scholarly journals Practice in Vietnam About the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under the Code of Civil Procedure 2015 and Recommendations for Improving the Efficiency of Law Application

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Banh Quoc Tuan
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Viet Nam ◽  
Arbitral Award ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Law

On the basis of studying the process of applying the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, the author has made comments on regulations of the law as well as analyzed the problems arising from the application of the law in practice as the basis for the proposal of some recommendations to improve the law. Keywords: International judiciary, foreign arbitral award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. References: [1] Bộ Tư pháp - Đại sứ quán Anh tại Hà Nội, Sổ tay hướng dẫn thực hiện Công ước New York 1958 về công nhận và cho thi hành phán quyết trọng tài nước ngoài, Nhà xuất bản Dân Trí, Hà Nội, 2017, tr. 45.[2] Nguyễn Thị Thuỳ Dung, Thực tiễn giải quyết yêu cầu công nhận và cho thi hành bản án, quyết định của Toà án nước ngoài, quyết định của cơ quan có thẩm quyền nước ngoài tại Toà án Nhân dân Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Tài liệu hội nghị “Tập huấn Công nước New York 1958 về Công nhận và cho thi hành phán quyết của Trọng tài nước ngoài, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, tháng 01/2019[3] Lê Nguyễn Gia Thiện - Lê Nguyễn Gia Thuận, “Phán quyết trọng tài phi chính thức: Quy định của pháp luật Italia, thực tiễn thi hành tại Đức và một số đề xuất cho Việt Nam”, Tạp chí Nghiên cứu lập pháp, (05), 2019 tr. 59, 64.[4] Trường đại học Luật Hà Nội, Giáo trình Tư pháp quốc tế, NXB Công an nhân dân, 1999, tr. 317, 348.[5] Trường đại học Luật Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Giáo trình Tư pháp quốc tế (Phần chung), Nhà xuất bản Hồng Đức - Hội luật gia Việt Nam, 2014, tr. 208.[6] Khoa Luật - Đại học quốc gia Hà Nội, Giáo trình Tư pháp quốc tế, Nhà xuất bản Đại học quốc gia Hà Nội,2013, tr. 468, 516.[7] Bành Quốc Tuấn, Công nhận và cho thi hành tại Việt Nam bản án, quyết định dân sự của Toà án nước ngoài (Sách chuyên khảo), Nhà xuất bản Chính trị quốc gia - Sự thật, Hà Nội, 2015, tr. 123.[8] Bành Quốc Tuấn, Giáo trình Tư pháp quốc tế, NXB Chính trị quốc gia - Sự thật, Hà Nội, 2017, tr. 334 - 335.[9] Bành Quốc Tuấn, “Áp dụng nguyên tắc có đi có lại trong công nhận và cho thi hành tại Việt Nam bản án, quyết định dân sự của nước ngoài”, Tạp chí Nghiên cứu lập pháp, 2017, 18, tr. 09 - 13.

scholarly journals Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitration Awards in Kazakhstan

2018 ◽  
pp. 358-367
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
New York ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
New York Convention

Arbitration, as an alternative way to resolve commercial disputes, has been used in Kazakhstan for more than twenty years. Arbitration Court is governed by Civil Procedure Code, The Law On Enactments and the Regulatory Resolution. The expansion of the list of documents in the Regulatory Resolution does not comply with the requirements of the New York Convention and therefore, the purpose of our study is to clarify it. The research institute of private law of the Caspian University together with Kazakhstan International Arbitration prepared proposals for making amendments and supplements to the Law On Arbitration and the CPC at the request of the Arbitration Chamber of Kazakhstan. Most of the proposals developed by us were approved and included in the Draft Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan On Amendments and Supplements to Certain Enactments of the Republic of Kazakhstan On Enhancing Protection of Title and Arbitration after discussion at the meetings of the General Meeting members of Arbitration Chamber of Kazakhstan. It was proposed to bringing in compliance with the New York Convention some paragraphs of the Art. 255 and the Art. 504 of CPC and a series of articles in the Law on arbitration. In this article also given answers to some questions of the arbitration court regarding corporate and marriage dispute, as well as an issue of contradiction public policy.

scholarly journals The Influence of the Law of the Country of the Place of Enforcement of the Arbitral Award on the Settlement of Disputes in the International Commercial Arbitration

2020 ◽  
pp. 86-97
Author(s):  
Volodymyr NAHNYBIDA
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
New York ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Arbitral Award ◽  
Opposing Party ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Law ◽  
New York Convention ◽  
The Impact

