scholarly journals Asthma Control during COVID-19 Lockdown in Patients with Severe Asthma under Biological Drug Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 12089
Author(s):  
Corrado Pelaia ◽  
Alessandro Casarella ◽  
Gianmarco Marcianò ◽  
Lucia Muraca ◽  
Vincenzo Rania ◽  
...  

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has deeply affected the management of patients with severe asthma, treated with add-on biological therapies. Objective: In this study, severe asthmatic patients on treatment with one of three different biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab) underwent a survey to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on the management of their clinical condition, with regard to the changes caused by the limited access to health facilities during the pandemic period. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 28 severe asthmatic outpatients referring to the Respiratory Unit of Magna Graecia University Hospital, Catanzaro (Italy), were asked to answer a telephone survey from May to July 2021. This survey included the evaluation of demographic and clinical data, as well as the number of lung function tests performed, exacerbations, biologic doses administered at hospital, or at general practitioner office, or through self-administration. Adherence to biological therapies before and during the pandemic period was also assessed. Moreover, the most recent asthma control test (ACT) score and the last forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) measurement, recorded during the pandemic phase, were compared to the pre-pandemic (baseline) period. Results: When comparing the pre-pandemic data with the pandemic observations, the mean ACT score and the exacerbation rate did not significantly change [ACT, 21.5 ± 2.8 to 23.0 ± 3.9 (p = 0.1); exacerbation rate, 0.3 ± 0.6 and 0.5 ± 1.5 (p = 0.3)]. When considering some variables related to disease management in the same periods, a statistically significant difference was detected with regard to the mean number of outpatient visits (5.2 ± 3.8 vs. 0.9 ± 2.5, p < 0.0001), as well as to the mean number of accesses to health facilities for the administration of biological drugs (from 7.0 ± 3.4 to 2.5 ± 3.9, p < 0.0001). None of the patients reported to have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and no adverse drug reactions (ADR) occurred during the study. Conclusions: The above results suggest that COVID-19 pandemic did not induce any significant change related to severe asthma control. Indeed, add-on treatment with biological drugs was regularly continued, despite the obvious limited access to health facilities.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 914.2-914
Author(s):  
S. Boussaid ◽  
M. Ben Majdouba ◽  
S. Jriri ◽  
M. Abbes ◽  
S. Jammali ◽  
...  

