FALLACY (SESAT PIKIR) ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM DALAM MOTIVERING VONNIS (PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM) / THE ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM FALLACY IN MOTIVERING VONIS (LEGAL REASONING)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Rocky Marbun ◽  
Nfn Armilius
Keyword(s):  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Argumentum Ad Verecundiam

Munculnya fallacy argumentum ad verecundiam dalam suatu putusan pengadilan merupakan suatu penalaran hukum yang tidak tepat, oleh karena penggunaan otoritas yang tidak dapat dibenarkan berdasarkan Ilmu Hukum, akan berakibat kepada validitas dari amar putusan—yang merupakan konklusi, yang dapat dibatalkan. Sifat pembatalan amar putusan tersebut bukanlah disebabkan karena amar putusannya yang tidak tepat, namun dikarenakan sumber logika yang digunakan adalah tidak tepat.The presence of the argumentum ad verecundiam fallacy in a court decision indicates erroneous legal reasoning, because the use of authority that cannot be justified based on the jurisprudence will affect the validity of the ruling, which is a conclusion of law, in that such ruling can be repealed. The repeal of the ruling is not because the ruling is incorrect, but because the source of the logic used is incorrect.

scholarly journals The Implementation of Outsourcing System in Industrial Relation after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 27/PUU-IX/2011 in West Nusa Tenggara

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
H. Lalu Husni ◽  
Any Suryani Hamzah
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Relation ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Protective Measure ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Specific Time ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Private Companies ◽  
Labor Contract ◽  
Article 59

Abstract The present study is an empirical legal research which was conducted at the companies in West Nusa Tenggara. The data were obtained through legal reasoning which is logical, systematic and coherent and were analyzed using descriptive-analytic. Based on the analysis, the result showed that the implementation of outsourcing system in industrial relation after the Constitutional Court decision No. 27/PPU-IX/2011 on private companies in West Nusa Tenggara has not been done properly. The companies which became object of the study have understood that after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 27/PPUIX/ 2011, labor contract on outsourcing system has changed from PKWT (perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu/ labor contract for specific time) to PKWTT (perjanjian kerja waktu tidak tertentu/ labor contract for an unspecified time). In other words, the principle of labor protective measure transfer at companies might happen in case the company implements PKWT. However, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 27/PUU/-IX/2011 which changed PKWT into PKWTT collides with Article 59 of Act No. 13 of 2003 on Manpower.

scholarly journals EKSEKUTABILITAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TERHADAP PENCALONAN ANGGOTA DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 287
Author(s):  
Tahegga Primananda Alfath
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
Election Commission

ABSTRAKKomisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) membuat Peraturan KPU Nomor 26 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan KPU Nomor 14 Tahun 2018 tentang Pencalonan Perseorangan Pemilu Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah yang khususnya diatur dalam Pasal 60A. Akan tetapi ketentuan pada peraturan tersebut diputus telah bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, dan tidak boleh dimaknai berlaku surut oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam Putusan Nomor 65P/ HUM/2018. Atas adanya fakta hukum yang tidak koheren tersebut, diambil isu hukum terkait kepastian hukum dapat atau tidaknya calon anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah yang juga merupakan pengurus (fungsionaris) partai. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini, pertama, terdapat kesesatan dalam penalaran hukum pada ratio decidendi Putusan Nomor 65P/HUM/2018. Kedua, putusan Mahkamah Agung tersebut dapat disimpangi oleh KPU, karena sebagaimana dalam kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi melakukan pengujian konstitusionalitas terhadap undang-undang yang bersifat erga omnes.Kata kunci: racio decidendi; penalaran hukum; Dewan Perwakilan Daerah.  ABSTRACT The General Election Commission (KPU) has enacted KPU Regulation Number 26 of 2018 concerning the Second Amendment to KPU Regulation Number 14 of 2018 over the Nomination of Individual Election of Regional Representative Council Members. The provisions of this regulation, especially Article 60A, contravene with Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Legislation Drafting Process. In the Decision Number 65P/HUM/2018, the Supreme Court should not retroactively interpret the KPU regulation. Due to the incoherent legal facts, legal issues raised in this article is about legal certainty whether a candidate of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) member can also become a political party official. This research uses legal research methods with normative, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of this research are as follows. The results of this research are as follows. First, there are errors in legal reasoning on the ratio decidendi of the Supreme Court Decision Number 65P/ HUM/2018. Second, the Supreme Court Decision can be distorted by the KPU because the court acted like the Constitutional Court reviewing an erga omnes law. Keywords: racio decidendi; legal reasoning; Regional Representative Council.

Court Decision on IPR Tax Exemption

1960 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
William L. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision

Reforming Arab Reason

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 19-42
Author(s):  
Khalid Shibib
Keyword(s):  
Arab World ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Decisive Role ◽  
Arab Countries ◽  
Religious Knowledge ◽  
Intrinsic Factors ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Present Information ◽  
Cultural Construct ◽  
Political Economic

As a humanitarian worker who was professionally involved for decades in crisis- and war-shaken countries, the author strove to understand the political, socioeconomic, and cultural factors contributing to conflicts. This contextualization, with a focus on Arab countries, confirmed what other thinkers found: the majority of political, economic, social, cultural, religious, and finally humanitarian crises in the Arab world are man-made and can be attributed to both extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Central to the latter appears to be a shared cultural construct that can be termed “Arab reason.” This essay tries to present information on various aspects of the crisis; to understand why reform efforts come so late and why are they are more difficult for Arabs than for other Muslims. It continues by looking at the knowledge systems that govern Arab reason and their evolution, including the decisive role of the religious knowledge system. From there, it proposes some reform ideas including a renewed legal reasoning process with the goal of a future-oriented, knowledge-based, and inclusive Arab Islamic vision. A pragmatic way forward could be an additional unifying eighth legal school (madhhab/madhāhib) to counter sectarian conflicts and violence. This essay is built on a targeted literature search and is not a comprehensive review of the growing literature generated by distinguished thinkers on various aspects of Arab Islamic identity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document