The article examines the key aspects of the impact of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award on arbitration and directly on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, given the study of doctrinal positions, regulations and relevant case law. It was found out that the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 refers to the procedural rules of the country of enforcement to settle matters inherent to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards not governed by the Convention, establishing only basic and fairly simple formal requirements for the said procedure, which is one of the strong characteristics of the conventional regime of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. In light of this, it is concluded that such an approach is moderate and takes into account the impossibility and lack of practical necessity of unification at the international treaty level of procedural features of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, establishing only basic principles and requirements. It is substantiated that there are two components of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award, which regulate the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards within the relevant jurisdiction, namely substantive and procedural, which, however, are contained in single legal acts — mostly national arbitration laws. The author emphasizes the crucial role of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award in the material and procedural aspects for the procedure of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards within the relevant jurisdiction. It is concluded that the unification of material grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement (in particular, non-arbitrability of the subject matter of the dispute and contradiction of the award to public policy as grounds that can be raised by the competent judicial authority at the place of enforcement ex officio, regardless of reference to them by opposing party), as well as the consolidation of basic procedural requirements and principles is carried out by the New York Convention of 1958, which leaves to the discretion of the national legislature, on the one hand, the settlement of minor aspects of the procedure, but, on the other hand, recognizes its full discretion in determining the limits of objective arbitrability, the content and specific filling of the category of international public policy applicable in the relevant jurisdiction. Keywords: arbitral award, international commercial arbitration, applicable law, arbitration process, public policy.

scholarly journals Exequatur de laudos arbitrales extranjeros en España: comentario al auto del TSJ de Murcia de 12 de abril de 2019 = Exequatur of foreign arbitral awards in Spain: commentary to the decision of the High Court of Justice of Murcia of 12th April 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 512
Author(s):  
María José Castellanos Ruiz
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
New York ◽  
Competent Authority ◽  
High Court ◽  
Arbitral Award ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Law ◽  
New York Convention ◽  
Art V 1

Resumen: En el Auto del TSJ de Murcia de 12 de abril de 2019 se acuerda conceder al exequatur en España de un laudo arbitral dictado en Colombia, solicitado por la parte demandante Productos Florida, S.A. Los motivos de denegación del exequatur que son alegados por la parte demandada, AMC JUICES, S.L y que son objeto de análisis son: a) Sentencia arbitral no obligatoria para las partes o que ha sido anulada o suspendida por una autoridad competente del país en que, o conforme a cuya Ley, ha sido dictada esa sentencia (art. V.1.e) Convenio de Nueva York de 1958); b) Reconocimiento o ejecución del laudo arbitral contrarios al orden público del Estado requerido (art. V.2.b) Convenio de Nueva York de 1958). En definitiva, la postura de los tribunales españoles en relación con el Convenio de Nueva York de 10 de junio de 1958 sobre el reconocimiento y ejecución de las sentencias arbitrales extranjeras, es la de favorecer el reconocimiento y ejecución de laudos arbitrales, de manera que sólo rechazan el exequatur de un laudo arbitral por motivos muy claros y evidentes.Palabras clave: laudos arbitrales extranjeros, convenios arbitrales, reconocimiento y ejecución, exequatur, Convenio de Nueva York de 1958, Ley española de Arbitraje de 2003. Abstract: In decision of the High Court of Murcia of 12th April 2019, it is agreed the exequatur in Spain of an foreign arbitral award issued in Colombia, requested by the plaintiff Productos Florida, S.A. The grounds for refusal of the exequatur that are alleged by the defendant, AMC JUICES, S.L. and that are subject to analysis are: a) The award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made. (art. V.1.e) New York Convention of 1958); b) Recognition or enforcement of the foreign arbitral awards would be contrary to its public policy (art. V.2.b) New York Convention of 1958). In short, the position of the Spanish courts in relation to The New York Convention of June 10, 1958 on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, is to favor the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, so that only they reject the exequatur of an arbitral award for very clear and obvious reasons. Keywords: foreign arbitral awards, arbitral clauses, recognition and enforcement, exequatur, New York Convention of 10 june 1958, Spanish arbitration law of 2003. 

Part 1 Fundaments of Arbitration in Brazil, 1 The Rise of Arbitration in Brazil

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sester Peter
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
New York Convention

This introductory chapter discusses the rise of arbitration in Brazil. Modern commercial arbitration in Brazil is overtaking classic strongholds of international arbitration, despite its relatively young history. The Brazilian Arbitration Law (BAL) was adopted in 1996, eleven years after Brazil's re-democratization in 1985. The law revoked those parts of the Civil Procedure Code of 1973 particularly detrimental to the success of arbitration in the last century. Rather than integrating the new arbitration law into the existing Civil Procedure Code (CPC), the Brazilian legislator preserved it as a standalone act, thus revoking the CPC's pre-existing arbitration rules. In this way, the legislator facilitated developing an interpretation sui generis, thus preventing the matter from being taken over entirely by scholars of civil procedure law. Today, Brazilian arbitration scholars and practitioners come from many different backgrounds, including commercial, civil, international, and civil procedure law. Even tax, constitutional, and administrative lawyers are part of the community. The chapter then looks at the ratification of the New York Convention (NYC) in Brazil.

