Use of shear-sensitive liquid crystals for surface flow visualization

1992 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Crystals ◽  
Flow Visualization ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Surface Flow Visualization

Measurements of turbulent crossflow separation created by a curved body of revolution

2007 ◽  
Vol 589 ◽  
pp. 353-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. GREGORY ◽  
P. N. JOUBERT ◽  
M. S. CHONG
Keyword(s):  
Flow Visualization ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Separated Flow ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Of Revolution ◽  
Outer Flow ◽  
Friction Measurements ◽  
Surface Flow Visualization

Using the method pioneered by Gurzhienko (1934), the crossflow separation produced by a body of revolution in a steady turn is examined using a stationary deformed body placed in a wind tunnel. The body of revolution was deformed about a radius equal to three times the body's length. Surface pressure and skin-friction measurements revealed regions of separated flow occurring over the rear of the model. Extensive surface flow visualization showed the presence of separated flow bounded by a separation and reattachment line. This region of separated flow began just beyond the midpoint of the length of the body, which was consistent with the skin-friction data. Extensive turbulence measurements were performed at four cross-sections through the wake including two stations located beyond the length of the model. These measurements revealed the location of the off-body vortex, the levels of turbulent kinetic energy within the shear layer producing the off-body vorticity and the large values of 〈uw〉 stress within the wake. Velocity spectra measurements taken at several points in the wake show evidence of the inertial sublayer. Finally, surface flow topologies and outer-flow topologies are suggested based on the results of the surface flow visualization.

Measurements of Endwall Flows in Transonic Linear Turbine Cascades: Part II—High Flow Turning

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Taremi ◽  
S. A. Sjolander ◽  
T. J. Praisner
Keyword(s):  
Mach Number ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Flow Visualization ◽  
Flow Separation ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Streamwise Vorticity ◽  
Vortical Structures ◽  
Turbine Cascades ◽  
Mach Numbers ◽  
Surface Flow Visualization

An experimental investigation of two low-turning (90°) transonic linear turbine cascades was presented in Part I of the paper. Part II examines two high-turning (112°) turbine cascades. The experimental results include total pressure losses, streamwise vorticity and secondary kinetic energy distributions. The measurements were made using a seven-hole pressure probe downstream of the cascades. In addition to the measurements, surface flow visualization was conducted to assist in the interpretation of the flow physics. The turbine cascades in Part II, referred to as SL1F and SL2F, have the same inlet and outlet design flow angles, but different aerodynamic loading levels: SL2F is more highly loaded than SL1F. The surface flow visualization results show evidence of small flow separation on the suction side of both airfoils. At the design conditions (outlet Mach number ≈ 0.8), SL2F exhibits stronger vortical structures and larger secondary velocities than SL1F. The two cascades, however, produce similar row losses based on the measurements at 40% axial chord lengths downstream of the trailing edge. Additional data were collected at off-design outlet Mach numbers of 0.65 and 0.91. As the Mach number is raised, the cascades become more aft-loaded. The absolute blade loadings increase, but the Zweifel coefficients decrease due to higher outlet dynamic pressures. Both profile and secondary losses decrease at higher Mach numbers; the main vortical structures and the corresponding peak losses migrate towards the endwall, and there are reductions in secondary kinetic energy and exit flow angle variations. The streamwise vorticity distributions show smaller peak vorticities associated with the passage and the counter vortices at higher exit Mach numbers. The corner vortex, on the other hand, becomes more intensified, resulting in reduction of flow overturning near the endwall. The results for SL1F and SL2F are compared and contrasted with the results for the lower turning cascades presented in Part I. The possible effects of suction-surface flow separation on profile and secondary losses are discussed in this context. The current research project is part of a larger study concerning the effects of endwall contouring on secondary losses, which will be presented in the near future.

scholarly journals Image-Space Texture-Based Output-Coherent Surface Flow Visualization

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1476-1487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Huang ◽  
Zherong Pan ◽  
Guoning Chen ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Hujun Bao
Keyword(s):  
Flow Visualization ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Image Space ◽  
Surface Flow Visualization

Centrifugal Compressor Impeller Aerodynamics: An Experimental Investigation

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. David Joslyn ◽  
Joost J. Brasz ◽  
Robert P. Dring
Keyword(s):  
Flow Visualization ◽  
Centrifugal Compressor ◽  
Flow Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Pressure Distributions ◽  
Compressor Impeller ◽  
Surface Flow Visualization

The ability to acquire blade loadings (surface pressure distributions) and surface flow visualization on an unshrouded centrifugal compressor impeller is demonstrated. Circumferential and streamwise static pressure distributions acquired on the stationary shroud are also presented. Data was acquired in a new facility designed for centrifugal compressor aerodynamic research. Blade loadings calculated with a blade–to–blade potential flow analysis are compared with the measured results. Surface flow visualization reveals some complex aspects of the flow on the surface of the impeller blading and hub. In a companion paper, Dorney and Davis (1990), a state–of–the–art, three–dimensional, time–accurate, Navier Stokes prediction of the flow through the impeller is presented.

Surface flow visualization around competitive swimmers by Tufts Method

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Zaïdi ◽  
R. Taïar ◽  
S. Fohanno ◽  
G. Polidori
Keyword(s):  
Flow Visualization ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Competitive Swimmers ◽  
Surface Flow Visualization
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document