One Trip 7" Multi Zone Gravel Pack System: Success Case and Learning Points from the First Installation in Malaysia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Helmi Nordin ◽  
Ajmal Faliq Jamal ◽  
M. Helmie Hairi ◽  
Sunanda Magna Bela
Keyword(s):  
High Rate ◽  
Control Technique ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Design Factor ◽  
Carrier Fluid ◽  
Recent Success ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
The One ◽  
Gravel Pack ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Main reservoirs in this brown field are designed with Cased Hole Gravel Pack (CHGP), which is a proven sand control technique in the area. Most multi-stack reservoirs in these wells require individual sand control treatment on each zone as the formation properties varies from one to another. One of the most recent success case was the installation of One Trip 7" Multi Zone System that enabled implementation of an optimized High Rate Water Pack sand control operation in the casing size. This new technique helps to make more multi zone CHGP in infill or sidetracked wells feasible and more economical. Previously, CHGP design in 7" casing was limited to stack pack design which means the steps of sump packer installation, perforation, deburr run, GP assembly installation and GP pumping have to be repeated for every zone. The repeated process was laborious and incurred a lot of cost due to the extensive rig time. With the new 7" one-trip design that evolved from the existing 9-5/8" system, the multiple zone GP treatment can be done in single trip and contributes to significantly reduced well cost. One of the design consideration that need to be focused on is selection of carrier fluid to ensure optimum carrying capability during proppant placement while reducing the pumping friction through the one trip system. Full coverage of screens and blanks was achieved for both zones that were completed with the One Trip 7" Multi Zone completion. Both zones were treated with hybrid pack that is combination of circulating and HRWP. The primary objectives on optimizing rig time were achieved in eliminating multiple runs for different zones, as well as reducing risks of multiple disengagement with lower assembly that adds difficulty during reverse-out operation. One of the key limitations of this system is the high friction pressure when pumping through long concentric wash pipes and this can affect the effectiveness during proppant reverse out, especially considering the burst rating of the casing as well. Due to this known restriction, cement have been designed and tested up to the anticipated annular pressure during reversing out operation. Another design factor that could also pose a challenge during operation is the limit of sand concentration that is 1 ppa and this again is due to concentric wash pipe design.

Extending Gravel Pack Carrier Fluid Performance in Highly Deviated Well for 7-Inch Gravel Pack Completion without Shunt Tube by Using High Grade Suspension Gravel Pack Fluid in Mahakam Offshore

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Yudis ◽  
Doffie Cahyanto Santoso ◽  
Edo Tanujaya ◽  
Kristoforus Widyas Tokoh ◽  
Rahmat Sinaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Control Method ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Sand Production ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Carrier Fluid ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Gravel Pack

Abstract In unconsolidated sand reservoirs, proper sand control completion methods are necessary to help prevent reservoir sand production. Failure due to sand production from surface equipment damage to downhole equipment failures which can ultimately result in loss of well integrity and worst-case catastrophic failure. Gravel Packing is currently the most widely used sand control method for controlling sand production in the oil and gas industry to deliver a proppant filter in the annular space between an unconsolidated formation and a centralized integrated screen in front of target zones. Additional mechanical skin and proper proppant packing downhole are the most critical objective when implementing gravel packs as part of a completion operation. This paper presents a case history of Well SX that was designed as single-trip multi-zone completion 7-inch casing, S-shape well type, having 86 deg inclination along 1300 meters, 4 to 5-meter perforation range interval and 54 deg inclination in front of the reservoir with total depth of 3800 mMD. The well consists of 4 zones of interest which had previously been treated with a two-trip gravel pack system. While Well NX was designed as single-trip multi-zone completion in 7-inch casing, J-shape well type, 8-meter perforation interval and 84 deg inclination in front of the reservoir with total depth of 3300 mMD. The well consists of two zones of interest which had previously been treated with a single-trip gravel pack system. Both wells are in the Sisi-Nubi field offshore Mahakam on East Kalimantan Province of Borneo, Indonesia. This paper discusses the downhole completion design and operation as well as the changes to the gravel pack carrier which overcame challenges such as high friction in the 7" lower completion and the potential for an improper annular gravel pack due to the lack of shunt tubes in a highly deviated wellbore. In vertical wellbores, obtaining a complete annular pack is relatively easy to accomplish but in highly deviated wellbores, the annular gravel pack is more difficult to achieve and can contribute additional skin. Tibbles at al (2007) noted that installing a conventional gravel pack could result in skin values of 40 to 50, mostly due to poor proppant packing in perforation tunnels. Therefore, operator required to find a reliable gravel pack carrier fluid optimization for typical highly deviated wells to overcome the potential sand production issues by applying a single-trip multi-zone sand control system across both zones (without shunt tubes) along with the utilization of a high-grade xanthan biopolymer gravel pack carrier fluid. Laboratory testing was conducted to ensure that the gravel pack fluid could transport the sand to the sand control completion, large enough to allow for a complete annular pack and still allow the excess slurry to be circulated out of the hole. Electronic gravel pack simulations were performed to ensure that rate/pressure/sand concentration would allow for a complete gravel pack. All four zones in Both of Well SX and NX were successfully gravel packed with a high rate, relatively high sand concentration slurry. The well has not exhibited any sand production issues to date. The current production from both wells is above expectation and are comingled from the two primary zones. Multiple factors were considered during the design and operation of the sand control treatment. Those factors will be described in this paper, starting with candidate selection, completion strategy, operational challenges and treatment execution along with production monitoring of the well.

