Coupled Optimization of Aircraft Families and Fleet Allocation for Multiple Markets

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1485-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Jansen ◽  
Ruben E. Perez
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Markets ◽  
Fleet Allocation

Innovation, Entry into Multiple Markets and Unobserved Heterogeneity

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ganna Pogrebna ◽  
Christian Schade
Keyword(s):  
Unobserved Heterogeneity ◽  
Multiple Markets

Availability of COVID-19 related products on Tor darknet markets

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roderic Broadhurst ◽  
Matthew Ball
Keyword(s):  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Small Proportion ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Medical Products ◽  
Diagnostic Instruments ◽  
Multiple Markets

Twenty Tor darknet markets were surveyed on 3 April 2020 to conduct a census of COVID-19 related medical products and supplies. There were 645 listings, including 222 unique listings, of COVID-19 related products across 12 markets. Three markets accounted for 85 percent of all unique listings identified. Of the 110 vendors identified, eight were active in multiple markets. A small proportion of vendors accounted for most listings. The estimated value of all unique listings was A$369,000. Personal protective equipment accounted for nearly half of all unique listings, and one third of products were antiviral or repurposed medicines. Supposed vaccines, tests and diagnostic instruments each accounted for nearly 10 percent of listings.

Entry and Merger in Commercial Fishing with Multiple Markets

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferenc Szidarovszky ◽  
Vladimira Ilieva ◽  
Koji Okuguchi
Keyword(s):  
Commercial Fishing ◽  
Multiple Markets

scholarly journals Peasant agency in Ghana's oil palm sector: The impact of multiple markets on food sovereignty

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 654-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Manley ◽  
Yves Van Leynseele
Keyword(s):  
Oil Palm ◽  
Food Sovereignty ◽  
Multiple Markets ◽  
The Impact

Limit pricing with complementary goods

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Tarziján
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Game ◽  
Entry Deterrence ◽  
Managerial Implication ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Limit Pricing ◽  
Equilibrium Limit ◽  
Multiple Markets ◽  
Limit Price ◽  
Complementary Product ◽  
Complementary Goods

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the equilibrium limit price charged by a producer trying to deter the entry of a firm that can choose one of the two markets of complementary goods.Design/methodology/approachThe authors model a dynamic game of incomplete information solved using a “perfect Bayesian equilibrium” approach.FindingsIt is shown that an incumbent will be willing to spend more resources – i.e. charge a lower limit price – to deter entry into its market as products become more complementary. This is because additional benefits are gained from entry deterrence by facing a more competitive market in the complementary product. The additional benefits of entry deterrence are shown to be a function of the degree of complementarity between goods.Practical implicationsA managerial implication of this article is that firms are willing to compete more fiercely to send an entrant to the other's incumbent market as the degree of complementarity between goods increases. An interesting conclusion that is derived from the above analysis is that managers should invest to understand the interdependences (e.g. complementarities) of the goods they sell, since the strategic variables chosen to compete may be affected by them, in some cases in a non‐trivial way.Social implicationsFrom a public policy perspective, the main contribution of this paper is to point out that regulators who analyze predatory pricing, or other (probably) illegal “low‐price strategies”, should consider the degree of complementarity between goods and its effect on pricing.Originality/valueAs far as the authors' knowledge goes, there are no other papers that analyze entry decisions involving multiple markets of complementary goods.

On the value relevance of customer satisfaction. Multiple drivers and multiple markets

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sascha Raithel ◽  
Marko Sarstedt ◽  
Sebastian Scharf ◽  
Manfred Schwaiger
Keyword(s):  
Customer Satisfaction ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Multiple Markets

scholarly journals Volume Dynamics and Multimarket Trading

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Halling ◽  
Pamela C. Moulton ◽  
Marios Panayides
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Insider Trading ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Order Flow ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
Multiple Markets ◽  
Multimarket Trading

AbstractThe trading of shares of the same firm in multiple markets has become common over the last 30 years, but there is little empirical evidence on the extent to which investors actively exploit multimarket environments. We introduce a volume-based measure of multimarket trading to address this question. Analyzing a large set of cross-listed firms, we find higher multimarket trading among markets with similar designs and strong enforcement of insider trading laws and for firms with higher institutional ownership. These findings are important for firms evaluating the benefits of cross listing and for markets competing for order flow.

Supply Chain Globalization and the Complexities of Cost-Minimization Strategies

2005 ◽  
pp. 109-143
Author(s):  
Brian A. Polin ◽  
Marvin D. Troutt ◽  
William Acar
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Supply Chain Management ◽  
Cost Minimization ◽  
Perceived Quality ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Global Integration ◽  
Political Debate ◽  
Chain Management ◽  
Multiple Markets ◽  
High Degree

We review the evolving literature on globalization with three aims in mind. First, we introduce the concept of globalization within the context of supply chain management. Second, with an eye toward information that may be useful for supply chain planners, we detail the motivation for global integration of the supply chain. Our third aim is to address global supply-chain issues that may be at odds with cost-minimizing strategies. Specifically, in this time of political debate regarding trade legislation, these issues involve the consideration of country of origin when sourcing, and the disparate demands of customers when marketing. A country offering inexpensive components may be associated with poor quality. Thus, despite inexpensive inputs, the overall profitability of the supply chain may suffer as perceived quality deteriorates. Similarly, a largely standardized product across multiple markets may present the lowest cost alternative from a production standpoint, but a high degree of standardization may reduce the attractiveness of the product in the eyes of the end consumer, and reduce overall profitability.

Multiple Markets:

2021 ◽  
pp. 193-212
Author(s):  
VIVIANA A. ZELIZER
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Markets
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document