scholarly journals Dallah: the death knell for deference?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Anastasia Lee Fraser
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
English Court ◽  
Arbitral Award ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
New York Convention

<p>This paper examines the decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v The Minister of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan, a rare case where an English court refused enforcement of an international arbitral award under the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention).  Although in Dallah the United Kingdom Supreme Court acknowledged the trend to limit reconsideration of the findings of arbitral tribunals in fact and in law, the Court considered it was bound to decide the question of validity de novo. Contrary to the tribunal, the Court held the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law to which it was subject and refused enforcement of the arbitral award.  This paper analyses how the English Supreme Court decided the legal issues before it. It concludes the English court could have reached the same decision on a more convincing basis. Even where the issue is initial consent, holding the court at the place of enforcement is always bound to decide a matter de novo neither serves the objectives of international commercial arbitration nor is necessary to promote the fundamental integrity of arbitral proceedings.</p>

Besondere Typen der Widerklage

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalena Hanke
Keyword(s):  
Case Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law

This highly significant work in terms of litigation practice critically examines the case law of Germany’s highest courts with regard to third-party counterclaims. In particular, it discusses the recognition of third-party counterclaims as an independent institution of procedural law. This work solves the problems that arise in this respect, above all the question of local jurisdiction, using the existing legally regulated instruments of procedural law. Due to the actual lack of the presupposed loophole in the regulations, it therefore calls into question both the analogous application of § 33 of Germany’s civil procedure code (Zivilprozessordnung) and the judicial development of the law in this area.

Kingdom of Spain v. Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.á.r.l.

2021 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 593-628
Keyword(s):  
Federal Court ◽  
Vienna Convention ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Arbitral Award ◽  
State Immunity ◽  
Foreign State ◽  
Municipal Law ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Law

593Arbitration — Arbitration award — International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) — ICSID Convention, 1965 — Article 54 — Recognition and enforcement of award — Distinction between enforcement and recognition proceedings — International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) implementing ICSID Convention in domestic law — Whether ICSID Convention excluding any claim for foreign state immunity in proceedings for recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award — Meaning of recognition and enforcement in Article 54 and execution in Article 55 of ICSID Convention — Whether Spain’s accession to ICSID Convention constituting a submission to jurisdiction of Federal Court of AustraliaRelationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — ICSID Convention, 1965 — International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) — Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth) — Whether Spain entitled to plead foreign State immunity — Whether ICSID Convention excluding any claim for foreign state immunity in proceedings for recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award — Meaning of recognition and enforcement in Article 54 and execution in Article 55 of ICSID Convention — Whether Spain’s accession to ICSID Convention constituting a submission to jurisdiction of Federal Court of AustraliaTreaties — Interpretation — ICSID Convention, 1965 — Articles 54 and 55 — Meaning of recognition and enforcement in Article 54 and execution in Article 55 of ICSID Convention — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969 — Whether ICSID Convention excluding any claim for foreign state immunity in proceedings for recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award — Whether Spain’s accession to ICSID Convention constituting a submission to jurisdiction of Federal Court of AustraliaState immunity — Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth) — Exceptions to immunity — Exception where foreign State agreeing by treaty to submit to jurisdiction — Spain acceding to ICSID Convention — Whether constituting submission to jurisdiction of Federal Court of Australia — Whether Spain entitled to plead foreign State immunity — Whether ICSID Convention excluding any claim for foreign State immunity in proceedings for recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award594Jurisdiction — State immunity — Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth) — Spain acceding to ICSID Convention — Whether constituting submission to jurisdiction of Federal Court of Australia — Whether Spain entitled to plead foreign State immunity — Whether Federal Court of Australia having jurisdiction — The law of Australia

scholarly journals Problems in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Turkey

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan Deynekli
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
New York ◽  
Necessary Conditions ◽  
Arbitral Tribunal ◽  
Arbitral Award ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
New York Convention ◽  
Domestic Law

If the arbitral award which requested to recognition and enforcement given in the country is a party to New York Convention dated 1958, primarily the provisions of this Convention shall be applied. The recognition and enforcement of domestic law and regulations duly implemented. Whether judgment fees should be fixed or proportional are discussion. The demand for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral tribunal shall not review the basis of the decision of the referee. The necessary conditions for enforcement of foreign arbitral decisions and must be moved. The existence of the arbitration agreement against the enforcement of the arbitration requested by referee assignments, and to be aware of the dispute to arbitration and enforcement required to be favorable verdict must not be contrary to public policy.

scholarly journals O processo cautelar sobrevive no Código de Processo Civil de 2015?