Multizone Openhole Gravel Packing with Enhanced Shunt Screens and Zonal Isolation in High-Rate Gas Wells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Markham ◽  
Alastair Michell ◽  
David Noblett ◽  
Bernard McCartan ◽  
Septiandi Sugiarto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Capital Expenditure ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Operating Pressure ◽  
Carrier Fluid ◽  
Shunt Tube ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Zonal Isolation ◽  
Gravel Pack

Abstract A reliable single-trip openhole multizone completion can significantly lower capital expenditure (CAPEX) by reducing rig time and well count. Recent improvements in openhole packers and enhanced shunt screen technology have enabled multizone openhole gravel pack completions with complete zonal isolation. A multizone openhole gravel-pack completion was installed in the Julimar Field with an enhanced shunt screen system, shunted mechnaical packers (SMP) and shunt tube isolation valves (STIV), to provide improved operating pressure envelope and erosion tolerance. Well design was tailored to derisk the installation and optimize performance of the multizone completion. Extensive reliability testing was undertaken on all new technology for this project. Completions were installed as planned, and the main objectives of sand control integrity, production attainment, and complete zonal isolation with selective production were validated through post-job gravel-pack analysis and subsequent well unloading. The successful implementation of these technologies significantly reduced project CAPEX and enabled access to reserves that would otherwise have been uneconomical to recover. This paper discusses design, execution, and evaluation of the multizone openhole gravel pack (OHGP) completions installed in the Julimar Field. This includes methodology followed for multizone completion selection, development of a new high-temperature formate-based viscous gravel-pack carrier fluid, detailed completion equipment qualification tests, post-job gravel-pack evaluation, and initial well performance from well unload. It is the industry's first field case study of enhanced shunt screens with novel shunt tube isolation valves and high-temperature xanthan-based gravel-pack carrier fluid.

Sand Free Production Success Through Proven Technology Enabler from An Untapped Heterogeneous Reservoir Zone Utilizing Gravel Pack Replacement Methodology

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Anggoro
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Erosion Resistance ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Screen Design ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Rules Of Thumb ◽  
Production Success ◽  
Control Technologies ◽  
Gravel Pack

