A new approach to scaling of transitional wall roughness in turbulent flow is introduced by a new nondimensional roughness scale ϕ. This scale gives rise to an inner viscous length scale ϕν∕uτ, inner wall transitional variable, roughness friction Reynolds number, and roughness Reynolds number. The velocity distribution, just above the roughness level, turns out to be a universal relationship for all kinds of roughness (transitional, fully smooth, and fully rough surfaces), but depends implicitly on roughness scale. The open turbulent boundary layer equations, without any closure model, have been analyzed in the inner wall and outer wake layers, and matching by the Izakson-Millikan-Kolmogorov hypothesis leads to an open functional equation. An alternate open functional equation is obtained from the ratio of two successive derivatives of the basic functional equation of Izakson and Millikan, which admits two functional solutions: the power law velocity profile and the log law velocity profile. The envelope of the skin friction power law gives the log law, as well as the power law index and prefactor as the functions of roughness friction Reynolds number or skin friction coefficient as appropriate. All the results for power law and log law velocity and skin friction distributions, as well as power law constants are explicitly independent of the transitional wall roughness. The universality of these relations is supported very well by extensive experimental data from transitional rough walls for various different types of roughnesses. On the other hand, there are no universal scalings in traditional variables, and different expressions are needed for various types of roughness, such as inflectional roughness, monotonic roughness, and others. To the lowest order, the outer layer flow is governed by the nonlinear turbulent wake equations that match with the power law theory as well as log law theory, in the overlap region. These outer equations are in equilibrium for constant value of m, the pressure gradient parameter, and under constant eddy viscosity closure model, the analytical and numerical solutions are presented.
On the compatibility of a logarithmic turbulent boundary layer velocity profile with experimental data
