PUPILLARY LIGHT REFLEX AND RECEPTIVE FIELD CALCULATION OF VISUAL DISCOMFORT FOR DIFFERENT SPATIAL FREQUENCIES AND LUMINANCE STEPS

Author(s):  
Gertjan Scheir ◽  
Peter Hanselaer ◽  
Wouter Ryckaert
2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
GH Scheir ◽  
P Hanselaer ◽  
WR Ryckaert

Light sources causing annoyance or pain produce discomfort glare. Traditional glare metrics fail for non-uniform luminaires. As an alternative, visual discomfort is determined by a model incorporating the centre–surround receptive field mechanism, the pupillary light reflex and a correction for retinal position. The pupil area, controlled by the pupillary light reflex, regulates the retinal illuminance. A centre–surround receptive field, described by a difference of Gaussians, represents the visual signal. A correction according to the Guth position index accounts for the reduction in brightness perception when a light source is moved away from the line of sight. The model is analysed with a forced choice paired comparison experiment involving 17 non-uniform rear projected stimuli with different spatial frequencies and luminance steps. A coefficient of determination of 0.68 between the subjective assessment and the model is obtained. A paired comparison office luminaire experiment and a magnitude estimation experiment involving diffusor luminaires validate the model resulting in a coefficient of determination of 0.86 and 0.81, respectively. By including the pupillary light reflex, receptive field mechanism and a correction for retinal position, the more physiologically justified model is a promising alternative to current, often empirical, glare metrics, especially for non-uniform luminaires.


2018 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Gertjan Hilde Scheir ◽  
Peter Hanselaer ◽  
Wouter Rita Ryckaert

Discomfort glare is defined as glare that causes discomfort without necessarily impairing the vision of objects. Traditional glare metrics fail for non-uniform luminaires. As an alternative, visual discomfort is determined by a physiological model incorporating the centre­surround receptive field mechanism and the pupillary light reflex. The pupil area, controlled by the pupillary light reflex, regulates the retinal illuminance. A centre-surround receptive field, described by a difference of Gaussians, represents the visual signal. The centre excites the signal whereas the surround controls the inhibition. A forced choice paired comparison experiment involves 7 non-uniform rear projected stimuli with different spatial frequencies. Inspired by a promising coefficient of determination of 0.90, the model is a candidate to replace current glare metrics as UGR or VCP, especially when non­uniform luminaires are to be evaluated.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakoor Ba-Ali ◽  
Birgit Sander ◽  
Adam Elias Brøndsted ◽  
Henrik Lund-Andersen

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e0162476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Angeles Bonmati-Carrion ◽  
Konstanze Hild ◽  
Cheryl Isherwood ◽  
Stephen J. Sweeney ◽  
Victoria L. Revell ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. S277-S284 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. MESTANIKOVA ◽  
I. ONDREJKA ◽  
M. MESTANIK ◽  
D. CESNEKOVA ◽  
Z. VISNOVCOVA ◽  
...  

Major depressive disorder is associated with abnormal autonomic regulation which could be noninvasively studied using pupillometry. However, the studies in adolescent patients are rare. Therefore, we aimed to study the pupillary light reflex (PLR), which could provide novel important information about dynamic balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system in adolescent patients suffering from major depression. We have examined 25 depressive adolescent girls (age 15.2±0.3 year) prior to pharmacotherapy and 25 age/gender-matched healthy subjects. PLR parameters were measured separately for both eyes after 5 min of rest using Pupillometer PLR-2000 (NeurOptics, USA). The constriction percentual change for the left eye was significantly lower in depressive group compared to control group (-24.12±0.87 % vs. –28.04±0.96%, p˂0.01). Furthermore, average constriction velocity and maximum constriction velocity for the left eye were significantly lower in depressive group compared to control group (p˂0.05, p˂0.01, respectively). In contrast, no significant between-groups differences were found for the right eye. Concluding, this study revealed altered PLR for left eye indicating a deficient parasympathetic activity already in adolescent major depression. Additionally, the differences between left and right eye could be related to functional lateralization of autonomic control in the central nervous system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document