The Belida field is an offshore field located in Block B of Indonesia’s South Natuna Sea. This field was discovered in 1989. Both oil and gas bearing reservoirs are present in the Belida field in the Miocene Arang, Udang and Intra Barat Formations. Within the middle Arang Formation, there are three gas pay zones informally referred to as Beta, Gamma and Delta. These sand zones are thin pay zones which need to be carefully planned and economically exploited. Due to the nature of the reservoir, sand production is a challenge and requires downhole sand control. A key challenge for sand control equipment in this application is erosion resistance without inhibiting productivity as high gas rates and associated high flow velocity is expected from the zones, which is known to have caused sand control failure. To help achieve a cost-effective and easily planned deployment solution to produce hydrocarbons, a rigless deployment is the preferred method to deploy downhole sand control. PSD analysis from the reservoir zone suggested from ‘Industry Rules of Thumb’ a conventional gravel pack deployment as a means of downhole sand control. However, based on review of newer globally proven sand control technologies since adoption of these ‘Industry Rules of Thumb’, a cost-effective solution could be considered and implemented utilizing Ceramic Sand Screen technology. This paper will discuss the successful application at Block B, Natuna Sea using Ceramic Sand Screens as a rigless intervention solution addressing the erosion / hot spotting challenges in these high rate production zones. The erosion resistance of the Ceramic Sand Screen design allows a deployment methodology directly adjacent to the perforated interval to resist against premature loss of sand control. The robust ceramic screen design gave the flexibility required to develop a cost-effective lower completion deployment methodology both from a challenging make up in the well due to a restrictive lubricator length to the tractor conveyancing in the well to land out at the desired set depth covering the producing zone. The paper will overview the success of multi-service and product supply co-operation adopting technology enablers to challenge ‘Industry Rules of Thumb’ replaced by rigless reasoning as a standard well intervention downhole sand control solution where Medco E&P Natuna Ltd. (Medco E&P) faces sand control challenges in their high deviation, sidetracked well stock. The paper draws final attention to the hydrocarbon performance gain resulting due to the ability for choke free production to allow drawing down the well at higher rates than initially expected from this zone.

Implementation of Multistack Sand Exclusion Methodology in Extremely Unconsolidated Wells: Learnings from Marginal Daman Field, Western Offshore India

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindra M Patil ◽  
P V Murthy ◽  
Kutbuddin Bhatia ◽  
Mayur Deshpande ◽  
Karan Pande
Keyword(s):  
Success Factors ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
High Rate ◽  
High Stakes ◽  
Carrier Fluid ◽  
Packing Factor ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Core Study ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Good Productivity

Abstract The Daman marginal field is a prolific gas-producing clastic field with highly unconsolidated Paleo-Miocene sandstone formations and a wide variety of lithologies across multistack sand layers. As such, high-rate water packs (HRWPs) are the ideal completion method in many Mumbai fields. Because multistack reservoirs require good zonal isolation, and to prevent crossflow between reservoirs with different pressure regimes, multistack sand exclusion (MSSE) methodology was selected for primary well completions with minimum rig time and a high degree of treatment placement accuracy. From an operational standpoint, exploiting these layers using this method means more control points can be achieved across these heterogeneous layers, and the MSSE completion is ideal for multiple applications in a shorter period, helping sustain sand-circumscribed gas production from these unconsolidated layers. During the design phase, grain-size distributions and core study defined the sand range from generally clean, coarse, and sorted to poorly sorted, with high-fines content and clay rich. To address the unique challenges of deep offshore operations, formation technical difficulties, high-stakes economics, and the significant untapped potential from these Daman sands, the MSSE approach was designed and implemented in this field. Historically, for multistack wells, an HRWP is performed zone by zone whereby the process of sump packer installation, perforation run, deburr run, screen assembly installation, and pumping is repeated for each zone. In Well A, the MSSE system was applied without any repetition and all in one phase. All layers were perforated and positively isolated. Each interval was individually opened for the HRWP treatment using a low-friction low-residue carrier fluid. Using a high-packing-factor proppant at a higher rate, the well was treated sequentially from the bottom of the interval to the top. Many marginal fields in this basin have become uneconomical because of the high cost and complexity of sand control methodology. Therefore, reducing costs and time becomes vital to help ensure economic viability, as well as achieving significant operational efficiencies. Additionally, reducing near-wellbore (NWB) mechanical skin and ensuring good productivity from the reservoir are among the major solutions when implementing an MSSE completion. The methodology adopted significantly helped reduce expenditures by standardizing completion design, simplifying the core complexity, and enhancing overall reliability and operational efficiency. The optimized engineering workflow was fit for purpose, rather than the conventional “cookie-cutter” method to address sanding propensity in this field. This paper discusses the cutting-edge MSSE completion systems that focused on downhole completion and modifications for pumping operations. Additionally, the paper reviews challenges addressed during this campaign, workflow adapted, detailed strategy success factors, and positive results obtained during evaluation. This has helped reduce potential risks and improve reliability and performance, which can act as best practices and can be applied within similar fields.