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (38) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Resende Leal ◽  
Flávio Luis De Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Historical Evolution ◽  
Porto Alegre ◽  
The Third ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Preliminary Injunction ◽  
The Law ◽  
Procedure Codes

O processo cautelar sobrevive no Código de Processo Civil de 2015? Does the precautionary process survive in the Civil Procedure Code of 2015? Fabio Resende Leal *Flávio Luis de Oliveira ** REFERÊNCIA LEAL, Fabio Resende; OLIVEIRA, Flávio Luis de. O processo cautelar sobrevive no Código de Processo Civil de 2015? Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFRGS, Porto Alegre, n. 38, p. 234-256, ago. 2018. RESUMOABSTRACTEste artigo procura desmentir a afirmação, feita em doutrina, de que o processo cautelar desapareceu no Código de Processo Civil de 2015, propondo uma nova forma de definir tal espécie processual. O primeiro de seus cinco itens versa sobre os conceitos de ação e processo; o segundo, sobre os Códigos de Processo Civil de 1939, 1973 e 2015; o terceiro, sobre o sincretismo processual e a tutela cautelar na lei hoje em vigor. Adentrando ao cerne da discussão, o quarto item procura, a partir de situações processuais hipotéticas, demonstrar a possível sobrevivência do processo cautelar, enquanto que o quinto e último, para sustentar tal sobrevida, formula, a título de sugestão, um novo conceito de processo cautelar, a partir da preponderância dos atos preventivos que nele serão praticados, com inspiração em Pontes de Miranda. O método adotado foi pesquisar, além da legislação e sua evolução histórica, os principais autores processuais pátrios em cada um dos três grandes momentos legislativos vividos no Brasil. This article seeks to deny the doctrinal assertion that the precautionary process disappeared in the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, proposing a new way of defining that procedural species. The first of its five chapters deals with the concepts of action and process; the second, the Civil Procedure Codes of 1939, 1973 and 2015; the third, procedural syncretism and preliminary injunction in the law today in force. At the heart of the discussion, the fourth chapter seeks, based on hypothetical procedural situations, to demonstrate the possible survival of the precautionary process, while the fifth and last, in order to sustain such survival, formulates, as a suggestion, a new concept of process precautionary, starting from the preponderance of the preventive acts that will be practiced in it, with inspiration in Pontes de Miranda. The method adopted was to investigate, in addition to the legislation and its historical evolution, the main procedural authors of the country in each of the three great legislative moments experienced in Brazil. PALAVRAS-CHAVEKEYWORDSProcesso cautelar. Sobrevivência. Código de Processo Civil de 2015.Precautionary process. Survival. Code of Civil Procedure of 2015.* Doutorando em Direito pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino de Bauru. Graduação, Especialização e Mestrado em Direito pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino de Bauru. Advogado. Professor Adjunto da Universidade Paulista - Campus de Bauru. Professor da Pós-Graduação em Direito Universidade Paulista Interativa, Professor convidado do Centro de Pós-Graduação da Instituição Toledo de Ensino de Bauru e da Escola Superior da Advocacia da OAB/SP. Coordenador da Comissão OAB vai à Faculdade da OAB/Bauru. Membro do Tribunal de Ética e Disciplina da OAB/SP. Autor do livro A celeridade processual como pressuposto da efetividade dos direitos fundamentais (Curitiba: Juruá, 2011).** Flávio Luis de Oliveira Mestre (1999) e Doutor (2001) em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Paraná. Coordenou o Curso de Graduação em Direito do Centro Universitário de Bauru/SP, mantido pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino - ITE. Coordenou o Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Direito do Centro Universitário de Bauru/SP, mantido pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino - ITE. Tem experiência em gestão acadêmica e docência superior na área do Direito Processual Civil. Membro do Instituto Ibero-americano de Direito Processual. Membro do Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual. Membro do Centro de Estudos Avançados de Processo. Consultor Ad Hoc da Capes - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Advogado. 

scholarly journals The Re-Codification of the Slovak Civil Procedure Code with a Special Emphasis on Remedial Measures

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-135
Author(s):  
Marek Števček ◽  
Dominika Malá
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Remedial Measures ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law

Abstract This analytical paper focuses on the ongoing works on the recodification of the law of civil procedure in Slovakia. Th e paper introduces and presents the most relevant changes to the Slovak Civil Procedure Code and offers the closer examination of the reform of remedial measures included in the re-codification proposal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document