Background:Music therapy is based on ancient cross-cultural beliefs that music can have a “healing” effect on mind and body. Research determined that listening to music can increase comfort and relaxation, relieve pain, lower distress, reduce anxiety, improve positive emotions and mood, and decrease psychological symptoms. Music therapy has been used greatly in various medical procedures to reduce associated anxiety and pain. Patients have a high level of anxiety when they are in the hospital, this is the case of patients with rheumatic diseases who consult regularly to have intravenous infusion of biological therapies.Objectives:The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of music therapy on pain, anxiety, and vital signs among patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases during intravenous infusion of biological drugs.Methods:Fifty patients were divided into two groups: The experimental group G1 (n=25) received drug infusion while lestening to soft music (30 minutes); and the control group G2 (n=25) received only drug infusion. Measures include pain, anxiety, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate). The pain was measured using visual analogic scale (VAS). The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) was used for measuring anxiety, low anxiety ranges from 20 to 39, the moderate anxiety ranges from 40 to 59, and high anxiety ranges from 60 to 80. Vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], heart rate [HR], and respiratory rate [RR]) were measured before, during and immediately after the infusion.Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) was used for analysis.Results:The mean age in G1 was 44.45 years (26-72) with a sex ratio (M/F) of 0.8. Including the 25 patients, 12 had rheumatoid arthritis, 10 had ankylosing spondylitis and 3 had psoriatic arthritis. The mean disease duration was 8 years. In G2, the mean age was 46 years (25-70) with a sex ratio (M/F) of 0.75, 12 had rheumatoid arthritis, 11 had ankylosing spondylitis and 2 had psoriatic arthritis. The mean disease duration was 7.5 years. The biological drugs used were: Infliximab in 30 cases, Tocilizumab in 12 cases and Rituximab in 8 cases.Before the infusion, the patients of experimental group had a mean VAS of 5/10±3, a mean STAI of 50.62±6.01, a mean SBP of 13.6 cmHg±1.4, a mean DBP of 8.6 cmHg±1, a mean HR of 85±10 and a mean RR of 18±3. While in control group the mean VAS was 5.5±2, the mean STAI was 50.89±5.5, the mean SBP was 13.4±1.2, the mean DBP was 8.8±1.1, the mean HR was 82±8 and the mean RR was 19±2.During the infusion and after music intervention in G1, the mean STAI became 38.35±5 in G1 versus 46.7±5.2 in G2 (p value=0.022), the mean SBP became 12.1±0.5 in G1 versus 13±1 in G2 (p=0.035), the mean DBP became 8.1±0.8 in G1 versus 8.4±0.9 in G2 (p=0.4), the mean HR became 76±9 in G1 versus 78±7 in G2 (p=0.04) and the mean RR became 17.3±2.1 in G1 versus 18.2±1.7 in G2 (p=0.39).This study found a statistically significant decrease in anxiety, systolic blood pressure and heart rate in patients receiving music interventions during biological therapies infusion, but no significant difference were identified in diastolic blood pressure and respiratory rate.Conclusion:The findings provide further evidence to support the use of music therapy to reduce anxiety, and lower systolic blood pressure and heart rate in patients with rheumatic disease during biological therapies infusion.References:[1] Lin, C., Hwang, S., Jiang, P., & Hsiung, N. (2019).Effect of Music Therapy on Pain After Orthopedic Surgery -A Systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Practice.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Thorax ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2020-215168
Author(s):  
David J Jackson ◽  
John Busby ◽  
Paul E Pfeffer ◽  
Andrew Menzies-Gow ◽  
Thomas Brown ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) is the world’s largest national severe asthma registry collecting standardised data on referrals to UK specialist services. Novel biologic therapies have transformed the management of type 2(T2)-high severe asthma but have highlighted unmet need in patients with persisting symptoms despite suppression of T2-cytokine pathways with corticosteroids.MethodsDemographic, clinical and treatments characteristics for patients meeting European Respiratory Society / American Thoracic Society severe asthma criteria were examined for 2225 patients attending 15 specialist severe asthma centres. We assessed differences in biomarker low patients (fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) <25 ppb, blood eosinophils <150/μL) compared with a biomarker high population (FeNO ≥25 ppb, blood eosinophils ≥150/µL).ResultsAge (mean 49.6 (14.3) y), age of asthma onset (24.2 (19.1) y) and female predominance (62.4%) were consistent with prior severe asthma cohorts. Poor symptom control (Asthma Control Questionnaire-6: 2.9 (1.4)) with high exacerbation rate (4 (IQR: 2, 7)) were common despite high-dose treatment (51.7% on maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS)). 68.9% were prescribed biologic therapies including mepolizumab (50.3%), benralizumab (26.1%) and omalizumab (22.6%). T2-low patients had higher body mass index (32.1 vs 30.2, p<0.001), depression/anxiety prevalence (12.3% vs 7.6%, p=0.04) and mOCS use (57.9% vs 42.1%, p<0.001). Many T2-low asthmatics had evidence of a historically elevated blood eosinophil count (0.35 (0.13, 0.60)).ConclusionsThe UKSAR describes the characteristics of a large cohort of asthmatics referred to UK specialist severe asthma services. It offers the prospect of providing novel insights across a range of research areas and highlights substantial unmet need with poor asthma control, impaired lung function and high exacerbation rates. T2-high phenotypes predominate with significant differences apparent from T2-low patients. However, T2-low patients frequently have prior blood eosinophilia consistent with possible excessive corticosteroid exposure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 410-413
Author(s):  
Paul A. Greenberger