Well-Flux Surveillance and Ramp-Up Method for Openhole Standalone Screen Completion

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (03) ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
Judy Feder
Keyword(s):  
Technical Conference ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Well Performance ◽  
University Of Houston ◽  
Surveillance Model ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Operating Limits ◽  
Direct Linkage ◽  
Flux Model ◽  
Gravel Pack

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Judy Feder, contains highlights of paper SPE 201662, “A Well-Flux Surveillance and Ramp-Up Method for Openhole Standalone Screen Completion,” by Mehmet Karaaslan and George K. Wong, University of Houston, and Kevin L. Soter, SPE, Shell, et al., prepared for the 2020 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, originally scheduled to be held in Denver, Colorado, 5-7 October. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Production and surveillance engineers need practical models to help maximize production while avoiding ramping up the well to an extent that the completion is damaged, causing well impairment or failure. The complete paper presents a well-flux surveillance method to monitor and ramp up production for openhole standalone screen (OH-SAS) completions that optimizes production by considering risks of production impairment and screen-erosion failure. Challenges of Increased Production vs. Well Failure The problem of increased production vs. the risk of well impairment or failure is a pressing problem for sand-control wells in deepwater, where projects tend to have a small number of high-rate wells. In such environments, any well impairments or failures greatly affect the project economics. Following unloading, well surveillance faces the critical step of ramping up to-ward the well’s designed peak rate for the first time when the actual well performance is uncertain. To reduce risk of well impairment or failure, surveillance information and models are needed to help make adjustments during the ramp-up process. Different models are available, from simple to complex and from small to large amounts of input data and computational efforts. Simple nonsurveillance models use field-derived operating limits of completion pressure drop and flow velocity or flux. They are non-surveillance models in the sense that no direct linkage of surveillance results to update flux calculations exists. Simple surveillance models use pressure transient analysis (PTA) results and completion information to evaluate changing well performance and adjust the ramp-up and long-term surveillance operations. The complex surveillance model evaluates well performance and adjusts well operations using probabilistic completion failure risks and coupled reservoir and completion simulations. These models mainly focus on cased-hole gravel pack and frac-pack applications. For openhole completions with sand control, the literature offers limited ramp-up surveillance references. The objective of the well-flux model described in the complete paper is to ramp up the well safely and optimize production using PTA results as surveillance inputs to calculate completion fluxes for well impairment or failure assessment. The method follows an approach presented in the literature.

Lessons Learned from the First Chemical Sand Consolidation in Zawtika Field

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiwat Wiwatanapataphee ◽  
Thanita Kiatrabile ◽  
Pipat Lilaprathuang ◽  
Noppanan Nopsiri ◽  
Panyawadee Kritsanamontri
Keyword(s):  
Control Method ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Candidate Selection ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Operation Performance ◽  
Coiled Tubing ◽  
Cost Effective Method ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Gravel Pack

Abstract The conventional gravel pack sand control completion (High Rate Water Pack / Extension Pack) was the primary sand control method for PTTEPI, Myanmar Zawtika field since 2014 for more than 80 wells. Although the completion cost of gravel pack sand control was dramatically reduced around 75 percent due to the operation performance improvement along 5 years, the further cost reduction still mandatory to make the future development phase feasible. In order to tackle the well economy challenge, several alternative sand control completion designs were reviewed with the existing Zawtika subsurface information. The Chemical Sand Consolidation (CSC) or resin which is cost-effective method to control the sand production with injected chemicals is selected to be tested in 3 candidate wells. Therefore, the first trial campaign of CSC was performed with the Coiled Tubing Unit (CTU) in March to May 2019 with positive campaign results. The operation program and lesson learned were captured in this paper for future improvement in term of well candidate selection, operation planning and execution. The three monobore completion wells were treated with the CSC. The results positively showed that the higher sand-free rates can be achieved. The operation steps consist of 1) Perform sand cleanout to existing perforation interval or perforate the new formation interval. 2) Pumping pre-flush chemical to conditioning the formation to accept the resin 3) Pumping resin to coating on formation grain sand 4) Pumping the post-flush chemical to remove an excess resin from sand 5) Shut in the well to wait for resin curing before open back to production. However, throughout the campaign, there were several lessons learned, which will be required for future cost and time optimization. In operational view, the proper candidate selection shall avoid operational difficulties e.g. available rathole. As well, detailed operation plan and job design will result in effective CSC jobs. For instance, the coil tubing packer is suggested for better resin placement in the formation. Moreover, accommodation arrangement (either barge or additional vessel) and logistics management still have room for improvement. These 3 wells are the evidences of the successful applications in Zawtika field. With good planning, lesson learned and further optimization, this CSC method can be beneficial for existing monobore wells, which required sand control and also will be the alternative sand control method for upcoming development phases. This CSC will be able to increase project economic and also unlock the marginal reservoirs those will not justify the higher cost of conventional gravel pack.

