scholarly journals Comparison of retention of two proximal sealants in mandibular first molars of 12-year-old school children - A split-mouth randomized trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Brinda Bhavani Sankar ◽  
Madan Kumar

Aim: This study was done to assess and compare the retention properties of a proximal sealant made of polyurethane dimethacrylate and a resin-based adhesive system for sealing proximal surfaces of permanent mandibular first molars in 12-year-old children over a period of 6 months. Methodology: A split-mouth randomized trial was conducted among 50 school children. Pre-operative and post-operative bitewing radiographs were taken bilaterally prior at baseline and the end of the sixth month. Separators were placed for those children who did not have physiological spacing. The interventions were delivered on the left and right sides after randomization as per the manufacturer’s instructions, and post-operative instructions were given to the participants. The interventions were assessed for retention primarily and other criteria such as color match, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, anatomic form, caries formation (using bitewing radiographs), post-operative sensitivity, and surface roughness at the end of the 1st, 3rd, and 6 months using United States Public Health Service Modified Ryge Criteria for Direct Clinical Evaluation of Restorations proposed by Cvar and Ryge, 1980. The data were compiled, analyzed using SPSS and results were generated. Conclusions: The study results revealed that the resin-based adhesive system was better than the adhesive patch in terms of retention over a period of 6 months. Hence, the feasibility of including proximal sealants as a part of the preventive regimen for caries risk children should be positively considered.

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 967
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Landry ◽  
Anthony Crimarco ◽  
Dalia Perelman ◽  
Lindsay R. Durand ◽  
Christina Petlura ◽  
...  

Adherence is a critical factor to consider when interpreting study results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing one diet to another, but it is frequently not reported by researchers. The purpose of this secondary analysis of the Keto–Med randomized trial was to provide a detailed examination and comparison of the adherence to the two study diets (Well Formulated Ketogenic Diet (WFKD) and Mediterranean Plus (Med-Plus)) under the two conditions: all food being provided (delivered) and all food being obtained by individual participants (self-provided). Diet was assessed at six time points including baseline (x1), week 4 of each phase when participants were receiving food deliveries (x2), week 12 of each phase when participants were preparing and providing food on their own (x2), and 12 weeks after participants completed both diet phases and were free to choose their own diet pattern (x1). The adherence scores for WFKD and Med-Plus were developed specifically for this study. Average adherence to the two diet patterns was very similar during both on-study time points of the intervention. Throughout the study, a wide range of adherence was observed among participants—for both diet types and during both the delivery phase and self-provided phase. Insight from this assessment of adherence may aid other researchers when answering the important question of how to improve behavioral adherence during dietary trials. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT03810378.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnel Hänsel Petersson ◽  
Per-Erik Isberg ◽  
Svante Twetman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document