCS use (57.9% vs 42.1%, p<0.001). Many T2-low asthmatics had evidence of a historically elevated blood eosinophil count (0.35 (0.13, 0.60)).ConclusionsThe UKSAR describes the characteristics of a large cohort of asthmatics referred to UK specialist severe asthma services. It offers the prospect of providing novel insights across a range of research areas and highlights substantial unmet need with poor asthma control, impaired lung function and high exacerbation rates. T2-high phenotypes predominate with significant differences apparent from T2-low patients. However, T2-low patients frequently have prior blood eosinophilia consistent with possible excessive corticosteroid exposure.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreina Bruno ◽  
Elisabetta Pace ◽  
Fabio Cibella ◽  
Pascal Chanez

Both severe asthma and obesity are growing health problems. Severe asthma leads to a poor quality of life. The relationship among BMI, comorbidities, and severe asthma control in adults is still unclear. The aim of the study is to better understand the effect of the comorbidities as atopy, type II diabetes, OSAS, gastroesophageal reflux, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, osteoporosis, infections, and psychological factors with BMI on asthma control in a cohort of adult severe asthmatics. One hundred and two patients were enrolled in a cross-sectional study assessing asthma control, treatments, pulmonary function, inflammatory markers, and comorbidities. Patients were divided into 3 classes according to BMI: normal weight, overweight, and obese. We found that the optimal state of asthma control is lower. whereas the score of Asthma Control Questionnaire, the number of asthma exacerbations during last year, the oral corticosteroids requirement during the previous year, and the LABA treatments are higher in obese than in overweight and normal weight severe asthmatics. The number of subjects with type II diabetes and OSAS are higher among obese and overweight patients than in normal weight asthmatics. In conclusion, BMI representsper sea factor for the deterioration in disease control in severe asthma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Menzies-Gow ◽  
Michael E. Wechsler ◽  
Chris E. Brightling

Abstract Despite treatment with standard-of-care medications, including currently available biologic therapies, many patients with severe asthma have uncontrolled disease, which is associated with a high risk of hospitalization and high healthcare costs. Biologic therapies approved for severe asthma have indications limited to patients with either eosinophilic or allergic phenotypes; there are currently no approved biologics for patients with eosinophil-low asthma. Furthermore, existing biologic treatments decrease exacerbation rates by approximately 50% only, which may be because they target individual, downstream elements of the asthma inflammatory response, leaving other components untreated. Targeting an upstream mediator of the inflammatory response may have a broader effect on airway inflammation and provide more effective asthma control. One such potential target is thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial-derived cytokine released in response to multiple triggers associated with asthma exacerbations, such as viruses, allergens, pollutants and other airborne irritants. Mechanistic studies indicate that TSLP drives eosinophilic (including allergic) inflammation, neutrophilic inflammation and structural changes to the airway in asthma through actions on a wide variety of adaptive and innate immune cells and structural cells. Tezepelumab is a first-in-class human monoclonal antibody that blocks the activity of TSLP. In the phase 2b PATHWAY study (NCT02054130), tezepelumab reduced asthma exacerbations by up to 71% compared with placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma across the spectrum of inflammatory phenotypes, and improved lung function and asthma control. Phase 3 trials of tezepelumab are underway. NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279), a pivotal exacerbation study, aims to assess the potential efficacy of tezepelumab further in patients with a broad range of severe asthma phenotypes, including those with low blood eosinophil counts. SOURCE (NCT03406078) aims to evaluate the oral corticosteroid-sparing potential of tezepelumab. DESTINATION (NCT03706079) is a long-term extension study. In addition, an ongoing phase 2 bronchoscopy study, CASCADE (NCT03688074), aims to evaluate the effect of tezepelumab on airway inflammation and airway remodelling in patients across the spectrum of type 2 airway inflammation. Here, we summarize the unmet therapeutic need in severe asthma and the current treatment landscape, discuss the rationale for targeting TSLP in severe asthma therapy and describe the current development status of tezepelumab.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-427
Author(s):  
S. N. Avdeev ◽  
Z. R. Aisanov ◽  
A. S. Belevskiy ◽  
A. V. Emelyanov ◽  
N. P. Knyazheskaya ◽  
...  

According to the modern concepts, asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by chronic airway inflammation and respiratory symptoms, which vary in time and intensity and manifest together with variable obstruction of the airways. Asthma is responsible for the deterioration of health status and quality of life in approximately 339 million of adult patients and children worldwide. Despite the fact that asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease, patients with asthma generally inadequately receive anti-inflammatory therapy in real clinical practice and rely on short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA) too much; this can “mimic” worsening of asthma symptoms. SABA monotherapy “on demand” does not affect chronic airway inflammation, underlying asthma occurrence and progression. As a result, such patients still have the risk of asthma exacerbation and disease progression. Therefore, the need of a new therapeutic strategy for patients with milder asthma (steps 1 and 2), which would provide anti-inflammatory treatment considering the low adherence to the regular maintenance therapy and high dependency on SABA, is obvious. Such approach has become available after the SYGMA (SYmbicort® Given as needed in Mild Asthma) trial was completed. According to the results of this trial, budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg/dose as needed was superior to as needed SABA in better asthma control and decrease in severe asthma exacerbation rate by 64% (p < 0.001). Results of SYGMA 1 and 2 trials also demonstrated that budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg/dose as needed was noninferior compared to regular treatment with budesonide in preventing severe asthma exacerbations while the cumulative dose of budesonide was reduced by ≥75%. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 12089
Author(s):  
Corrado Pelaia ◽  
Alessandro Casarella ◽  
Gianmarco Marcianò ◽  
Lucia Muraca ◽  
Vincenzo Rania ◽  
...  