scholarly journals Visual Experimental Study on Gradation Optimization of Two-Stage Gravel Packing Operation in Unconventional Reservoirs

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1519
Author(s):  
Xingbang Meng ◽  
Minhui Qi ◽  
Zhan Meng ◽  
Tong Li ◽  
Zhongxiao Niu
Keyword(s):  
Similarity Criterion ◽  
Particle Migration ◽  
Unconventional Reservoirs ◽  
Control Technique ◽  
Sand Particle ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Gravel Bed ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Gravel Packing ◽  
Gravel Pack

During the development of unconventional reservoirs with high sand production rate and fine silt content such as heavy oil and hydrate reservoirs, silt sand blockage problem is a serious issue. A two-stage gravel-packing sand control technique is applied to solve the silt sand blockage now. However, traditional experiments on this technique could not obtain the dynamic distribution law of intrusive sand in the gravel pack. In this study, a new visualization experiment based on hydrodynamic similarity criterion for studying particle blockage in gravel packs was conducted. Real-time monitoring of sand particle migration in the gravel pack could be achieved. Also, the stable penetration depth and the distributing disciplinarian of invaded particles could be determined. The results show that when the gravel-to-sand median size ratio of gravel bed I is less than five, the sand bridge can be formed at the front end of the gravel pack. This could prevent sand from further intruding. As the grain size of gravel bed II is increased, the flow velocity is reduced. Thus, the sand invading into gravel bed II tends to settle at the interface. A large amount of sand intrusion can happen to gravel pack II when the pore filling front breaks through the gravel bed I.

Industry First Openhole Alternate Path Gravel Pack Completion in HPHT Environment: Fluid Development and Case History

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep Pillai ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lin ◽  
Jonathan Brege ◽  
Raj Mohan ◽  
Edward Derkach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case History ◽  
System Integration ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Carrier Fluid ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Different Temperatures ◽  
Pumping Equipment ◽  
Gravel Pack

Abstract For offshore wells requiring sand control, Open Hole Gravel Packing (OHGP) with or without shunted screen technology is a common completion technique. Prior to this paper, there has been no application of shunted screen OHGP in High-Pressure High-Temperature (HPHT) environment due to lack of a viscous fluid availability in high-density divalent brines (> 14.6 lbm/U.S. gal). For the case study, the fluid requirements in terms of density and temperature were 15.4 lbm/U.S. gal and 265°F, respectively. The only brine option at this density was a blend of calcium chloride/bromide and zinc bromide. In this brine and density, none of the existing fluids work hence a novel polymer-based fluid had to be developed. The fluid had to pass the following tests a) rheology before and after subjecting to high shear of both uncontaminated and contaminated fluids at 3 different temperatures b) sand settling tests at 4 different temperatures c) Production Screen Tester to ensure the fluid does not plug the screens during the job. System Integration Tests (SIT) were performed to ensure the mixing equipment would be able to batch mix the fluid and actual pumping equipment would function properly with the fluid. The field trial planning included simulations, pre-job meetings, and fluid management plan. The job was executed as per the procedure outlined during pre-job meetings. This paper discusses laboratory development, yard test qualification, and successful shunted screen OHGP case history of a novel 15.4 lbm/U.S. gal viscous gravel pack carrier fluid.