Exacerbations of persistent or intermittent asthma should be anticipated by physicians and health-care professionals. Patients who are likely to experience an exacerbation often have a history of an exacerbation in the previous year, and the absolute eosinophil count in peripheral blood is ≥ 400/μL. Similarly, expectorated or induced sputum eosinophilia of ≥2% is associated with exacerbations. These phenotypic findings have led to effective biologic therapies, which target eosinophils or immunoglobulin E or the T-helper type 2 phenotype, especially in children, adolescents, and adults with frequent exacerbations. In children, a reduced forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) to forced vital capacity ratio can be associated with future exacerbations, although the FEV1 may be in the normal range, even with children who have persistent severe asthma. Asthma control questionnaires did not differentiate between children with or children without a future exacerbation. Alternatively, in adults, the lower baseline FEV1 (2.3 L [74% predicted] versus 2.5 L [78% predicted]) identified patients more likely to have a future exacerbation compared with patients who were not having an exacerbation. After correcting for FEV1, the asthma control questionnaire data were associated with exacerbations. In adolescents (ages ≥ 12 years) and adults with persistent mild asthma, most (73%) did not have sputum eosinophilia, and some of these patients responded well to the anticholinergic, tiotropium, which would argue differently from administration of an inhaled corticosteroid as first-line controller therapy. In a three-track study of patients with persistent mild asthma, as-needed budesonide-formoterol and scheduled budesonide were associated with approximately one-half of the annual exacerbation rate of as-needed albuterol. In patients with persistent moderate-to-severe asthma, tiotropium added to controller therapy caused an increase in FEV1 without improving the asthma control questionnaire findings. There were two studies that explored whether either quadrupling or quintupling the inhaled corticosteroid at the first sign of loss of control of asthma would provide meaningful reductions of severe exacerbations of asthma, but the findings did not support this strategy. Both biologic therapies and environmental control (dust mite impermeable encasings) have resulted in reductions of exacerbations in patients with persistent moderate and severe asthma.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145
Author(s):  
Nattapong Jaimchariyatam ◽  
Phurin Haprasert ◽  
Sutep Gonchanvit ◽  
Somkiat Wongtim

Abstract Background Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of airways. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is known to be associated with worsening asthma. We hypothesized that treatment of GERD in asthmatics will improve asthma control and quality of life. We reviewed our experience of treatment of GERD in asthmatics in Thailand. Objectives To study the effects of omeprazole for treatment of GERD in patients with poorly controlled asthma on pulmonary function tests and asthma control test (ACT) scores. Methods This study was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between August 2009 and December 2010. Patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma who were found to have GERD by 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring were administered omeprazole 40 mg per day for 8 weeks. Pulmonary function tests and ACT scores before and after treatment were compared at 4-weeks and 8-weeks follow up. Results Twenty four patients were included in this study. None of them had asthmatic attacks during the study. After 4 and 8 weeks of omeprazole treatment, the mean FEV1 (2.20 ± 0.64 L, 2.36 ± 0.58 L, respectively) and the mean ACT score (20.82 ± 3.30, 23.00 ± 1.69, respectively) were significantly higher than the pretreatment values (mean FEV1 1.99 ± 0.56 L and ACT score 16.36 ± 3.97) (P < 0.05). Conclusion High-dose omeprazole may improve pulmonary function and the level of asthma control in Thai patients with partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma and coexisting GERD.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S145-S146
Author(s):  
M. Turki ◽  
R. Naoui ◽  
N. Moussa ◽  
S. Sellami ◽  
I. Gassrara ◽  
...  

IntroductionAlexithymia refers to difficulties in verbal expression of emotions, commonly observed in patients with psychosomatic symptoms. In this context, asthma is described as one of psychosomatic diseases.ObjectivesIdentify clinical profile of asthmatic patients and assess the alexithymia level as well as associated factors.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytic study, including 30 patients followed for asthma at pulmonary outpatient department, Hedi Chaker Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia, during September and October 2015. We collected socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Asthma control level was assessed by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Alexithymia was measured using Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20).ResultsThe mean age was 51 ans. Sex-ratio F/M was 14. The mean duration of disease was 11 years. Long-term control medicines were: inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta agonists and theophylline respectively in 86.7%, 33.3% and 26.7%. Two thirds of our patients had a bad therapeutic adherence. The average ACT score was 16.8 points. Asthma was uncontrolled in 1/3 and well controlled in 1/3 of cases. The average TAS 20 score was 64.8 points. Twenty percent of patients were non-alexithymic, 13.3% had a probable alexithymia and 66.7% were alexithymic. This score was positively correlated to bad asthma control (P < 0.001), long term evolution (P = 0.002) and use of inhaled corticoids (P < 0.001). It was inversely correlated to ACT score (P < 0.001).ConclusionOur study shows the high prevalence of alexithymia in patients with asthma and its negative impact in asthma control. Psychological support aiming specifically alexithymic dimension in these patients is indispensable.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Author(s):  
Abbas Dabbaghzadeh ◽  
Marzieh Tavakol ◽  
Mohammad Gharagozlou

  Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive marker of inflammation, used for monitoring asthma. The aim of this study was to compare FeNO, asthma control test (ACT), and lung function test (spirometry) in children aged 8-15 years. This observational, cross-sectional study was performed on76 asthmatic children (age, 8-15 years), who were referred to the Department of Immunology and Allergy, Children's Medical Center, Tehran, Iran during 2012-2013. Patients were matched for sex and age. The recruited patients were selected via consecutive sampling. FeNO was measured with a portable electrochemical analyzer and forced spirometry was performed according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines. The ACT questionnaire was used and completed for all the patients.  The mean FeNO was 28.5±29.1 ppb, and the mean ACT score was 19.8±3.6. FeNO was significantly correlated with forced expiratory volume (FEV1) (r, 0.232; p=0.049) or 25-75% maximum expiratory flow (MEF 25-75) (r, -0.304; p=0.009). FeNO showed no significant correlation with ACT score or FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (p>0.05). Additionally, there was no significant correlation between FeNO and changes in FEV1 and MEF 25-75% before and after the administration of bronchodilators (p>0.05). To improve asthma control, childhood ACT, FeNO, and spirometric tests can be used as complementary tools in clinical practice to detect children with poorly controlled asthma.


Author(s):  
Enas M. Al-Zayadneh ◽  
Ala’ Dia-Eddin Arafah ◽  
Sarah Muwaffag Ibrahim ◽  
Maram Abdalla Glessa ◽  
Montaha Al-Iede

Background: Asthma is a common chronic illness worldwide. Identifying and treating impaired health-related quality of life is now recognized as an important component of asthma management. High prevalence of behavioral and emotional difficulties was noticed among children with asthma. Methods: Cross-sectional study that was conducted over 8 weeks involving 45 asthmatic children within the ages of 7-17 years old presented to Jordan University Hospital in Amman, Jordan. General demographic characteristics were collected, two questionnaires were used: asthma control test (ACT), and the pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire (PAQLQ). We also used the feeling thermometer scale, and a pulmonary function test was done for patients. SAS Software version 9.4 USA and Pearsons coefficient were used to find associations. Results and Discussion: Among 45 patients, 53% of the sample had poor asthma control. The mean FEV1 on lung function testing was 80% (± 16.18) of predicted. The mean for asthma clinical scores (ACT) were 18.8 ± 4.53 (out of 25). FEV1 was significantly higher in children with good control compared to those with a low ACT score (P value <0.05). Mean total PAQLQ score was 5.3 ± 1.06 and it correlated significantly with ACT score (P value <0.001). Conclusion: This study highlights the association of poorly controlled asthma with a poor quality of life. It is recommended that the quality of life of children should be assessed and observed during clinic visits, for a better comprehensive approach and effective improvement of outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A92-A92
Author(s):  
Julie Martin-Grace* ◽  
Vincent Brennan* ◽  
Christopher Mulvey ◽  
Garrett Greene ◽  
Geraldine Collier ◽  
...  