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has deeply affected the management of patients with severe asthma, treated with add-on biological therapies. Objective: In this study, severe asthmatic patients on treatment with one of three different biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab) underwent a survey to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on the management of their clinical condition, with regard to the changes caused by the limited access to health facilities during the pandemic period. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 28 severe asthmatic outpatients referring to the Respiratory Unit of Magna Graecia University Hospital, Catanzaro (Italy), were asked to answer a telephone survey from May to July 2021. This survey included the evaluation of demographic and clinical data, as well as the number of lung function tests performed, exacerbations, biologic doses administered at hospital, or at general practitioner office, or through self-administration. Adherence to biological therapies before and during the pandemic period was also assessed. Moreover, the most recent asthma control test (ACT) score and the last forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) measurement, recorded during the pandemic phase, were compared to the pre-pandemic (baseline) period. Results: When comparing the pre-pandemic data with the pandemic observations, the mean ACT score and the exacerbation rate did not significantly change [ACT, 21.5 ± 2.8 to 23.0 ± 3.9 (p = 0.1); exacerbation rate, 0.3 ± 0.6 and 0.5 ± 1.5 (p = 0.3)]. When considering some variables related to disease management in the same periods, a statistically significant difference was detected with regard to the mean number of outpatient visits (5.2 ± 3.8 vs. 0.9 ± 2.5, p < 0.0001), as well as to the mean number of accesses to health facilities for the administration of biological drugs (from 7.0 ± 3.4 to 2.5 ± 3.9, p < 0.0001). None of the patients reported to have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and no adverse drug reactions (ADR) occurred during the study. Conclusions: The above results suggest that COVID-19 pandemic did not induce any significant change related to severe asthma control. Indeed, add-on treatment with biological drugs was regularly continued, despite the obvious limited access to health facilities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 628-634
Author(s):  
Olga N. Titova ◽  
Natalia A. Kuzubova ◽  
Daria B. Sklyarova ◽  
Maria A. Petrova

To evaluate the effectiveness of benralizumab in patients with the eosinophilic phenotype of severe asthma in real clinical practice after a year of therapy.Methods. During Benralizumab therapy, 13 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (average age – 55.44 ± 7.18 years old) were examined twice: before the treatment and after 1 year of benralizumab therapy. The assessment included collection of complaints, medical history, current therapy, Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) test, absolute blood count of eosinophils, spirometry.Results. All patients initially had pronounced eosinophilia of 577.5 ± 356.4 cells/μl. After 1 year of using benralizumab, the eosinophil count decreased by 96.15%. During therapy, the ACQ-5 index decreased from 1.63 ± 0.62 to 0.73 ± 0.41 in the study patients, which corresponded to the achievement of asthma control. The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased by 23 %. The number of exacerbations decreased by 58.09%. 12 (92.31%) patients were on oral corticosteroids (OCS) (10 ± 2.17 mg of prednisolone daily) before benralizumab therapy. All subjects noted a decrease in night and day symptoms over time and were able to reduce the use of OCS. 5 (38.46%) patients achieved complete elimination of daily OCS use, 7 (53.84%) patients were able to reduce their daily OCS dose.Conclusion. Benralizumab therapy as an add-on maintenance treatment in patients with eosinophilic phenotype of severe asthma contributes to a significant decrease in peripheral blood eosinophils, which mediates an improvement in asthma control, an increase in FEV1, a reduction in the number of exacerbations, and a decrease in the need for the OCS usage. Careful monitoring of long-term adverse events is necessary during treatment with benralizumab.


Author(s):  
Berghea Elena Camelia ◽  
Mihaela Balgradean ◽  
Carmen Pavelescu ◽  
Catalin Cirstoveanu ◽  
Claudia Toma ◽  
...  

Background: Asthma is the most common chronic disease affecting children and altering their quality of life. The severity of asthma is often modulated by immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergen sensitization and is associated with comorbid allergic dis-eases. Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody anti-IgE, the first biological therapy approved to treat patients aged &ge;6 years with severe allergic asthma. The primary objective of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of Omali-zumab in Romanian paediatric patients with severe allergic asthma. Methods: In this observational real-life study, 12 children aged 6 to 18 years, (mean age 12.4 years ) with severe allergic asthma received Omalizumab as an add-on treatment. The levels of asthma control, exacerbations, lung function and adverse events were evaluated at baseline and after the first year of treatment. Results: We noticed general improvements in total asthma symptom scores and the rate of exacerbation of severe asthma. Omalizumab increased the initial variables of lung function, and no serious adverse reactions were reported. FEV1 improved statistically significant after one year of treatment with Omalizumab, [&Delta;FEV1 (% pred.) =18.3, and similarly, &Delta;MEF50 (%) = 25.8]. The mean severe exacerbation rates due to asthma decreased from 4.1 (2.8 SD) to 1.15 (0.78 SD) during the treatment year (p&lt;0.0001) with Omalizumab. Conclusions: Treatment with Omalizumab can be an effective and safe therapeutic option for Romanian children with severe allergic asthma, providing clinically relevant in-formation on asthma control and exacerbation rate in children and adolescents. The results highlighted the effect of Omalizumab in young patients, starting from the first year of treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document