Comprehensive Transient Modeling of Sand Production in Horizontal Wellbores

SPE Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 468-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Nouri ◽  
Hans H. Vaziri ◽  
Hadi Arbi Belhaj ◽  
M. Rafiqul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Model ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Sand Production ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Gravel Pack

Summary Installing sand control in long horizontal wells is difficult and particularly challenging in offshore fields. It is, therefore, imperative to make decisions with regard to the most optimum completion type objectively and based on reliable assessment of the sanding potential and its severity over the life of the well for the intended production target. This paper introduces a predictive tool that forecasts not only the initiation of sanding, but also its rate and severity in real time. A series of well-documented experiments on a large-size horizontal wellbore was simulated using a finite difference numerical model. The model accounts for the interaction between fluid flow and mechanical deformation of the medium, capturing various mechanisms of failure. The model allows capturing the episodic nature of sanding and the resulting changes in the geometry and formation consistency and behavior within the sand impacted regions. Sand detachment is simulated by removal of the elements that are deemed to have satisfied the criteria for sanding based on considerations of physics, material behaviour and laws of mechanics. The proposed numerical model is designed to account for many of the factors and mechanisms that are known to influence sanding in the field and as such can be used as a practical tool for predicting the frequency and severity of sand bursts and changes in operating conditions that can be considered for mitigating or managing such problems. The model shows reasonable agreement with the experimental results in terms of borehole deformation and sanding rates. The model correctly predicted initiation of shear failure from the sides of the borehole and its propagation to the boundaries of the sample. It was further seen that the propagation of the shear failed zone resulting from sand production agreed well with the numerical pattern of failure growth upon removal of elements satisfying the sanding criteria. The approach and concepts used are considered suitable for application to field problems involving horizontal wells. Introduction A significant proportion of the future oil and gas production is expected to come from sand-prone reservoirs, many of which are offshore. While these reservoirs are highly prolific they are complex to develop and manage. Typical cost of completing a major offshore well exceeds $100 million and these wells are expected to remain productive for 20 years and longer. The control of solids production in these high-rate wells over the life of the well is a challenge and requires a good understanding of the mechanical behavior of the formation under a variety of conditions. Various options are available, ranging from placing active sand control, such as gravel pack and frac pack, to natural completion, such as a cased and perforated hole. Objectivity is required in choosing the correct completion type, which must account for the production strategy and natural changes in the reservoir such as changes in the stress state, permeability, and multiphase flow, including water cut. Once the completion type is chosen, it must be operated optimally to maximize production while maintaining efficiency and longevity. For instance, in sand-control completions, operations must be tailored to mitigate generation and transport of fines that can cause plugging of the gravel pack and lead to screen erosion, whereas in natural completions, the emphasis would be in preventing formation sand production or keeping it under the tolerance that can be handled by the facility. Utilization of a reliable sand production prediction tool is essential in selecting the optimum completion technique and optimization of the operational conditions.

Note on Selection of Coordinate Systems for Geodynamics

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 395-407
Author(s):  
S. Henriksen
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
The Other ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The One ◽  
Static Systems ◽  
Selection Of

The first question to be answered, in seeking coordinate systems for geodynamics, is: what is geodynamics? The answer is, of course, that geodynamics is that part of geophysics which is concerned with movements of the Earth, as opposed to geostatics which is the physics of the stationary Earth. But as far as we know, there is no stationary Earth – epur sic monere. So geodynamics is actually coextensive with geophysics, and coordinate systems suitable for the one should be suitable for the other. At the present time, there are not many coordinate systems, if any, that can be identified with a static Earth. Certainly the only coordinate of aeronomic (atmospheric) interest is the height, and this is usually either as geodynamic height or as pressure. In oceanology, the most important coordinate is depth, and this, like heights in the atmosphere, is expressed as metric depth from mean sea level, as geodynamic depth, or as pressure. Only for the earth do we find “static” systems in use, ana even here there is real question as to whether the systems are dynamic or static. So it would seem that our answer to the question, of what kind, of coordinate systems are we seeking, must be that we are looking for the same systems as are used in geophysics, and these systems are dynamic in nature already – that is, their definition involvestime.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document