Abstract The extent to which inhaled glucocorticoid exposure (ICS) contributes to risk of adrenal insufficiency (AI) is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to establish the relative contribution of both oral (OCS) and inhaled (ICS) glucocorticoid exposure to risk of AI.82 patients with severe asthma treated with fluticasone propionate (FP) who participated in a 32-week prospective randomised trial INCA SUN, (NCT02307669) were studied. Cumulative ICS exposure was calculated using a unique digital device, which creates an acoustic recording of inhaler adherence and technique. Analysis of this data provides an exact measure of the ICS dose received by each patient. Morning serum samples collected during the final study visit (week 32) were analysed for serum cortisol concentration (cortisol) using Roche Elecsys Cortisol II immunoassay. Participants were then stratified into three groups based on cortisol concentration to predict risk of AI; cortisol &lt; 100nmol/l (high risk), 100–315 nmol/l (indeterminate risk) and &gt; 315 nmol/l (low risk) based on locally derived reference ranges. 21% participants were classified as low risk, 18% as high risk and the remaining 61% at indeterminate risk of AI. Median morning cortisol in the low risk group was ten-fold higher than those in the high risk group (380 vs 38.5 nmol/l, p=0.001). OCS exposure was a significant predictor of risk of AI (OR 1.1 [1.03–1.17] per mg/kg increase in prednisolone exposure, p=0.004)). Participants at high risk were more likely to be on maintenance OCS (33% vs 0%, p=0.015) and had a greater median cumulative OCS exposure over the study period (7.55 vs 0.66 mg/kg prednisolone, p=0.002). ICS exposure was also associated with risk of AI. Participants at high risk AI had a greater adherence to ICS therapy (78% vs 62%, p=0.049) and greater cumulative received ICS dose over the study duration than those at low risk AI (178.2 vs 127.9 mg, p=0.036). ICS exposure remained a significant predictor of AI even when OCS exposure is controlled for (OR 2.49 [1.06–5.82] per 1mg/kg increase in FP exposure). Both the asthma control test (ACT) & asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) scores correlate with morning cortisol concentration (ACT r=0.2, p=0.068, AQLQ r=0.26, p=0.019). Interestingly, participants with cortisol &lt; 100nmol/l reported worse asthma control (ACT score 16 vs 20, p=0.07) and a lower AQLQ score (4.1 vs 5.8, p=0.02) than the low risk group despite objectively better lung function (FEV1 90.6 vs 77.6% predicted). Our data suggests that both cumulative oral and inhaled glucocorticoid exposure contribute independently to cortisol suppression and risk of AI. The discrepancy between objective (FEV1) and more subjective measures of asthma control (ACT score) in the high risk group suggests that undiagnosed AI, as well as other non-airway co-morbidities, may contribute to the symptom burden experienced by these patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Padilla-Galo ◽  
A. J. García-Ruiz ◽  
R. Ch. Levy Abitbol ◽  
C. Olveira ◽  
F. Rivas-Ruiz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Availability of clinically effective and cost-effective treatments for severe asthma would be beneficial to patients and national healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditure after incorporating benralizumab into the standard treatment of refractory eosinophilic asthma. Methods This was a cross-sectional multicentre study of consecutive patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma who received treatment with benralizumab during at least 12 months. Patient follow-up was performed in specialised severe asthma units. The main effectiveness parameters measured were: the avoidance of one asthma exacerbation, a 3-point increase in the asthma control test (ACT) score, and the difference in utility scores (health-related quality of life) between a 1-year baseline treatment and 1-year benralizumab treatment. The health economic evaluation included direct costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results After 1 year of treatment with benralizumab, patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma showed an improvement in all the effectiveness parameters analysed: improvement of asthma control and lung function, and decrease in the number of exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (both as corticosteroid courses and maintenance therapy), and inhaled corticosteroid use. The total annual cost per patient for the baseline and benralizumab treatment periods were €11,544 and €14,043, respectively, reflecting an increase in costs due to the price of the biological agent but a decrease in costs for the remaining parameters. The ICER was €602 per avoided exacerbation and €983.86 for every 3-point increase in the ACT score. Conclusions All the pharmacoeconomic parameters analysed show that treatment with benralizumab is a cost-effective option as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donghai Ma ◽  
María-Jesús Cruz ◽  
Iñigo Ojanguren ◽  
Christian Romero-Mesones ◽  
Diego Varona-Porres ◽  
...  

AbstractThough asthma and bronchiectasis are two different diseases, their coexistence has been demonstrated in many patients. The aim of the present study is to compare the characteristics of asthmatic patients with and without bronchiectasis and to assess risk factors for the development of this condition. Two hundred and twenty-four moderate-severe asthmatic patients were included. The severity of bronchiectasis was assessed by Reiff and FACED parameters. Logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with bronchiectasis. Bronchiectasis was identified in 78 asthma patients. In severe asthma patients, its prevalence was 56.9%. Bronchiectasis was defined as mild in81% of patients using modified Reiff criteria and in 74% using FACED criteria. Asthmatic patients with bronchiectasis had decreasing FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC (p = 0.002, 0.005 and 0.014 respectively), presented more frequent asthma exacerbations (p < 0.001) and worse asthma control (ACT 21 vs 16pts, p < 0.001). Factors independently associated with bronchiectasis were older age (42–65 years: OR, 3.99; 95% CI 1.60 to 9.95, P = 0.003; ≥ 65 years: OR, 2.91; 95% CI 1.06 to 8.04, P = 0.039), severe asthma grade (OR, 8.91; 95% CI 3.69 to 21.49; P < 0.001) and frequency of asthma exacerbations (OR, 4.43; 95% CI 1.78 to 11.05; P < 0.001). In patients with severe asthma, age of asthma onset (OR, 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04; P = 0.015) and asthma exacerbations (OR, 4.88; 95% CI 1.98 to 12.03; P = 0.001) were independently associated with the development of bronchiectasis. The prevalence of bronchiectasis in severe asthmatic patients is high. Age of asthma onset and exacerbations were independent factors associated with the occurrence of bronchiectasis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document